5. GROUPS ENDING IN Y.

73. This class contains: 1st, combinations of consonant + y < e̯ or

i̯, cf. § 40, (2); 2d, consonant + g´ > y (§ 55, G), the g´ having

been in some cases always contiguous to the preceding consonant, in

others originally separated from it by a vowel; 3d, consonant + g >

y, the g representing an original c or g between the last two vowels

of a proparoxytone, cf. § 65, G, (3). It does not include dy and gy,

which early became y: see § 65, Y. See § 63, (1). The groups will be

considered in alphabetical order:--

Bry > bry in _ebriācum_ > ebriac (_iure_ is probably French).

βy was early reduced to y in _habeo_ _habeam_ etc. and _dēbeo_ _dēbeam_

etc., partly, no doubt, through the proclitic use of these words,

partly under the influence of _audio_ > ✱_auyo_ _audiam_ > ✱_auya_ and

_video_ > ✱_veyo_ _vĭdeam_ > ✱_veya_; this y, like any other medial

y (§ 65, Y), became džy̆ or remained y: ai (for some reason there

seems to have been no form ✱_ach_), aia; dẹi dẹch, dẹia. Aside from

these words, βy > udž and uy apparently in the north; elsewhere uy,

by, vy--uy prevailing in the west, by and vy in the south and east.

When the y became final, it changed to i, which, after a consonant,

was syllabic. Ex.: _abbrĕviat_ > abręuia, ✱_aggrĕviat_ > agrẹuia,

_allĕviat_ > alęuia, _avĭŏ́lum_ > aviǫl aiǫl, _cavĕa_ > gabia cauia,

_labia_ > lavia-s, ✱_leviarius_ > leugięrs, ✱_rabiam_ (= _rabiem_) >

rabia rauia,[67] ✱_rabiāre_ > rabiar, _rabiōsus_ > rabiọs rauiọs,

_rŭbeum_ > rọg rọi,[68] ✱_sabium_ > savi sabi, _atavia_ > tavia,

_vidŭvium_ > vezọig bedọi.[68] In purely learned words, Latin _bi_,

_vi_, etc., are kept: _abiurament_, _fluvial_. _Brĕvio_ > bręy: cf. §

65, β, 3.

Cc´y: see C´y.

Cly > l´: _coclearium_ > cuilhięr.

Cty > is: _factiōnem_ > faissọ, _lectiōnem_ > leissọ, _suspectiōnem_

> sospeissọ. In purely learned words we find the spellings _cti_,

_cci_, which doubtless indicate ktsy or ksy: _electio_, _accio_. Cf.

Ssy.

C´y, cc´y, kwy > ts; this ts, when it remained medial, was reduced,

before and during the literary period, to s: _bracchia_ > brassa,

_bracchium_ > bratz bras (§ 64), _faciam_ > faza fassa, _faciem_ > fatz

fas, _glaciem_ > glatz glas[69], _laqueāre_ > lassar, _laqueum_ > latz

las, ✱_pĕcia_ > pęssa, _placeam_ > plassa. Learned words have _zi_ and

_ci_, doubtless pronounced at first dzi, tsi, later zi, si (cf. A.

Horning, _Zs._, XXIV, 545; XXV, 736): _iuzizi iudici, edifici, Grecia_.

Cf. Pty.

D-g > dž: _jūdĭco_ > iütge, _mĕdĭcum_ > męge, ✱_sĕdĭcum_ > sęie[70].

Dy: see § 55, Y and § 65, Y.

Gdy: see § 80, Gd.

Gy: see § 55, Y and § 65, Y.

Kwy: see Cy.

Lc´y > lts > uts > us: _calceāre_ > caussar. Cf. Lty. See § 74, (2).

Lg´ apparently became ldz > udz > uz in ✱_fŭlgĕrem_ (= _fŭlgur_) >

fọuzer.

Ll-g´ > l´ in _cŏllĭgit_ > cuęlh. Cf. Ly.

Lly: see Ly.

Lny > n´: _balneum_ > banh.

Lty > lts >uts > us: ✱_altiāre_ > auçar aussar. Cf. Lc´y. See § 74, (2).

Lvy > lby > uby in _salvia_ > saubia (Gascon).

Ly, lly > l´: _consĭlium_ > cossẹlh, _fīlium_ > filh, _fīlia_ > filha,

_nūllī_ + vowel > nülh. Learned words have _li_: _familiarmens_. _Lili_

_liri_ _lire_ < _līlium_ are doubtless learned; _lis_ is French.

Mby > mby, mdž, and ndž; mdž being the usual form in the literary

language: _cambiāre_ > camiar caniar cambiar.

Mmy > my, mdž, and ndž: _commeātus_ > comiatz coniatz.

Mny > n´ in Limousin and in the extreme east and southwest, elsewhere

ndž: _somniāre_ > sonhar soniar. _Somni_, beside _suenh_ _songe_, is

learned.

Mply > mply in _ampliāre_ > ampliar, probably learned.

