HOW MUCH SLEEP
Six hours in sleep, in law’s grave study six,
Four spend in prayer, the rest on Nature fix.
(Translation.) SIR EDWARD COKE.
Man is the highest expression yet discovered of the “living organism,”
and sleep has always taken more of his time than any other function.
Marie de Manacéïne of St. Petersburg, in her great book called
“Sleep,” says: “The weaker the consciousness is, the more easily it
is fatigued and in need of sleep; an energetic consciousness, on the
contrary, is contented with periods of sleep that are shorter, less
deep, and less frequent.” Although the consciousness of the race has
developed and strengthened enormously, and is steadily strengthening
itself, the old-fashioned idea that one-third of our time should
be spent in sleep holds the average mind as strongly as ever. We
insist upon it for the young, impress it upon everybody, and look
distrustfully upon him who is so daring and unreasonable as to say that
he requires less than eight hours of sleep. When an idea is intrenched
in the mind it is next to impossible to drive it out by reason or even
by repetition.
It is the popular belief that Alfred the Great—who is also Alfred the
Wise and Alfred the Good (being dead so long)—divided time into three
equal parts, and taught that one part should be given to sleep. If he
had said this, it would not follow that it is the last and wisest word
on the best way to divide our time, but he did not say it. What he
said was that one-third of each day should be given to sleep, diet and
exercise: that is, that a man should devote eight hours to sleeping,
eating and whatever form of exercise or recreation he desired.
There is nothing to show that Alfred spent even six hours in sleep,
although there is plenty of proof that he recognized the difference
between rest and sleep, for he gave the second division of the
day—eight hours—to study and to reflection, while the remaining eight
hours were to be for business. In those days kings worked hard. Sir
Henry Sumner Maine says that the list of places where King John held
court shows that even he was as active as any commercial traveler
nowadays. (“Early Law and Custom,” p. 183.)
But the superstition that Alfred recommended eight hours for sleep will
not down, and no amount of argument or proof will change the opinion
of the average man on this point. “Our forefathers slept eight hours,”
they say; “so should we.” We forget that probably the rushlight and
the candle had much to do with the long hours of sleep in olden times.
As artificial light has improved, sleeping-time has been shortened.
There is an old English quatrain which runs:
“Nature requires five,
Custom gives seven,
Laziness takes nine
And wickedness eleven.”
But sleep is a natural need, and, like any other natural need, varies
in degree in different persons. Dogs, cats and other animals generally
sleep more than we do, and their young ones sleep still more. Generally
speaking, the infant, whose mental powers have barely awakened, who is,
so far as we can tell, merely a human animal, needs more sleep than it
will ever need again in its existence. In this great need of sleep the
human animal resembles other animals.
It frequently happens that, as a man waxes older, he requires less and
less sleep than in his growing and most active years. But old people
who have outlived their mental life come to a time when they sleep and
perform merely the physical functions like the infant; so also with
those whose energy so far exceeds their physical strength that the mere
effort of living exhausts them. This condition may be in part due to
overstrain of the powers of youth and middle age, but it also follows
the fixed idea that years diminish strength and lessen energy. It is
easy to fall into this notion, for it accords so well with the general
idea that rest must come only after the period of activity, whether
that period be a day or a lifetime.
All of us have had periods when we have needed fewer than our average
hours of sleep. People who sleep out of doors or in thoroughly
ventilated rooms, under warm but light clothing, find that they need
less sleep than when they occupy poorly ventilated rooms and wrap
themselves in heavy, unhygienic clothing. Fresh discoveries are being
made almost daily by those who give intelligent consideration to these
things.
Even babies differ in their need of sleep. I know one healthy,
happy, beautiful baby who has never slept the average sixteen hours
that babies are supposed to need. This child is now between three
and four years of age, and has never gone to sleep before nine or
half-past nine at night. Her parents had the common idea of long
hours of sleep for infants, and the child had a hard struggle for a
while to convince them that she had no such need: such struggles are
often called “naughtiness.” She was regularly put to bed at seven
o’clock, and all the usual devices for enticing a baby to sleep were
practiced. Sometimes she was left severely alone, sometimes she had
gentle lullabies sung to her, but, whether alone or in company, this
particular baby played and enjoyed herself until between nine and
nine-thirty, when she quietly dropped to sleep. She awoke as early as
the average baby wakes, happy and refreshed, and her parents finally
learned that there is no sleeping rule that has no exceptions, whether
applied to infants or adults.
Drowsiness is a sign that we ought to sleep, just as hunger is a sign
that we ought to eat. Natural wakefulness means that we ought not to
sleep. The child tries to obey the promptings of nature, but we think
these promptings are wrong, if not wicked, and force him into all sorts
of bad habits. Says Michelet, “No consecrated absurdity could have
stood its ground if the man had not silenced the objections of the
child.” We are slowly learning that there is no need or function of the
body or of the mind that is exactly the same in all individuals, or
that is always the same even in the same individual.
But, in spite of this dawning knowledge, we still view with alarm any
disregard of the rule, either in ourselves or another; so true it is,
as Thomas Paine says, that “It is a faculty of the human mind to
become what it contemplates.” We have looked upon ourselves as having
certain, unvarying, imperative needs until we have almost become
subject to them.