OF THE KINDS AND CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT.

4. Writers have admitted in general four kinds of displacement;

backward, forward, outward, and inward. But all these are not alike

frequent, as is proved by experience, and demonstrated by the relative

situation of the parts.

5. In a backward direction the olecranon and the radius may pass up

behind the humerus, as the coronoid apophysis offers but little

resistance in consequence of its slight curvature. On the other hand,

the kind of hook formed by the olecranon, prevents it and the radius

from passing before the lower articulating extremity of the humerus,

and therefore, without a fracture of the olecranon, a luxation in that

direction is impracticable: at the sides, the two lateral ligaments,

but more particularly the reciprocal joining or interlocking of the

uneven articulating surfaces, present almost insurmountable obstacles

to luxations laterally. Whence it follows, that luxation backward is

much more frequent than the others; compared to lateral luxations, it

is, at least, in the proportion of ten to one: with luxations forward,

no comparison can be made; neither Petit nor Desault having ever met

with such.

6. An external force produces the whole of these luxations, but

according to each, this force must vary. In a fall sideways, suppose

the hand be applied to the ground, with the arm extended, to save the

body. It is evident that the resistance of the ground will tend to make

the bones of the fore-arm pass upwards over the humerus, while the

weight of the body pushing that bone downward and forward, will make it

glide over the coronoid apophysis. Thus, the capsule, being distended

before by the humerus, and behind by the bones of the fore-arm, will

give way in one or the other place, or in both, as Desault observed

in a man, who fell on his side, as he was carrying a heavy load: the

weight of the body increased by the load, had such an effect, that the

bones overlapped each other nearly two inches.

7. It appears from this, that a state of extension is the position

most favourable to a displacement backwards; a doctrine by no means

conformable to that of most practitioners, who consider a state of

flexion as necessary to the accident. But, then, in what direction

should the fall take place, in order that the olecranon may pass

upwards? Applied as it is against the side of the cavity that receives

it when the arm is extended, would not this apophysis prevent such

passage? Whatever may be the mode of displacement, the olecranon, in

passing upward and backward, may incline a little to the one or the

other side.

8. I have already said, that without a fracture of the olecranon, no

luxation forward can occur (5). But what cause can act with sufficient

power on the parts to produce both accidents at the same time? It

would be necessary that a fall which had produced a fracture should

be succeeded by another fall; but in such a case, the fore-arm would

be half-bent, and it is in a state of extension alone (7) that the

luxation can take place.

9. Lateral luxations, that is, luxations at the sides have been divided

into complete, when the two articular ranges of the arm and fore-arm,

have lost their connexion entirely, and incomplete, when only one bone

or one part of a bone has been separated from its natural connexion

with the humerus. But what cause can act with sufficient force to

produce the first kind of luxation, namely, that which is complete? In

such an accident so great would be the extent of the wreck and ruin of

the part, that without doubt amputation would be the only resource.

10. The second kind of lateral displacement is the result of a stroke

which forces violently the extremity of the fore-arm outward or

inward. A footman, says Petit, in falling from a carriage, had his arm

entangled between the spokes of the wheel, and suffered in consequence

a luxation outwards. Another produced one inwardly, by being thrown

from his horse, and falling with his arm under him, on rough ground.

Strokes of this kind may, as that author remarks, vary in a singular

manner. But, in general, in all of them, the fore-arm must represent a

lever of the first kind, where the power acts on the end next the hand;

the resistance being in the joint, and the fulcrum in the middle.

§ III.

A Treatise on Fractures, Luxations, and Other Affections of the Bones · 第 103 / 182 题