6681. I see that some women make home-spun tweed?-Yes

6682. Do you purchase a quantity of that also?-Yes.

6683. Is it also paid for in goods?-No; it is paid for in cash if

required.

6684. But at a cash price?-Yes.

6685. In this case [showing] it was entered in the book?-Yes.

6686. Was that because the party wanted goods, or was there any

particular reason for it?-She was not sure when she gave the

tweed, whether she might require the whole of it in goods. She

wanted meal, I think, and some other goods.

6687. Are your dealings in cloth with the people the country very

extensive?-I buy a good deal of it occasionally, when the trade is

brisk.

6688. Is it paid for regularly in cash?-Yes.

6689. Do your purchases of it not appear in this book?-There

may be some of them there.

6690. But are the majority of your purchases of that sort of cloth

entered here?-Possibly they may appear in the men's ledger more

frequently, unless when the cloth is bought over the counter.

6691. If it is paid for in cash, why does it appear in any ledger?-

What is paid for cash does not appear in any ledger.

6692. Does it not appear in your day-book?-No, it does not enter

our day-book. We just buy it the same as we buy any hosiery. For

instance, if a girl brings it in, she may require the value of it in

goods; that is a separate transaction, finished at once, and there is

no more trace of it.

6693. Is the cloth almost all of the same quality?-It is all very

much the same.

6694. Do you ticket each web at the time when you take it in?-

Yes.

6695. Then I understand you to say, that the great bulk of your

dealings in cloth are cash transactions?-Yes, I think the bulk of

them, or they are settled for at the time in goods.

6696. Is tea a very usual article for the knitters to take out their

payments in?-I think it is. They often take tea.

6697. Have you known any cases in which the goods or tea so

obtained for hosiery were sold or disposed of for cash?-I think I

have not.

6698. It is probably not so necessary for them to do so when they

can get provisions for their hosiery, as when they are only paid in

soft goods?-Perhaps not; but it is not very likely I would learn

that that was done, even if it was the case.

6699. When a woman has sold you some hosiery goods or cloth,

and does not want goods in exchange to the full value at the time,

is it the practice in your shop to issue any line or acknowledgment

for the balance?-I believe that is done occasionally.

6700. Is the line in the form of an order to credit the bearer with so

much in goods?-Yes.

6701. Are these lines or vouchers generally brought back by the

party to whom they were given?-I think so.

6702. Are they ever brought back by another?-I think not;

because we know all the people, and they could not impose on

us in that way.

6703. But if the party to whom the line was issued had handed

it over for a consideration to another party, that would be no

imposition upon you?-No; but still we would know whether it

was done or not, that is to say, we would suspect something amiss.

If it was presented by another person than one of the woman's own

family, we would naturally suppose there was something

suspicious about it.

6704. Do these lines bear to be payable to any particular person?-

Yes; we always mention in them the name of the person who has

sold us the goods. However, it is perhaps right to state that that is

not very much practised in our shop.

6705. I think you said there were not many little shops in this

district?-There are a few. Arthur Harrison has a shop within two

miles of me; Laurence Smith has a shop within three miles; and

Jack Anderson has a shop within five miles to the westward.

6706. Are all these on the Busta estate?-Yes. Jack Anderson

rents a booth belonging to Ollaberry.

6707. Is there any difficulty or any obstruction placed in the way

of small shopkeepers getting premises and carrying on their

business in this district?-There seems not to have been any lately.

When I took a lease of Hillswick, I thought I had an understanding

that Mr. Cheyne was not to put up other places of business in the

district, but there was no sort of agreement about it and that

understanding has not been acted upon.

6708. Do you refer to shops or fish-curing establishments?-Not

fish-curing establishments; there is no restriction upon them.

6709. Any person may set up a business of that sort?-I think so.

6710. You have been present and heard the whole of the evidence

that has been given to-day: is there any part of it with regard to

which you wish to make any statement or contradiction?-There is

nothing that I am aware of.

6711. Are you an agent for the Shipwrecked Mariners' Society?-I

am.

6712. Do most of your fishermen subscribe to that society?-A

good many of them do.

6713. Is their annual subscription debited to them in their

account?-Yes, very frequently.

6714. When they have anything to get from the society, how is that

payment settled with them?-That I daresay depends very much

upon their own wishes.

6715. Does it depend to any extent on the fact, whether or not they

are indebted to you at the time?-I don't think it does generally.

6716. But it may sometimes?-It may sometimes.

6717. That is to say, supposing a man who loses his boat has a sum

to receive in cash from the society, which passes through your

hands, it may be written down to square off your account?-No. It

may be entered to his credit in the account; but I think, if the

matter was searched into, it would be found that in that case it was

to square off for some boat he had got before, and which he had

not paid for.

6718. And not his ordinary shop account?-No.

6719. Therefore, you say that you would retain the money if he

was in debt to you for a boat?-Yes.

6720. But you would not retain it if he was only in debt to you for

shop goods?-I think not.

6721. What is your reason for making that distinction?-I think it

is nothing but simple justice to myself. It would certainly be very

unreasonable for a man to get remuneration for a boat from the

Shipwrecked Fishermen's Society while the same boat was

standing unpaid for in my books.

