His great successor goes more thoroughly to work,--

"He takes delight in placing torpedoes under the ark."

If, then, I have designated Ibsen as a revolutionary nature, I need

scarcely defend myself from the charge of having declared his to

be one of those natures that are enthusiastic for violent exterior

convulsions. Far from it! Indeed, quite the contrary! For, isolated

as he is and feels himself to be, reluctantly opposed to all parties,

simply as parties, stately, polished, reserved, "awaiting the approach

of time in a spotless wedding garment," he is, so far as exteriors

are concerned, strictly conservative, although his conservatism is of

a peculiar nature; that is, it proceeds from radicalism, because he

expects nothing from special reforms. In the depths of his soul he is a

decided revolutionist, but the revolution he raves about and labors for

is the purely spiritual one I have pictured. The reader will not have

overlooked the concluding words of the letter of December, 1870, "What

is really needed is a revolting of the human spirit." I have never been

able to forget these words; for they contain, in a measure, Ibsen's

entire poetic programme--an admirable programme for a poet.

I should, however, fail to be true to myself if I said that Ibsen's

view of life seemed to me to possess more than a powerful element

of truth. It is a view of life by virtue of which one may think

and produce poetic creations, but not act, which, indeed, strictly

considered, cannot even be put into plain language in the world, as

it is, because it is calculated to instigate others to action, which

in this instance means--capital offence. Whoever, through a yearning

for great, decisive, sweeping overthrows, is led to look indifferently

or contemptuously on the slow, insignificant changes of the natural

course of development; on the tardy, gradual, petty improvements, the

compromises, with which the practical worker must be content, because

through them alone he can hope to attain the partial realization of

his ideal; on the associations without which it is impossible for any

one who is not in a position of brutal command to transmit a single

thought into the reality of life,--such a man must relinquish all hopes

of raising a finger in practical life. Like Sören Kierkegaard, like

Brand, he can do nothing but point helplessly at the yawning gulf that

separates existing reality from the ideal. To attempt to act himself

or induce others to act in harmony with the desired goal, would simply

mean to lead his followers headlong over the brink of that dizzy abyss

which parts what exists from what is desired, and to expose himself

to immediate arrest. Indeed, even the poet can only express so ideal

a view of life indirectly, insinuatingly, ambiguously, in the drama;

only through thoroughly responsible personages, and thus with a certain

reservation, so far as the author himself is concerned. Only the rudest

kind of opponents could possibly have taken the hideous jest about the

torpedoes beneath the ark for literal, bloodthirsty earnest. This mode

of contemplating life involves and necessitates, therefore, a dualism

between the theoretic and the practical, between the individual and the

citizen, between spiritual freedom and that practical freedom which has

the form of an obligation, a dualism that in actual life can only be

carried out by a dramatic poet who lives in exile, who is not obliged

to have the slightest dealings with state, society, politics, groups of

human beings, parties, or reforms.

Therefore the ideal of intellectual reserve that has its origin in

this mode of contemplating life seems not to me the highest. To be

sure, a distinguished author provides best for his outward dignity

when he is never found in a skirmish or amid an excited throng. It

is unquestionably aristocratic to hold one's self aloof from the

vulgar crowd, never to mingle in the turmoil of the day, never to

write a newspaper article. Yet to my taste it savors of a still

higher aristocracy to act as did the legitimist generals who reported

themselves as simple soldiers in Condé's army, and who, notwithstanding

their general's epaulettes, did not disdain to fight now and then on

foot and in the first rank. Not one whit of true inner dignity is

sacrificed by such a course.

Eminent Authors of the Nineteenth Century: Literary Portraits · 第 88 / 91 题