CHAPTER XIV.

LOSS OF QUEENS.

OF SWARMS THAT LOSE THEIR QUEEN.

Swarms that lose their queen the first few hours after being hived,

generally return to the parent stock; with the exception that they

sometimes unite with some other. If much time has elapsed before the

loss, they remain, unless standing on the same bench with another. On a

separate stand they continue their labor, but a large swarm diminishes

rapidly, and seldom fills an ordinary-sized hive. One singular

circumstance attends a swarm that is constructing combs without a

queen. I have never seen it noticed by any one, and may not always be

the case, but _every_ instance that has come under my notice, I have so

found it. That is, four-fifths of the combs are drone-cells; why they

thus construct them is another subject for speculation, from which I

will endeavor in this instance to refrain.

A SUGGESTION AND AN ANSWER.

It has been suggested as a profitable speculation, "to hive a large

swarm without a queen, and give them a piece of brood-comb containing

eggs, to rear one, and then as soon as it is matured, deprive them of

it, giving them another piece of comb, and continue it throughout the

summer, putting on boxes for surplus honey. The bees having no young

brood to consume any honey, no time will be lost, or taken to nurse

them, and as a consequence they will be enabled to store large

quantities of surplus honey."

This appears very plausible, and to a person without experience

somewhat conclusive. If success depended on some animal whose lease of

life was a little longer, it would answer better to calculate in this

way. But as a bee seldom sees the anniversary of its birthday, and most

of them perish the first few months of their existence, it is bad

economy. It will be found that the largest amount of our surplus honey

is obtained from our prolific stocks. Therefore it is all-important

that every swarm and stock has a queen to repair this constant loss.

A DISPUTED QUESTION.

We now approach another disputed point in natural history, relative to

the queen leaving at any time except when leading out a swarm. Most

writers say that the young queen leaves the hive, and meets her

paramour, the drone, on the wing. Others deny this _positively_, having

watched a whole summer without seeing her highness leave. Consequently

they have arrived at the very plausible and apparently consistent

conclusion, that nature never intended it to be so, since it must

happen at a time when the existence of the whole family depends

entirely on the life of the queen. The stock at such times contains no

eggs or larvae, from which to rear another, if she should be lost. "The

chances at such times of being devoured by birds, blown away by the

winds, and other casualties, are too many, and it is not probable the

Creator would have so arranged it." But facts are stubborn things; they

will not yield one jot to favor the most "finely-spun hypothesis;" they

are most provokingly obstinate, many times. When man, without the

necessary observation, takes a survey through animated nature, and

finds with scarcely an exception that male and female are about equal

in number, he is ready, and often does conclude that one bee among

thousands cannot be the only one capable of reproduction or depositing

eggs. Why, the idea is preposterous! And yet only a little observation

will upset this very consistent and analogous reasoning. So it appears

to be with the excursions of the young queens. I was compelled, though

reluctantly, to admit that they leave the hive. That their purpose is

to meet the drones, I cannot at present contradict. Also, that, when

the queen is once impregnated, it is operative for life, (yet it is

another anomaly), as I never detected her coming out again for that

purpose. What then is the use of the ten thousand drones that never

fulfil this important duty? It seems, indeed, like a useless waste of

labor and honey, for each stock to rear some twelve or fifteen hundred,

when perhaps but one, sometimes not any of the whole number is of any

use. If the risk is great in the queen's leaving, we find it arranged

admirably in its not being too frequent.

A MULTITUDE OF DRONES NEEDED.

Instinct teaches the bee to make the matters left to them as nearly

_sure_ as possible. When they want one queen, they raise half a dozen.

If one drone or only half a dozen were reared, the chances of the queen

meeting one in the air would be very much reduced. But when a thousand

are in the air instead of one, the chances are a thousand times

multiplied. If a stock casts a swarm, there is a young queen to be

impregnated, and be got safely back, or the stock is lost. Every time

she leaves, there is a chance of her being lost, (one in fifteen). If

the number of drones was any less than it is, the queen would have to

repeat her excursions in proportion, before successful. As it is, some

have to leave several times. The chances and consequences are so great,

that on the whole no doubt but it is better to rear a thousand

unnecessarily, than to lack one just in time of need. Therefore let us

endeavor to be content with the present arrangement, inasmuch as we

could not better it, and probably had we been consulted, would have so

fixed "the thing, that it would not go at all."