6722. Would the same principle not apply to the case of an

account which a man owed to you?-No doubt the man would be

entitled to pay me that account; but I would certainly consider it a

great hardship if I had to pay that money over to a man who had an

account standing due in my books for the very boat for the loss of

which the money was given.

6723. Have you ever had any dispute with the fishermen about the

payment of that money, or any complaints that it was not settled

for in cash?-I don't think I have, within my recollection. I think

there was one man who said something about it at one time; but

after I had showed to him what I considered to be the justice of the

matter, I fancied he was satisfied, and never heard any more about

it.

6724. What is the other book you have brought with you?-It is a

boat-book, merely for entries relating to the boats.

6725. How are the boat-builders paid? Do they run accounts with

you in the same way as the fishermen?-I think so.

6726. Are they paid by weekly wages?-No; they are paid so

much for building a boat.

6727. What does their contract generally amount to?-We furnish

the wood, and merely pay them for [Page 163] their work. I think

we generally pay £3 for the work on a six-oared boat.

6728. When you enter into a contract for the building of a boat,

does the man open an account, or is it generally the case that he

has an account already running?-The builder I employ generally

has an account running.

6729. Are his family and himself supplied with goods from your

shop from time to time?-Only occasionally. I think the boats are

paid for mostly in cash. Probably he would get a few pounds from

me if he was requiring them, and then he would come and build

boats for me afterwards.

6730. Are the boat-builders a class of men by themselves, who

work at nothing else?-Yes.

6731. Do they travel about the country?-Yes.

6732. Are they not employed by you all the year round?-No.

6733. Then, they generally get an advance of money from you

before they begin work for you?-I don't say generally, but I say

the particular builder I employ has done that sometimes.

6734. So that, when his boat is finished, he has generally nothing

to get?-No; he has something to get still, because he is building

more than one at a time.

6735. But during the time he is building them, he has an account at

your shop for necessaries to his family?-Yes.

6736. What is the other book you have there?-It is a ledger for

the purpose of entering anything into-goods supplied to a family.

6737. Are these the families of your fishermen?-Yes; or it may

be others that we intend to have short accounts.

6738. But these accounts are only for goods supplied: there is

nothing entered that is due to them?-No.

6739. The other side of the account is not in this book at all?-No.

6740. And the fishermen's ledger is quite different?-Yes.

6741. It is a large book?-Yes.

6742. Is there a separate ledger for beach boys and men employed

in fish-curing?-Yes.

6743. Is there also a separate ledger for the kelp women?-No;

their accounts are entered in the women's book unless they are

paid right off.

6744. Show me the account of one of these kelp women in the

women's book: take Mrs. Hughson?-I don't think she ever had

anything to get, and therefore we would not enter her name in the

book.

6745. Take Maria Sandison, who was spoken of today?-I think

her account was kept on a slip of paper or in a small book, until

they got it squared off, and then it was entered.

6746. I see there is nothing about kelp in her account?-No, I

fancy it was just paid off at the time.

6747. Is there anything else you wish to say?-It has been asserted

that the fish-curers paid no cash, and that scarcely a coin passed

between the curer and the fisherman. That was said before the

Truck Commissioners in Edinburgh. Now, I would wish to show

what amount of cash I have paid since I began to settle this year. I

think the cash I paid during the settling time in November and

December last amounted to £1006.

6748. What was it in previous years?-I cannot tell for every year;

but I know that for the whole year, in 1866, I paid £1811 in cash,

and in 1870 I paid £2040. I think the highest I paid to one man

this season was £24, 7s. 9d. in cash at settlement.

6749. Was that much higher than the average?-It must have been

higher. Perhaps I may be allowed to say also, that I think the great

bar to improvement in Shetland is the want of leases. In my

opinion, a Land Bill for Shetland-an Act somewhat resembling

the Irish Land Bill-would be very useful, by which all

improvements could be held to belong to the tenant instead of to

the proprietor; because as soon as a tenant here begins to improve

his farm, he is very likely to have his rent raised upon him.

6750. Have you known cases in which the rent has been raised

upon an improving tenant?-Yes. I am not prepared just now to

give names, but I think I have met with several cases of that kind.

6751. What is the bar to the introduction of a system of leases in

Shetland, which, you say, would greatly improve the country?-

There seems to be an unwillingness on the part of the proprietors

to give lease. I have known several parties who have asked for

leases and have not got them.

6752. Has the unwillingness of the proprietors to give leases

anything to do with the fishing?-I don't think it.

6753. On some properties are not yearly tenants under an

obligation to fish, which might be interfered with, or which might

not be so easily enforceable, there were leases?-That shows the

necessity granting leases.

6754. But is not the objection of proprietors to grant leases due to

some extent to the fact, that it would be less easy to enforce the

obligation to fish if leases existed?-Perhaps it is, but even on

those estates where there is no such obligation leases are not

granted.

6755. Is there a general desire on the part of fishermen-farmers in

Shetland to have leases?-I cannot say that exactly. I think there

is such desire in many cases, but then they fear that their rent

would be raised if a lease were granted.

6756. Have there been any cases of leases being granted or offered

in which ground has been given for that apprehension?-I think

so, although I could not name them just now.

