CHAP. XI.

Coronation of Charles--The Nuncio Aleander--Will Luther's

Books be burnt?--Aleander and the Emperor--The Nuncios and

the Elector--The Son of Duke John pleads for

Luther--Luther's calmness--The Elector protects

Luther--Reply of the Nuncios--Erasmus at Cologne--Erasmus

with the Elector--Declaration of Erasmus--Advice of

Erasmus--System of Charles V.

The powerful words of the Reformer penetrated all minds, and

contributed to their emancipation. The sparks of light which each word

threw out were communicated to the whole nation. But a great question

remained to be solved. Would the prince, in whose states Luther dwelt,

favour the execution of the bull, or would he oppose it? The reply

seemed doubtful. At that time the Elector and all the princes of the

empire were at Aix-la-Chapelle where the crown of Charlemagne was

placed upon the head of the youngest but most powerful monarch of

Christendom. Unprecedented pomp and magnificence were displayed in the

ceremony. Charles V, Frederick, the princes, ministers, and

ambassadors, immediately after repaired to Cologne. Aix-la-Chapelle,

where the plague was raging, seemed to empty itself into this ancient

town on the banks of the Rhine.

[Sidenote: THE NUNCIO ALEANDER.]

Among the crowd of strangers who pressed into the city were the two

papal nuncios, Marino Carracioli and Jerome Aleander. Carracioli, who

had previously executed a mission to Maximilian, was appointed to

congratulate the new emperor, and confer with him on matters of state.

But Rome had become aware that, in order to succeed in extinguishing

the Reformation, it was necessary to send into Germany a nuncio

specially entrusted with the task, and with a character, address, and

activity fitted to accomplish it. Aleander had been selected.[318]

This man, who was afterwards decorated with the cardinals' purple,

seems to have been of rather an ancient family, and not of Jewish

parentage as has been said. The guilty Borgia called him to Rome to be

secretary to his son, the Cesar, before whose murderous sword all Rome

trembled.[319] "Like master like servant," says a historian, who thus

compares Aleander to Alexander VI. This judgment seems too severe.

After the death of Borgia, Aleander devoted himself to study with new

ardour. His skill in Greek, Hebrew, Chaldee, and Arabic, gave him the

reputation of being the most learned man of his age. He threw his

whole soul into whatever he undertook. The zeal with which he studied

languages was not a whit stronger than that which he displayed in

persecuting the Reformation. Leo X took him into his service.

Protestant historians speak of his epicurean habits--Roman historians

of the integrity of his life.[320] He seems to have been fond of

luxury, show, and amusement. "Aleander," says his old friend Erasmus,

"lived in Venice, in high office, but in low epicureanism." He is

admitted to have been violent in temper, prompt in action, full of

ardour, indefatigable, imperious, and devoted to the pope. Eck is the

blustering, intrepid champion of the school,--Aleander the proud

ambassador of the arrogant court of the pontiffs. He seemed formed to

be a nuncio.

[318] Studium flagrantissimum religionis, ardor idolis...incredibile

quanta solertia (Pallavicini, i, p. 84.)

[319] Capello, Venetian ambassador at Rome, in 1500, says of him,

"Tutta Roma trema di esso ducha non li faza amazzar"... (Relatione

M.S. Archives of Vienna, extracted by Ranke.)

[320] Er wird übel als ein gebohrner Jude und schaendlicher Epicurer

beschrieben. (Seckend. 286.)--Integritas vitæ qua prænoscebatur...

(Pallavicini, i, p. 84.)

Rome had made every preparation to destroy the monk of Wittemberg. The

duty of assisting at the coronation of the emperor, as representative

of the pope, was to Aleander only a secondary mission, fitted to

facilitate his task by the respect which it secured to him. The

essential part of his commission was to dispose Charles to crush the

growing Reformation.[321] In putting the bull into the hands of the

emperor, the nuncio had thus addressed him:--"The pope, who has

succeeded with so many great princes, will have little difficulty in

bringing three grammarians to order." By these he meant Luther,

Melancthon, and Erasmus. Erasmus was present at this audience.

[321] "Cui tota sollicitudo insisteret, nascentis hæresis evellendæ."

(Pallavicini, i, p. 83.) Whose whole anxiety was directed to the

extirpation of the growing heresy.

[Sidenote: WILL LUTHER'S WORKS BE BURNT?]

No sooner had Aleander arrived at Cologne, than he proceeded in

concert with Carracioli, to put everything in train for burning

Luther's heretical writings throughout the empire, but more especially

under the eyes of the princes of Germany who were then assembled.

