2. Ulcers and Caruncles in the Urethra.

We have already seen from Hippocrates, Celsus and Galen that the

ancient Physicians had observed the inflammation and subsequent

matteration of the small mucous glands of the urethra evidenced by the

symptoms of painful micturition, and seeing that mere tenesmus, as

well as dysentery, are denominated ἑλκώσις (ulceration) by them, it is

by no means improbable that many a urethral ulcer and many a case of

gonorrhœa may have been treated under the name of ischuria (retention

of urine). This is the more likely, as we learn from a passage of

_Celsus_[329], one usually misinterpreted in several respects, that

the urethral discharge was explained as due to an extension of

the ulcer to the spermatic cords (_vasa deferentia_,—seed-bringing

vessels). Yet further confirmation is afforded by a passage of

_Actuarius_,[330] already cited by Simon, and our own conjecture

expressed on a previous page thus justified.

Ulcers however also occurred in the urethra[331] unconnected with

tubercular swellings (ἀφανὲς ἕλκος,—invisible ulcer); these not

unfrequently occasioned bleeding,[332] and made their presence known

by the accompanying pain, while synchronously small irregularly-shaped

particles (ἐφελκύδες) were ejected.[333] The appropriate treatment of

these ulcers has been described by _Paulus Aegineta_ (loco citato);

it consisted in injections of honey and milk (_Aëtius_, IV. 2. 19.,

and _Actuarius_ also recommended _enemata morsus expertia_,—clysters

free from biting acridity), introduction of lotus pounded in a leaden

mortar by means of a feather or a twisted piece of lint (λεπτὸν

στρεπτὸν,—light material twisted,—an anticipation of the bougie?)

along with a mixture of gall-apple, flowers of zinc (oxide of zinc),

starch-flour and aloes smeared in equal parts with rose-sap and

plantain-sap.

Not unfrequently such ulcers give rise to the establishment of

_caruncles in the urethra_, particularly _in the neighbourhood of

the neck of the bladder_, though they occur[334] also in the ear,

nose, as well as in connection with the privates and anus, in the

latter case presenting the symptoms of ischuria (retention of urine),

interfering as they do with the outflow of the urine. The presence of

these caruncles may be diagnosed by the preceding symptoms, as also

by the circumstance that the urine is evacuated by the introduction

of a _catheter_, that this occasions pain at the seat of ulceration

and breaks through the caruncle, causing the urine to pass mixed

with blood and the remains of the caruncle. It is necessary to know

if a thrombus (blood-clot) or calculus blocks the urethra; but as

to whether we pronounce the mischief to be situated in the urethra

itself and the cause of the ischuria to be there as well, this is a

distinction of no practical or scientific value.[335] For as a rule

it was solely as being the excretory duct of the bladder that the

urethra had some little attention directed to it; while any signs

it exhibited were generally regarded simply as symptoms connected

with the urinary bladder and the kidneys. Partial _growing up, or

morbid extuberance, in the urethra_ (συσσάρκωσις,—a growing together)

following on a previous ulceration is described by _Heliodorus_, as

given in Oribasius,[336] occasioning either a narrowing of the urethral

passage in one spot or its being filled up over its entire superficies

with morbid outgrowths of tissue. Partial narrowing causes dysuria or

strangury (difficulty of micturition), the narrowing of the whole canal

by morbid outgrowths, ischuria (impossibility of micturition, retention

of urine). The outgrowth must be removed by means of a small lancet.

The mode of procedure is then as follows. The patient is placed on his

back, the penis straight out; then with the fingers of the left hand

the operator compresses it behind the spot where the growth is found,

in order to prevent the blood from flowing inwards when the incision

is made; next he takes the knife in the right hand, pushes the point

into the urethra, divides it as far along as the base of the morbid

growth, but not so as to go beyond it. This done, he proceeds to cut

out the growth by means of a circular incision, and compresses the

urethra between the fingers, causing the growth to spring forwards.

Supposing it now projects but does not actually spring out, it is

extracted by means of a _mydion_ (boat-shaped instrument). After the

removal of the growth the urethra must be protected from contact with

the urine, which during the first few days is best done by applying an

_ipoterion_, or compress,[337] made of papyrus. The mode of preparing

this is described in detail later on, and a sort of elastic catheter

indicated. Catheters of copper and tin might also be used, or a

quill taken for the purpose. The tin or lead catheters are not to be

inserted till after the third day, and carry in front a projecting

shield. The application of a bandage described is declared to be of

great advantage. Scirrhosities of _the neck of the bladder_, abscesses

and the like, are mentioned by _Galen_ (loco citato) as occurring

occasionally. With regard to _diseases of the prostates_ subsequent

investigations must authenticate the amount of knowledge possessed of

these by the physicians of Antiquity.

_Inflammation of the testicles_[338] is usually characterized according

to _Paulus Aegineta_[339] by pain under strong pressure by the fingers,

while only a slight pressure causes no uneasiness. Redness and heat

are slight externally, but the latter is perceptible deep in by an

investigating finger. Sometimes fever is associated with it, and if

the inflammation is not quickly combated, the pain, _Celsus_ tells

us,[340] extends to the inguinal and lumbar regions, the parts swell,

the spermatic cord grows thicker and at the same time indurated. Both

authorities make the treatment consist at first in blood-letting at the

ankle,[341] and the use of soft poultices of bean-meal,[342] pounded

cumin, linseed, etc. to which in cases of induration is added later on

a mixture of crocus and wine. In obstinate instances poultices are used

of _rad. cucumeris agrestis_ (root of the wild cucumber);[343] _Paulus

Aegineta_ under these circumstances prescribes grapes, peas, cumin,

brimstone, nitre and resin, made into a cataplasm with honey, besides

sundry wax-salves. A considerable list of remedial agents is found

enumerated in _Marcellus_ (ch. 33.) intended to combat the _tumores et

dolores testiculorum_ (swellings and pains in the testicles); of these

we will only mention the salves of mutton-suet and nitre, the sea-water

compresses, the poultices of _rad. cicutae_ (hemlock root), white of

egg, frankincense and ceruse (white lead). _Aretaeus_[344] gives us

an interesting piece of information to the effect that in order to

counteract neuralgia of the testicles and spermatic cord, accompanied

at the same time by intestinal colic, the spermatic cord was _cut

out_, being looked upon as the cause of the suffering. Important too

is the case related by _Hippocrates_,[345] where a patient at Athens

suffered from _prurigo_ (itch) of the whole body, but above all of the

_testicles_ and the forehead, his skin having grown thick and hard as

it does in leprosy, so that nowhere could it be pulled up above the

general surface.

_Induration_ of the testicles is mentioned by _Galen_,[346] who assigns

it as one cause of sterility. The same author[347] likewise speaks of

the testicles being affected with _aphthae_ (διδύμους ἀφθῶντας), which

he says should be treated with _terra cimolia_ (Cimolian chalk) and

myrtle-berries.

§ 41.

The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2) Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity · 第 36 / 77 题