85. The insertion (or addition) of a consonant, in such cases as those
mentioned below, is probably always due to some false association or
wrong etymology, but the specific cause often cannot be ascertained;
the added consonant seems to be generally a liquid or a nasal:--
alhọnd_r_e -s ＜ _aliŭnde_: V. L. ✱_aliŭnder_?
co_n_si = _cossi_ ＜ _eccu’ sīc_: analogy of the prefix _co-_
_con-_. Cf. § 76, (1), nf, ns.
enc_l_utge ＜ _incūdĭnem_: cf. French _enclume_.
e_n_gal = _egal_ ＜ _æquālem_: analogy of the prefix _e-_ _en-_.
Cf. § 76, (1), nf, ns.
i_n_vęrn = _ivern_ ＜ _hibĕrnum_: _hi-_ mistaken for the prefix
_in-_; cf. Italian _inverno_, etc.
par_v_en (hence _parvensa_) ＜ _parĕntem_ (_parēre_): analogy of
_ferven_, _serven_, or of _espaven_, _espavensa_, or influence
of _parui_, etc.?
pe_n_chenar ＜ _pectināre_: analogy of _pencheire_, _penchura_?
perd_r_is = _perditz_ ＜ _perdīcem_: progressive assimilation?
Cf. French _perdrix_.
pǫuze_r_ = _pouze_ ＜ _pŏllĭcem_: confusion with _polgar_ ＜
_pollicāre_.
ref_r_eitọr = _refeitor_ ＜ _refectōrium_: association with
_refreidar_ (_freit_).
re_n_linquir = _relinquir_ ＜ _relĭnquĕre_: analogy of _e-_
_en-_; cf. _reforsar_ and French _renforcer_.