_man_ tawatz nahanes.
_woman_ maruqua nikil.
_head_ mutacowa niyuluka.
_hair_ torpip piiki.
_face_ cobanim nepush.
_ear_ nancaba nanocka.
_eye_ puoui napush.
_nose_ muvi nemu.
_mouth_ timpouo netama.
_tongue_ ago nenun.
_tooth_ towwa netama.
_hand_ masiwanim nemohemosh.
_foot_ nampan neik.
_bone_ maiigan neta.
_blood_ paipi neo.
_sky_ tuup tuquashanica.
_sun_ tabaputz tamit.
_moon_ meagoropitz menyil.
_star_ putsih chehiam.
_fire_ cun cut.
_water_ pah pal.
_one_ shuish supli.
_two_ waii mewi.
_three_ paii mepai.
_four_ watchu mewitchu.
_five_ manu nomequadnun.
_six_ nabai quadnunsupli.
_seven_ moquist quanmunwi.
_eight_ natch quanmunpa.
_nine_ uwip quanmunwichu.
_ten_ mashu nomachumi.
P. 353. Now comes the correction of a statement in p. 353--"_the
language of San Luis El Rey which is Yuma, is succeeded by that of San
Luis Obispo, which is Capistrano_."--This is an inaccuracy; apparently
from inadversion. A reference to the Paternosters of _pp._ 304-305
shews that the San Luis Rey, and the San Juan Capistrano forms of
speech are closely allied. Meanwhile, the San Fernando approaches the
San Gabriel, _i. e._ the Kizh.
See also Turner, _p._ 77--where the name _Kechi_ seems, word for word,
to be _Kizh_. The _Kizh_, however is a _San Gabriel_ form of speech.
XIV. _The Yuma group._--Turner gives a Mojave, or Mohavi vocabulary;
the first ever published. It is stated and shewn to be Yuma. The
Yabipai, in the same paper, is inferred to be Yuma; containing, as it
does, the word
_hanna_ = _good_ = _hanna_, _Dieguno_.
_n'yatz_ = _I_ = _nyat_, _do_.
_pook_ = _beads_ = _pook_, _Cuchan_.
The Mohave vocabulary gives the following extracts,