Thaci found himself with plenty of returning refugees, meddlesome

peacekeepers and houses burned to their basements. He also found

himself with very little money. Rugova and Bukoshi, on the other hand,

have access to funds but very few adherents. Rugova's decline did not

start in March 1999. It started long ago when he objected even to

peaceful student demonstrations (which the Serbs found tolerable). It

was then clear that if there ever was any distinction between his

pacifism and traitorous, collaborationist cowardice - it has long

vanished. People deserted him in droves and in Rambouillet, it was

Thaci who headed the Kosovar delegation, not his elder rival.

So now Thaci needs money. One way is to collect taxes, as Rugova did.

Another is to monopolize the business interests of Kosovo. He set

himself upon this task no less ferociously than he did fighting the

Serbs. In collaboration with Albanian politicians (government

supporters) and with Macedonian politicians of Albanian descent, he

began to take over lucrative trades and economic activities both in

Kosovo and in its neighbours. The Berisha (Albanian opposition) crowd

regard him as an imminent danger. They believe his aim is to become the

President of a Greater Albania comprising Albania and Kosovo (though

not Macedonia, a new found and perhaps short lived ally). This is a

recipe for a civil war, the second one within two years in Albania. The

first one erupted after the life savings of one third of the population

were squandered by a cronyist group of investment houses in pyramid

schemes.

The Spoils

The Greeks are grabbing Macedonian property: real estate, banks,

factories, and a refinery, perhaps the Macedonian Telecom. They pay

outlandishly cheap prices. The Macedonians are on their knees, reduced

by the war to a loosely connected network of bartering businesses.

While plundering, the Greeks do not refrain from political

arm-twisting. They vetoed Macedonia's application to become the centre

of the reconstruction of Kosovo and then proceeded to propose

Thessalonica (Saloniki) - a proposal adopted by the EU. They also

refuse to call Macedonia by its constitutional name, forcing the

impossible acronym FYROM on the international community. The next

logical target is Serbia. To the Greek businessmen, Kosovo is lost due

to the brutal treatment of Albanian refugees in Greece and the

expressed pro-Serb sympathies of the Greek main street.

Thus, strange, chimeral alliances emerge. They are likely to prove as

ephemeral as their predecessors, to melt away in the searing heat of

the Balkanian summer. But while they last they give one pause. The

Russians and two NATO members, Greece and Italy, are likely to defy

America and enthusiastically embark upon the lucrative reconstruction

of devastated Serbia. Financed by German money through the inefficient

and corrupt money transfer mechanism known as the EU, German businesses

are not likely to tolerate this Christian Orthodox monopoly. They will

join the fray, to America's increasing dismay and chagrin. American

firms, on the other hand, will probably not be allowed to undo the

damage their government wrought. Left out of the game, America will try

to spoil it. It might well succeed, for it controls the strings of the

American purses known as IMF and World Bank. Americans never hesitate

to bully and to blackmail where money is involved.

The Russians are preparing to supply Serbia with new military

technology as do other rogue states. Greece is secretly negotiating

with Iran. Serb leaders visit Iraq. Russians are meeting North Koreans.

So do the Chinese. Russian aircraft breach NATO's airspace. The

Europeans are hastily forming their own defence alliance and finally

appointed Mr. PESC, the long awaited EU foreign policy supremo. The

ramblings of a new cold war (the world against the USA) are clearly

audible to the attentive ear. In the margins more minor players such as

Israel position themselves to counter what they regard as dangerous

liaisons between Pakistani, Afghani and Albanian Islamic

fundamentalist, terrorist cum drug concerns (sometimes in the guise of

aid organizations). Bin Laden is in the area. Every secret service,

every crime organization, every terrorist group, every liberation

movement, every weapons dealer, every drug pusher are here, eager not

to miss the unfolding action.

These wrangles will surely depress investors' appetites. They will not

increase the pledges in bow tied donor conferences either. Good money

(investments and international aid) rarely follows bad one (crime and

weapons trading, for example).

