1. The nature and origin of the caste

_Pasi, Passi._ [426]--A Dravidian occupational caste of northern

India, whose hereditary employment is the tapping of the palmyra,

date and other palm trees for their sap. The name is derived from the

Sanskrit _pashika_, 'One who uses a noose,' and the Hindi, _pas_ or

_pasa_, a noose. It is a curious fact that when the first immigrant

Parsis from Persia landed in Gujarat they took to the occupation

of tapping palm trees, and the poorer of them still follow it. The

resemblance in the name, however, can presumably be nothing more than

a coincidence. The total strength of the Pasis in India is about a

million and a half persons, nearly all of whom belong to the United

Provinces and Bihar. In the Central Provinces they number 3500, and

reside principally in the Jubbulpore and Hoshangabad Districts. The

caste is now largely occupational, and is connected with the Bhars,

Arakhs, Khatiks and other Dravidian groups of low status. But in the

past they seem to have been of some importance in Oudh. "All through

Oudh," Mr. Crooke states, "they have traditions that they were lords of

the country, and that their kings reigned in the Districts of Kheri,

Hardoi and Unao. Ramkot, where the town of Bangarmau in Unao now

stands, is said to have been one of their chief strongholds. The last

of the Pasi lords of Ramkot, Raja Santhar, threw off his allegiance

to Kanauj and refused to pay tribute. On this Raja Jaichand gave his

country to the Banaphar heroes Alha and Udal, and they attacked and

destroyed Ramkot, leaving it the shapeless mass of ruins which it now

is." Similar traditions prevail in other parts of Oudh. It is also

recorded that the Rajpasis, the highest division of the caste, claim

descent from Tilokchand, the eponymous hero of the Bais Rajputs. It

would appear then that the Pasis were a Dravidian tribe who held a part

of Oudh before it was conquered by the Rajputs. As the designation

of Pasi is an occupational term and is derived from the Sanskrit,

it would seem that the tribe must formerly have had some other name,

or they may be an occupational offshoot of the Bhars. In favour of this

suggestion it may be noted that the Bhars also have strong traditions

of their former dominance in Oudh. Thus Sir C. Elliott states in his

_Chronicles of Unao_ [427] that after the close of the heroic age,

when Ajodhya was held by the Surajvansi Rajputs under the great Rama,

we find after an interval of historic darkness that Ajodhya has been

destroyed, the Surajvansis utterly banished, and a large extent of

country is being ruled over by aborigines called Cheros in the far

east, Bhars in the centre and Rajpasis in the west. Again, in Kheri

the Pasis always claim kindred with the Bhars, [428] and in Mirzapur

[429] the local Pasis represent the Bhars as merely a subcaste of

their own tribe, though this is denied by the Bhars themselves. It

seems therefore a not improbable hypothesis that the Pasis and perhaps

also the kindred tribe of Arakhs are functional groups formed from the

Bhar tribe. For a discussion of the early history of this important

tribe the reader must be referred to Mr. Crooke's excellent article.

The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India, Volume 4 · 第 389 / 607 题