"My visit to New York was thoroughly profitable; it has given

me much food for thought, and has enabled me to see some things

more clearly than ever before. I cannot tell you of all the

impressions New York brought, and has left upon me. I have never

quite managed to shake off the attitude of mind of a student, and

I find myself constantly weaving my experiences in New York into

my philosophy of life. The two events which seem to stand out

most clearly are the visit to the _Art Museum_, and the concert

at the _Metropolitan_. That was a glorious day, for it showed

how men in the rush and flurry of business life have at hand

the means of soul purifying and refreshment in art and music,

two great agencies which bring men's minds back from semblances

to truth. Will you ever forget the music we heard? The singing

of Rossini's _Stabat Mater_ was to me like wandering through a

sea of dreams, beautiful yet sad. Greatest of all, I thought,

was Nordica's _Inflammatus_, a soul-stirring song, splendidly

set off by the orchestra and chorus, and which stirred the vast

audience to its depths. It was the great victory of the evening.

How strong must be the satisfaction of the possession of so

magnificent a voice, both in the capacity to interpret such

beautiful music, and in the ability to thrill and purge the human

soul. For is it not the case that great music ever does this? I

know little of the _technique_ of music, but for years I have

felt its influence upon me for good.

"Every hour of my visit was profitable, and I need not say

that it would have been a blind, stupid ramble without your

assistance. I know what it meant in sacrifice of time and

hard-earned money to you. I would have liked to have controlled

your generosity. However, I know the spirit which moved you, and

I am deeply grateful to you.

"And now, my dear brother Will, I trust that this New Year which

ushers in a new century, will bring to you true happiness, and

the accomplishment of your most worthy ambitions.

"Your affectionate brother,

"BERT."

It is not surprising to find in a remote corner of the diary of a man

whose feelings were so genuine, and sympathies so sincere, such mention

as the following, of an evening spent with "The Woodcutters," a society

he had helped to organize the year after he left the university, and

the purposes of which will be sufficiently clear from the reference:

"We went to old Thomas Mahoney's where we worked hard from about

8:30 to 11:00 P. M., sawing and splitting wood. The family

consisted of Mrs. Mahoney, an old woman of about sixty or

sixty-five, and her daughter. The daughter, who is half-witted,

goes out washing and scrubbing, while the old lady has to saw

and split all the wood necessary to keep their hovel warm, it

being situated in an exposed place on the edge of the common.

The interior does not betoken wealth, but the old woman and her

daughter seem to be not unhappy, this probably because of their

having come from the Emerald Isle. I shall try and follow up the

acquaintance with a view to discovering to what causes their

poverty is due. This institution is a good one, for besides the

hard work, it affords undoubtedly a good way of helping the

deserving poor, and gives one a splendid chance for economic

study."

Nor is the following entry less surprising, written, as it was, in

part justification of himself, lest he should have erred in having

aided financially, and in other ways, a deaf-mute boy who came to him

for assistance, but into whose circumstances he had not, at the time,

had opportunity of making a personal inquiry. A file of correspondence

with the Charity Organizations officer, and the superintendent of

_The Institute for the Deaf and Dumb_, reveals the care with which he

subsequently satisfied his conscience in this particular case of one

who belonged to "the dependent and neglected poor."

"Whatever may be held regarding the unwisdom of a paternal system

with regard to society generally,--and while my own best judgment

inclines me to be individualistic,--I have a strong sympathy with

those who are robbed of the use of their senses, to whom so much

of the beauty of God's world is as a sealed book. I felt this

strongly as I dictated the letters which he could not hear. The

bright intelligence on his face as he learned my intention, and

indicated his approval of some of my suggestions, was beautiful

to see. I trust that he will not prove a disappointment, and that

I shall not be deceived."

Harper had the faith which led him at times to cast his bread upon the

waters. Had he been asked why he did so, he would have replied, because

he loved to. If questioned further, he would, with Tennyson, have said:

"That nothing walks with aimless feet;

That not one life shall be destroy'd,

Or cast as rubbish to the void,

When God hath made the pile complete."

