CHAP. III.

Arrival of Eck and the Wittembergers--Amsdorf--The

Students--Carlstadt's accident--Placard--Eck and

Luther--Pleissenburg--Shall Judges be appointed?--Luther

objects.

[Sidenote: ECK'S ARRIVAL. AMSDORF. THE STUDENTS.]

At the time when the Electors met at Frankfort to give an emperor to

Germany, (June, 1519,) theologians met at Leipsic for an act which,

though unnoticed by the world, was destined to be not less important

in its results.

Eck was the first who arrived at the place of rendezvous. On the 21st

June he entered Leipsic in company with Poliander, a young man whom he

had brought from Ingolstadt to report the debate. All kinds of honours

were paid to the scholastic doctor, who, on the Fête Dieu, paraded the

town in full canonicals, and at the head of a numerous procession.

There was a general eagerness to see him. According to his own

account, all the inhabitants were in his favour. "Nevertheless," adds

he, "a rumour was current in the town that I was to be worsted in the

encounter."

The day after the fête, viz., Friday, 24th June, (St. John's Day,) the

Wittembergers arrived. Carlstadt, Eck's destined opponent, came first

in a chariot by himself. Next, in an open carriage, came Duke Barnim

of Pomerania, who was then studying at Wittemberg under the direction

of a tutor, and had been elected rector of the University. On each

side of him sat the two great theologians, the fathers of the

Reformation, Melancthon and Luther. Melancthon had been unwilling to

quit his friend. He had said to Spalatin, "Martin, the soldier of the

Lord, has stirred up this fetid marsh.[61] I cannot think of the

shameful conduct of the pope's theologians without indignation. Be

firm, and adhere to us." Luther himself had expressed a desire that

his Achates, as he has been called, should accompany him.

[61] Martinus, Domini miles, hanc camarinam movit. (Corp. Ref. i, p.

82.)

John Lange, vicar of the Augustins, some doctors in law, several

masters of arts, two licentiates in theology, and other ecclesiastics,

among whom Nicolas Amsdorf was conspicuous, closed the rear. Amsdorf,

the member of a noble family in Saxony, disregarding the brilliant

career which his birth might have opened to him, had devoted himself

to theology. The theses on indulgences having brought him to the

knowledge of the truth, he had forthwith made a bold profession of the

faith.[62] Vigorous in intellect and vehement in temper, Amsdorf often

pushed on Luther, by nature abundantly ardent, to acts which were

perhaps imprudent. Born to high rank, he was not overawed by the

great, and occasionally addressed them with a freedom bordering on

rudeness. "The gospel of Jesus Christ," said he one day in an assembly

of nobles, "belongs to the poor and afflicted, and not to you princes,

lords, and courtiers, whose lives are passed in luxury and joy."[63]

[62] Nec cum carne et sanguine diu contulit, sed statim palam ad alios

fidei confessionem constanter edidit. (M. Adami. Vita Amsdorf.) Nor

did he confer with flesh and blood, but forthwith made a public and

firm profession of his faith.

[63] Weisman. Hist. Eccl. i, p. 1444.

[Sidenote: CARLSTADT'S ACCIDENT.]

But we have not yet mentioned the whole train from Wittemberg. A

large body of students accompanied their teachers. Eck affirms that

the number amounted to two hundred. Armed with pikes and halberds,

they walked beside the carriages of the doctors ready to defend them,

and proud of their cause.

Such was the order in which the body of Reformers entered Leipsic.

Just as they passed the Grimma gate, which is in front of St. Paul's

cemetery, one of the wheels of Carlstadt's carriage broke down. The

archdeacon, who, with great self-complacency, was enjoying the solemn

entry, tumbled into the mire. He was not hurt, but was obliged to

proceed to his lodgings on foot. Luther's chariot, which was

immediately behind Carlstadt's, moved rapidly forward, and delivered

the Reformer safe and sound. The inhabitants of Leipsic, who had

assembled to witness the entry of the Wittemberg champions, considered

the accident as a bad omen for Carlstadt; and the inference was soon

current over the town, viz., that he would be defeated in the combat,

but that Luther would come off victorious.[64]

[64] Seb. Fröschel vom Priesterthum. Wittemb., 1585, in Præf.

Adolphus of Merseberg did not remain idle. As soon as he learned the

approach of Luther and Carlstadt, and even before they had lighted

from their carriages, he caused a notice to be posted up on all the

church-doors forbidding the discussion under pain of excommunication.

Duke George, astonished at his presumption, ordered the town council

to tear down the bishop's placard, and imprison the individual which

had been employed to put it up.[65] The Duke George, who had come in

person to Leipsic, attended by all his court--among others by Jerôme

Emser, with whom Luther spent the famous evening at Dresden, sent the

disputants the usual presents.[66] "The duke," boasted Eck, "presented

me with a fine stag, and gave Carlstadt only a roebuck."[67]

[65] L. Op. (L.) xvii, p. 243.

[66] First vol., p. 172.

[67] Seckend. p. 190.