But what is the use of the drones in hives that do not swarm, and do

not intend it, situated in a large room or very large hives? Such

circumstances seldom produce swarms, yet as regular as the return of

summer, a brood of drones appear. What are they for? Suppose the old

queen in such hive dies, leaving eggs or young larvae, and a young queen

is reared to supply her place. How is she to be impregnated without the

drones? Perhaps they are taught that whenever they can afford it, they

should have some on hand to be ready for an emergency. I have already

said when bees are numerous, and honey abundant, they never fail to

provide them. I once put a swarm in a glass hive. The queen was a

cripple, having lost one of her posterior legs; in two months after she

was replaced by one young and perfect. Here was an instance of drones

being needed, when no intention of swarming was indicated; the hive was

but little more than half full.

THE QUEEN LIABLE TO BE LOST IN HER EXCURSIONS.

This excursion of the queen, whenever I have witnessed it, always took

place a little after the middle of the day, when the drones were out in

the greatest numbers. At such times I have seen them leave amid rather

more commotion than usual among the workers. I have watched their

return, which varied from three minutes to half an hour, and seen them

hover around their own hive, apparently in doubt whether they belonged

in that, or the next; in a few instances they have actually settled on

the neighboring hive, and would have there perished, but for my

assistance in putting them right.

THE TIME WHEN IT OCCURS.

Thus we see that queens are lost on these occasions from some cause,

and part of them by entering the wrong hive, perhaps most of them; if

so, it is another good reason for not packing stocks too close. The

hives are very often nearly alike in color and appearance. The queen

coming out for the first time in her life, is no doubt confused by this

similarity.

The number of such losses in a season has varied: one year the average

was one in nine, another it was one in thirteen, and another one in

twenty. The time from the first swarm also varies from twelve to twenty

days. The inexperienced reader should not forget that it is the old

stocks which have cast swarms, where these accidents happen; the old

queen having left with the first swarm. Also all after swarms are

liable to the same loss. I would suggest that these have abundant room

given between the hives; if it is necessary to pack close, let it be

the first swarms, where the old queen has no occasion to leave. Having

never seen this matter fully discussed, I wish to be somewhat

particular, and flatter myself that I shall be able to direct the

careful apiarian how to save a few stocks and swarms annually, that is,

if he keeps many. A few years ago, I wrote an article for the Albany

Cultivator. A subscriber of that paper told me a year afterwards that

he saved two stocks the next summer by the information; they were worth

at least five dollars each, enough to pay for his paper ten years or

more.

When a stock casts but one swarm, the queen having no competitors to

interfere with her movements, will leave in about fourteen days, if the

weather is fair; but should an after swarm leave, the oldest of the

young queens will probably go with that, of course: then, it must be

later before the next is ready: it may be twenty days, or even more;

those with after swarms will vary from one to six. It _always must_

occur when no eggs or larvae exist, and no means left to repair this

loss; a loss it is, and a serious one; the bees are in as much trouble

as their owner, and a great deal more, they seeming to understand the

consequences, and he, if he knows nothing of the matter, has no

trouble. Should he now, for the first time, learn the nature of it, he

will at the same time understand the remedy.

INDICATIONS OF THE LOSS.

The next morning after a loss of this kind has occurred, and

occasionally at evening, the bees may be seen running about in the

greatest consternation, outside, to and fro on the sides. Some will fly

off a short distance and return; one will run to another, and then to

another, still in hopes, no doubt, of finding their lost sovereign! A

neighboring hive close by, on the same bench, will probably receive a

portion, which will seldom resist an accession under such

circumstances. All this will be going on while other hives are quiet.

Towards the middle of the day, this confusion will be less marked; but

the next morning it will be exhibited again, though not so plainly, and

cease after the third, when they become apparently reconciled to their

fate.

They will continue their labors as usual, bringing in pollen and honey.

Here I am obliged to differ with writers who tell us that all labor

will now cease. I hope the reader will not be deceived by supposing

that because the bees are bringing in pollen, that they _must_ have a

queen; I can assure you it is not always the case.

THE RESULT.