_SOCIAL AND POLITICAL IDEALS_

Few men of his years have thought as deeply as Harper did, or had

clearer perceptions, concerning conditions and forces which make

for happiness and progress in social life, and the development of

national greatness. Had he been spared he would have been an earnest

and practical reformer; silent as his voice is now, the words he once

uttered are not without their value to our day and generation. He was a

true patriot in sentiment and aspiration.

Harper loved his country and its people, and in all that he undertook,

which was of a public nature, he was animated by an enthusiasm for

the common good. Of the self-imposed tasks he had undertaken in

addition to his regular duties at the department of labour, and in

each of which he had made some progress, were treatises on "Labour

Legislation in Canada," and the "Outlines of an Industrial History of

the Dominion." Among his contributions to publications other than the

_Labour Gazette_, was a short essay on _Colleges and Citizenship_ in

a Christmas number of the _Acta Victoriana_ of Victoria College, one

or two articles in _The Commonwealth_ on _Canada's Attitude Towards

Labour_, and an uncompleted monograph, intended for publication, on

_The Study of Political Economy in the High Schools_. He was president

of the Ottawa Social Science Club, secretary-treasurer of the Ottawa

section of the University of Toronto Alumni Association, and an active

member of the Ottawa Literary and Scientific Society. He was at the

same time promoting the organization of a University Club, a plan of

which he had carefully prepared, and the object of which was to bring

the university men of the city into closer touch with each other, and

make their influence more widely felt in the civic and social life of

the community.

The background of all Harper's thinking on social and political

problems was coloured by his belief in a moral order; in the forefront

was ever the individual proclaiming this order, and seeking to realize

it in his own life. Institutions of whatever kind, whether national

or religious, were to him of human creation. Their usefulness was in

proportion to the degree to which they helped to give expression to the

unseen purpose in the universe. Nature and man, alone, were divine. It

followed logically from this that man's work among his fellows in the

world was to discover the moral order, reveal and maintain it, so far

as within him the power lay. Harmony with this order meant happiness,

want of harmony, whether by the individual or the state, unhappiness.

In this view, the individual is vastly superior to any institution he

and his fellows may construct, superior as an end, and as a means to an

end. If a set of conditions exist which are counter to the moral order,

or obstruct its fulfillment in the lives of men, these conditions

should be changed, the individual should not be sacrificed to them.

On the other hand, change may be, and ought to be accomplished more by

men than by institutions, and can only be accomplished in the degree to

which beliefs become active, potent factors in individual lives.

It is true that human knowledge is limited, and that the purpose of

God is infinite, and so there may rightly be among men differences

of opinion as to what, under any circumstances, are the ends to be

sought, and the best means to attain those ends; and humility may well

characterize all expressions of belief relative thereto; but, to the

extent of knowledge gained, the ground underfoot is firm, and humility

will not excuse the want of assertion, where right reason is set at

naught by wrongful conduct. Moreover, there is much on which men can be

agreed, broken arcs visible to all, though the perfect round is seen

by none. There are right and wrong, truth and falsehood, honesty and

dishonesty, love and hate, purity and vice, honour and dishonour, and

the difference between them is as apparent and real as the difference

'twixt day and night, albeit, now and again, a twilight of uncertainty

may render doubtful the confines of separation. Harper's exclusive

insistence was only upon what in this way was acceptable to all; and

knowing that it was acceptable, he was sure the appeal would find a

response in those to whom it was addressed. Whatever men might be in

seeking privately their own selfish ends, their belief in a moral order

was apparent once action became collective; the public had a conscience

to which it was generally true, though men at times might seem to

betray their better selves; and public opinion might be expected to

guard for society as a whole a right for which individuals sometimes

lost respect. How great, therefore, was the responsibility upon those

who had the capacity, or opportunity, to see that public opinion was

rightly formed and directed, and that, in social and political affairs,

truth and right should be made to prevail!

This insistence upon the recognition of responsibility in those

favoured by educational training or opportunity, is well brought out

in a paragraph or two in the short essay on _Colleges and Citizenship_.

