TABLE 2.—NOVEMBER, 1903.

+-------------------+----+-------+----+------++----+-------+----+------+

| | | | | Var. || | | | Var. |

| Name. |Date| Avg. |M.V.| from ||Date| Avg. |M.V.| from |

| | | | | G.A. || | | | G.A. |

+-------------------+----+-------+----+------++----+-------+----+------+

|I. Coffman | 6 | 303.7 |37.9| 87.6 || 20 | 215.9 |22.8| 0.5 |

|II. Henderson | 5 | 248.5 |72.9| 47.4 || 19 | 198.2 |22.0| 2.9 |

|III. Loewenthal | 13 | 190.1 |23.7| 34.6 || 30 | 229.7 |37.4| 5.0 |

|IV. Morris | | | | || 25 | 248.6 |45.0| 17.2 |

|V. Oakman | 10 | 185.9 |13.9| 32.0 || 24 | 212.1 |21.9| 5.8 |

|VI. Sliney | 12 | 200.1 |25.3| 11.0 || 26 | 209.2 |24.6| 3.3 |

|VII. Steltz | 10 | 203.2 |45.7| 15.1 || 24 | 163.8 |31.4| 24.3 |

|VIII. Zooman | 5 | 192.0 |29.2| 22.9 || 19 | 183.8 |23.4| 31.1 |

|IX. Fritz | 2 | 240.1 |17.3| 19.5 || 17 | 204.8 |18.2| 15.8 |

|X. Broyles | | | | || 17 | 184.7 |23.0| 3.2 |

|XI. Cohn | | | | || 23 | 279.1 |50.7| 70.3 |

+-------------------+----+-------+----+------++----+-------+----+------+

|Group average | | | | || | 211.8 | | |

+-------------------+----+-------+----+------++----+-------+----+------+

+-------------------+----+-------+----+------+

| | | | | Var. |

| Name. |Date| Avg. |M.V.| from |

| | | | | G.A. |

+-------------------+----+-------+----+------+

|I. Coffman | | | | |

|II. Henderson | | | | |

|III. Loewenthal | | | | |

|IV. Morris | | | | |

|V. Oakman | | | | |

|VI. Sliney | | | | |

|VII. Steltz | | | | |

|VIII. Zooman | | | | |

|IX. Fritz | 30 | 223.8 |52.3| 3.2 |

|X. Broyles | | | | |

|XI. Cohn | | | | |

+-------------------+----+-------+----+------+

|Group average | | | | |

+-------------------+----+-------+----+------+

Physiological economy in nutrition, with special reference to the minimal proteid requirement of the healthy man an experimental study · 第 183 / 237 题