6757. Have there been any attempts made recently in Shetland to

introduce leases on a larger scale than they at present exist?-

Not within my knowledge. With regard to the Ollaberry property,

I find there are only 33 out of 71 tenants who fish either to

Anderson & Co. or to me.

6758. Are you aware whether the other 38 tenants fish at all?-

There are some of them who do not fish, but there are others of

them who do, and who are ling fishers. The man Blance who was

examined goes to Faroe and I think another man too.

6759. Do many of them go to Faroe?-No; not many.

6760. They are not obliged to engage with any particular person at

the Faroe fishing?-No.

6761. In the evidence to which you have referred as having been

given in Edinburgh, there is a statement that leases were offered

on a large estate in Delting or in Yell, but that the bulk of the

tenants would not accept of them: do you know the reason of

that?-Because, I suspect, they were suspicious of the factor.

6762. The statement was, 'Ten years was mentioned as the

minimum length of the lease, because the people were frightened

to take leases; but when any one came and asked for a longer

lease, I gave it to him. No one would take a longer lease than

fourteen years, and I have given none longer than fourteen.' Can

you suggest any other reason than that you have named for the

tenants declining leases on these estates?-I think it must have

been because under the leases, all improvements were to be held

to belong to the landlord.

6763. But they belong to the landlord at present?-True; but what

I mean is, that that is the great bar to improvements in Shetland.

6764. Do you think it is possible for a man to improve his land

much who is employed for four or five months in the year

fishing?-I think it is. His time in winter is almost thrown away

at present; but if he had the security of getting the value of his

labour at the end of his lease or on removing, I think he would

work actively and improve his land. There are many, I know, who

have regretted that they could not spend their time in that way.

6765. Is it not possible for a tenant who wants to improve his land

to make some contract with his landlord on the subject?-I have

never been aware of any case where that has been done.

6766. Have you the management of the Ollaberry estate in your

own hands?-Yes.

6767. Have you made any effort to induce the people [Page

164] there to take leases, or offered them compensation for

improvements?-I have not offered them compensation. I could

not do that; but I have told them that the understanding on which

they held their lands was this-that if they made improvements,

either in cultivating the land, keeping up their fences, or repairing

their houses, their rents would not be raised during my lease.

6768. You have only a lease of Ollaberry?-Yes, for nineteen

years.

6769. Has your intimation to the tenants, that their rents would not

be raised if they improved their holdings, had a beneficial

effect?-I think it has in some cases; that is to say, they have kept

up their fences very well, and I know some parties who have added

to their cultivated ground.

6770. Do you think that has been done to a greater extent than

would have been the case if you had held out no such inducement

to them?-I would fancy so.

6771. Is there any other suggestion or statement you wish to

make?-I think not.

Hillswick, Northmavine, January 11, 1872, PETER PETERSON,

examined.

6772. Are you a fisherman at Hillswick?-Not present. I am at

Hillyar now. I live at Hillswick, but I am not fishing there.

6773. Have you got any land?-Yes; a small piece in Hillswick

from Mr. Gifford.

6774. For whom do you fish?-For Mr. Laurence Smith at Hillyar

at present.

6775. Is he a large curer?-No; he has only two boats fishing for

him. I have been fishing for him two years now.

6776. For whom did you fish before?-For Mr. Anderson.

6777. Why did you leave off fishing for him?-I got into debt, and

was refused supplies from him; and, as I could not do without

supplies for my family, I went to another man.

6778. Why would you not pay your debt to Mr. Anderson?-I did

not make a sufficient fishing to pay it, and I had no great means to

work on either: I had no boat.

6779. What was the amount of your debt?-£17, 9s. 5d.

6780. And when it came to that amount, he refused you

supplies?-Yes.

6781. At what time of the year was that?-In the summer time,

during the fishing season.

6782. Did you settle with him at the end of that season?-Yes.

6783. Did you clear off what was due by you at that settlement, or

was there still something due to Mr. Anderson?-£17, 9s. 5d. was

the debt I left when I went away from him. I continued to fish the

season out, and left him when the season was done.

6784. But you made a settlement at the end of the season?-Yes.

6785. What was the result of that settlement?-He made out that I

was due him £17, 9s. 5d, and he summoned me for it.

6786. Did you ask him how much was due at the time when he

stopped the supplies?-No.

6787. Then, the sum you have mentioned was due after he had

allowed you credit for all the fish of that season?-Yes.

6788. So that, at the time when he stopped the supplies, there

would be a larger sum than that due by you?-There may have

been.

6789. Were you asked to engage to fish to him after that?-No.

6790. What was his reason for summoning you?-I don't know. I

was not asked to fish to him again, so that I had to look out for

myself some other way, and I went to Smith and got supplies from

him.

6791. Was there a decree against you in the action in which Mr

Anderson summoned you?-No, I have not got any yet.

6792. Was the case not decided against you?-I don't think it. At

least I left it unsettled in the hands of Mr. Spence, the lawyer,

when I left the town.

6793. Is the case not at an end yet?-I don't know. Mr. Spence

was to give me notice but I have got none yet.

6794. What was the nature of your defence in that case?-I was

not able to pay, and therefore I was forced to appear in Lerwick

before the court. Very likely, if I had been in a good boat the last

season I fished for him, I would have done somewhat better.

