Nor was this, with Harper, a blind love, an unreasoned passion. On the

contrary, whatever its origin, it derived its strength from a carefully

thought out philosophy of life, a philosophy based on a belief in

a divine order and purpose in the universe, and in the sanctity of

individual lives. He had faith in both God and man, and he held that

the will of the one could only be fulfilled as it was realized in

the life of the other. This belief explains his efforts on behalf of

individuals, it interprets the views he held on such questions as those

of social and political reform.

He loved men because of the belief he had in their natures. "After

all," he writes, "it is not the external appearance of a man, nor what

he says or does, that ought to excite our admiration or distrust, but

that inner personality, the individuality, the soul, which is 'the all

and in all,' and of which appearances are but imperfect representations

and expressions." He was not a man given to professions, or to the

public performance of good deeds; in fact, the being seen of men caused

him to hesitate in the doing of much which a less sensitive nature

would have allowed. He did not shrink, however, from manifesting a

personal interest in lives which seemed to demand it of him, or from

revealing his purpose to those whom he knew could appreciate it aright.

One incident, among two or three which he has recorded, but one of

a great many known only to those with whom the occasion was shared,

is sufficient to illustrate how practical expression was given to

this belief. It occurred within a short time after he had left the

university, and before he had entered upon his journalistic career.

"I was returning home one night after a social evening, when I

saw a young man in the hands of a policeman. He was what some

people would have called a 'bad boy,' kept rather doubtful

company, and was under arrest for having raised a disturbance

during a drunken row. Well, I managed to get the boy, who was

about eighteen years of age, out of the cells on bail, and, in

company with a fellow who had been 'painting the town' with him,

I undertook to take him home. I contrived, after some time, to

get rid of his 'pal,' and, as soon as the boy was sober enough, I

undertook to find out whether he had a conscience.

"After walking about the streets with him for a couple of hours

in the beautiful moonlight, by the aid of a power which was

certainly not my own, I discovered that he had; and the boy

opened up his heart to me. I showed him the uselessness and folly

of the life into which he was rapidly drifting, and, in a voice

convulsed with sobs, he told me that what I said was true. My own

eyes moistened as he confessed what a fool he was. He concluded

by promising me in a voice and with a pressure of the hand which

meant truth, that he would never touch a drop of liquor again.

From the frank manner in which he meets my eyes when I now see

him occasionally, I believe that he has thoroughly reformed. That

night, as I went home, I knew that one prayer had not been in

vain."

For society as a whole, as for its individual members, his aim was a

constant betterment.

"There are so few men who couple the capacity for appreciating

the troubles of struggling humanity with an earnest desire to

remove them, that I can see in such a life a tremendous power for

good, and, after all, is not that the highest ideal a man can

hold before him?"

In this sentence, penned in reference to another, he wrote of himself

more truly than he knew. His journals are full of passages which

disclose his "capacity to appreciate," and his "earnest desire to

remove," the obstacles which thwart the upward and onward progress

of men engaged in the competitive rivalries of the world, and in the

struggle for daily bread. Whether it was pursuing an uncongenial task

in the wilds of Muskoka, or immersed in the cares and unrest of

journalism, or busied in research for material from which to construct

an article for the _Labour Gazette_, a human interest in the life

and the lot of the mass of men was ever before him, and a purpose to

understand and improve that lot his aim.

"During the course of my stay here," he writes of Muskoka, in

the winter of 1895, "I have had some chance to notice the type

of inhabitants of this inhospitable district. First and foremost

come the lumbermen, not the miners who live in the town, but

the stout fellows in smock and jersey, with their pants shoved

into stockings, which are in turn encased in stout rubbers.

Overcoats are scarce, they don't seem to be needed. Altogether,

though these fellows lead a hard life, and are often coarse and

dissipated, they have opinions of their own, and must be reckoned

with by the rulers of the country.

"Next comes the Muskoka farmer living in his shanty, for that is

pretty much the rule, although there is, of course, an occasional

farmhouse of more pretentious appearance, and drawing a bare

livelihood by his constant toil with antiquated implements; most

of the hay (the chief product, since it requires little care,)

being cut by the scythe on patches of land cleared by years of

toil, and in most cases thickly strewn with rocks, the only

satisfaction that they have in their poverty being that they are

independent.

"It is difficult to conceive of culture and refinement under such

circumstances. It may be well, however, to have one part of our

population comparatively free from the two dangerous influences

of our time, riches and luxury on the one hand, and, on the

other, embittered and ignorant combinations actuated by selfish

interests and swayed too largely by demagogues.

"My sojourn here, though not pleasant and not profitable from a

business point of view, has opened an extensive field of thought.