The Balkan countries stand to get a small fraction of the magnificent

and magnanimous and generous promises made to them in the heat of the

battle. The Balkan will be forgotten because it refuses to reform,

because it is obstreperous. The number of officials visiting will

decline. The journalists will beat a path to other blazes. The local

politicians, pampered by the likes of Clinton and the CNN will revert

unwillingly to their petty squabbles and ragged local papers. In a few

months, it is will all seem like a mirage. It will all sink into the

fertile soil of this luscious region, fertilized by countless bodies

and bloody rivulets. The great togetherness will evaporate leaving

behind the putrid fumes of re-emerging, centuries old, grudges and

suspicions. The people will complain. The leaders will thieve and

collaborate with organized crime. The criminals will prosper. The

farmers will toil their land and intellectuals will conspire. It is the

Balkans where nothing changes.

And nothing ever will.

(Article written on July 11, 1999 and published July 19, 1999

in "Central Europe Review" volume 1, issue 4)

Return

The Dance of Jael

"Envy is forever looking upwards. It does not look sideways. In 'Facial

Justice' Hartley (1960) describes a life after a catastrophic war. A

Dictator has decreed that envy is so destructive that it has to be

eliminated. The citizens are coerced to be as alike each other as

possible. The worst crime is not envy itself but to excite envy.

'Equality and Envy - the two E's were...the positive and negative poles

on which the New State rotated' (p.12). In order to exterminate envy

everything that was enviable has been destroyed. Of course that in

itself is the very essence of envy. Neither envy nor equality are

spoken of as words but referred to as Good and Bad E. All tall

buildings had been destroyed in the war except the tower of Ely

Cathedral and none are allowed to be built - a horizontal view of life

is required. No comparisons are to be made, women are encouraged to

undertake an operation so they all looked alike, to be pretty would

excite envy. The result is that the populace loses its humanity and

becomes a non-thinking mass. The independently minded heroine, Jael,

visits the Ely and looks up at the tower and leads a dance round it.

She pays the price of having her more than averagely pretty face (an

Alpha face) changed to a Beta face by cosmetic surgery and so made

indistinguishable from the others."

(From "Cronos and His Children - Envy and Reparation" by Mary Ashwin -

Chapter II "Everyday Envy")

The distinction between fiction and non-fiction became ever subtler in

the "Underground" world of post-socialism, "After the Rain" of

communism. In a lethal embrace, in an act of unprecedented intercourse,

literature penetrated reality as only the most fervent lovers or the

most avid haters do. A topsy-turvy continent adrift among the gales of

newspeak, under the gaze of a million grey bureaucrats passing for big

brothers. A motion picture gone awry: the plot long forgotten, the

actors wondering forlornly on a dilapidated scene and the credits

flashing over and again, in an endless loop.

This crazed landscape, this party of mad hatters, where time stood

still was the result of the two great equalizers: oppression and

ideology. The substrate of numerous experiments of groups without

control, the inhabitants of these feverish lands internalised their own

predicament. The broken toys of spoiled imperial children, the guinea

pigs of scientific materialism and then of materialism only - they

strutted around, eyes wide shut, ears clogged, mouths stapled, lips

sown with the wire of terror. Everyone was equal under their occupiers,

their tormentors, and their slave masters. And everyone was equal by

decree, on pain of death or exile, by the horror-stricken conviction

called ideology. To succumb to the former was to survive - to subscribe

to the latter was to flourish. Many flourished.

The New Oxford Dictionary of English defines envy as: "A feeling of

discontented or resentful longing aroused by someone else's

possessions, qualities, or luck." And an earlier version (The Shorter

Oxford English Dictionary) adds: "Mortification and ill will occasioned

by the contemplation of another's superior advantages."

Pathological envy - the second deadly sin - is a compounded emotion. It

is brought on by the realization of some lack, deficiency, or

inadequacy in oneself. It is the result of unfavourably comparing

oneself to others: to their success, their reputation, their

possessions, their luck, and their qualities. It is misery and

humiliation and impotent rage and a tortuous, slippery path to nowhere.