6795. But was the debt really due for which you were

summoned?-I did not have any pass-book, and got no copy

of my account, so that I could not say whether it was due or not.

6796. Did you ever ask for a pass-book?-I have asked for copies

of my account.

6797. Did you get them?-At one time I got a copy of my account

for nine years.

6798. Had your debt been running on increasing for nine years?-

It was always increasing.

6799. Have you got these accounts here, or are they in your

lawyer's hands?-They are in Mr. Spence's hands in Lerwick.

6800. How often did you ask for them before you got the accounts

for the nine years?-I asked for them when I was summoned.

6801. Had you ever asked for them before?-Yes; I had asked for

them sometimes, but not every year.

6802. Did you always get them when you asked for them?-No; I

got none until I got the whole at one time.

6803. Why did you not get them when you asked for them?-I

don't know; I never was refused them, but I did not get them.

6804. Were you just put off?-Yes.

6805. Did you fish for Mr. Anderson all the time these accounts

were running up?-Yes. The commencement of the debt was

when I lost a fleet of lines by bad weather. There might have been

a little due before that, but it was very little.

6806. How much do you call a fleet of lines?-Just what the boat

carries. A boat takes 108 lines, and we lost them all except

eighteen. The weather prevented us from taking any more in.

6807. Were these lines hired from Mr. Anderson?-Yes.

6808. Are the fishermen always liable for hired lines which they

lose?-Yes. If they lose lines which they have hired, they have to

pay for them.

6809. What is the value of these lines?-The price is about 2s. 8d.

per line for new lines when they are ready for sea.

6810. Then a fleet of 108 lines would cost about £8 or £10?-I

never give any consideration to what the cost of them might be.

There were some of them old and some of them new; but I think

2s. 8d. was about the price for new lines about that time. The

price varies at different times.

6811. Is not each man of the boat's crew liable for his share of the

lines?-Yes. If there are five men in a boat, then the lines belong

to these men, and they have each to pay their share of the hire for

the season.

6812. In that way, you would be liable only for one-fifth of the

value of the lines?-Yes; only for one-fifth that year.

6813. And that was the beginning of your debt?-Yes; but it was

always going on, as I had a small family, and they were needing

bread. Then interest was charged, and such as that.

6814. Was there any interest charged upon that account?-Yes.

6815. Are you sure of that?-Yes. It is marked down in the copies

that I got.

6816. Did you ever know any man who got the whole of his

accounts for nine years at once except yourself?-No.

6817. Did you ever know a man who asked for them?-No.

[Page 165]

6818. Did you ever know a man who was nine years in debt to a

fish-merchant, with the debt always increasing, except yourself?-

I could not positively say. I could not pick out any particular man;

but very likely there are some who have been in the same position.

6819. During the time your debt was increasing, did you continue

to fish every year for Mr. Anderson?-I was fishing for him the

whole time.

6820. Did you, during that time, sell any of your fish to other

merchants?-I did. The last year I was fishing for him I sold

some fish to others, in order to keep my family alive.

6821. Who did you sell them to that year?-To Mr. Adie's factor.

6822. Was that what you call smuggling fish?-Yes. It was

necessity that made me do it, in order to save my family.

6823. Was any objection made to your selling them?-No. I

told that in court the same as I am telling it to you, and there was

nothing said to me for doing it. I was obliged to do it.

6824. Was it not quite a fair thing for Mr. Anderson to do to

summon you for the debt you were due him?-He did summon

me for it; and when I asked him how it was to be paid, he wanted

me either to pay it down at once or get cautioners for it, but I

could not do either of these things. I perhaps I might have got a

cautioner, but the money I did not have.

6825. Is it usual for a fisherman to get a cautioner when he is a

little in debt?-I don't know; some of them have got one.

6826. But if the man continues to fish for the merchant to whom

the debt is due, is he required to get a cautioner?-No. It is only

when he goes away from the merchant that he is asked for a

cautioner.

6827. Were you bound in any way to fish for Mr. Anderson, or for

any one else, during these nine years?-I suppose I was, from the

way I was in debt to him; but, instead of getting out of debt, the

debt always increased.

6828. Whose fault was that?-I don't know. It was not my fault.

As I have said, the last season I fished for Mr. Anderson I did not

have a boat fit to go to sea with; but very likely, if I had had a good

boat that season, as it was a good year's fishing, I might have got

the debt somewhat reduced. Therefore it was not my fault. I got a

boat from him, but ought to have got one that was fit to go to sea.

6829. Had you not your choice of boat?-I had no choice of a boat

for that season.

6830. Where do you get the supplies for your family now?-From

Laurence Smith, the man I fish to.

6831. Do you settle with him every year?-Yes; I have settled with

him two years now.

6832. Had you something to get in cash last year?-Yes. The first

year I fished for Laurence Smith I had 28s. to get, after paying for

the things I had got from him during the season. This year, when I

settled with him, I was clear. I had nothing to get, or very little.

6833. Were these two good fishing years?-They were very good;

but the fishing is not the same with all the boats. They are not

always equal in the same year.

6834. What was the price of meal at these two stores you have

been dealing with?-It is just up and down, according to the

market-less in one year than another. I think that last year it was

about 21s. per boll in Mr. Smith's store.

