But it was while the Lacedaemonians were yet in Attica, and during the

first freshness of the terrible malady, that Pericles equipped and

conducted from Piraeus an armament of one hundred triremes and four

thousand hoplites to attack the coasts of Peloponnesus; three hundred

horsemen were also carried in some horse-transports, prepared for the

occasion out of old triremes. To diminish the crowd accumulated in the

city was doubtless of beneficial tendency, and perhaps those who went

aboard might consider it as a chance of escape to quit an infected home.

But unhappily they carried the infection along with them, which

desolated the fleet not less than the city, and crippled all its

efforts. Reenforced by fifty ships of war from Chios and Lesbos, the

Athenians first landed near Epidaurus in Peloponnesus, ravaging the

territory and making an unavailing attempt upon the city; next they made

like incursions on the most southerly portions of the Argolic

peninsula--Troezen, Halieis, and Hermione--and lastly attacked and

captured Prasiae, on the eastern coast of Laconia. On returning to

Athens, the same armament was immediately conducted under Agnon and

Cleopompus, to press the siege of Potidaea, the blockade of which still

continued without any visible progress. On arriving there an attack was

made on the walls by battering engines and by the other aggressive

methods then practised; but nothing whatever was achieved. In fact, the

armament became incompetent for all serious effort, from the aggravated

character which the distemper here assumed, communicated by the soldiers

fresh from Athens even to those who had before been free from it at

Potidaea. So frightful was the mortality that out of the four thousand

hoplites under Agnon no fewer than one thousand and fifty died in the

short space of forty days. The armament was brought back in this

distressed condition to Athens, while the reduction of Potidaea was left

as before, to the slow course of blockade.

On returning from the expedition against Peloponnesus, Pericles found

his countrymen almost distracted with their manifold sufferings. Over

and above the raging epidemic they had just gone over Attica and

ascertained the devastations committed by the invaders throughout all

the territory--except the Marathonian Tetrapolis and Deceleia, districts

spared, as we are told, through indulgence founded on an ancient

legendary sympathy--during their long stay of forty days. The rich had

found their comfortable mansions and farms, the poor their modest

cottages, in the various _demes_, torn down and ruined. Death, sickness,

loss of property, and despair of the future now rendered the Athenians

angry and intractable to the last degree. They vented their feelings

against Pericles as the cause not merely of the war, but also of all

that they were now enduring. Either with or without his consent, they

sent envoys to Sparta to open negotiations for peace, but the Spartans

turned a deaf ear to the proposition. This new disappointment rendered

them still more furious against Pericles, whose long-standing political

enemies now doubtless found strong sympathy in their denunciations of

his character and policy. That unshaken and majestic firmness, which

ranked first among his many eminent qualities, was never more

imperiously required and never more effectively manifested.

In his capacity of _strategus_, or general, Pericles convoked a formal

assembly of the people, for the purpose of vindicating himself publicly

against the prevailing sentiment, and recommending perseverance in his

line of policy. The speeches made by his opponents, assuredly very

bitter, are not given by Thucydides; but that of Pericles himself is set

down at considerable length, and a memorable discourse it is. It

strikingly brings into relief both the character of the man and the

impress of actual circumstances--an impregnable mind conscious not only

of right purposes, but of just and reasonable anticipations, and bearing

up with manliness, or even defiance, against the natural difficulty of

the case, heightened by an extreme of incalculable misfortune. He had

foreseen, while advising the war originally, the probable impatience of

his countrymen under its first hardships, but he could not foresee the

epidemic by which that impatience had been exasperated into madness: and

he now addressed them not merely with unabated adherence to his own

deliberate convictions, but also in a tone of reproachful remonstrance

against their unmerited change of sentiment toward him--seeking at the

same time to combat that uncontrolled despair which for the moment

overlaid both their pride and their patriotism. Far from humbling

himself before the present sentiment, it is at this time that he sets

forth his titles to their esteem in the most direct and unqualified

manner, and claims the continuance of that which they had so long

accorded, as something belonging to him by acquired right.

His main object, through this discourse, is to fill the minds of his

audience with patriotic sympathy for the weal of the entire city, so as

to counterbalance the absorbing sense of private woe. If the collective

city flourishes, he argues, private misfortunes may at least be borne;

but no amount of private prosperity will avail if the collective city

falls--a proposition literally true in ancient times and under the

circumstances of ancient warfare, though less true at present.

"Distracted by domestic calamity, ye are now angry both with me who

advised you to go to war, and with yourselves who followed the advice.