The effort to break the padded walls of this self-visited purgatory

often leads to attacks on the perceived source of frustration.

Pathological envy is THE driving force of post-communist Central and

Eastern Europe. Unable to cope with the sudden shift in values from

enforced and artificial equality to primitive, pirate capitalism - the

populace retreated to acrimony and bitterness. Faced with the chasmic

inequalities engendered by the serial collective robberies known as

"privatisation" - it reacted with suppressed rage, with despair, with

the multiple sadness which is nostalgia. The land has split between a

colourful, dynamic, rapacious and omnivorous class - and the sepia-like

and quaint backdrop of their compatriots. As the castles of the former

rose - so were the abodes of the latter humbled.

The resentment led to fears of abandoning one's self-control, of

confronting one's rulers and their cronies, of losing even the little

one was allowed to possess. It was a muted mutiny, a rebel-less

rebellion, a static trip from guilt to hate. To maintain these seething

undercurrents from erupting, to avoid the volcanic tremors that precede

every revolution - behaviour was formalized and ritualised. Speech

became ever vaguer and ambiguous. Effective communication was halted.

The community splintered and the very fabric of society was consumed by

this massive act of dissociation.

Pathological envy mutated into solutions the envious could live with.

Some sought to imitate or even emulate the newfound heroes of the

capitalist revolution. They immersed themselves in conspicuous

consumption, the badly matched purchases of the nouveaux riches replete

with the vulgar manners of unrefined power. They adhered to coarse

materialism with its confusion of ends and means. They suffered the

ever-present agitation of envy, the constant comparison to one's

superiors, the plagued rat race. To get rich quick through schemes of

crime and corruption is thought by these people to be the epitome of

cleverness (providing one does not get caught), the sport of living, a

winked-at vice, a spice.

Yet others embarked on paths of rivalry and enmity and destruction.

This hydra has many heads. From scratching the paint of new cars and

flattening their tyres, to spreading vicious gossip, to media-hyped

arrests of successful and rich businessmen, to wars against advantaged

neighbours. The stifling, condensed vapours of envy cannot be

dispersed. They invade their victims and snatch their rageful eyes,

their calculating souls, they guide their hands in evil doings and dip

their tongues in vitriol. This is the day-to-day existence in places as

far apart as Moscow and the Balkans. A constant hiss, a tangible

malice, the piercing of a thousand eyes. The imminence and immanence of

violence. The poisoned joy of depriving the other of that which you do

not or cannot have.

There are those who idealize the successful and the rich and the lucky.

They attribute to them super-human, almost divine, qualities. They

think of serendipity as earned, of work as bestowed, of success as

deserved and reserved to the deserving. In an effort to justify the

agonizing disparities between themselves and others, they humble

themselves as they elevate the others. They reduce and diminish their

own gifts, they disparage their own achievements, they degrade their

own possessions and look with disdain and contempt upon their nearest

and dearest, who are unable to discern their fundamental shortcomings.

They feel worthy only of abasement and punishment. Besieged by guilt

and remorse, voided of self-esteem, self-hating and self-deprecating -

this is by far the more dangerous species. For he who derives

contentment from his own humiliation cannot but derive happiness from

the downfall of others. Indeed, most of them end up driving the objects

of their own devotion and adulation to destruction and decrepitude.

But the most common reaction is the good old cognitive dissonance. In

Central and Eastern Europe, entire societies are in its grip. It is to

prefer the belief that the grapes are sour to the admission of their

desirability. These people devalue the source of their frustration and

envy. They find faults, unattractive features, high costs to pay,

immorality in everything they really most desire and aspire to and in

everyone who has attained that which they so often can't. They walk

around critical and self-righteous, inflated with a justice of their

making and secure in the wisdom of being what they are rather than what

they could have been and really wish to be. They make a virtue of

abstention, of wishful constipation, of judgmental neutrality, this

oxymoron, the favourite of the disabled.

