CHAPTER X.

_Nineteenth Volunteer Battalion. Statement of occurrences which

does not correspond with the official report of Colonel Peacocke,

and historical narrative of Major Denison._

The nineteenth battalion of volunteers comprises the St. Catharines

and Thorold companies. It is commanded by Lieut.-Col. the Hon. J. C.

Currie, member of the legislative council. St. Catharines is situated

about twelve miles from Clifton Suspension Bridge, both on G. W.

Railway. Chippewa is five miles higher on Niagara shore with railway

connection, the Erie and Ontario line. Col. Peacocke says, (official

reports)

“On arriving at St. Catharines (about 4 p. m.) I received telegrams

to the effect that the Fenians about 800 strong, were marching on

Suspension Bridge and were two or three miles from Chippewa.”

I am informed, for the object of this full and true account of

the Fenian Invasion, and enabled on authority the most reliable,

to remark on Major Denison’s history, that he says nothing about

the fact that until about 8 p. m., Friday, June 1, the village of

Chippewa and important bridges were entirely unprotected. At 10 a.

m. on Friday, ten hours sooner, the St. Catharines 19th volunteers,

under Lieut.-Col. Currie, could have easily been there 450 strong.

It is now asked, why were they not sent there instead of the men

kicking their heels on the street until half past 9 p. m.? The 19th

at that hour, a day wasted, left St. Catharines with the detachment

of 47th and 10th Royals, for Clifton (Suspension Bridge) and could

have reached Chippewa that night at half past 11 o’clock. But instead

of that being done they remained at Clifton in the cars until 4 a.

m. next day. “Had they been allowed to go up the night before, the

whole force under Colonel Peacocke could have left Chippewa at 3 or 4

a. m. on Saturday, and by going the direct road, would have reached

Stevensville by 7 a. m. with ease.” [Letter from the 19th.]

As to the delay at Chippewa to enable the volunteers to breakfast

[see Col. P.’s Rep. and extracts just given from Major Denison], it

is stated on behalf of the 19th, that they did not take breakfast

until they reached New Germany. There they partook of their own

supplies, and shared them with both the royals and regulars.

At noon they reached New Germany and there _remained until after 6 p.

m._ Col. Peacocke says he left this place at 4 p. m. Major Denison

says Col. Peacocke at about 4 p. m. had positive intelligence, of the

Fenians falling back on Fort Erie. “He immediately made arrangements

to move in pursuit. _It was about half past 5_, when he started from

New Germany.” And then says Major D. “Had this delay not occurred the

Fenians in all probability could not have escaped.” Which delay? does

he mean the time that elapsed between noon and 4 p. m.? or the time

lost after 4 p. m.? He says: “it was particularly unfortunate that

Col. Peacocke had not decided to move on Fort Erie three hours or so

sooner.” On behalf of the Volunteer 19th it is said, the whole force

remained at New Germany until after 6 p. m. “I cannot understand why

we delayed unless Col. P. waited for reinforcements (see Lowry’s

report.)” Looking to Col. Lowry’s report it does appear that Col.

P. had telegraphed for assistance, and additional force arrived at

New Germany after he had left. The superintendent of G. W. Railway

told Col. L. at Hamilton, that Col. P. had twice telegraphed for

reinforcements.

It may be reasonably suggested on behalf of Col. Peacocke, that at

New Germany he neither knew the force of the Fenians, nor where they

were, nor whether they had been augmented in strength by artillery.

As it was, they had on that morning, though unknown to any British

commander, from forty to fifty horses. They had cavalry men also, but

no cavalry accoutrements. The critics of Col. Peacocke are writing

after the time and the occurrences when all is known. It is easy in

that case to say what should have been done. But this suggestion

only covers the time from 12 noon to 4 p. m. Why the loss of ninety

minutes (Denison) or over two hours (authority of 19th) before

starting when the locality of the Fenians became known at 4 p. m.