6835. Are you told the price at the time you buy the meal?-Yes.

6836. Is the quality of the meal you get there as good as at Mr.

Anderson's?-Yes, it is equally good. Meal and flour are just the

same at the one place as at the other.

6837. Could you get better meal or flour anywhere else?-I don't

know. We would, no doubt, get a different quality in Lerwick, if

we were dealing there.

6838. Have you tried it there?-No.

6839. Are you obliged to take your provisions from the shop of the

merchant you fish for?-I don't know about that. I have asked Mr.

Smith at different times for a few shillings until the end of the

twelvemonth.

6840. Have you got it?-Yes; I got it, but I never asked for any

money to buy meal with, because he brought up stores there to

supply his customers.

6842. But is it understood among the fishermen here that they

ought to take their stores, or part of them, both provisions and

clothing, from the merchant to whom they sell their fish?-That is

generally the way in which they take there.

6842. Are they generally obliged to do that?-No; I don't think

they are obliged to do it.

6843. Can they get cash from the merchants with which to buy

their goods in other places?-I don't know. If the merchant has

meal and other things which they are requiring, and can sell them

as cheap and as good as they can get them at any other place then,

of course, they don't need to ask money from him.

6844. But they generally do get their provisions from the

merchant's shop, and nowhere else?-Yes.

6845. Did you ever ask for cash with which to go and buy your

provisions from another store?-No; but I got an allowance from

Mr. Smith with which to go to Mr. Anderson's factor if he (Mr.

Smith) did not have the things I wanted.

6846. When was that?-I got it in both years when was fishing for

Mr. Smith.

6847. Was that a general allowance or was it given to you on some

particular occasion, when you wanted something?-If there was

anything I required for the fishing, which Mr. Smith did not have,

then I got leave from him to sell fish to another merchant, so that I

might buy it, or I got cash from him with which to buy it from

another.

6848. That, I suppose, was when you wanted any kind of clothing

which he did not keep?-Yes; or a bit of meat, or butter or meal, if

he did not have it. Then he gave us money to buy it with from Mr.

Anderson's, or allowed us to go and sell fish to Mr. Anderson and

to purchase it.

6849. Did you often do that?-Not often.

6850. Your daughter was examined to-day?-Yes.

6851. She works at the kelp?-Yes, a little. She is young yet, and

has not done much to it.

6852. She also knits a little?-Yes. The most she has knitted has

been for people belonging to the family, stockings and other things

that we were requiring for ourselves.

6853. She also sells your eggs?-Yes.

6854. When she sells these things, are they paid for in money or in

goods?-We are generally requiring some stores for the house:

soap or soda, or a little tea or sugar; and they are got in that way.

6855. Does she always sell her hosiery for goods?-Yes; I suppose

she never asked anything else for it.

6856. Do you sell the eggs yourself, or are they usually sold by

your daughter?-They are generally sold by her.

6857. Has she a book of her own in which they are entered?-She

has no book. They are generally paid for at once.

6858. How are you paid for your winter fishing?-We were

generally paid for every haul as we brought it ashore, but we

cannot do that now. We have to salt our fish ourselves in the

winter fishing; and when we have got as many as two or three

cwt. we send them over to Mr. Laurenson, and sell them to him.

6859. Then you are paid for them on account now?-Yes; we

cannot settle for them now every time we come ashore. We salt

so much, and sell it off, and then we begin to salt again; but

before, when we sold our fish green, we settled for every haul of

fish as they came ashore.

6860. Did you do that with Mr. Anderson too?-Yes, as long as I

fished to him.

6861. Did you get cash for that?-No; I cannot say that I ever got

cash.

6862. Did you ask for it?-Yes; we asked for cash [Page 166]

several times, but we only got a small line, saying we had

delivered so many fish.

6863. Have you got any of these lines this year?-No.

6864. What did you do with these lines?-When we came back

with the line, we got anything we required for it.

6865. Did the line name any particular sum of money?-Yes.

The haul was divided between four men, and every man got his

haul marked down on a separate line, with his name on it.

Hillswick, Northmavine, January 11, 1872, ANDREW ANDERSON,

examined.

6866. Are you a fisherman at Hillyar?-I am.

6867. Do you live there?-Yes.

6868. Who do you fish for?-I have fished for Laurence Smith for

the last two years.

6869. Who did you fish for before?-I fished for different men, for

Mr. Inkster, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Williamson, and now for Mr.

Smith.

6870. Who did you fish for last before Mr. Smith?-For Gideon

Williamson, or James Williamson, his uncle.

6871. Is your fishing paid for every year in the winter?-Yes.

6872. Do you generally get a payment in cash at settlement?-I

have been a poor man, and very unfortunate, and I never had much

cash to get; but sometimes I did get some, and sometimes not.

6873. What was the reason why you did not get it?-A poor man

sometimes did not have it to get.

6874. Were you generally in debt to the merchants?-Sometimes I

was a good deal in their debt and sometimes not, just as the season

turned out. In some years I cleared off all my debt, and in other

years I was a good bit behind.

6875. How long have you been in debt?-I have been in debt now

for a good while, I cannot tell for how many years; and when I

could not pay my debt, then I could not get my supplies, and that

was what made me shift from man to man.