Topped by a thin layer of coagulated fat, a bubble of enraged and

maddened envy is boiling underneath - from Murmansk to Athens and from

Prague to Dresden. Will it burst and spill over or will it only noisily

release its steam is anybody's guess. It is a force to reckon with. The

tide of capitalism has lifted few yachts and no one else's boats.

People feel cheated. They feel used and abused. They feel conned out of

their dignity and their possessions and their future. They look around

and see island castles surrounded by oceans of physical and moral

filth. This is no decadence because it has no aesthetic values to

ameliorate it. It is as ugly as the survival of the thiefest. As

Central and Eastern Europe engages, for the first time, in serious

restructuring - the social costs will mount dramatically and so will

inequality. The process can be reversed only by the redistribution of

wealth. But that it will be achieved through progressive taxation

rather than through a bloodbath is not a foregone conclusion.

(Article written on September 26, 1999 and published October 11, 1999

in "Central Europe Review" volume 1, issue 16)

Return

Homo Balkanus

How does one respond to a torrent of belligerent correspondence from

Balkanians arguing against the belligerence of Balkanians asserted by

one in one's articles? Were it not sad, it surely would have been

farcical. Only yesterday (August 17th, 1999 - five months after the

Kosovo conflict) Macedonian papers argued fiercely, vehemently and

threateningly against an apparently innocuous remark by Albania's Prime

Minister. He said that all Albanians, wherever they are, should share

the same curriculum of studies. A preparatory step on the way to a

Greater Albania perhaps? In this region of opaque mirrors and "magla"

(fog) it is possible. And what is possible surely IS.

I do not believe in the future of this part of the world only because I

know its history too well. Every psychologist will tell you that past

violent behaviour is the best predictor of future recidivism. Homo

Balkanus is lifted straight off the rustling pages of the Diagnostic

and Statistics Manual (DSM) version IV (1994) - the bible of the

psychiatric profession:

"A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behaviour), need for

admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and

present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the

following:

1. Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates

achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without

commensurate achievements);

2. Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power,

brilliance, beauty, or ideal love;

3. Believes that he or she is 'special' and unique and can only be

understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status

people (or institutions);

4. Requires excessive admiration;

5. Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of

especially favourable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her

expectations;

6. Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of

others to achieve his or her own ends;

7. Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the

feelings and needs of others;

8. Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious

of him or her;

9. Shows arrogant, haughty behaviours or attitudes."

Narcissism is a result of stunted growth and of childhood abuse. It is

a reactive pattern, the indelible traces of an effort to survive

against all odds, against bestial repression and all-pervasive decay.

Brutally suppressed by the Turks for hundreds of years and then by

communism in some countries and by cruel, capricious banana republic

regimes in others - Homo Balkanus has grown to be a full-fledged

narcissist.

The nation state structure and ideology enthusiastically adopted by

Homo Balkanus in the wake of the collapse of the rotten Ottoman edifice

- has proven to be a costly mistake. Tribal village societies are not

fit for the consumption of abstract models of political organization.

This is as true in Africa as it is in the Balkans. The first allegiance

of Homo Balkanus is to his family, his clan, and his village. Local

patriotism was never really supplanted by patriotism. Homo Balkanus

shares an Ottoman unconscious with his co-regionists. The "authorities"

were and are always perceived to be a brutal, menacing and

unpredictable presence, a natural power, to be resisted by the equal

employment of cunning and corruption. Turkish habits die hard. The

natives find it difficult not to bribe their way through their own

officialdom, to pay taxes, not to litter, to volunteer, in short: to be

citizens, rather than occupants or inhabitants. Their

passive-aggressive instincts are intact and on autopilot.

The Balkanian experiment with nation states has visited only misery and

carnage upon the heads of its perpetrators. Borders tracked

convulsively the movements of half-nomad populations. This instability

of boundaries led to ethnic cleansing, to numerous international

congresses, to fitful wars. In an effort to justify a distinct

existence and identity, thousands of "scholars" embarked on Herculean

efforts of inventing histories for their newly emergent nations.