The number of bees will gradually decrease, and be all gone by the

early part of winter, leaving a good supply of honey, and an extra

quantity of bee-bread, as before mentioned, because there has been no

young brood to consume it. This is the case when a large family was

left at the time of the loss. When but few bees are left, it is very

different; the combs are unprotected by a covering of bees; the moth

deposits her eggs on them, and the worms soon finish up the whole. Yet

the bees from the other stocks will generally first remove the honey.

AGE OF BEES INDICATED.

Hundreds of bee-keepers lose some of their stocks in this way, and can

assign no reasonable cause. "Why," say they, "there wasn't twenty bees

in the hive; it was all full of honey," or worms, as the case may be.

"Only a short time before, it was full of bees; I got three good swarms

from it, and it always had been first rate, but all at once the bees

were gone. I don't understand it!" Such bee-keepers cannot understand

how rapidly a family of bees diminish, when there is no queen to

replenish with young this mortality of the old ones. I doubt whether

the largest and best family possibly could be made to exist six months,

without a queen for their renewal, except, perhaps, through the winter.

When standing close on one bench, they are gone sooner than if on

separate stands, as they often join a neighboring hive when they can

walk to it.

NECESSITY OF CARE.

As this tumult cannot be seen but a few days at most, it is well--yes,

it is necessary--to make it a duty to glance at the hives at this

period after swarming, _every morning_; a glance is sufficient to tell

you of the fact. Remember to reckon from the date of the first issue;

this occurs when the first royal cells are sealed over, and is the best

criterion as to when the queen will leave. If the first swarm issue and

return, it can make no difference; reckon from their first issuing.

REMEDY.

When you discover a loss, first ascertain if there is any after swarm

to be expected from another stock, (by listening for the piping); if

so, wait till it issues, and obtain a queen from that for your stock;

even if there is but one, take it, and let the bees return; they would

be likely to come out again the next day; if not, it is very often no

great loss.

Should no such swarm be indicated, go to a stock that has cast a first

swarm within a week; smoke it and turn it over, as before directed,

find a royal cell, and with a broad knife cut it out, being careful not

to injure it. This must now be secured in the other hive in its natural

position, the lower end free from any obstacle, that would interfere

with the queen leaving it. It will make but little difference whether

at the top or bottom, providing it is secure from falling.

I generally introduce it through a hole in the top, taking care to find

one that will allow the cell to pass down between two combs. It being

largest at the upper end, the combs each side will sustain it, and

leave the lower end free. In a few hours the bees will secure it

permanently to the combs with wax. This operation cannot be performed

in a chamber hive, as it is impossible to see the arrangement of the

combs through the holes. To put it in at the bottom is some more

trouble; the difficulty is, to fasten it, and prevent it resting on the

end. I have done it as follows: Get an _old_ thick piece of dry comb

some three inches square; cut out an inch of the middle. At right

angles with this, in one edge in the centre, make another to intersect

it, just the size of the cell, and have the lower end reach into the

opening. This comb will keep it in the right position, and may rest on

the floor-board. It can now be put in the hive, cutting out a piece of

comb to make room for it if necessary.

Soon after such cell is introduced, the bees are quiet. In a few days

it hatches, and they have a queen as perfect as if it had been one of

their own rearing. This queen of course will be necessitated to leave

the hive, and will be just as liable to be lost, but no more so than

others, and must be watched the same. It is unnecessary to look for a

cell in a stock that has cast its first swarm more than a week before,

as they are generally destroyed by that time, (sometimes short of it,)

unless they intend to send out an after swarm.

MARK THE DATE OF SWARMS ON THE HIVE.

Should you have so many stocks that you cannot remember the date of

each swarm without difficulty, it is a good plan to mark the date on

one side or corner of the hive, as it issues. You can then tell at once

where to look for a cell when wanted.

It will sometimes happen that a queen may be lost at the extreme end of

the swarming season, when no other stock contains such cells. I then

look around for the poorest stock or swarm that I have on hand, one

that I can afford to sacrifice, if it possesses a queen, to save the

one that has sustained this loss; this is not often the case, but is

sometimes. I have a few times put just bees enough with the queen to

keep her in a box, and kept them for this purpose, as was mentioned in

the last chapter. When introduced, the bees are generally killed, but

the queen is preserved.