My > my and n´: _sīmia_ > simia, _vindēmia_ > vendẹmia vendanha.

Nc´y > nts > ns: ✱_Francia_ > Fransa. Cf. Nty.

Nd-g > ndž: ✱_pĕndĭcat_ > penia, _vĭndĭco_ > vẹnie. Similarly

_mandūcāre_ > ✱_mandugare_ _manduyare_ _mandyare_ > maniar[71].

Ndy > n´: ✱_Burgŭndia_ > Borgọnha, _verecŭndia_ > vergọnha.

N-g > ndž: ✱_excommĭnĭco_ (= _excommūnĭco_) > escomẹnie[71],

_mŏnăchum_ > monie.

Ng´ > n´ and ndž: _jŭngĕre_ > iọnher iọnger, _ŭngĕre_ > ọnher

ọnger, _plangĕre_ > planher planger, _pŭngĕre_ > pọnher pọnger.

_Angel_ is probably learned.

Ng´y > ndž: _spŏngia_ > esponia.

Nny > n´: _stanneum_ > estanh.

Nty > nts > us: _cantiōnem_ > cansọ, _comĭn(i)tiāre_ > comensar,

_sperantia_ > esperansa. Purely learned words have _nti_: _essentia_.

Cf. Nc´y.

Ny > n´: _extraneum_ > estranh, _tĕneo_ > tenh, _vĕniat_ > venha.

Before or during the literary period final n´ or n´s lost its palatal

quality in many dialects: _ingĕnium_ > genh gen. If _estraniar_ comes

from _extraneāre_ (and not from ✱_extranicāre_), it must be a word of

later adoption; so _estrangier_. In _sotran_ < _subterraneum_ there is

probably a change of suffix.

Pry probably became regularly bry: _capreŏlum_ > ✱cabriǫl cabirǫl

(cabrǫl seems to be a new formation from _cabra_). _Coyre_ <? _cŭpreum_

is unexplained.

Pty > ts, which, when it remained medial, was reduced, before and

during the literary period, to s: ✱_captiāre_ > cassar, ✱_corrŭptiāre_

> corrossar, _nĕptia_ > nęssa, ✱_nŏptias_ (§ 38, 2) > nǫssas. Cf. C´y.

Py remained py in the west and a part of the south, and elsewhere

became ptš, later tš: _apium_ > ache api, ✱_apprŏpiat_ (< _prŏpe_) >

aprǫpcha aprǫcha aprǫpia, _sapiam_ > sapcha sacha sapia, _sapiĕntem_

> sachent sapient, _sēpia_ > sẹpia. _Asabentar_ is from sabẹn.

_Piion_ < _pipiōnem_ is French. Learned words have _pi_: _copia_; but

_mancĭpium_ > _mancip massip_.

Rc´y > rts (> rs?): _urceŏ́lum_ (_Zs._, XXVI, 668) > orzǫl.

Rdy > rdz: ✱_dis-tardiat_ > destarza. Ordi = _hŏrdeum_ is perhaps from

the genitive _hŏrdeī_, as in _tres modii hordei_, etc.

R-g > rdž: _clĕrĭcus_ > clęries.

Rg´ > rdž and rdz (> rz): _argĕntum_ > argen, ✱_burgē(n)sis_ > borgẹs

borzẹs (also _borgues_, under the influence of _borc_), ✱_dē-ērĭgit_

> dẹrs, ✱_dē-ē(i)gĕre_ > dẹrzer (also _derdre_: § 71), _sŭrgĕre_ >

sọrger sọrzer, _sŭrgit_ > sọrtz.

Rny > rn´: ✱_Arvĕrnium_ > Alvęrnhe.

Rr-g > rdž: ✱_carrĭcat_ > caria.

Rry > ir: _porrum_ > ✱_porreum_ > poyre; but ✱_horrearium_? > orgięr

(cf. Körting).

Rt-g > rdž and rts (> rs): ✱_excŏrtĭcat_ > escǫria escǫrsa.

Rty > rts > rs ✱_fortiāre_ > forsar, _tĕrtium_ > tęrz tęrs. _Convercio_

is learned.

Rvy > rvy rby: ✱_cĕrvia_ > cervia cerbia.

Ry > r´, which developed into ir when it remained medial, but became

r at the end of a word[72]: ✱_exclariāre_ > esclairar, ✱_donatōria_

> donadọira, ✱_fĕria_ > fęira fięira, _fĕriat_ > fęira, _matĕria_

> madęira, ✱_mŏriat_ > mǫira, _primaria_ > premęira premięira (§

23, 1), ✱_punitōria_ > punidọira, _varia_ > vaira, _variāre_ >

vairar; ✱_a(u)gūrium_ > aür, _cŏrium_ > cuęr, ✱_donatōrium_ >

donadọr, _impĕrium_ > empięr, _mĭnistĕrium_ > mestięr, ✱_mŏrio_ >

mǫr muęr, _monastĕrium_ > mostięr (§ 45, 3), _primarius_ > premięrs,

✱_punitōrius_ > punidọrs. If the ry is preceded by au, it apparently

remains unchanged: _Auriācum_ > Auriac (_Zs._, XXVII, 559). Learned

words have _ri_: _bori_ < _ebŏreum_, _contrari_.

