Book of
章节目录
共 102 题- THE BOOK OF THE DAMNED
- And everything that isn't, will be--
- But, of course, will be that which won't be--
- As to the logic of our expressions to come--
- That nothing ever has been proved--
- He was never able to tell what he meant by a "species."
- All would be heavenly--
- This is the explanation that was agreed upon in 1883--
- But for seven years the atmospheric phenomena continued--
- A secret of power--
- I think it's another profundity.
- Not the strongest; not the cleverest--
- They may have been symbols. They may have been objective hieroglyphics--
- Mere passing fancy--let it go--
- They wouldn't try--
- I take some of that back: I accept that the approximation is higher--
- The Wessex explanation--
- That the science of chemistry is as impositive as fortune-telling--
- Or no--
- Scientists and their dream of "pure science."
- Artists and their dream of "art for art's sake."
- Orange-red hail, March 14, 1873, in Tuscany. (Notes and Queries 9-5-16.)
- Each fall occurred in "exactly the same quarter of town."
- The great difficulty is to explain segregation in these showers--
- I suppose one thinks--but grain in bags never has fallen--
- Object of Amherst--its covering like "milled cloth"--
- Except that, if fabricable materials have fallen from the sky--
- That it would have been equally noteworthy when it went up--
- Whatever it may have been--
- I have nine other instances.
- In some of our acceptances, I have felt a little radical--
- But, with the fall, loud noises were heard--
- I find that I have another note upon a specific hurricane:
- In amiable accommodation to the crucifixion it'll get, I think--
- That never has a fall of full-grown frogs been reported--
- If we try to accept that a whirlwind could segregate them--
- The famous fall of stones at Siena, Italy, 1794--"in a violent storm."
- Or--we are on our way to account for "thunderstones."
- Peasants believe in "thunderstones."
- Scientists exclude "thunderstones."
- I confess that we're a little flattered by that.
- Bombardments of this earth--
- Attempts to communicate--
- I begin to suspect something else.
- I don't know about that. It looks very desirable--undesirable to us.
- Nevertheless the thing can be nullified--
- But our eyebrows--
- One of the damnedest in our whole saturnalia of the accursed--
- And still, and for regiments to come, hypnosis and inertia rule us--
- M. Maurice Schwab:
- M. Oppert:
- Because that was found "near a house once occupied by a Mormon."
- And a wreck that occurred to one group of them--
- And the loot that was lost overboard--
- Drugs and divorce and rape: venereal diseases, drunkenness, murder--
- So astronomy and its seemingly exact, little system--
- Wrecks and flotsam and fragments of vast iron constructions--
- I think we're property.
- I should say we belong to something:
- I have a very convincing datum that the ancient Britons were blue ones.
- I suppose they fell there.
- Or parent-worlds and their colonies here--
- Super-Romanimus--
- Super-Israelimus--
- So then the wrath of Azuria--
- The Science of Super-Geography--
- Monstrator and Elvera and Azuria and Super-Romanimus--
- But now Leverrier and "Vulcan."
- So Leverrier and the "planet Vulcan."
- Leverrier and the "planet Vulcan."
- Dr. Lescarbault wrote to Leverrier, who hastened to Orgeres--
- March 22, 1877--
- As to us--
- That he picked out observations that could be formulated--
- That of this type are all formulas--
- I think Leverrier was translated to the Positive Absolute.
- March 22, 1876--
- But the meaninglessness of all utterances in quasi-existence--
- Taking up only one of the listed observations--
- The things seen high in the sky by Swift and Watson--
- Well, only two months before--the horse and the barn--
- A new aspect of inter-planetary inhabitancy or occupancy--
- I have been very much struck with phenomena of "cup marks."
- I emphasize the row-formation of cup marks:
- We have another datum. I think it is more extraordinary than--
- But now they're negatives, or they're out of harmony--
- But that they'd quake, and that they'd affect this earth with quakes--
- I have discovered a new unintelligibility.
- I explain.
- I mean "primarily" all that opposes Exclusionism--
- So a dragnet that was let down from above somewhere--
- Or that the birds of Baton Rouge were only from the Super-Sargasso Sea--
- Of course it sounds--
- An object from which nets were suspended--
- Deflated balloon, with its network hanging from it--
- A deep-sea fish, and its adaptation to a dense medium--
- I suppose I'll have to repeat that:
- That they looked like "vegetable cells."
- So the substance was identified as birds' blood--
- The fall of blood from the sky--
- I found that the excitement had continued for weeks.
- I call them cones in incomplete basins.