THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 57, Art. 3]

Whether Christ Ascended by His Own Power?

Objection 1: It would seem that Christ did not ascend by His own

power, because it is written (Mk. 16:19) that "the Lord Jesus, after

He had spoken to them, was taken up to heaven"; and (Acts 1:9) that,

"while they looked on, He was raised up, and a cloud received Him out

of their sight." But what is taken up, and lifted up, appears to be

moved by another. Consequently, it was not by His own power, but by

another's that Christ was taken up into heaven.

Obj. 2: Further, Christ's was an earthly body, like to ours. But it

is contrary to the nature of an earthly body to be borne upwards.

Moreover, what is moved contrary to its nature is nowise moved by its

own power. Therefore Christ did not ascend to heaven by His own power.

Obj. 3: Further, Christ's own power is Divine. But this motion does

not seem to have been Divine, because, whereas the Divine power is

infinite, such motion would be instantaneous; consequently, He would

not have been uplifted to heaven "while" the disciples "looked on,"

as is stated in Acts 1:9. Therefore, it seems that Christ did not

ascend to heaven by His own power.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Isa. 63:1): "This beautiful one in

his robe, walking in the greatness of his strength." Also Gregory

says in a Homily on the Ascension (xxix): "It is to be noted that we

read of Elias having ascended in a chariot, that it might be shown

that one who was mere man needed another's help. But we do not read

of our Saviour being lifted up either in a chariot or by angels,

because He who had made all things was taken up above all things by

His own power."

_I answer that,_ There is a twofold nature in Christ, to wit, the

Divine and the human. Hence His own power can be accepted according

to both. Likewise a twofold power can be accepted regarding His human

nature: one is natural, flowing from the principles of nature; and it

is quite evident that Christ did not ascend into heaven by such power

as this. The other is the power of glory, which is in Christ's human

nature; and it was according to this that He ascended to heaven.

Now there are some who endeavor to assign the cause of this power to

the nature of the fifth essence. This, as they say, is light, which

they make out to be of the composition of the human body, and by

which they contend that contrary elements are reconciled; so that in

the state of this mortality, elemental nature is predominant in human

bodies: so that, according to the nature of this predominating

element the human body is borne downwards by its own power: but in

the condition of glory the heavenly nature will predominate, by whose

tendency and power Christ's body and the bodies of the saints are

lifted up to heaven. But we have already treated of this opinion in

the First Part (Q. 76, A. 7), and shall deal with it more fully in

treating of the general resurrection (Suppl., Q. 84, A. 1).

Setting this opinion aside, others assign as the cause of this power

the glorified soul itself, from whose overflow the body will be

glorified, as Augustine writes to Dioscorus (Ep. cxviii). For the

glorified body will be so submissive to the glorified soul, that, as

Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xxii), "wheresoever the spirit listeth,

thither the body will be on the instant; nor will the spirit desire

anything unbecoming to the soul or the body." Now it is befitting the

glorified and immortal body for it to be in a heavenly place, as

stated above (A. 1). Consequently, Christ's body ascended into heaven

by the power of His soul willing it. But as the body is made glorious

by participation with the soul, even so, as Augustine says (Tract.

xxiii in Joan.), "the soul is beatified by participating in God."

Consequently, the Divine power is the first source of the ascent into

heaven. Therefore Christ ascended into heaven by His own power, first

of all by His Divine power, and secondly by the power of His

glorified soul moving His body at will.

Reply Obj. 1: As Christ is said to have risen by His own power,

though He was raised to life by the power of the Father, since the

Father's power is the same as the Son's; so also Christ ascended into

heaven by His own power, and yet was raised up and taken up to heaven

by the Father.

Reply Obj. 2: This argument proves that Christ did not ascend into

heaven by His own power, i.e. that which is natural to human nature:

yet He did ascend by His own power, i.e. His Divine power, as well as

by His own power, i.e. the power of His beatified soul. And although

to mount upwards is contrary to the nature of a human body in its

present condition, in which the body is not entirely dominated by the

soul, still it will not be unnatural or forced in a glorified body,

whose entire nature is utterly under the control of the spirit.

Reply Obj. 3: Although the Divine power be infinite, and operate

infinitely, so far as the worker is concerned, still the effect

thereof is received in things according to their capacity, and as God

disposes. Now a body is incapable of being moved locally in an

instant, because it must be commensurate with space, according to the

division of which time is reckoned, as is proved in Physics vi.

Consequently, it is not necessary for a body moved by God to be moved

instantaneously, but with such speed as God disposes.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 383 / 654 题