6876. Have you shifted often for that reason?-I have shifted

twice because I was in debt.

6877. When did you shift first because you were in debt?-I

cannot tell how long it is ago.

6878. Who did you shift from then?-From Mr. Anderson to Mr.

Williamson.

6879. You were in debt to Mr. Anderson at that time?-Yes.

6880. And you could get no more supplies?-I could not get the

supply that I asked for, and for that cause I left.

6881. When your supplies were stopped, did you go on fishing for

Mr. Anderson until the end of the season?-I had not commenced

then, and my family required meat, and I had no money to buy it

with.

6882. Why were your supplies stopped? Was it because you were

in debt?-Mr. Anderson never said anything about that; but when I

asked for bread, he said they would not give it until fishing time.

6883. How much were you in debt at that time?-I don't recollect.

6884. Had your debt been running on for a number of years?-

Not for a great many years; but I was a good bit in debt to him,

although I don't recollect how much, as I had no pass-book, and

no copy of my account.

6885. Was it ten years ago since that happened?-I cannot say

rightly, because I was away from him for a while, and then I had

to go back again, and afterwards I left him again.

6886. How much were you due him? Was it as much as £10?-I

don't think it was so much as that, but I don't remember.

6887. Was it not quite reasonable that he should ask you for

payment of your debt?-Certainly; but I had no money, and I

could not give it. He had a right to ask for his debt, as everybody

has; and I had a right to pay it, if I had been able.

6888. Did you leave Williamson because you were in his debt

too?-No; the old man died, and then this man broke. I was

serving him after that, but he was not able to give me my supplies,

either clothes or meal, and therefore I left him.

6889. Were you in his debt?-I was due him a little.

6890. But you did not leave him because you were in his debt?-

No; it was only because he could not give me supplies.

6891. And you get your supplies now from Mr. Smith?-Yes; I

have got them from him for the last two years, when I have been

fishing for him.

6892. Do you generally get a balance in cash at the end of the

year?-No; I have not settled with him this year, and I don't know

yet what I am to get.

6893. Had you a balance to get last year?-No; I was nearly clear

with him.

6894. But there was a balance against you?-Yes; but it was not

much-a mere trifle.

6895. Do you get cash from him during the season if you want

it?-No; I will get anything he has in his shop to supply me with,

either meat or anything else; but cash is seldom to be got.

6896. Why is that?-I don't know. I suppose it is because the man

has not got much himself. Cash is not often very plentiful with

him.

6897. Have you often asked for cash?-Not often. I may have

asked for a shilling or two at a time. I could get anything else he

had in his shop, but money was a thing that was seldom or never

got.

Hillswick, Northmavine, January 11, 1872, LAURENCE PETERSON,

examined.

6898. You are a fisherman, and the son of a previous witness?-I

am.

6899. Whom do you fish for?-I fished first for Mr. Anderson for

two years.

6900. Whom do you fish for now?-For Mr. Joseph Leask,

Lerwick, at the Faroe fishing.

6901. When did you give over going to the home-fishing?-In

1868.

6902. You fished for Mr. Anderson then?-Yes.

6903. Had you an account in his shop?-Yes.

6904. When you settled up at the end of the year, had you a

balance to receive in cash?-Yes; in both years when I fished

for him.

6905. Did you get money in the course of the season if you wanted

it?-No.

6906. Did you ask for it?-Yes.

6907. Was it refused to you?-Yes.

6908. Why?-I don't know.

6909. But you got as much goods as you wanted?-Yes.

6910. What was the balance you received in cash at the end of

these years?-I don't remember how much it was the first year;

but in the second year I had 10s. to get.

6911. In the Faroe fishing you are paid at the end of the year

too?-Yes.

6912. Are you paid in cash?-Yes; if we want it, we are paid in

cash.

6913. Have you an account in Mr. Leask's shop?-Yes. I have an

account the whole time, from the time I go out until I come back

and go again.

6914. Is that account closed when you come back from the

fishing?-Yes; I have no account after that.

6915. Is that because you live at a distance from Lerwick during

the winter?-I suppose that is the reason.

6916. What is your account for?-For tea, coffee, butter, pork, and

such things as that.

6917. Have you got a pass-book?-No, I asked for [Page 167] one

in 1870, but they refused to mark anything into a pass-book, and I

never asked for it again.

6918. Who refused it?-The people in the shop; and they did not

give a pass-book to any one more than to me.

6919. Was it refused to you in Mr. Leask's shop in Lerwick?-

Yes.

6920. Did they give you any reason for refusing?-They thought it

too much bother, I suppose. I knew of no other reason.

6921. Were the things you got for your own use at the fishing?-

Yes.

6922. Did you take them all to the fishing with you?-Yes; we buy

cloth and all other things for ourselves. We are only supplied with

bread.

6923. What you got from the shop was what you call small

stores?-Yes.

6924. Did you get anything from Mr. Leask's shop except your

small stores and your outfit?-Yes; I bought some meal and took

it home.

6925. Did you do that more than once?-I bought some for myself,

and I bought some when I went out first in spring, and sent it

home.

6926. Were these the things that you wanted to have entered in the

pass-book?-Yes; these things of my own small stores and clothes,

and anything I required.