Referring to a quotation from Sir Alfred Milner's life of Arnold

Toynbee, in which "the estrangement of the men of thought from the

leaders of the people" is referred to as having constituted, in

Toynbee's mind, the great danger of the democratic upheaval of the

time, Harper writes:

"People in Canada to-day are doubtless not so anxious about

democratic upheaval. Fortunately the aggravated conditions of an

old world metropolis have not yet been developed. The task is

easier; the duty none the less imperative. It is more possible to

secure the confidence of men who are not embittered by the pangs

of slumdom. But because conditions here are not as distressing as

they have been and are elsewhere, it is surely no less desirable,

with a view to promoting industrial peace and healthy national

development, that the men who have opportunity and capacity for

the serious study of social and economic problems, should not

allow themselves to become fenced off by a wall of indifference

of their own creation from those to whom the mass of the people

look for direction, inspiration and suggestion. It is reasonable

to expect that he who claims to be engaged in the pursuit of

truth should not give countenance to what makes for social

disorder and national decay.

"Men are as much open to reason, as liable to accept truth,

when they have been convinced of it, as when Arnold Toynbee

studied, lectured and wrote. They are as prone to prefer what is

genuine to what is pretense and dissimulation. Surely a peculiar

obligation to see that men think rightly and act sanely, devolves

upon those whose vantage ground should enable them to distinguish

what is genuine. Sir Alfred Milner, having in mind the earnest

friend of his undergraduate days, said six years ago to the

members of Toynbee Hall: 'I do not go so far as to say that what

Oxford thinks to-day England will do to-morrow, but certainly any

new movement of thought at the universities in these days rapidly

finds its echo in the press and in public opinion.' Indeed, is

there not fair ground for the belief that much of the virtue

which has marked the conduct of Great Britain's High Commissioner

at Cape Town, throughout the South African crisis is due to

association with the high-minded student, who, in the congenial

atmosphere of Oxford, did not forget that he was a citizen?"

It was his belief in the importance of men recognizing their duties as

citizens, and being able to discharge these duties with intelligence

and for the common good, which led Harper to prepare a scheme for the

teaching of Political Economy in the high schools. The merits of this

plan he had summarized as follows:

"Such a study would tend to remedy the great evil of democratic

institutions, the susceptibility of the masses to the influence

of demagogues, and their liability to misconstrue the relations

of cause and effect because of ignorance. It would tend to

promote mental development, especially in the direction of

individual thought. It would tend to raise the standard of such

studies in the universities, and this in time would react upon

the high schools in the way of more competent teachers, and,

in the end, create great possibilities for the prosecution

of research in this all important branch of knowledge in our

country. It would tend to remedy social evils by giving the

philanthropist and the public generally, something like an

accurate idea of the true state of society. It would react

beneficially upon the government, which, with a more critical

observation, would be more careful in its actions."

He modestly concludes,

"I simply put forward a proposal which, I think, if carried

out, would tend to modify the evils fostered by ignorance. I

have to a great extent taken it as an axiom that whatever tends

to disseminate knowledge, to advance truth, and to develop the

intellect, cannot be wrong, and should be accepted by all liberal

minded men; and this, I think, would be the result of the study

of Political Economy in our high schools."

From the notes he had made, and from what is contained in the body of

the article, it would appear that he had in mind a course on _Civic

Ethics_, quite as much as on the _Elements of Economics_, and that he

would have liked, if possible, to have had a beginning made in the

public schools.

Scattered throughout his diary are such observations as the following:

"I am becoming more and more convinced that the true rulers of

the nation are outside of our parliaments and our law courts,

and that the safety of society lies in informing those who form

public opinion."

* * * * *

"I feel more and more the necessity of emphasizing the importance

of the scientific study of economic and political problems in a

country in which every man has the franchise, and is supposed to

be in a position to express an intelligent opinion upon public

questions, and particularly at a time when labour and kindred

problems are prominent in the public mind."

* * * * *

"A man who truly loves his country should be disposed to do his

utmost to see it rightly governed."