OBTAINING A QUEEN FROM WORKER BROOD.

There is yet another method to be adopted, and that is, to obtain a

piece of brood-comb containing workers' eggs, or larvae very young. You

will generally find it without much trouble, in a young swarm that is

making combs; the lower ends usually contain eggs; take a piece from

one of the middle sheets, two or three inches long, (you will probably

use smoke by this time without telling). Invert the hive that is to

receive it, put the piece edgewise between the combs, if you can spread

them apart enough for the purpose; they will hold it there, and then

there will be ample room to make the cells. They will nearly always

rear several queens. I have counted nine several times, which were all

they had room for. But yet I have very little confidence in such

queens, they are almost certain to be lost.

THEY ARE POOR DEPENDENCE.

Therefore I would recommend getting a royal cell whenever it is

practical. There is yet another advantage; you will have a queen ready

to lay eggs two or three weeks earlier, than when they are compelled to

commence with the egg. I have put such piece of brood-comb in a small

glass box on the top of the hive instead of the bottom, because it was

less trouble, but in this case the eggs were all removed in a short

time; whether a queen was reared in the hive or not I cannot say; but

this I know, I never obtained a prolific queen, after repeated

experiments in this way.

It would appear that I have been more unfortunate with queens reared in

this way, than most experimenters. I have no difficulty to get them

formed to all appearance perfect, but lose them afterwards. Now whether

this arose from some lack of physical development, by taking grubs too

far advanced to make a perfect change, or whether they were reared so

late in the season, that most of the drones were destroyed, and the

queen to meet one had to repeat her excursions till lost, I am yet

unable to _fully_ determine. To test the first of these questions, I

have a few times removed all the larvae from the comb; leaving nothing

but eggs, that all the food given them might be "royal pap," from the

commencement, and had no better success so far. Yet occasionally

prolific queens have been reared when I could account for their origin

in no other way but from worker eggs. But you will find they are not to

be depended upon generally.

Sometimes, after all our endeavors, a stock or two will remain

destitute of a queen. These, if they escape the worms, will generally

store honey enough in this section to winter a good family. This will

have to be introduced, of course, from another hive, containing a

queen; but this belongs to Fall management.

As respects the time that elapses from the impregnation of the queen

till the commencement of egg laying, I cannot tell, but guess it might

be about two or three days. I have driven out the bees twenty-one days

after the first swarm, when no second swarm had issued--the young queen

came out on the fourteenth day. I found eggs and some very young larvae.

When it is remembered that eggs remain three days before they hatch, it

shows that the first of these must have been deposited some four or

five days. When writers tell us the exact time to an hour (46 or 48)

from impregnation to laying, I am willing to admit the thing in this

case, but feel just as if I would like to ask how they managed to find

out the fact; by what sign they knew when a queen returned from an

excursion, whether she had been successful or not, in her amours; or,

whether another effort would have to be made; and then, how they

managed to know exactly when the first egg was laid.

Occasionally a queen is lost at other than the swarming season,

averaging about one in forty. It is most frequent in spring; at least

it is generally discovered then. The queen may die in the winter, and

the bees not give us any indications till they come out in spring.

(Occasionally they may all desert the hive, and join another.) If we

expect to ascertain when a queen is lost at this season, we must notice

them just before dark on the first warm days--because the mornings are

apt to be too cool for any bees to be outside--any unusual stir, or

commotion, similar to what has been described, shows the loss. This is

the worst time in the year to provide the remedy, unless there should

happen to be some very poor stock containing a queen, that we might

lose any way--then it might be advisable to sacrifice it to save the

other, especially if the last contained all the requisites of a good

stock except a queen. Some eight or ten, that I have managed in this

way, have given me full satisfaction. I have at other times let them go

till the swarming season, and then procured a queen, or introduced a

small swarm; at which time they are so reduced as to be worth but

little, even when not affected by the worms. To obviate this loss in

this way, it might be an advantage to transfer the bees to the next

stock, if it was not too full already; or the bees of the next stock to

this. Let the age and condition of the combs, quantity of stores, &c.,

decide.

Mysteries of Bee-keeping Explained · 第 14 / 25 章