But the other question raised by the letter from the 19th battalion

is more serious. Why were the forces, (they were all night in the

cars at Clifton only five miles off,) not at Chippewa to advance to

Stevensville at 3 or 4 a. m.? The delay for breakfast was meant well,

but no breakfast rewarded the delay, at least for the 19th. None of

these authorities tell why. Let me. The delay was for breakfast;

the marching to New Germany without breakfast was from want of camp

kettles to cook it. These were not up in time. The government was at

fault. The St. Catharines authority says:

At pp. 52, 53, Major Denison gives the cause of our halt when

within two and a half miles of Fort Erie. I have undeniable

authority for saying that there were really no Fenians in the woods

there referred to, nor had there been any for twenty-four hours

before.

These woods were on Lots 8 and 9, R. and W. Bowens, fifth concession

of Bertie. The Fenians had been on Newbigging’s farm less than two

miles distant until the midnight preceding and entrenched there as

related in this work. Col. Peacocke not knowing their number and

resources was right in being cautious now that night had come. Yet,

again, Why so late in getting there? The writer continues: “I do not

deny that he and his troop (Denison) saw some men. But they were

people of our own, who accompanied us to see the expected fight. This

halt was most unfortunate. Then, as to the positions of the troops at

page 54, he commits other errors.

“The 19th were the only men in line on the left of the road; but were

covered by a company of the 16th, regulars, and by No. 7 of the 19th,

as advanced skirmishers.” The statement of Major Denison is: “The

19th battalion, Lieut.-Col. Currie took up a similar position [in

line] on the left of the road; in the rear of the 16th.”

There was a small creek close in front, and at a mile farther,

Frenchman’s creek; both crossing Col. P’s line of march. “At this

time,” says Major Denison, p. 54. “While I was close beside Col.

Peacocke, a voice in the dark, said, ‘you can’t go down that way,

sir.’ On looking closely we saw that it was a farmer living about

a quarter of a mile back, who had given us some information as we

passed. Col. Peacocke asked him; ‘Why not?’ He answered, ‘The bridge

is broken.’ The Colonel questioned him closely and he adhered to it

positively that we could not get through. This information, together

with the inability for the skirmishers to make their way through

the woods (these were tangled bush and logs, the ground marshy and

wet, p. 53). This decided Colonel Peacocke. With that report of a

broken bridge; with darkness of night set in; with uncertainty of his

enemy’s place and strength; with the possibility of an ambush in the

woods, or at the broken bridge, he was fully justified in remaining

as he did until daylight.”

The reader will keep in mind that the blame laid on this commander

for that halt implies that he thereby permitted the Fenians to

escape. This is no light charge. But the graver charge of his not

advancing from Chippewa at 3 or 4 a. m. so as to reach Stevensville

at 7 remains as the gentleman of the 19th has put it.

In Major Denison’s account of the line of march taken, and as Col.

Peacocke related to me personally when in conversation at Fort Erie,

there arose several circumstances of hinderance. There was the bad

and devious road taken by the river side instead of the better and

shorter direct way, through his relying on advisers and informants

who seem to have led him up the river side to Black Creek, around

windings and out of the way in order to drive the Fenians from

their properties, or prevent their coming upon them. Mr. Tupper, a

government constable resident at Fort Erie, has since told me that

he was sent to inform Col. Peacocke and conduct him from Chippewa,

but that his service was not accepted. Tupper says that Mr. Street M.

P. P. told the Col. that he was an official person and reliable. But

after seeing him at Fort Erie that officer had no recollection of him

at Chippewa. Major Denison remarking on the unreliability of persons

offering to be guides, relates that one bustling person, talking on

Friday night at Chippewa told what he could accomplish in taking a

message to Port Colborne if he had a horse. He was furnished with

a horse, and the message committed to his care; what did he do? He

rode to the Fenians, gave them the message and the horse too; himself

also, perhaps, for he never again turned up.

We are now sufficiently informed on the aspect which the campaign

presented on the morning of 2nd June; at Chippewa, where delay was

caused because volunteer militia had come without haversacks without

food; at Ridgeway, where Col, Booker had arrived an hour before the

time he should have been leaving Colborne; at Henry Angur’s farm,

where the Fenian commander O’Neil had halted his force, while he sent

scouts forward to see if British and Canadian troops were approaching

in his direction.—With this sufficiency of information let us catch

up to the gallant eight hundred sons of Toronto and Hamilton, cities;

Caledonia and York villages, and march in their footsteps to the

field of conflict.

Narrative of the Fenian invasion of Canada · 第 8 / 13 章