Charles V had already consented to its being done in his hereditary

states. The minds of men were greatly agitated. "Such measures," it

was said to the ministers of Charles, and to the nuncios themselves,

"far from curing the evil, will only make it worse. Do you imagine

that the doctrine of Luther exists only in the books which you throw

into the flames? It is written where you cannot reach it--on the

hearts of the population.[322] If you will employ force, it must be

that of innumerable swords, drawn to massacre an immense

multitude.[323] Some billets of wood, collected for the purpose of

consuming some bits of paper, will do nothing; such weapons become not

the dignity either of the emperor or the pontiff." The nuncio defended

his faggot piles. "These flames," said he, "are a sentence of

condemnation written in gigantic letters, and understood alike by

those who are near, and those who are at a distance, by the learned

and the ignorant, by those even who cannot read."

[322] "Altiusque insculptam in mentibus universæ fere Germaniæ."

(Pallavicini, i, p. 88.)

[323] "In vi innumerabilium gladiorum qui infinitum populum

trucidarent." (Ibid.)

But, in reality the nuncio's efforts were directed not against papers

and books, but Luther himself. "These flames," resumed he, "are not

sufficient to purify the infected air of Germany.[324] If they deter

the simple, they do not correct the wicked. The thing wanted is an

edict from the emperor against Luther's head."[325]

[324] "Non satis ad expurgandam aërem Germaniæ jam tabificum." (Ibid.,

p. 89.)

[325] Cæsaris edictum in caput ... Lutheri. (Ibid.)

Aleander did not find the emperor so complying on the subject of the

Reformer's person as on that of his books.

"Having just ascended the throne," said he to Aleander, "I cannot,

without the advice of my counsellors, and the consent of the princes,

strike such a blow at an immense faction, surrounded by such powerful

defenders. Let us first know what our father, the Elector of Saxony,

thinks of the affair; after that, we shall see what answer to give to

the pope."[326] On the Elector, therefore, the nuncios proceeded to

try their wiles, and the power of their eloquence.

[326] "Audiamus antea hac in re patrem nostrum Fredericum." (L. Op.

Lat., ii, p. 117.)

On the first Sunday of November, after Frederick had attended mass in

the convent of the Cordeliers, Carracioli and Aleander requested an

audience. He received them in the presence of the Bishop of Trent, and

several of his counsellors. Carracioli first presented the papal

brief. Milder than Aleander, he thought it best to gain the Elector by

flattery, and began to laud him and his ancestors. "In you," said he,

"we hope for the salvation of the Roman Church and the Roman empire."

[Sidenote: THE NUNCIOS AND THE ELECTOR.]

But the impetuous Aleander, wishing to come to the point, came

briskly forward, and interrupted his colleague, who modestly gave way

to him.[327] "It is to me," said he, "and Eck, that Martin's affair

has been entrusted. See the immense perils to which this man exposes

the Christian commonwealth. If a remedy is not speedily applied, the

empire is destroyed. What ruined the Greeks if it was not their

abandonment of the pope? You cannot remain united to Luther without

separating from Jesus Christ.[328] In the name of his Holiness, I ask

of you two things: _first_, to burn the writings of Luther;

_secondly_, to punish him according to his demerits, or at least to

give him up a prisoner to the pope.[329] The emperor, and all the

princes of the empire have declared their readiness to accede to our

demands; you alone still hesitate...."

[327] "Cui ita loquenti de improviso sese addit Aleander ..." (L. Op.

Lat., ii, p. 117.)

[328] Non posse cum Luthero conjungi, quin sejungeretur a Christo.

(Pallavicini. p. 86.)

[329] Ut de eo supplicium sumeret, vel captum pontifici transmitteret.

(L. Op. Lat. ii, p. 117.)

Frederick replied, by the intervention of the Bishop of Trent, "This

affair is too grave to be decided on the spur of the moment. We will

acquaint you with our resolution."

Frederick's position was difficult. What course will he adopt? On the

one side are the emperor, the princes of the empire, and the chief

pontiff of Christendom, from whose authority the Elector has as yet no

thought of withdrawing; on the other, a monk, a feeble monk; for his

person is all that is asked. The reign of the emperor has just

commenced, and will discord be thrown into the empire by Frederick,

the oldest and the wisest of all the princes of Germany? Besides, can

he renounce that piety which led him as far as the sepulchre of

Christ?...

