SEVENTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 31, Art. 7]

Whether Any Pleasure Is Not Natural?

Objection 1: It would seem that no pleasure is not natural. For

pleasure is to the emotions of the soul what repose is to bodies. But

the appetite of a natural body does not repose save in a connatural

place. Neither, therefore, can the repose of the animal appetite,

which is pleasure, be elsewhere than in something connatural.

Therefore no pleasure is non-natural.

Obj. 2: Further, what is against nature is violent. But "whatever is

violent causes grief" (Metaph. v, 5). Therefore nothing which is

unnatural can give pleasure.

Obj. 3: Further, the fact of being established in one's own nature,

if perceived, gives rise to pleasure, as is evident from the

Philosopher's definition quoted above (A. 1). But it is natural to

every thing to be established in its nature; because natural movement

tends to a natural end. Therefore every pleasure is natural.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. vii, 5, 6) that some

things are pleasant "not from nature but from disease."

_I answer that,_ We speak of that as being natural, which is in

accord with nature, as stated in _Phys._ ii, 1. Now, in man, nature

can be taken in two ways. First, inasmuch as intellect and reason is

the principal part of man's nature, since in respect thereof he has

his own specific nature. And in this sense, those pleasures may be

called natural to man, which are derived from things pertaining to

man in respect of his reason: for instance, it is natural to man to

take pleasure in contemplating the truth and in doing works of

virtue. Secondly, nature in man may be taken as contrasted with

reason, and as denoting that which is common to man and other

animals, especially that part of man which does not obey reason. And

in this sense, that which pertains to the preservation of the body,

either as regards the individual, as food, drink, sleep, and the

like, or as regards the species, as sexual intercourse, are said to

afford man natural pleasure. Under each kind of pleasures, we find

some that are _not natural_ speaking absolutely, and yet _connatural_

in some respect. For it happens in an individual that some one of the

natural principles of the species is corrupted, so that something

which is contrary to the specific nature, becomes accidentally

natural to this individual: thus it is natural to this hot water to

give heat. Consequently it happens that something which is not

natural to man, either in regard to reason, or in regard to the

preservation of the body, becomes connatural to this individual man,

on account of there being some corruption of nature in him. And this

corruption may be either on the part of the body--from some ailment;

thus to a man suffering from fever, sweet things seem bitter, and

vice versa--or from an evil temperament; thus some take pleasure in

eating earth and coals and the like; or on the part of the soul; thus

from custom some take pleasure in cannibalism or in the unnatural

intercourse of man and beast, or other such things, which are not in

accord with human nature.

This suffices for the answers to the objections.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 222 / 746 题