SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 102, Art. 2]

Whether the Ceremonial Precepts Have a Literal Cause or Merely a

Figurative Cause?

Objection 1: It would seem that the ceremonial precepts have not a

literal, but merely a figurative cause. For among the ceremonial

precepts, the chief was circumcision and the sacrifice of the paschal

lamb. But neither of these had any but a figurative cause: because

each was given as a sign. For it is written (Gen. 17:11): "You shall

circumcise the flesh of your foreskin, that it may be a sign of the

covenant between Me and you": and of the celebration of the Passover

it is written (Ex. 13:9): "It shall be as a sign in thy hand, and as

a memorial before thy eyes." Therefore much more did the other

ceremonial precepts have none but a figurative reason.

Obj. 2: Further, an effect is proportionate to its cause. But all the

ceremonial precepts are figurative, as stated above (Q. 101, A. 2).

Therefore they have no other than a figurative cause.

Obj. 3: Further, if it be a matter of indifference whether a certain

thing, considered in itself, be done in a particular way or not, it

seems that it has not a literal cause. Now there are certain points

in the ceremonial precepts, which appear to be a matter of

indifference, as to whether they be done in one way or in another:

for instance, the number of animals to be offered, and other such

particular circumstances. Therefore there is no literal cause for the

precepts of the Old Law.

_On the contrary,_ Just as the ceremonial precepts foreshadowed

Christ, so did the stories of the Old Testament: for it is written (1

Cor. 10:11) that "all (these things) happened to them in figure." Now

in the stories of the Old Testament, besides the mystical or

figurative, there is the literal sense. Therefore the ceremonial

precepts had also literal, besides their figurative causes.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), the reason for whatever

conduces to an end must be taken from that end. Now the end of the

ceremonial precepts was twofold: for they were ordained to the Divine

worship, for that particular time, and to the foreshadowing of

Christ; just as the words of the prophets regarded the time being in

such a way as to be utterances figurative of the time to come, as

Jerome says on Osee 1:3. Accordingly the reasons for the ceremonial

precepts of the Old Law can be taken in two ways. First, in respect

of the Divine worship which was to be observed for that particular

time: and these reasons are literal: whether they refer to the

shunning of idolatry; or recall certain Divine benefits; or remind

men of the Divine excellence; or point out the disposition of mind

which was then required in those who worshipped God. Secondly, their

reasons can be gathered from the point of view of their being

ordained to foreshadow Christ: and thus their reasons are figurative

and mystical: whether they be taken from Christ Himself and the

Church, which pertains to the allegorical sense; or to the morals of

the Christian people, which pertains to the moral sense; or to the

state of future glory, in as much as we are brought thereto by

Christ, which refers to the anagogical sense.

Reply Obj. 1: Just as the use of metaphorical expressions in

Scripture belongs to the literal sense, because the words are

employed in order to convey that particular meaning; so also the

meaning of those legal ceremonies which commemorated certain Divine

benefits, on account of which they were instituted, and of others

similar which belonged to that time, does not go beyond the order of

literal causes. Consequently when we assert that the cause of the

celebration of the Passover was its signification of the delivery

from Egypt, or that circumcision was a sign of God's covenant with

Abraham, we assign the literal cause.

Reply Obj. 2: This argument would avail if the ceremonial precepts

had been given merely as figures of things to come, and not for the

purpose of worshipping God then and there.

Reply Obj. 3: As we have stated when speaking of human laws (Q. 96,

AA. 1, 6), there is a reason for them in the abstract, but not in

regard to particular conditions, which depend on the judgment of

those who frame them; so also many particular determinations in the

ceremonies of the Old Law have no literal cause, but only a

figurative cause; whereas in the abstract they have a literal cause.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 662 / 746 题