* * * * *

"The poor downtrodden have more to hope for from men who, having

a specialized training in the operation of social forces, apply

themselves to the proper remedy, than from all the windy,

ultra-radical demagogues."

"It is the alienation--partly, no doubt, due to indolence--of

the men of thought from those from whom the mass of the people

habitually receive their inspiration, which accounts for much of

the crass ignorance and purposeless passion of the people and

their demagogues."

* * * * *

"For myself, I have long deplored the foolish worship of this or

that set of political machinery by apparently well intentioned

men. In Matthew Arnold's _Culture and Anarchy_, there is a

solution for much of our distressing bluster and blunder. With

confidence in the possibilities of man and a resolute endeavour

to strive towards perfection, to allow our best consciousness

to play about our stock notions and our painful conditions of

society, we should be able to see the real value of things, and

ultimately to approach more nearly to right and truth. If our

well-intentioned, but perhaps 'over-Hebraized' ultra-socialists

and ultra-individualists would have perfection more prominently

in mind than the pet panacea they have ever before them, and

would allow their best consciousness to play about their notions

of society and its evils, there would be less of viciousness and

ignorance in their propaganda."

"The fallacy of political panaceas! And the vital importance of

improving the individual morally, and encouraging him to elevate

his ideals! What a splendid thing it would be if every labour

agitator, every demagogue, every member of parliament, every

professor, teacher and minister, and, in fact, every one who

exerts an influence upon the public mind, could realize and act

upon the truth which came to Alton Locke after his life of bitter

trial: 'My only ground was now the bare realities of life and

duty. The problem of society--self-sacrifice, the one solution.'"

* * * * *

"We are too apt to regard social phenomena as if they are

entities in themselves, instead of incidents in the development

of society, a fact which a man who is amidst the strife of

existing social and economic conditions should not lose sight of."

* * * * *

"I am continually impressed with the wisdom of keeping a mind

open to suggestion and impressions from the men one meets in

the ordinary course of life, in fine, the importance of keeping

an open mind. If one can accomplish this, even the din of

'the world's most crowded streets' becomes interesting and

instructive, even beautiful, because of the opportunities of

seeing truth and discovering the remedy for evils."

* * * * *

"Justice and truth must prevail over tyranny and ignorance."

* * * * *

The true mind is revealed in its unconscious moments, and it is,

therefore, from passages like these, casually expressed, and constantly

recurring in much that he wrote, which was of a private nature, that

his real views and beliefs are to be gathered. One or two other

passages in a similar vein will disclose these views more fully.

During Christmas week of 1900 he visited New York for the first time.

Of the many impressions made upon his mind, the contrasts of wealth and

poverty, and all that they implied, were to him more real than aught

else.

"What was particularly irritating to me," he writes in his

journal, after returning from this trip, "was the constant

evidence of the power of money rule in that throbbing metropolis.

The story is written, even on the store signs on Broadway, that

this, the greatest commercial city in America, is practically

owned by monied persons, whose tastes and ambitions strike one as

being essentially low, mean and vulgar. I felt strongly a growing

pride in British institutions and British character compared with

what I saw about me. The ground taken by Mr. Mulock, on behalf

of labour, came strongly before me. I felt that selfishness must

be reckoned with in the solution of social problems. What is to

be hoped is that strong men may be brought to see that right

legislation is good politics, that they may thus be persuaded

to lend their aid to those who hope to avoid the growth in

Canada of a corrupt system by which the power is in the hands

of the octopus who owns the money bags, and who fattens on the

blood of the people whom he crowds under him. There is luxury

and magnificence on Fifth Avenue, but I envied not the proud

possessors of those costly mansions. I want naught but what my

own ability and effort will bring me. I believe in making one's

surroundings as beautiful as may be, but I feel that there is

much waste and vulgar display in the way in which wealthy New

York arrays herself. Her luxury is ponderous and heavy and dull,

when one remembers that much of it rests on the necks of the

hundreds of thousands of toilers who gasp for breath in the

narrow streets, from whom are withheld God's free gifts, the

sunlight and the pure air."