Other voices were then heard. John Frederick, son of Duke John, and

nephew of Frederick, the pupil of Spalatin, a young prince, seventeen

years of age, who afterwards wore the electoral crown, and whose reign

was marked by great misfortunes, had been inspired with a heartfelt

love of the truth, and was strongly attached to Luther.[330] When he

saw him struck with the anathemas of Rome, he embraced his cause with

the warmth of a young Christian and a young prince. He wrote to the

doctor, he wrote also to his uncle, soliciting him to protect Luther

against his enemies. At the same time, Spalatin, though indeed he was

often very desponding, Pontanus, and the other counsellors who were

with the Elector at Cologne, represented to him that he could not

abandon the Reformer.[331]

[330] ... Sonderliche Gunst und Gnade zu mir unwürdiglich und den

grossen Willen und Lust zer der heiligen göttlichen Wahrheit ... (L.

Ep. i, p. 548, to John Frederick, 30th October, 1520.)

[331] "Assiduo flabello ministrorum, illi jugiter suadentium ne

Lutherum desereret." (Pallavicini, i, p. 86.)

[Sidenote: THE ELECTOR PROTECTS LUTHER.]

Amid the general agitation, only one man remained tranquil--that man

was Luther. While others were trying to save him by the influence of

the great, the monk, in his cloister at Wittemberg, thought that the

great stood more in need of being saved by him. Writing to Spalatin,

he says, "If the gospel was of a nature to be propagated or maintained

by the power of the world, God would not have entrusted it to

fishermen.[332] To defend the gospel appertains not to the princes and

pontiffs of this world. They have enough to do to shelter themselves

from the judgments of the Lord and his Anointed. If I speak, I do it

in order that they may obtain the knowledge of the divine word, and be

saved by it."

[332] Evangelium si tale esset, quod potentatibus mundi aut

propagaretur aut servaretur, non illud piscatoribus Deus demandasset.

(L. Ep. i, p. 521.)

Luther's expectation was not to be deceived. The faith which a convent

of Wittemberg contained exercised its influence in the palaces of

Cologne. The heart of Frederick, shaken perhaps for an instant, became

gradually stronger. He was indignant that the pope, notwithstanding of

urgent entreaties to investigate the matter in Germany, had condemned

it at Rome, on the demand of the Reformer's personal enemy; and that

in his absence that enemy should have dared to publish in Saxony a

bull which threatened the existence of the university and the peace of

his people. Besides, the Elector was convinced that Luther had been

wronged. He shuddered at the thought of delivering an innocent man

into the cruel hands of his enemies. Justice, rather than the pope,

such was the rule he adopted. He resolved not to yield to Rome. On the

4th November, when the Roman nuncios were in his presence with the

Bishop of Trent, his counsellors announced to them, on the part of the

Elector, that he was much grieved to see how Doctor Eck had taken the

opportunity of his absence to involve in condemnation several persons

not adverted to in the bull; that it might be that, since his

departure, an immense number of the learned and the ignorant, the

clergy and the laity, had united in adhering to the cause and the

appeal of Luther;[333] that neither his Imperial Majesty, nor any

person, had shown him that the writings of Luther had been refuted,

and that the only thing now necessary was to throw them into the fire,

that he moreover demanded a safe conduct for Doctor Luther, to enable

him to appear before learned, pious, and important judges.

[333] "Ut ingens vis populi, doctorum et rudium, sacrorum et

profanorum, sese conjunxerint...." (L. Op. Lat., ii, p. 116.)

[Sidenote: ERASMUS AT COLOGNE.]

After this declaration, Aleander, Carracioli, and their suite, retired

to deliberate.[334] It was the first time the Elector had publicly

declared his intentions with regard to the Reformer. The nuncios had

anticipated a very different result. "Now," thought they, "that the

Elector, by persisting in playing his part of impartiality, would

expose himself to dangers, the full extent of which cannot be

foreseen, he will not hesitate to sacrifice the monk." So Rome had

reasoned. But her schemes were destined to fail before a power to

which she had not adverted--the love of justice and truth.

[334] "Quo audito, Marinus et Aleander seorsim cum suis locuti sunt."

(Ibid., p. 117.)

When again before the Elector's counsellors, "I would fain know," said

the imperious Aleander, "what the Elector would think were one of his

subjects to choose the King of France or some other foreign prince for

judge?" Seeing at length that the Saxon counsellors were not to be

shaken, he said, "We will execute the bull; we will prosecute and burn

the writings of Luther. As to his person," added he, affecting a

disdainful indifference, "the pope has no anxiety to dip his hand in

the blood of the wretch."

