M. FAURE: M. Reuter, you are a lawyer of the Luxembourg Bar?

REUTER: Yes.

M. FAURE: You are President of the Chamber of Deputies of the Grand

Duchy of Luxembourg?

REUTER: Yes.

M. FAURE: You had been exercising these functions at the time of the

invasion of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg by the German troops?

REUTER: Yes.

M. FAURE: Can you give us any indication on the fact that the Government

of the Reich had, a few days before the invasion of Luxembourg, given to

the Government of the Grand Duchy assurances of their peaceful

intentions?

REUTER: In August 1939 the German Minister for Luxembourg gave to the

Minister of Foreign Affairs of the country a statement according to

which the German Reich, in the event of a European war, would respect

the independence and neutrality of the country, provided that Luxembourg

would not violate its own neutrality. A few days before the invasion, in

May 1940, the Germans constructed pontoon bridges over half of the

Moselle River which separates the two countries. An explanation from the

German Minister in Luxembourg represented such construction of pontoon

bridges as landing stages in the interest of navigation. In the general

public opinion of the country, these installations were really of a

military character.

M. FAURE: Can you tell us about the situation of public authorities in

Luxembourg following the departure of Her Royal Highness, the Grand

Duchess, and of her government?

REUTER: The continuity of administration in the country was assured by a

government commission which possessed the necessary powers bestowed upon

it by the competent constitutional authorities. There was, therefore, no

lack of authority in the administration.

M. FAURE: Is it not true, however, that the Germans claimed, upon their

arrival in that country, that the government had failed to carry out its

functions; and, following the departure of the government, that there

was no regular authority in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg?

REUTER: Yes, such declaration was made by the Ministers of the Reich in

Luxembourg before a Parliamentary Commission.

M. FAURE: Do I understand correctly that these statements on the part of

the German authorities did not in fact correspond to the truth inasmuch

as you have told us that there did exist a higher organism for the

administration of the country?

REUTER: This statement did not correspond to the reality. It was

obviously aimed at usurping authority.

M. FAURE: M. Reuter, the Germans never proclaimed by law the annexation

of Luxembourg. Do you consider that the measures adopted by the Germans

in that country were equivalent to annexation?

REUTER: The measures that were taken by the Germans in the Grand Duchy

were obviously equivalent to a _de facto_ annexation of that country.

Shortly after the invasion the leaders of the Reich in Luxembourg stated

in public and official speeches that the annexation by law would occur

at a time which would be freely selected by the Führer. The proof of

this _de facto_ annexation is shown in a clear manner by the whole

series of ordinances which the Germans published in the Grand Duchy.

M. FAURE: The Germans organized an operation which was called a census

in Luxembourg. In the form that was given the inhabitants of Luxembourg

to effect the census, there was one question concerning the native or

usual language and another question as to the racial background of the

individual. Are you prepared to assert that in view of these two

questions this census was considered as having the character of a

plebiscite, a political character?

REUTER: From the menacing instructions published by the German

authorities in connection with this census, the political purpose was

obvious; therefore public opinion never envisaged this census except as

a sort of attempt to achieve a plebiscite camouflaged as a census, a

political operation destined to give a certain justification to the

annexation which was to follow.

M. FAURE: The report of the Luxembourg Government does not give any

indication of the statistical results of this census, specifically with

regard to the political question of which I spoke a moment ago. Would

you be kind enough to tell us why these statistical data are not to be

found in any document?

REUTER: The complete statistical data have never been collected because

after a partial examination of the first results the German authorities

noted that only an infinitesimal fraction of the population had answered

the two tricky questions in the German sense. The German authorities

then preferred to stop the operation, and the forms distributed in the

country for obtaining the answers were never collected.

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 06 · 第 314 / 333 题