6927. Did you get these articles at many different times in the

course of the year, or did you just get them once or twice when

you came home?-I got them twice.

6928. How often does your boat generally come home from the

Faroe fishing in the course of the season?-We generally make

two voyages; last year we made three.

6929. And you would be getting something additional each time

you came home?-Yes. All we require is small stores for every

voyage.

6930. What amount of the price of your fish did you get at settling

time in these two years when you were at the Faroe fishing?-Last

year I got an account for £17, and this year it was £22.

6931. That was the whole price of your fish?-Yes.

6932. But how much had you to get in money at the end of the

year on the whole of your account?-I had £16 odds to get last

year, and this year I had £10.

6933. Was that all paid to you in money at the settlement?-If I

had liked to take it all in money I could have got it, but I did not

take it all. I left some money in the book in Mr. Leask's shop.

6934. Then your account is still standing in his book?-Yes.

6935. What was your reason for sending meal home to your people

from Lerwick?-I suppose the reason was, because they could not

get a supply at home from Mr. Anderson, whom they were serving.

6936. Was that about the time when your father left off fishing for

him?-Yes, that was about the time.

6937. Did you ever work as a beach boy here?-No; I was always

at school before I went to the fishing.

Hillswick, Northmavine, January 11, 1872, JOHN SANDISON,

examined.

6938. Are you a fisherman?-I am.

6939. Have you got some land?-Yes; I live on a farm in

Hillswick along with my father. The land we have belongs to

the Busta estate.

6940. Do you go to the home fishing?-Yes.

6941. For whom do you fish?-For Mr. Anderson. I have fished

for him and his brother for upwards of twenty years. I went to the

fishing when I was a little boy. I never was at the beach.

6942. Do you settle every year for your fishing?-Yes; about the

middle of November.

6943. You have an account of your own in Mr. Anderson's

ledger?-Yes.

6944. Do you get supplies of goods from his shop?-Yes.

6945. Do you get your goods anywhere else?-Yes, occasionally.

6946. Where?-Perhaps from Laurence Smith or from Arthur

Harrison, just as may suit my convenience.

6947. What quantity do you get at these different shops? Do you

get more at one than at another?-Yes; I get most from Mr.

Anderson's.

6948. Do you get the same kind of goods there as at Smith's and

Harrison's?-Yes, much the same.

6949. Then what is your reason for going to them?-I have had

little employment from Smith for the last two years, which led me

to take a few supplies from him.

6950. Did you fish for him?-No; I was employed by him at other

kinds of work-principally boat-building during the winter and

spring.

6951. Have you an account with Mr. Smith for boat-building?-

Yes.

6952. Do you take goods in settlement of that account?-Yes; but

it is just because I think it right myself. I am in no way compelled

to do so.

6953. But you keep an account with Smith, and the goods you

get are put on one side of it, and the amount of your payment

for boat-building is put on the other?-Yes; until the time of

settlement.

6954. What is the time of settlement for boat-building?-Much

about the same time as for the other-some time in November or

December.

6955. Do you get money whenever you ask it for your

boat-building?-Yes; if I was to ask for money, I would get it.

6956. Do you get money during the season from Mr. Anderson for

your fishing when you ask for it?-Yes; I never was refused

money at any time.

6957. Did you ever ask for it except at settling time?-Yes.

6958. How much did you ask for?-Small sums.

6959. You said the reason why you went to Laurence Smith for

some of your goods was, because you were employed by him: is it

a general sort of understanding that when a man is employed by a

merchant, he deals with him for his goods?-To a certain extent it

is.

6960. He is not altogether bound to do it?-No, not in my

experience.

6961. But is it thought fair and proper that he should take a certain

quantity of his goods from that merchant?-If a merchant gives a

man employment, and he has the goods as good and as cheap as

they can be got elsewhere, it is generally thought that the man

should take his goods from him.

6962. Would it not be better to get your payments in cash at

shorter periods, rather than to have the whole of your money paid

to you at the end of the year?-I don't know.

6963. Do you not forget what quantity of goods you have got from

the merchant in the course of the year?-Oh no. We can easily

remember what goods we have had; and besides, we generally

keep accounts of our own; at least I do so.

6964. Have you got a pass-book in which are entered all the goods

you receive from Mr. Anderson?-Yes [produces pass-book].

6965. How long have you kept that passbook?-I think it is from

1865 or 1866 to the present time.

6966. Is that just a copy of the account that is entered in Mr.

Anderson's book?-Yes.

6967. I see here an entry of a payment to Mr. Inkster: what was

that for?-I asked Mr. Anderson to make it.

6968. Were you in Mr. Anderson's debt at the time?-I don't think

I was.

6969. Is there any entry here showing how you are settled with at

the end of the year?-Yes [showing]; the balance in 1870 was £14,

8s. 7d.

6970. You live with your father?-Yes.

6971. And you take meal from Mr. Anderson for the supply of

your father's family?-Yes, at times, when they require it.

6972. Is the meal which you get there of good [Page 168]

quality?-Yes; it is the same as we can get anywhere else in the

country.

6973. Have you compared the price of the meal which you get

there with the prices at which you can get it elsewhere?-Yes.

6974. Have you got meal from Lerwick?-Yes; and when the cost

of carriage came to be added to it, it was much the same price as at

Mr. Anderson's.