Of my companions the most interesting was the lumberman whose

wife was sick, and who as a result was leaving the woods. I was

quite interested by his ideas of human life, although they were

not given in a scientific way. He was evidently a man of energy;

one who took life seriously and who had his share of troubles. It

was pathetic to hear the way he spoke of how his wife's family

usually died at about twenty-four years of age, how his wife was

now at that age and was sick. In fact, there are worse places

than the lumber woods for the study of man."

In the spring of 1898 he was rejoiced at having the opportunity of

conducting a more or less extended inquiry into the conditions of

working men in the several trades.

"The _Mail_," he writes, "intends, during the coming summer, to

publish a series of articles concerning the conditions, social,

moral and economic, governing each of the various trades, the

facts to be gathered by personal observation and enquiry from

journeymen, apprentices, employers and employees. The work is

to be a feature of each day's paper, and, _mirabile dictu_, the

entire charge of the matter, design and detail, has been handed

over to me. I need not say that I am pleased. I have at once an

opportunity of examining into the industrial and sociological

conditions of the city and province, and possibly of doing

good to my fellow men as the result of these observations.

Incidentally, also, I have an opportunity of strengthening myself

in my own profession, although that is a thing that one can do in

journalism no matter what line of work one is pursuing. Roughly

described, the aim of the series of sketches is to indicate to

the parent what qualifications are required for, and what returns

are to be expected from, the several vocations, in order that

he may the better decide what to do with his boy or girl. I

appreciate the responsibility which the work places upon me, and

pray that I may be able to meet it."

The articles which were written by Harper, then twenty-four years of

age, and which appeared under the caption "What to do with your boy or

girl," were continued in the _Mail_ from day to day for several months,

and attracted very considerable attention at the time. They disclose

a remarkable ability to get at facts, and the strongest sympathy with

the end in view, and constitute a not unimportant contribution to

the scanty literature which has thus far appeared, having to do with

industrial and labour conditions in the Dominion.

The human interest which made even the dry language of statutes to glow

with animation for him, is abundantly apparent from the following

passages in reference to some of his work in the department of labour:

"I spent most of the day in the Library of Parliament, reading up

the provincial acts concerning mining. The thing which impressed

me, as I read, was the uninviting nature of the task of the

miner, cut off from the light of day, hewing away in the bowels

of the earth, exposed to the danger of cave-ins, explosions,

and a living entombment, as the result of carelessness on the

part of his employers, or his associates, or the will of nature.

How can such men, if they are crowded down almost to the margin

of subsistence, develop a roseate view of life! Ever facing

almost terrorizing conditions, they must become brave, sturdy,

self-reliant and earnest enough, but how can they fail to be out

of sympathy with the shams, hypocrisies and dilettantisms of

modern society!"

And again:

"At the office, I have been much interested in working upon the

article on the Fisheries of Canada, inasmuch as it has shown to

me a sturdy class of men toiling under conditions of hardship

and danger for what is comparatively a small return. Doubtless

the isolation of the fishing villages, the system of part

proprietorship, and the passion for a sea-faring life, account

for the relative immobility of the population.

"I am becoming more and more convinced daily of the fact that

this country is going through a transition stage which must

influence it to the bottom. The use of machinery, the weakening

of the artisan by removing the rewards of skill, the work and

wages of girls, the prevalence of piece work and its results,

the effects of pauper and convict labour, and a thousand other

problems are brought daily before my notice in terms of flesh and

blood.

"It is important to know and understand all sorts and conditions

of men if society as a whole is to be led towards what is better.

Certainly the 'better class of people' need leading as well as

the others, for with them the opportunity offered by leisure is

too often wasted in dilettantism and folly."

To "society," in the highly specialized meaning of that word, a

reference may not be out of place. In its ambitions, its mandates,

Harper saw but little which made for the development of true manhood or

womanhood, while he saw much which aimed directly at the destruction

of both. There was never any one who enjoyed more the pleasure of good

company, whose temperament, frank, hearty and mirthful, and whose

manner, courteous and sincere, made him a more welcome guest wherever

he went. It was no affectation, therefore, which caused Harper to feel

as he did; it was his belief in the true purpose of life. What to

some, and to himself, was a pastime, he saw, to others, was becoming

an end; instead of developing, it was robbing, natures of their finer

sensibilities. Many of its conventions were wholly artificial, some of

its relationships altogether false. The following short sentences are

sufficient to reveal this view:

"Social engagements may, I think, be a healthy relaxation, if

kept in their place, and if one does not forget to keep hold of

one's self, and remembers the force of example. With many people

here in Ottawa, I fear the social round is becoming an end in

itself, and therefore a danger to themselves and others.

"I am coming to the conclusion that if a man is to wield any

influence worth while in this world, he has to cut this folly out

of his life. The past fortnight has shown me how impossible it

is for a man to do what the social world expects of him, and do

justice to himself."