1. Adjectives in _-er_ (_-ier_) and _-or_, coming from _-arium_

and _-ōrium_, regularly have feminines in _-eira_ (_-ieira_)

and _-oira_. By the analogy of the masculine, there is a

feminine in _-era_ in parts of the west; by the analogy of the

feminine, there is a masculine in _-eir_ in Auvergne. The i of

_vair_ probably comes from the feminine _vaira_ and from the

verb _vairar_. The noun _feira_ sometimes becomes _fiera_ like

a feminine adjective.

Sc´y: see Ssy.

Ssy, sc´y, sty > s´, which in most of the territory became is, but

in the west and the extreme east developed into i(t)š and (t)š:

✱_bassiāre_ > baissar baichar bachar, ✱_angŭstia_ > engọissa,

✱_ingrŏssiat_ > engruęissa, _fascia_ > faissa, ✱_grassiāre_ > graissar,

_pŏstea_ > puęissas pueih püch, _ūstium_ > üis.

Sty: see Ssy.

Sy > z´, which in most of the territory became iz, but in parts of the

northeast, north, and west developed into i(d)ž and (d)ž, and in some

scattered dialects gave y and z: _basium_ > bais bai (§ 63), _basiare_

> baisar baiiar baiar bayar basar, _quasi_ + vowel > cais quaish,

_camisia_ (cf. _Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie_, XII, 265) >

camiza, _cerĕsea_ (_Einf._, § 103) > ciręiza cirięiia cerięya cerięza,

_ma(n)siōnem_ > maisọn maiiọn maiọn mayọ, _occasiōnem_ > ochaizọ,

_pre(hen)siōnem_ > preisọ (cf. enpreyọna, ‘imprisons’), _quĭd se_ +

vowel > quẹis, Ger. _sazjan_ > saisir, _to(n)siōnem_ > toisọ.

T-g > dž: ✱_coratĭcum_ > corage, ✱_paratĭcum_ > parage, _viaticum_ >

viatie. For _messatgue_, etc., see § 65, (3).

Try apparently became ir: _atrium_? > aire, _arbĭtrium_ > albire.

Tty > ts > s: ✱_plattĕa_ > plassa.

Ty > apparently t´ > d´ > generally d´z´,[73] which in most of the west

and north became dz, but in the south and east developed into idz; dz

and idz, when they remained medial, were reduced, before and during

the literary period, to z and iz: ✱_altĭtia_ > altẹza, ✱_bellĭtia_

> belẹza, _malĭtia_ > malẹza, _pigrĭtia_ > perẹza, ✱_prĕtiat_ >

pręza, ✱_rikĭtia_ > riquẹza; _palatium_ > palatz palaitz palais (§

64), _pŭteum_ > pọtz püis, _prĕtium_ > prętz pręs, _solatium_ > solatz

solas; _potiōnem_ > pozọn poizọn, ✱_pretiāre_ > prezar, _ratiōnem_

> razọ raizọn, _s(t)atiōnem_ > sazọ saizọn. The forms without i

prevail in the literary language, and in words in which the dz comes

after the accent (especially in the ending -ẹza) they seem to have

encroached largely upon the ground of the others.[74] According to

some philologists, the development of ty differed according to its

position before or after the accent: for a brief bibliography of the

discussion, see _Zs._, XXVII, 689. In learned words we find _zi_,

_ci_, _çi_, _ti_: _estimatio_, _iustizia_ _-icia_ _-ecia_ _-eçia_,

_natio_ _nacio_, _negoci_, _servizi_ _-ici_ (cf. A. Horning, Zs., XXIV,

545, XXV, 736, XXXI, 200).

1. _Palai_ (beside _palatz_ _-aitz_ _-ais_) may have been made

from _palais_ (used by Bertran de Born and in _Flamenca_) by

dropping the s which was regarded as an inflectional ending.

It was perhaps influenced by such words as _bais_ _bai_: cf.

Sy. A clerical Latin ✱_palasium_, however, would account, not

only for _palai_ _palais_, but also for French _palais_ and for

Italian _palagio_.

2. Modern _poijon_ (Alps) and _rajo_ (Limousin) have perhaps

followed the analogy of such words as _maison_ _maijon_

_majon_: cf. Sy.

3. _Escoisson_ < _excŭtiunt_ seems to follow ✱_escois_

< _excŭtio_. It was perhaps influenced by _conoisson_ <

_co(g)nōscunt_.

4. Some of the modern western dialects have d in _radon_,

_sadon_, etc. = _razo_, _sazo_, etc.

An Outline of the Phonology and Morphology of Old Provençal · 第 51 / 139 题