SECOND ARTICLE [III, Q. 84, Art. 2]

Whether Sins Are the Proper Matter of This Sacrament?

Objection 1: It would seem that sins are not the proper matter of

this sacrament. Because, in the other sacraments, the matter is

hallowed by the utterance of certain words, and being thus hallowed

produces the sacramental effect. Now sins cannot be hallowed, for

they are opposed to the effect of the sacrament, viz. grace which

blots out sin. Therefore sins are not the proper matter of this

sacrament.

Obj. 2: Further, Augustine says in his book _De Poenitentia_ [Cf.

Serm. cccli]: "No one can begin a new life, unless he repent of the

old." Now not only sins but also the penalties of the present life

belong to the old life. Therefore sins are not the proper matter of

Penance.

Obj. 3: Further, sin is either original, mortal or venial. Now the

sacrament of Penance is not ordained against original sin, for this

is taken away by Baptism, [nor against mortal sin, for this is taken

away by the sinner's confession]*, nor against venial sin, which is

taken away by the beating of the breast and the sprinkling of holy

water and the like. Therefore sins are not the proper matter of

Penance. [*The words in brackets are omitted in the Leonine edition].

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (2 Cor. 12:21): "(Who) have not

done penance for the uncleanness and fornication and lasciviousness,

that they have committed."

_I answer that,_ Matter is twofold, viz. proximate and remote: thus

the proximate matter of a statue is a metal, while the remote matter

is water. Now it has been stated (A. 1, ad 1, ad 2), that the

proximate matter of this sacrament consists in the acts of the

penitent, the matter of which acts are the sins over which he

grieves, which he confesses, and for which he satisfies. Hence it

follows that sins are the remote matter of Penance, as a matter, not

for approval, but for detestation, and destruction.

Reply Obj. 1: This argument considers the proximate matter of a

sacrament.

Reply Obj. 2: The old life that was subject to death is the object of

Penance, not as regards the punishment, but as regards the guilt

connected with it.

Reply Obj. 3: Penance regards every kind of sin in a way, but not

each in the same way. Because Penance regards actual mortal sin

properly and chiefly; properly, since, properly speaking, we are said

to repent of what we have done of our own will; chiefly, since this

sacrament was instituted chiefly for the blotting out of mortal sin.

Penance regards venial sins, properly speaking indeed, in so far as

they are committed of our own will, but this was not the chief

purpose of its institution. But as to original sin, Penance regards

it neither chiefly, since Baptism, and not Penance, is ordained

against original sin, nor properly, because original sin is not done

of our own will, except in so far as Adam's will is looked upon as

ours, in which sense the Apostle says (Rom. 5:12): "In whom all have

sinned." Nevertheless, Penance may be said to regard original sin, if

we take it in a wide sense for any detestation of something past: in

which sense Augustine uses the term in his book _De Poenitentia_

(Serm. cccli).

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 610 / 654 题