45. The cultivating status

The social status of the Kurmi appears to be that of the cultivator. He

is above the menial and artisan castes of the village and the impure

weaving and labouring castes; he is theoretically equal to the

artisan castes of towns, but one or two of these, such as the Sunar

or goldsmith and Kasar or brass-worker, have risen in the world owing

to the prosperity or importance of their members, and now rank above

the Kurmi. The Kurmi's status appears to be that of the cultivator

and member of the village community, but a large proportion of the

Kurmis are recruited from the non-Aryan tribes, who have obtained

land and been admitted into the caste, and this tends to lower the

status of the caste as a whole. In the Punjab Kurmis apparently do

not hold land and are employed in grass-cutting, weaving, and tending

horses, and are even said to keep pigs. [83] Here their status is

necessarily very low as they follow the occupations of the impure

castes. The reason why the Kurmi as cultivator ranks above the village

handicraftsmen may perhaps be that industrial pursuits were despised

in early times and left to the impure Sudras and to the castes of

mixed descent; while agriculture and trade were the occupations of

the Vaishya. Further, the village artisans and menials were supported

before the general use of current coin by contributions of grain from

the cultivators and by presents of grain at seed-time and harvest;

and among the Hindus it is considered very derogatory to accept a

gift, a man who does so being held to admit his social inferiority to

the giver. Some exception to this is made in the case of Brahmans,

though even with them the rule partly applies. Of these two reasons

for the cultivator's superiority to the menial and artisan castes

the former has to a large extent lost its force. The handicrafts are

no longer considered despicable, and, as has been seen, some of the

urban tradesmen, as the Sunar and Kasar, now rank above the Kurmi, or

are at least equal to him. Perhaps even in ancient times these urban

artificers were not despised like the village menials, as their skill

was held in high repute. But the latter ground is still in full force

and effect in the Central Provinces at least: the village artisans are

still paid by contributions from the cultivator and receive presents

from him at seed-time and harvest. The remuneration of the village

menials, the blacksmith, carpenter, washerman, tanner, barber and

waterman is paid at the rate of so much grain per plough of land

according to the estimated value of the work done by them for the

cultivators during the year. Other village tradesmen, as the potter,

oilman and liquor-vendor, are no longer paid in grain, but since the

introduction of currency sell their wares for cash; but there seems

no reason to doubt that in former times when no money circulated

in villages they were remunerated in the same manner. They still

all receive presents, consisting of a sowing-basketful of grain at

seed-time and one or two sheaves at harvest. The former are known as

_Bijphuti_, or 'the breaking of the seed,' and the latter as _Khanvar_,

or 'that which is left.' In Bilaspur the Kamias or village menials also

receive as much grain as will fill a winnowing-fan when it has been

threshed. When the peasant has harvested his grain all come and beg

from him. The Dhimar brings waternut, the Kachhi or market-gardener

some chillies, the Teli oil and tobacco, the Kalar some liquor if he

drinks it, the Bania some sugar, and all receive grain in excess of

the value of their gifts. The village menials come for their customary

dues, and the Brahman, the Nat or acrobat, the Gosain or religious

mendicant, and the Fakir or Muhammadan beggar solicit alms. On that

day the cultivator is like a little king in his fields, and it is

said that sometimes a quarter of the crop may go in this way; but

the reference must be only to the spring crop and not to the whole

holding. In former times grain must have been the principal source

of wealth, and this old custom gives us a reason for the status of

the cultivator in Hindu society. There is also a saying:

Uttam kheti, madhyam ban,

Kanisht chakri, bhik nidan,

or 'Cultivation is the best calling, trade is respectable, service

is menial, and begging is degraded.'

The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India, Volume 4 · 第 98 / 607 题