6975. Have you tried that more than once?-Yes.

6976. Is the flour of good quality?-Yes; the flour is not bad, and

the price is just about the same as at Lerwick after adding

something for carriage.

Hillswick, Northmavine, January 11, 1872, LAURENCE ANDERSON,

examined.

6977. Are you a fisherman?-Yes; I have been a fisherman for

some time.

6978. Have you got any land, or do you live with your father?-I

am living with my father.

6979. Who do you fish for?-I have fished for Laurence Smith for

three years.

6980. Do you settle with him every year in winter?-Yes.

6981. Have you an account with him for the articles which you get

from his shop?-Yes.

6982. Have you generally a balance to get in cash at the end of the

year?-Yes. If there is anything coming to me then, I get it.

6983. When did you settle with him last?-I settled for last year

about two months ago.

6984. How much was due to you then?-I was due him a little; but

it was not much.

6985. Were you due him anything when you settled for the year

before?-I was.

6986. And the year before that?-No; the year before that I was

clear. I had something to get the year before.

6987. When you have anything to get at the end of the year, is it

paid to you in money?-No; I have not got any money.

6988. When there was a balance due to you three years ago, did

you not get it in money?-No, I did not ask it.

6989. It was left standing, and was carried into the next

account?-Yes.

6990. And you got goods for it as you required them?-Yes.

6991. Is it a usual thing for the men here to get their balances in

money?-No; they don't get them in money.

6992. How do they get them?-They get supplies, and perhaps

they may get a little money.

6993. Given after settlement?-Yes.

6994. Have you a pass-book?-Yes [produces it].

6995. That book commences in 1870. Had you no pass-book

before?-No.

6996. Would you not be better to be paid in cash for the whole of

what was due to you?-Yes; but I have never got the cash.

6997. But could you not have got it in cash, instead of taking all

these goods, if you had liked?-No. I have been a poor man now

for the time that is past, and I have never had the money, and I

could not get it.

6998. You required to get supplies and you could not pay for them

in money?-Yes. I always got what wanted from this man; he did

not keep anything back, but the money I did not have to get. I did

not have money, and I could not get it.

6999. Did you begin to work as a beach boy?-Yes. I was two

years at Hillyar fishing station first, and then at Ollaberry.

7000. Was that for Mr. Anderson?-No; it was for Mr. George

Henry.

7001. What did you get as a beach boy?-I got 20s. the first year;

and I was there three months.

7002. Was that as long ago as ten years?-Yes, it will be ten years

since I first went to it.

7003. How was that 20s. paid to you?-I just got what I required

from him at the time.

7004. Had you any money to get at the end of the first year?-No,

not at the end of the first year; but the second year I had 10s. to

get, and I got it.

7005. How many years were you a beach boy?-Five years.

7006. During that time you always had an account with your

employer?-Yes.

7007. Were you always with the same employer?-No; I was two

years with Mr. Henry, and three years with Mr. Anderson.

7008. Had you always a little balance of money to get at the end of

the year from Mr. Anderson?-No. The first year I was clear; the

second year I was due very little, but the third year I was due

something. Then, the first year I was at the haaf, I fished for Mr.

Anderson.

7009. Could you have gone to fish for anybody else that year if you

had liked?-Yes; but I made a bargain that year to fish for him.

7010. Was it because you were in his debt that you made a bargain

to fish for him?-Yes. I had nothing for supplies, and I got my

supplies the first year from him.

7011. Would you have got your supplies from Mr. Anderson and

still have been at liberty to engage with anybody else for the

haaf?-No.

7012. Why?-I did not engage with any other body that year.

7013. But would you have been at liberty to have done that if you

had liked?-I don't know. If I had been clear with Mr. Anderson,

I might have had my liberty.

7014. You thought you were not at liberty because, you were not

clear?-Yes.

7015. Were you told you were not at liberty to engage with

anybody after you had got your supplies from Mr. Anderson?-No.

7016. You just wanted the supplies, and you went and engaged

yourself to him?-Yes. Of course, I had to get my supplies, and I

just got them from the man that I was to engage with.

7017. But nobody asked you to engage for the haaf?-Yes.

7018. Is it usual for men to be engaged for the haaf fishing so early

as November?-Yes; most of them are engaged then.

7019. Although the haaf fishing does not begin until six months

afterwards?-Yes.

7020. What is their reason for engaging so early in the season?-

Most of time, when they are settling up, engage for a new year.

They make up their crews then.

7021 Is it more convenient for the men to make up their crews

then?-Yes.

7022. Why?-Because they know then who are to go together in

the rising year.

7023 Do they get supplies more readily from the merchants if

they make up their crews at that time and engage to fish for the

following year?-Yes, when they are in debt.

7024. Is that one reason why the men sometimes make up their

crews and make their engagements so soon?-I don't know, but I

believe there is something in that.

7025. Was that the reason why you engaged so early that first year

when you went to the fishing?-It was because I was in debt that

year when I left the beach.

7026. Have you been in debt in other years?-Yes. I was in debt

to Mr. Anderson at settling time for the first year I fished for him.

I left him because I was in debt, and could not get supplies.

Second Shetland Truck System Report · 第 425 / 467 题