News of the reply which the Elector had given to the nuncios having

reached Wittemberg, Luther's friends were overjoyed. Melancthon and

Amsdorff, in particular, cherished the most flattering hopes. "The

German nobility," said Melancthon, "will shape their course by the

example of a prince whom they follow in every thing as their Nestor.

If Homer called his hero '_the wall of the Greeks_,' why should not

Frederick be called '_the wall of the Germans_?'"[335]

[335] Homerica adpellatione murum Germaniæ. (Corp. Ref. i, p. 272.)

[Sidenote: ERASMUS WITH THE ELECTOR.]

Erasmus, the oracle of courts, the torch of the schools, the light of

the world, was then at Cologne, having been invited thither by several

princes who wished to consult him. At the period of the Reformation,

Erasmus was at the head of the true middle (_juste milieu_) party, at

least he thought he was, but erroneously; for when truth and error are

in presence of each other, the right side is not the middle. He was

the chief of that philosophical and university party, which had for

ages aspired to correct Rome, without being able to do so; he was the

representative of human wisdom; but this wisdom was too weak to

repress the arrogance of the papacy. The wisdom of God was

necessary--that wisdom which the world often calls folly, but at the

bidding of which mountains are crushed. Erasmus was unwilling either

to throw himself into the arms of Luther, or to seat himself at the

feet of the pope. He hesitated, and often vibrated between these two

powers, sometimes attracted towards Luther, and then suddenly repelled

towards the pope. He had declared for Luther in a letter to the

Archbishop of Mentz, in which he had said, "The last spark of

Christian piety seems ready to be extinguished. It is this that has

moved Luther's heart; he cares neither for money nor honour."[336] The

publication of this letter by the imprudent Ulric von Hütten,

subjected Erasmus to so much annoyance that he resolved to act with

more prudence in future. Besides, he was accused of being in concert

with Luther whose unguarded speeches moreover offended him. "Almost

all good people,"[337] said he, "are for Luther, but I see that we are

on the high way to a revolt. I would not have my name coupled with

his. It hurts me and does him no good."[338] "Be it so," replied

Luther, "since it pains you, I promise never to mention your name, nor

that of any of your friends." Such was the man to whom both the

enemies and the friends of the Reformer applied.

[336] "Et futurum erat .... ut tandem prorsus extingueretur illa

scintilla Christianæ pietatis; hæc moverunt animum Lutheri .... qui

nec honores ambit nec pecuniam cupit." (Erasm. Ep. Londini, 1642, p.

586.)

[337] Favent vero ferme boni omnes. (Corp. Ref. i, p. 205.)

[338] Er will von mir ungenennt seyn. (L. Ep. i, p. 525.) Nam ea res

me gravat et Lutherum non sublevat. (Corp. Ref. i, p. 206.)

[Sidenote: OPINION OF ERASMUS.]

The Elector, aware that the opinion of a man so much respected as

Erasmus would carry great weight, invited the illustrious Dutchman to

come to him. Erasmus complied. This was on the 5th of December. The

friends of Luther saw this step not without secret apprehension. The

Elector was sitting before the fire, with Spalatin beside him, when

Erasmus was introduced. "What think you of Luther?" immediately asked

Frederick. The prudent Erasmus, surprised at the direct question, at

first tried to evade it. He twisted his mouth, bit his lips, and said

nothing. Then the Elector, opening his eyes (says Spalatin,) as he was

wont to do when speaking to persons from whom he wished a precise

answer, looked piercingly at Erasmus,[339] who, not knowing how to

disembarrass himself, at last said, half in jest, "Luther has

committed two great faults; he has attacked the pope's crown and the

monks' belly." The Elector smiled, but gave Erasmus to understand that

he was in earnest. Then Erasmus, laying aside his reserve, said, "The

source of all this dispute is the hatred of the monks against letters,

and the fear they have of seeing an end put to their tyranny.[340]

What have they put in operation against Luther? Clamour, cabal,

hatred, libels. The more virtuous, and the more attached to the

doctrines of the gospel a man is, the less is he opposed to

Luther.[341] The harshness of the bull has excited the indignation of

all good men, and nobody has been able to discover in it the meekness

of a vicar of Jesus Christ.[342] Out of so many universities two only

have attacked Luther, and even these have only condemned, not

convicted him. Let not people deceive themselves; the danger is

greater than some suppose. Things difficult and arduous are at

hand.[343]... To begin the reign of Charles with an act so hateful as

the imprisonment of Luther would be of sad augury. The world is

thirsting for evangelical truth.[344] Let us beware of culpably

resisting it. Let the affair be examined by grave men of sound

judgment; this would be more accordant with the dignity of the pope

himself."