Eck was no sooner informed of Luther's arrival than he called upon

him--"What!" said he, "it is said that you refuse to debate with me."

_Luther._--"How can I when the duke forbids me?"

_Eck._--"If I cannot debate with you, I am not anxious to have any

thing to do with Carlstadt. It was for you I came here." Then, after a

short pause, he added--"If I obtain the dukes permission, will you

take the field?"[68]

[68] Si tecum non licet disputare, neque cum Carlstatio volo: propter

te enim huc veni. (L. Op. in Præf.)

_Luther_ (_joyfully_).--"Obtain it, and we shall debate."

[Sidenote: PRELIMINARY ARRANGEMENTS.]

Eck forthwith repaired to the duke, and tried to dissipate his fears,

representing to him that he was certain of victory, and that the

authority of the pope, so far from suffering by the discussion, would

come out of it more glorious. "We must strike at the head. If Luther

stands erect, so do all his adherents--if he falls, they all fall."

George granted permission.

The duke had caused a large hall to be prepared in his palace of

Pleissenburg. Two desks had been erected opposite to each other,

tables arranged for the notaries who were to take down the discussion

in writing, and benches for the spectators. The desks and benches were

covered with rich tapestry. At the doctor of Wittemberg's desk was

suspended the portrait of St. Martin, after whom he was named; and at

that of Dr. Eck, the portrait of the knight of St. George. "We shall

see," said the arrogant Eck, with his eye on the emblem, "whether I do

not, with my steed, trample down my enemies." Every thing bespoke the

importance which was attached to the combat.

On 25th June, the parties met in the castle to arrange the order of

proceeding. Eck, who had more confidence in his declamation and

gesture than in his arguments, exclaimed, "We will debate freely, off

hand, and the notaries will not take down our words in writing."

_Carlstadt._--"The agreement was, that the discussion should be

written down, published, and submitted to the judgment of all men."

_Eck._--"To write down every thing is to wear out the spirit of the

disputants, and protract the battle. In that case there can be no hope

of the vivacity requisite in an animated debate. Do not lay an arrest

on the flow of eloquence."[69]

[69] Melancth. Op. i, p. 139. (Kœthe ed.)

Dr. Eck's friends supported his proposal, but Carlstadt persisted in

his objection, and Eck was obliged to yield.

_Eck._--"Be it so, let there be writing; but, at all events, the

debate, when taken down by the notaries, is not to be published before

it has been submitted to the decision of judges."

_Luther._--"The truth of Dr. Eck and the Eckians fears the light."

_Eck._--"There must be judges."

_Luther._--"And what judges?"

_Eck._--"After the debate is over we will agree upon them."

The object of the partisans of Rome was evident. If the theologians of

Wittemberg accepted judges, their cause was lost. It was obvious

beforehand who the persons were whom their opponents would suggest;

and yet the Reformers, if they refused them, would be covered with

obloquy, as it would be circulated every where that they were afraid

of submitting to impartial judges.

[Sidenote: LUTHER OBJECTS.]

The judges whom the Reformers desired were not individuals whose

opinion was already declared, but the whole of Christendom. Their

appeal was made to the general voice. It mattered little who condemned

them, if, in pleading their cause in presence of the Christian world,

they succeeded in bringing some individuals to the light. "Luther,"

says a Roman historian, "demanded all the faithful for judges--in

other words, demanded a tribunal so numerous that there could be no

urn large enough to hold its votes."[70]

[70] "Aiebat, ad universos mortales pertinebat judicium, hoc est ad

tribunal cujus colligendis calculis nulla urna satis capax."

(Pallavicini, T. i, p. 55.)

The meeting broke up. "See their stratagem," said Luther and his

friends to each other. "They would to a certainty ask to have the pope

or the universities for judges."

In fact, the theologians of Rome, next morning, sent one of their

party to Luther, with a proposal that the judge should be ... the

pope!... "The pope!" said Luther, "how could I accept him?"

"Beware," exclaimed all his friends, "of accepting conditions so

unjust." Eck and his friends having consulted anew, gave up the pope,

and proposed certain universities. "Don't take from us the liberty

which you have already granted us," replied Luther. "We cannot yield

this point," resumed Eck. "Then," exclaimed Luther, "I don't

debate."[71]

[71] I. Op. (L. xvii, p. 245.)

They again parted, and what had just passed was talked of over the

whole town. The Romans kept crying every where, "Luther won't

debate--he refuses to accept of any judge!" Commenting on, and

torturing his words, they endeavoured to represent them in the most

unfavourable light. "What! truly? he will not debate?" say the best

friends of the Reformer, and hasten to him to express their alarm.

"You decline the contest," exclaim they. "Your refusal will bring

eternal disgrace on your university and your cause." This was to

attack Luther in his most tender point. "Very well," replied he, his

heart filled with indignation, "I accept the terms which are imposed

on me; but I reserve a right of appeal, and I decline the Court of

Rome."[72]

[72] Ibid., p. 246.

[Sidenote: THE PROCESSION. MASS.]

History of the Reformation in the Sixteenth Century, Volume 2 · 第 74 / 141 题