Ye listened to me, considering me superior to others in judgment, in

speech, in patriotism, and in incorruptible probity--nor ought I now to

be treated as culpable for giving such advice, when in point of fact the

war was unavoidable and there would have been still greater danger in

shrinking from it. I am the same man, still unchanged--but ye in your

misfortunes cannot stand to the convictions which ye adopted when yet

unhurt. Extreme and unforeseen, indeed, are the sorrows which have

fallen upon you: yet inhabiting as ye do a great city, and brought up in

dispositions suitable to it, ye must also resolve to bear up against the

utmost pressure of adversity, and never to surrender your dignity. I

have often explained to you that ye have no reason to doubt of eventual

success in the war, but I will now remind you, more emphatically than

before, and even with a degree of ostentation suitable as a stimulus to

your present unnatural depression, that your naval force makes you

masters not only of your allies, but of the entire sea--one-half of the

visible field for action and employment. Compared with so vast a power

as this, the temporary use of your houses and territory is a mere

trifle, an ornamental accessory not worth considering: and this too, if

ye preserve your freedom, ye will quickly recover. It was your fathers

who first gained this empire, without any of the advantages which ye now

enjoy; ye must not disgrace yourselves by losing what they acquired.

"Delighting as ye all do in the honor and empire enjoyed by the city, ye

must not shrink from the toils whereby alone that honor is sustained:

moreover, ye now fight, not merely for freedom instead of slavery, but

for empire against loss of empire, with all the perils arising out of

imperial unpopularity. It is not safe for you now to abdicate, even if

ye chose to do so; for ye hold your empire like a despotism--unjust

perhaps in the original acquisition, but ruinous to part with when once

acquired. Be not angry with me, whose advice ye followed in going to

war, because the enemy have done such damage as might be expected from

them: still less on account of this unforeseen distemper: I know that

this makes me an object of your special present hatred, though very

unjustly, unless ye will consent to give me credit also for any

unexpected good-luck which may occur. Our city derives its particular

glory from unshaken bearing up against misfortune: her power, her name,

her empire of Greeks over Greeks, are such as have never before been

seen; and if we choose to be great, we must take the consequence of that

temporary envy and hatred which is the necessary price of permanent

renown. Behave ye now in a manner worthy of that glory: display that

courage which is essential to protect you against disgrace at present,

as well as to guarantee your honor for the future. Send no further

embassy to Sparta, and bear your misfortunes without showing symptoms of

distress."

The irresistible reason, as well as the proud and resolute bearing of

this discourse, set forth with an eloquence which it was not possible

for Thucydides to reproduce--together with the age and character of

Pericles--carried the assent of the assembled people, who when in the

Pnyx, and engaged according to habit on public matters, would for a

moment forget their private sufferings in considerations of the safety

and grandeur of Athens. Possibly, indeed, those sufferings, though still

continuing, might become somewhat alleviated when the invaders quitted

Attica, and when it was no longer indispensable for all the population

to confine itself within the walls. Accordingly, the assembly resolved

that no further propositions should be made for peace, and that the war

should be prosecuted with vigor.

But though the public resolution thus adopted showed the ancient habit

of deference to the authority of Pericles, the sentiments of individuals

taken separately were still those of anger against him as the author of

that system which had brought them into so much distress. His political

opponents--Cleon, Simmias, or Lacratidas, perhaps all three in

conjunction--took care to provide an opportunity for this prevalent

irritation to manifest itself in act, by bringing an accusation against

him before the _dicastery_. The accusation is said to have been

preferred on the ground of pecuniary malversation, and ended by his

being sentenced to pay a considerable fine, the amount of which is

differently reported--fifteen, fifty, or eighty talents, by different

authors. The accusing party thus appeared to have carried their point,

and to have disgraced, as well as excluded from reelection, the veteran

statesman. The event, however, disappointed their expectations. The

imposition of the fine not only satiated all the irritation of the

people against him, but even occasioned a serious reaction in his favor,

and brought back as strongly as ever the ancient sentiment of esteem and

admiration. It was quickly found that those who had succeeded Pericles

as generals neither possessed nor deserved in an equal degree the public

confidence. He was accordingly soon reelected, with as much power and

influence as he had ever in his life enjoyed.

But that life, long, honorable, and useful, had already been prolonged

considerably beyond the sixtieth year, and there were but too many

circumstances, besides the recent fine, which tended to hasten as well

as to embitter its close. At the very moment when Pericles was preaching

to his countrymen, in a tone almost reproachful, the necessity of manful

and unabated devotion to the common country in the midst of private

suffering, he was himself among the greatest of sufferers, and most

hardly pressed to set the example of observing his own precepts. The

epidemic carried off not merely his two sons--the only two legitimate,

Xanthippus and Paralus--but also his sister, several other relatives,

and his best and most useful political friends. Amid this train of

domestic calamities, and in the funeral obsequies of so many of his

dearest friends, he remained master of his grief, and maintained his

habitual self-command, until the last misfortune--the death of his

favorite son Paralus, which left his house without any legitimate

representative to maintain the family and the hereditary sacred rites.