[339] Da sperret auch wahrlich mein gnädister Herr seine Augen nur

wohl auf... (Spalatin Hist. MS. in Seckend. p. 291.)

[340] Lutherus peccavit in duobus, nempe quod tetigit coronam

pontificis et ventres monachorum, (See 1st vol.)

[341] Cum optimus quisque et evangelicæ doctrinæ proximus dicatur,

minime offensus Luthero. (Axiomata Erasmi in L. Op. Lat. ii, p. 115.)

[342] Bullæ sævitia probos omnes offendit ut indigna mitissimo Christi

vicario. (Ibid.)

[343] Urgent ardua negotia.... (Ibid.)

[344] Mundus sitit veritatem evangelicam. (Axiomata Erasmi in L. Op.

Lat. ii, p. 115.)

Thus spoke Erasmus to the Elector. The reader will perhaps be

astonished at his frankness; but Erasmus knew to whom he was speaking.

Spalatin was delighted, and going out with Erasmus, accompanied him as

far as the house of the Count of Nuenar, provost of Cologne, where the

illustrious scholar was residing. Erasmus, in a fit of frankness, went

into his room, took up the pen and wrote down the substance of what he

had said to the Elector, and gave it to Spalatin. But fear of Aleander

soon took possession of the timid Erasmus, the courage which he had

felt in the presence of the Elector and his chaplain vanished, and he

begged Spalatin to send back his too bold writing lest it should fall

into the hands of the terrible nuncio. It was too late.

The Elector, feeling strong in the opinion of Erasmus, spoke in more

decided terms to the emperor. Erasmus himself strove in nocturnal

conferences,[345] like Nicodemus of old, to persuade the counsellors

of Charles that it was necessary to remit the whole affair to

impartial judges. Perhaps he had some hope of being named arbiter in

this cause which threatened to divide the Christian world. His vanity

would have been flattered by the office. But, at the same time, not to

lose himself at Rome, he wrote the most submissive letters to Leo, who

replied in kind terms, and thereby put poor Aleander to the

torture.[346] From love to the pope, he could have sharply rebuked the

pope. Erasmus communicated the pontiff's letters because they added to

his credit. The nuncio made a complaint at Rome: "Pretend," was the

answer, "that you do not observe the naughtiness of that man. Prudence

requires it: it is necessary to leave the door open for

repentance."[347]

[345] Sollicitatis per nocturnos congressus. (Pallavicini, p. 87.)

[346] Quæ male torquebant Aleandrum. (Ibid.)

[347] Prudentis erat consilii hominis pravitatem dissimulare. (Ibid,

p. 88.)

[Sidenote: POLICY OF CHARLES V.]

Charles V himself embraced a vacillating system, which consisted in

flattering both the pope and the Elector, and in seeming to incline

alternately towards the one or the other according to the wants of the

moment. One of his ministers, whom he had sent to Rome on certain

Spanish matters, had arrived at the very time when Eck was loudly

prosecuting Luther's condemnation. The wily ambassador instantly saw

the advantages which his master might derive from the Saxon monk, and

on the 12th May, 1520, wrote the emperor, who was still in Spain:

"Your Majesty should go into Germany, and there show some favour to

one Martin Luther, who is at the Court of Saxony, and, by his

discourses, is giving much uneasiness to the Court of Rome."[348]

Such, at the outset, was the light in which Charles viewed the matter.

His object was not to know on which side truth or error lay, or to

ascertain what the great interest of Germany demanded. What does

policy require, and by what means can the pope be induced to support

the emperor? This was the whole question, and at Rome was well known

to be so. The ministers of Charles gave Aleander a hint of the plan

which their master meant to follow. "The emperor," said they, "will

act towards the pope as the pope acts towards the emperor: for he

cares not to increase the power of his rivals, and in particular of

the king of France."[349] At these words the imperious nuncio gave

vent to his indignation: "What!" replied he, "even should the pope

abandon the emperor must the emperor abandon religion? If Charles

means thus to take his revenge ... let him tremble! This unprincipled

course will turn against himself." The imperial diplomatists were not

moved by the menaces of the nuncio.

[348] Despatches of Manuel Llorente, i, p. 338.

[349] Pallav. p. 91.

History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 2 · 第 93 / 141 题