Commenting on a wedding notice which appeared in a local paper, he

writes:

"So spoke the society editor this morning. The important thing,

really, was the happy union for life of two loving hearts.

Apparently what the public is supposed to be interested in, is

the gown of white something or other. It may be salutary, as a

means of developing an æsthetic taste generally, to have space

in our public prints for such trifles. For my own part, I often

think the world would be better and saner if the society editor

had never been born."

And of the "better part," in a personal letter to a friend:

"If you will pardon me for making the remark, I was very

pleased to see the lively interest your sisters take in the

great work of improving the condition of the masses. It is

one which is bound to widen their sympathies, and remove any

possibility of their becoming enthralled by the chains of hollow

conventionality, which, more than anything else, prevents the

development of true womanhood, under the conditions of our modern

society."

How, according to his view, true womanhood might be developed, may be

gathered from a letter written by Harper to one of his sisters a short

time before his death. It is one of many home letters which might be

quoted, but it may be taken by itself as characteristic. In speaking of

his love for others, its reproduction here may not be out of place:

"_Ottawa, Oct. 4th, 1901._

"MY DEAR L----:

"I am not writing to give you news, for there is little to give.

I have been having a quiet happy little evening all by myself,

and I thought I could not do better than let you into the secret

of my happiness. I think I have told you before that I am an

admirer of the high-mindedness of Matthew Arnold, 'the apostle

of sweetness and light.' Latterly, I have been taking a great

deal of true pleasure from his poems, and one of the best of

them, _The Buried Life_, I have just finished reading, not for

the first time, for they stand many readings; and I am sure

you would find it hopeful and inspiring. I wish you would read

Matthew Arnold's works, particularly some of the poems, such as

_Rugby Chapel_, _Dover Beach_, _Self Dependence_ and _The Buried

Life_; the last, most of all. There is a good deal of the stoical

Greek about Matthew Arnold, but his is a beautiful, noble, pure

mind whose example makes the pursuit of perfection meaningful,

and beautiful to contemplate. There is much in his philosophy

with which you doubtless will not agree, but there is a richness,

beauty and purity, which you will find most inspiring.

"And this brings me still to another question. Why should not you

and E---- turn this winter to profit by spending a part of every

day reading aloud to each other, choosing, preferably, such works

as _The Idylls of the King_, Matthew Arnold's poems, or other

writings of the great masters in literature which take one away

from the sordidness of life, and tend to develop the best that is

in one. This, with an adulteration of fiction, would make the

winter very profitable as well as very enjoyable to you both.

When E---- can find time, he could read with you, and direct

your reading course. My dear L----, I am becoming more and more

convinced every day that the most important duty we have is the

moulding of our character; for it is in the strength and richness

of our character that we obtain the title to self-respect, and

are able to influence others. It is by bringing ourselves into

closer contact with the highest thought that we are going to be

enabled to obtain high-mindedness and purity ourselves. There

is a world of truth in the statement, 'Blessed are the pure in

heart, for they shall see God,' and these things of which I speak

are some of the ways of attaining that purity of heart which

makes life richer, deeper and happier.

"Longfellow, in his prose romance, _Hyperion_, has something of

what I have in mind, when he says:

"'It is the part of an indiscreet and troublesome ambition to

care too much about fame, about what the world says of us; to

be always looking into the faces of others for approval; to be

always anxious for the effect of what we do and say; to be

always shouting to hear the echo of our own voices. If you look

about you, you will see men who are wearing life away in feverish

anxiety of fame, and the last we shall ever hear of them will be

the funeral bell which tolls them to their early graves! Unhappy

men and unsuccessful! because their purpose is, not to accomplish

well their task, but to clutch the "fantasy and trick of fame";

and they go to their graves with purposes unaccomplished, and

wishes unfulfilled. Better for them, and for the world in their

example, had they known how to wait! Believe me, the talent of

success is nothing more than doing what you can do well; and

doing well whatever you do,--without a thought of fame. If it

comes at all, it will come because it is deserved, not because it

is sought after. And, moreover, there will be no misgivings, no

disappointment, no hasty, feverish, exhausting excitement.'

"This is rather a heavy quotation for a letter, but I wished

you to catch the thought, you will find it in the chapter in

_Hyperion_ on _Literary Fame_. You will see the truth of it, if

you allow your mind to dwell upon it for a moment. Longfellow

has no thought of discouraging ambition. Far from it. He

simply wants to emphasize the folly of hoping for fame which is

undeserved, and, as he points out, the way to deserve it is by

doing well what is to be done. But as you are not fame hunting,

it is not the fame part of it that I wish to dwell upon here,

so much as the parallel thought, that it is the inner life, the

inner strength which comes from resolute effort and familiarity

with the best thought, which tells, and which makes for true

happiness.