On this final blow, though he strove to command himself as before, yet

at the obsequies of the young man, when it became his duty to place a

wreath on the dead body, his grief became uncontrollable, and he burst

out, for the first time in his life, into profuse tears and sobbing.

In the midst of these several personal trials he received the

intimation, through Alcibiades and some other friends, of the restored

confidence of the people toward him, and of his reelection to the office

of strategus. But it was not without difficulty that he was persuaded to

present himself again at the public assembly and resume the direction of

affairs. The regret of the people was formally expressed to him for the

recent sentence--perhaps, indeed, the fine may have been repaid to him,

or some evasion of it permitted, saving the forms of law--in the present

temper of the city; which was further displayed toward him by the grant

of a remarkable exemption from a law of his own original proposition.

He had himself, some years before, been the author of that law whereby

the citizenship of Athens was restricted to persons born both of

Athenian fathers and Athenian mothers, under which restriction several

thousand persons, illegitimate on the mother's side, are said to have

been deprived of the citizenship, on occasion of a public distribution

of corn. Invidious as it appeared to grant, to Pericles singly, an

exemption from a law which had been strictly enforced against so many

others, the people were now moved not less by compassion than by anxiety

to redress their own previous severity. Without a legitimate heir, the

house of Pericles, one branch of the great Alcmaeonid gens by his

mother's side, would be left deserted, and the continuity of the family

sacred rites would be broken--a misfortune painfully felt by every

Athenian family, as calculated to wrong all the deceased members, and

provoke their posthumous displeasure toward the city. Accordingly,

permission was granted to Pericles to legitimize, and to inscribe in his

own gens and phratry, his natural son by Aspasia, who bore his own name.

It was thus that Pericles was reinstated in his post of strategus as

well as in his ascendency over the public counsels--seemingly about

August or September, B.C. 430. He lived about one year longer, and seems

to have maintained his influence as long as his health permitted. Yet we

hear nothing of him after this moment, and he fell a victim, not to the

violent symptoms of the epidemic, but to a slow and wearing fever, which

undermined his strength as well as his capacity. To a friend who came to

ask after him when in this disease, Pericles replied by showing a charm

or amulet which his female relations had hung about his neck--a proof

how low he was reduced, and how completely he had become a passive

subject in the hands of others.

And according to another anecdote which we read--yet more interesting

and equally illustrative of his character--it was during his last

moments, when he was lying apparently unconscious and insensible, that

the friends around his bed were passing in review the acts of his life,

and the nine trophies which he had erected at different times for so

many victories. He heard what they said, though they fancied that he was

past hearing, and interrupted them by remarking: "What you praise in my

life belongs partly to good fortune--and is, at best, common to me with

many other generals. But the peculiarity of which I am most proud, you

have not noticed--no Athenian has ever put on mourning through any

action of mine."

DEFEAT OF THE ATHENIANS AT SYRACUSE

B.C. 413

SIR EDWARD SHEPHERD CREASY

(That great writer of the history of the Romans, Thomas Arnold, says of

the defeat of the Athenian fleet at Syracuse: "The Romans knew not, and

could not know, how deeply the greatness of their own posterity, and the

fate of the whole western world, were involved in the destruction of the

fleet of Athens in the harbor of Syracuse. Had that great expedition

proved victorious, the energies of Greece during the next eventful

century would have found their field in the West no less than in the

East; Greece, and not Rome; might have conquered Carthage; Greek instead

of Latin might have been at this day the principal element of the

language of Spain, of France, and of Italy; and the laws of Athens,

rather than of Rome, might be the foundation of the law of the civilized

world."

The foregoing, the author's own selection, really sums up all that need

be said as to the importance of the great event so finely treated by

Creasy.)

Few cities have undergone more memorable sieges during ancient and

mediaeval times than has the city of Syracuse. Athenian, Carthaginian,

Roman, Vandal, Byzantine, Saracen, and Norman have in turns beleaguered

her walls; and the resistance which she successfully opposed to some of

her early assailants was of the deepest importance, not only to the

fortunes of the generations then in being, but to all the subsequent

current of human events. To adopt the eloquent expressions of Arnold

respecting the check which she gave to the Carthaginian arms, "Syracuse

was a breakwater which God's providence raised up to protect the yet

immature strength of Rome." And her triumphant repulse of the great

Athenian expedition against her was of even more widespread and enduring

importance. It forms a decisive epoch in the strife for universal

empire, in which all the great states of antiquity successively engaged

and failed.

The present city of Syracuse is a place of little or no military

strength, as the fire of artillery from the neighboring heights would

almost completely command it. But in ancient warfare its position, and

the care bestowed on its walls, rendered it formidably strong against

the means of offence which were then employed by besieging armies.

