CHAPTER III

THE TIME OF SLEEP

“Women, like children, require more sleep normally than men, but

‘Macfarlane states that they can better bear the loss of sleep, and

most physicians will agree with him.’” H. CAMPBELL.

The amount of sleep, like the amount of food, required by an individual

varies greatly, depending largely upon the conditions at the time.

Edison, for instance, can go days without sleep when engrossed in some

invention, and he has been quoted as saying that people sleep too much,

four hours daily being quite sufficient.

In answer to my inquiry, Mr. Edison’s secretary wrote, “Mr. Edison

directs me to write you that the statement is correct, that for

thirty years he did not get four hours of sleep per day.” Evidently,

experience taught him that an average of four hours per day, if taken

rightly and at the right time, is enough for him. He keeps a couch in

his workroom so as to sleep when he is sleepy. He does not need a clock

to tell him when to go to bed, any more than you need a thermometer to

tell you when to pull up the blankets.

Edison is not alone in his views on sleep. He made extensive

experiments with the two hundred workers in his own factory which

convinced him and most of them that the majority slept much too long.

The hands seem to have entered willingly into the trials: perhaps

their personal regard for him influenced their conclusions. Napoleon

Bonaparte and Frederick of Prussia were both satisfied with four hours

of sleep,[1] while Bishop Taylor was of opinion that three hours was

sufficient for any man’s needs, and Richard Baxter, who wrote “The

Saints’ Rest,” thought four hours the proper measure.

[1] It is said, however, that in later life Napoleon carried this too

far, and was sometimes stupid for lack of sleep.

Paul Leicester Ford, who was never a strong person, once told me that

he found four hours’ sleep enough for all purposes. He did not wish

to be understood as saying that four hours’ rest was enough, but four

hours’ sleep. He was one of the few who understood the difference

between sleep and rest. He frequently rested; his favorite practice

being to lie back in a big armchair with a book, and forget the

surrounding conditions. The book created a different set of sensations,

which, combined with the pause in physical activity, brought a sense

of rest to the frail body. He frequently got his four hours of sleep

curled up in the big chair, and was then able to go on with the work

which in a few short years made him famous. The wife of the late

George T. Angell of Boston testifies that for years he seldom slept

four hours a night, having found that, for him, more was unnecessary;

but, of course, it does not follow that no more is necessary for anyone.

These are not unusual instances, but rather typical cases. History

and biography are full of such; each of us can probably mention one

or more persons among his own acquaintance who can do well with less

than the usual eight hours of sleep, but we have looked upon them as

exceptions and perhaps have prophesied that they will feel the evil

results later, if not now. We usually select ourselves as the standard

for all other persons, or perhaps it is more correct to say that we are

prone to select one stage of our own development as a standard, and try

to compel even our growing self to conform to that stage. When the crab

outgrows his shell it sloughs off, and, so far as we know, he offers

no objection, but takes the new shell, which answers his needs better.

But we, who consider ourselves infinitely superior to the crab, try

to compel ourselves to keep within the bounds of old thoughts, early

habits, and outgrown customs after we no longer need them. When we are

unfortunate enough to succeed, we rejoice at our cramped souls as the

Chinese woman prides herself upon her crushed, cramped, misshapen foot.

The amount of sleep that suited you last year may not suit you to-day.

You may really be getting better sleep and so needing less of it: or

you may have to make up by quantity for a poorer quality. The test

is that, if you are sleepy in waking hours, you need better sleep or

more of it. If you are wakeful in sleeping hours, you need less sleep

or else you are not getting the right kind. Good sleep is a habit, a

natural habit as distinguished from an acquired habit, and when we

learn to take it naturally, and in natural amount, we get a great deal

more from it. It is fair to assume that purely natural habits, which

continue from age to age through all stages of human progress, are

essential to human welfare. Otherwise they would drop away from us

as many useless physical parts have dropped. If you stop to think of

this, you know that it is so; the man in the street and the girl at the

ribbon counter do not know, so there is more excuse for them if they

misunderstand. It may be that they usually sleep better than you do,

and so do not need to know it.

The psychology of sleep · 第 3 / 54 章