"I have often told you that your worst danger is your tendency

to worry, a tendency which is based, I know, upon the depth of

the interest which you take in those who are dear to you. What

you must do is to prevent that tendency from casting a shadow

over your life. I have a picture of you--a copy which W----

enlarged from the little sunbeam of you, with a big white hat,

you remember,--in a gold frame over my desk. It is much admired,

and I am proud to introduce it as my sister. As I look at it, I

can see my dear little sister, bright, happy and devoted, and

now I don't want to think of her with any unnecessary cares. Now

do be good, and you and E---- try and make the winter profitable

to both of you. Take walks, get exercise in the open air, be

cheerful, read, and generally try and make life happier by

the means which you have at hand. I am neither scolding nor

lecturing, and I have said nothing which you do not already know,

but somehow to-night, you have been running in my mind, and I

wanted to tell you what I thought and wished, so that, in due

course of time, you will look back to the winter of 1901 as one

of the happiest chapters in your life. I am sorry that, when we

were in Barrie, the shadow of memories and the pressure of many

things must have made me seem selfish and not kind enough to my

sisters, but I need not tell you, L----, that your happiness is

dear to me.

"And now I must close. So good-night, my dear little sister.

"With much love,

"Ever your affectionate brother,

"BERT."

Just how characteristic this letter is of the interest taken by Harper

in the welfare and happiness of those to whom he was united by the

closest of ties, will be apparent from another letter, written many

months previous, to a brother in New York, after returning from a

short visit to that city. It reveals the same earnest endeavour of a

life to impart its own secret to the lives of others, and to establish

a standard of happiness which could bring no deceptions. Its practical

common sense will make it no less commendable as an evidence of the

truest affection.

He writes:

"_Ottawa, Dec. 30, 1900._

"MY DEAR WILL:

"Since returning to Ottawa there has been little happening that

would be of interest to you. I have been busy enough, and have

managed to control a tendency, fostered by the invitations of a

number of kind people here, and my own disposition, to be drawn

into the social whirl. It is weak, and life is earnest, so I

have decided to do with as little of it as possible. No man who

desires to make progress in this world, can hope to do so if he

squanders his evenings. There are two ways in which a man may

equip himself so that he may be in the van of progress:--first,

by strengthening his own mind through a study of what is and has

been in the minds of great men of thought,--this, one can do

from books;--secondly, by pursuing positive original work along

the special line to which he has devoted himself. These things I

am attempting to do. The difficulty lies in selection. What we

have to do is to get away from the semblances, and get at the

realities of life.

"Of Carlyle's _Hero Worship_, I have already spoken to you. It

is healthy and sturdy. I am now reading Carlyle's _Past and

Present_, and do not know anything in literature more wholesome

or worth reading. Do not neglect to read it. Men of the stamp of

Carlyle, Emerson and Matthew Arnold go to the root of questions,

and their books will do you one hundred times as much good as

all the novels which are going the rounds. Every man owes it to

himself to supply his mind with the best material available, and,

although Carlyle may seem a little heavy in parts, where one may

not have become familiar with the subject matter he refers to,

you will find the influence of his sturdy personality upon your

own views of life.

"With regard to the second point,--work along one's own special

line,--I am plodding along at work in the field of economics,

and hope to be able to get out a book in the more or less near

future. You know best what will be profitable for you. What I

would suggest is, that you lose no opportunity of familiarizing

yourself with the best writings on architecture; that you devote

time and thought to studying architectural models of buildings

as they are, and otherwise; and, that you take every opportunity

to attend lectures or discussions where architectural subjects

are being considered. In this way you will find your interest in

your work, and in life generally, as well as your usefulness to

your employers, increasing at a surprising rate. I know how hard

it is for a man living in a great, interesting place like New

York, to do deliberate, consecutive work, and to keep control of

himself and his time, but he must do this, if he is going to get

along. Life is real and earnest, and a man who is going to hold

up his end in dull times, and in the autumn of life, must take

every opportunity to equip himself, and to save his dollars. A

man need not be mean, he can go to things worth going to, he can

dress decently, and hold up his end generally; but there are lots

of things upon which money is often spent, which are absolute

folly. Money is hard to make, and a man cannot justify himself in

throwing it away.

"I hope you will pardon all this which may appear like a

lecture. It is not, I can assure you, dear old Will. It is simply

a few conclusions which I have come to, and which I believe to

be absolutely true. If they are, why should we not follow them?

I want us both to live fruitful and useful lives, and it is by

such conscious, deliberate work as I have referred to, that we

both can do it. Let us cut asunder what of empty, unprofitable

conviviality, and the like, may have grown into our lives, and

let us live so that when we are old men,--if we are spared,--we

may look back upon our lives without regret, and feel that we

have been worthy of the best that is in us, and of the trust

which our dear parents placed in us.

The Secret of Heroism: A Memoir of Henry Albert Harper · 第 3 / 6 段