The ancient city, in its most prosperous times, was chiefly built on the

knob of land which projects into the sea on the eastern coast of Sicily,

between two bays; one of which, to the north, was called the Bay of

Thapsus, while the southern one formed the great harbor of the city of

Syracuse itself. A small island, or peninsula (for such it soon was

rendered), lies at the southeastern extremity of this knob of land,

stretching almost entirely across the mouth of the great harbor, and

rendering it nearly land-locked. This island comprised the original

settlement of the first Greek colonists from Corinth, who founded

Syracuse two thousand five hundred years ago; and the modern city has

shrunk again into these primary limits. But, in the fifth century before

our era, the growing wealth and population of the Syracusans had led

them to occupy and include within their city walls portion after portion

of the mainland lying next to the little isle, so that at the time of

the Athenian expedition the seaward part of the land between the two

bays already spoken of was built over, and fortified from bay to bay,

and constituted the larger part of Syracuse.

The landward wall, therefore, of this district of the city traversed

this knob of land, which continues to slope upward from the sea, and

which, to the west of the old fortifications, that is, toward the

interior of Sicily, rises rapidly for a mile or two, but diminishes in

width, and finally terminates in a long narrow ridge, between which and

Mount Hybla a succession of chasms and uneven low ground extends. On

each flank of this ridge the descent is steep and precipitous from its

summits to the strips of level land that lie immediately below it, both

to the southwest and northwest.

The usual mode of assailing fortified towns in the time of the

Peloponnesian war was to build a double wall round them sufficiently

strong to check any sally of the garrison from within or any attack of a

relieving force from without. The interval within the two walls of the

circumvallation was roofed over, and formed barracks, in which the

besiegers posted themselves, and awaited the effects of want or

treachery among the besieged in producing a surrender; and in every

Greek city of those days, as in every Italian republic of the Middle

Ages, the rage of domestic sedition between aristocrats and democrats

ran high. Rancorous refugees swarmed in the camp of every invading

enemy; and every blockaded city was sure to contain within its walls a

body of intriguing malcontents, who were eager to purchase a party

triumph at the expense of a national disaster. Famine and faction were

the allies on whom besiegers relied. The generals of that time trusted

to the operation of these sure confederates as soon as they could

establish a complete blockade. They rarely ventured on the attempt to

storm any fortified post, for the military engines of antiquity were

feeble in breaching masonry before the improvements which the first

Dionysius effected in the mechanics of destruction; and the lives of

spearmen the boldest and most high-trained would, of course, have been

idly spent in charges against unshattered walls.

A city built close to the sea, like Syracuse, was impregnable save by

the combined operations of a superior hostile fleet and a superior

hostile army; and Syracuse, from her size, her population, and her

military and naval resources, not unnaturally thought herself secure

from finding in another Greek city a foe capable of sending a sufficient

armament to menace her with capture and subjection. But in the spring of

B.C. 414 the Athenian navy was mistress of her harbor and the adjacent

seas; an Athenian army had defeated her troops, and cooped them within

the town; and from bay to bay a blockading wall was being rapidly

carried across the strips of level ground and the high ridge outside the

city (then termed Epipolae), which, if completed, would have cut the

Syracusans off from all succor from the interior of Sicily, and have

left them at the mercy of the Athenian generals. The besiegers' works

were, indeed, unfinished; but every day the unfortified interval in

their lines grew narrower, and with it diminished all apparent hope of

safety for the beleaguered town.

Athens was now staking the flower of her forces, and the accumulated

fruits of seventy years of glory, on one bold throw for the dominion of

the western world. As Napoleon from Mount Coeur de Lion pointed to St.

Jean d'Acre, and told his staff that the capture of that town would

decide his destiny and would change the face of the world, so the

Athenian officers, from the heights of Epipolae, must have looked on

Syracuse, and felt that with its fall all the known powers of the earth

would fall beneath them. They must have felt also that Athens, if

repulsed there, must pause forever from her career of conquest, and sink

from an imperial republic into a ruined and subservient community.

At Marathon, the first in date of the great battles of the world, we

beheld Athens struggling for self-preservation against the invading

armies of the East. At Syracuse she appears as the ambitious and

oppressive invader of others. In her, as in other republics of old and

of modern times, the same energy that had inspired the most heroic

efforts in defence of the national independence soon learned to employ

itself in daring and unscrupulous schemes of self-aggrandizement at the

expense of neighboring nations. In the interval between the Persian and

the Peloponnesian wars she had rapidly grown into a conquering and

dominant state, the chief of a thousand tributary cities, and the

mistress of the largest and best-manned navy that the Mediterranean had

yet beheld. The occupations of her territory by Xerxes and Mardonius, in

the second Persian war, had forced her whole population to become

marines; and the glorious results of that struggle confirmed them in

their zeal for their country's service at sea.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 02 (From the Rise of Greece to the Christian Era) · 第 5 / 38 段