FOREST PENALTIES.

Fine.

For a load of sear wood { a child 34 kreuzers.

{ grown-up person 54 do.

If it be green wood, the fine is doubled.

For a load of dead leaves { a child 26 to 28 kreuzers.

{ grown-up person 46 to 48.

For a load of green grass torn {a child 30 do.

up by the hand {grown-up person 50 do.

Should a sickle or scythe be used, the fine then becomes doubled;

likewise for a second trespass: for a third, imprisonment ensues.

It is against the Duke's laws to take birds' nests; even those of

birds of prey cannot be taken without the permission of the keeper of

the forests.

For a nest taken of common singing-birds, 5 florins.

For nightingales 15 do.

Should the nest be taken out of a pleasure-ground, the fine then

becomes doubled.

It may appear to many people quite impossible that these penalties can

be enforced in desolate districts so nearly uninhabited: nevertheless,

by a sort of diamond-cut-diamond system, the Duke's forest officers

have various cunning ways of detecting those who infringe them, and the

fact is that fuel and wild grass are very often wanting in a solitary

hovel absolutely environed by both. I myself was one day told that I

had become liable to be fined eighteen kreuzers, because in a reverie

I had allowed a rough pony I was riding to bend his head down and

eat a few mouthfuls of grass; and another day, seeing a man who was

driving the ass I was riding rub with mud the end of a switch he had

just cut, I was told by him, in answer to my inquiry, that he did so in

order that it might not be proved he had _cut_ it. However, lest these

trifling data should not be deemed sufficient proof, I will at once

add, that I have myself seen the peasants lying in the Duke's prison

for having offended against these petty laws.

I took some pains to inquire what possible objection there could be to

the poor people collecting a few dead leaves, or the rank wild grass

which grows here and there all over the forest, and I was told that

both of these by rotting are supposed to manure the trees, yet, as I

have already stated, quantities of the largest timber are to be seen

decaying in every direction.

In a crowded, populous country, all descriptions of property must be

clearly distinguished and most sternly protected; but in a state of

nature, or in districts so nearly approaching to it as many parts of

Nassau, the same rule is not applicable--the same necessity does not

exist; and under such circumstances, the punishment inflicted upon a

child for tearing up wild grass with his hands most certainly is (and

who can deny it?) greater than the offence.

It is with no hostile or bad feeling towards the Duke of Nassau that I

mention these details: he is a personage much beloved in his duchy, and

I believe with great reason is he respected there; yet his forest laws

no one surely can admire; and though custom certainly has sanctioned

them,--though the humble voice of those who have suffered under them

has hitherto been too feeble to reach his ears,--and though those about

his court and person are but little disposed to awaken his attention to

such mean complaints,--yet no one can calmly see and foresee the state

of political feeling in Germany without admitting that the most humble

traveller (and why not an English one?) may render the Duke of Nassau a

friendly service, by bringing into daylight, unveiled by flattery, an

act of oppression in his government, which, while it has most probably

escaped his attention, is seditiously hoarded up by his political

enemies to form part of that fulcrum which they are secretly working

at, in order to effect by it, if possible, his downfall. A grievance,

like a wound, often only requires to be laid open to be cured; whereas

if, deeply seated, it be concealed from view, like gunpowder imbedded

in a rock, when once the spark _does_ reach it, it explodes with a

violence proportionate to the power which would vainly have attempted

to smother it in the earth.

Bubbles from the Brunnens of Nassau By an Old Man. · 第 26 / 37 题