Inevitably, these histories conflicted and led to yet more bloodshed. A

land fertilized by blood produces harvests of bloated corpses.

In the Balkans people fight for their very own identity. They aspire to

purity, albeit racial, and to boundaries, albeit of the abstract kind.

It is, perhaps, the kernel of this Greek tragedy: that real people are

sacrificing real people on the altar of the abstract. It is a battle of

tastes, a clash of preferences, an Armageddon of opinions, judgements,

and lessons. Armies are still moved by ancient events, by symbols, by

fiery speeches, by abstract, diffuse notions. It is a land devoid of

its present, where the past and future reign supreme. No syllogism, no

logic, no theory can referee that which cannot be decided but by the

compelling thrust of the sword. "We versus They" - they, the aliens.

Threatened by the otherness of others, Homo Balkanus succumbs to the

protection of the collective. A dual track: an individualist against

the authorities - a mindless robot against all others, the foreigners,

the strangers, the occupiers. The violent acting out of this

schizophrenia is often referred to as "the history of the Balkans".

This spastic nature was further exacerbated by the egregious behaviour

of the superpowers. Unfortunately possessed of strategic import, the

Balkan was ravaged by geopolitics. Turks and Bulgarians and Hungarians

and Austrians and Russians and Britons and Germans and Communists and

the warplanes of NATO - the apocalyptic horsemen in the mountains and

rivers and valleys and sunsets of this otherworldly, tortured piece of

land. Raped by its protectors, impregnated by the demon seeds of global

interests and their ruthless pursuit - the Balkan was transformed into

a horror chamber of amputated, zombie nations, a veritable hellish

scene. Many a Pomeranian grenadier bequeathed their bones to the

Balkans but Pomeranian grenadiers came and went while the people of the

Balkan languished.

Thus, it was not difficult to foster a "We" against every "They" (or

imagined "They"). A crossroads of fault lines, a confluence of tectonic

clashes - the Balkan always obliged.

Religion came handy in this trade of hate. Orthodox Serbs fought Muslim

Serbs in Bosnia (the latter were forced to convert by the Turks

hundreds of years ago). Catholic Croats fought Orthodox Serbs. And

Bulgarians (a Turkic tribe) expelled the Turks in 1989, having

compelled them to change their Muslim names to Bulgarian sounding ones

in 1984.

Race was useful in the agitated effort to prevail. Albanians are of

Illyrian origin. The Greeks regard the Macedonians as upstart Slavs.

The Bulgarians regard the Macedonians as rebel Bulgarians. The

Macedonian regard the Bulgarians as Tartars (that is, Barbarian and

Turkish). The Slovenes and the Croats and, yes, the Hungarians claim

not to belong in this cauldron of seething, venomous emotions.

And culture was used abundantly in the Balkan conflicts. Where was the

Cyrillic alphabet invented (Macedonia, Greece, Bulgaria) and by whom

(Greeks, Macedonians, Bulgarians). Are some nations mere inventions?

(The Bulgarians say this about the Macedonians). Are some languages one

and the same? Minorities are either cleansed or denied out of

existence. The Greek still claim that there are no minorities in

Greece, only Greeks with different religions. The Bulgars in Greece

used to be "Bulgarophone Greeks". The Balkan is the eternal hunting

grounds of oxymorons, tautologies and logical fallacies.

It is here that intellectuals usually step in (see my article: "The

Poets and the Eclipse"). But the Balkan has no intelligentsia in the

Russian or even American sense. It has no one to buck the trend, to

play the non-conforming, to rattle, to provoke, to call upon one's

conscience. It does not have this channel to (other) ideas and view

called "intellectuals". It is this last point, which makes me the most

pessimistic. The Balkan is a body without a brain.

(Article written on August 8, 1999 and published September 6, 1999

in "Central Europe Review" volume 1, issue 11)

Return

The MinMaj Rule

After the Rain : how the West lost the East · 第 5 / 22 段