THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 46, Art. 3]

Whether There Was Any More Suitable Way of Delivering the Human Race

Than by Christ's Passion?

Objection 1: It would seem that there was some other more suitable

way of delivering the human race besides Christ's Passion. For nature

in its operation imitates the Divine work, since it is moved and

regulated by God. But nature never employs two agents where one will

suffice. Therefore, since God could have liberated mankind solely by

His Divine will, it does not seem fitting that Christ's Passion

should have been added for the deliverance of the human race.

Obj. 2: Further, natural actions are more suitably performed than

deeds of violence, because violence is "a severance or lapse from

what is according to nature," as is said in _De Coelo_ ii. But

Christ's Passion brought about His death by violence. Therefore it

would have been more appropriate had Christ died a natural death

rather than suffer for man's deliverance.

Obj. 3: Further, it seems most fitting that whatsoever keeps

something unjustly and by violence, should be deprived of it by some

superior power; hence Isaias says (52:3): "You were sold gratis, and

you shall be redeemed without money." But the devil possessed no

right over man, whom he had deceived by guile, and whom he held

subject in servitude by a sort of violence. Therefore it seems most

suitable that Christ should have despoiled the devil solely by His

power and without the Passion.

_On the contrary,_ St. Augustine says (De Trin. xiii): "There was no

other more suitable way of healing our misery" than by the Passion of

Christ.

_I answer that,_ Among means to an end that one is the more suitable

whereby the various concurring means employed are themselves helpful

to such end. But in this that man was delivered by Christ's Passion,

many other things besides deliverance from sin concurred for man's

salvation. In the first place, man knows thereby how much God loves

him, and is thereby stirred to love Him in return, and herein lies

the perfection of human salvation; hence the Apostle says (Rom. 5:8):

"God commendeth His charity towards us; for when as yet we were

sinners . . . Christ died for us." Secondly, because thereby He set

us an example of obedience, humility, constancy, justice, and the

other virtues displayed in the Passion, which are requisite for man's

salvation. Hence it is written (1 Pet. 2:21): "Christ also suffered

for us, leaving you an example that you should follow in His steps."

Thirdly, because Christ by His Passion not only delivered man from

sin, but also merited justifying grace for him and the glory of

bliss, as shall be shown later (Q. 48, A. 1; Q. 49, AA. 1, 5).

Fourthly, because by this man is all the more bound to refrain from

sin, according to 1 Cor. 6:20: "You are bought with a great price:

glorify and bear God in your body." Fifthly, because it redounded to

man's greater dignity, that as man was overcome and deceived by the

devil, so also it should be a man that should overthrow the devil;

and as man deserved death, so a man by dying should vanquish death.

Hence it is written (1 Cor. 15:57): "Thanks be to God who hath given

us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." It was accordingly

more fitting that we should be delivered by Christ's Passion than

simply by God's good-will.

Reply Obj. 1: Even nature uses several means to one intent, in order

to do something more fittingly: as two eyes for seeing; and the same

can be observed in other matters.

Reply Obj. 2: As Chrysostom [*Athanasius, Orat. De Incarn. Verb.]

says: "Christ had come in order to destroy death, not His own, (for

since He is life itself, death could not be His), but men's death.

Hence it was not by reason of His being bound to die that He laid His

body aside, but because the death He endured was inflicted on Him by

men. But even if His body had sickened and dissolved in the sight of

all men, it was not befitting Him who healed the infirmities of

others to have his own body afflicted with the same. And even had He

laid His body aside without any sickness, and had then appeared, men

would not have believed Him when He spoke of His resurrection. For

how could Christ's victory over death appear, unless He endured it in

the sight of all men, and so proved that death was vanquished by the

incorruption of His body?"

Reply Obj. 3: Although the devil assailed man unjustly, nevertheless,

on account of sin, man was justly left by God under the devil's

bondage. And therefore it was fitting that through justice man should

be delivered from the devil's bondage by Christ making satisfaction

on his behalf in the Passion. This was also a fitting means of

overthrowing the pride of the devil, "who is a deserter from justice,

and covetous of sway"; in that Christ "should vanquish him and

deliver man, not merely by the power of His Godhead, but likewise by

the justice and lowliness of the Passion," as Augustine says (De

Trin. xiii).

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 307 / 654 题