ANSWERED IN KIND.

Why should we smother a good thing with _mystifying dashes_, instead

of plain English high-sounding names, when the subject is of

"honourable men?" "_Recte facta refert._"--Horace forbid it! The

learned Chancery Barrister, John Bell, K.C., "_the Great Bell of

Lincoln_," as he has been aptly called, was _Senior Wrangler_, on

graduating B.A., at Trinity College, Cambridge, in 1786, with many

able competitors for that honour. He is likewise celebrated, as every

body knows, for writing three several hands; one only he himself can

read, another nobody but his clerk can read, and a third neither

himself, clerk, nor any body else can read! It was in the latter hand

he one day wrote to his legal contemporary and friend, the present Sir

Launcelot Shadwell, Vice-Chancellor of England (who is likewise a

Cantab, and graduated in 1800 at St. John's College, of which he

became a Fellow, with the double distinction of Seventh Wrangler and

Second Chancellor's Medallist) inviting him to dinner. Sir Launcelot,

finding all his attempts to decipher the note about as vain as the

wise men found theirs to unravel the Cabalistic characters of yore,

took a sheet of paper, and having _smeared_ it over with ink, he

folded and sealed it, and sent it as his answer. The receipt of it

staggered even the Great Bell of Lincoln, and after breaking the seal,

and eyeing and turning it round and round, he hurried to Mr.

Shadwell's chambers with it, declaring he could make nothing of it.

"Nor I of your note," retorted Mr. S. "My dear fellow," exclaimed Mr.

B., taking his own letter in his hand, is not this, as plain as can

be, "Dear Shadwell, I shall be glad to see you at dinner to-day." "And

is not this equally as plain," said Mr. S., pointing to his own paper,

"My dear Bell, I shall be happy to come and dine with you."

* * * * *

Nuts to crack; or Quips, quirks, anecdote and facete of Oxford and Cambridge Scholars · 第 194 / 414 题