Elsewhere, he writes after a walk through the city streets:

"On the way home I turned over in my mind the question as to

how wealthy men come to be so much appreciated in spite of the

fact that it is only the lovable in man which is truly loved--by

right-minded men at all events, and I am satisfied that,

consciously or unconsciously, men come to compromise with their

own sense of justice in their estimate of men, until a habit of

thought and regard is fixed. What goes forward is something like

this: we do not love the man with the big house, but we would

love to be the man with the big house. And since the man with the

big house often has it in his power to get a bigger house than

we have, we come to appreciate him. Many men do this until it

comes to be usual to appreciate the man with the big house, and

he comes to be a large figure in the eyes of the world, however

little we may love him and his methods. This is particularly

the case in a young nation like the United States which has, as

yet, scarcely come to realize the really valuable things, an

appreciation of which comes from genuine culture.

"Again, whilst there is no great sin _per se_ in being rich, I

can see the truth in the old scriptural saying, 'It is easier for

a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to

enter into the kingdom of God.' When it is so hard for an earnest

student to keep his mind rivetted upon the eternal realities of

life, through which character building and true happiness come,

how much harder must it be for the man whose circumstances make

the existing order, if not sufficient, yet comfortable, who has

his vanity flattered by the things which he has been pursuing,

and who has a vast web of houses and other possessions to shut

him off from even an occasional view of the realities. These

facts, of course, only hold in their general application and

tendencies. There have been, doubtless, splendid rich men. When

these reach that state when, of their own free will, and of

deliberate choice, they are prepared to go, sell all that they

have, and give to the poor, then they have reached an attitude

of mind and heart which enables them to distinguish between

semblances and realities, to deliberately select the latter, and

so realize the greatest happiness, the Kingdom of Heaven."

His fine spirit is no less clearly revealed in the views which he

held of the duties of the department of labour, and of the ideals he

believed should govern and direct its work. The following extracts from

letters to the one with whom he was associated, may serve to show with

what purpose and to what end he had given himself to the work. The

letters were written during the summer of 1901, while he was in charge

of the department:

"As I lay in a hammock last night at Kingsmere, and gazed into

the deep blue moonlit vault of heaven, and ran over in my mind

the progress already made by the department, and taxed my

imagination to see its future, the one formidable obstacle which

I saw ever before us was the difficulty of keeping firm to one's

convictions in the face of growing clamours for things which one

cannot approve, yet which are uttered by people whom one cannot

ignore. Nevertheless, I am convinced that all will be well in

the end. We will have the good will of the decent, fair-minded

people, and that is all one should be much concerned about, after

one has satisfied one's own sense of right and justice. I feel a

deep sense of the gravity of our position, and I am determined

that you shall command my best effort in your endeavours to make

the work of the department effective, and to defeat unworthy

attacks. I do not think that I am lacking either in faith in

human nature or in the ultimate triumph of right, but I am coming

to realize more, day by day, that it is a great man's work which

we are called upon to perform. I have every confidence in our

ability to weather the storms which we will undoubtedly be called

upon to meet, and you can be assured that you will find me ready

to do my share. It behooves us both to steadfastly keep before us

those things which are true, and, if we do, Nature, as Carlyle

says, will be on our side.

"The work on the _Labour Gazette_ allows opportunity for a

careful and searching analysis of the industrial and social life

of the Dominion. Already I can see the practical usefulness of

the work. In addition to the obvious recognition of the claims

of labour involved in the creation of the department, we have it

in our power to publish information which should lead to a better

understanding all round, as well as to further such movements as

arbitration and conciliation which tend to promote industrial

peace.

"With the added responsibility there has come to me an increasing

sense of the usefulness of the work which we are doing. I

believe we can do much towards determining the direction of

social progress. With a knowledge of fact, an absence of

sectarian prejudice, some understanding of the progress of human

institutions, and of the motives which influence men, we should,

if we can keep control of ourselves, and maintain high ideals as

inspiration for the development of the best that is in us, be

able to render a lasting service to this country."

The Secret of Heroism: A Memoir of Henry Albert Harper · 第 4 / 6 段