XX. FAITH IN FILTH.

No light whatever is shed upon what passed in the world after the

confounding of language at Babel, until the birth of Abraham. But,

before speaking of the history of the Jewish people, it may be proper

for me to say that many things are recounted in Genesis, and other books

attributed to Moses, of which I do not wish to speak. There are many

pages of these books unfit to read, many stories not calculated, in my

judgment, to improve the morals of mankind. I do not wish even to call

the attention of my readers to these things, except in a general way. It

is to be hoped that the time will come when such chapters and passages

as cannot be read without leaving the blush of shame upon the cheek of

modesty, will be left out, and not published as a part of the Bible. If

there is a God, it certainly is blasphemous to attribute to him the

authorship of pages too obscene, beastly and vulgar to be read in the

presence of men and women.

The believers in the Bible are loud in their denunciation of what they

are pleased to call the immoral literature of the world; and yet few

books have been published containing more moral filth than this inspired

word of God. These stories are not redeemed by a single flash of wit or

humor. They never rise above the dull details of stupid vice. For one,

I cannot afford to soil my pages with extracts from them; and all such

portions of the Scriptures I leave to be examined, written upon, and

explained by the clergy. Clergymen may know some way by which they can

extract honey from these flowers. Until these passages are expunged

from the Old Testament, it is not a fit book to be read by either old

or young. It contains pages that no minister in the United States would

read to his congregation for any reward whatever. There are chapters

that no gentleman would read in the presence of a lady. There are

chapters that no father would read to his child. There are narratives

utterly unfit to be told; and the time will come when mankind will

wonder that such a book was ever called inspired.

I know that in many books besides the Bible, there are immodest lines.

Some of the greatest writers have soiled their pages with indecent

words. We account for this by saying that the authors were human; that

they catered to the taste and spirit of their times. We make excuses,

but at the same time regret that in their works they left an impure

word. But what shall we say of God? Is it possible that a being of

infinite purity--the author of modesty, would smirch the pages of his

book with stories lewd, licentious and obscene? If God is the author of

the Bible, it is, of course, the standard by which all other books can,

and should be measured. If the Bible is not obscene, what book is? Why

should men be imprisoned simply for imitating God? The Christian world

should never say another word against immoral books until it makes the

inspired volume clean. These vile and filthy things were not written

for the purpose of conveying and enforcing moral truth, but seem to

have been written because the author loved an unclean thing. There is

no moral depth below that occupied by the writer or publisher of obscene

books, that stain with lust, the loving heart of youth. Such men should

be imprisoned and their books destroyed. The literature of the world

should be rendered decent, and no book should be published that cannot

be read by, and in the hearing of the best and purest people. But as

long as the Bible is considered as the work of God, it will be hard

to make all men too good and pure to imitate it; and as long as it is

imitated there will be vile and filthy books. The literature of our

country will not be sweet and clean until the Bible ceases to be

regarded as the production of a god.

We are continually told that the Bible is the very foundation of modesty

and morality; while many of its pages are so immodest and immoral that

a minister, for reading them in the pulpit, would be instantly denounced

as an unclean wretch. Every woman would leave the church, and if the men

stayed, it would be for the purpose of chastising the minister.

Is there any saving grace in hypocrisy? Will men become clean in speech

by believing that God is unclean? Would it not be far better to admit

that the Bible was written by barbarians in a barbarous, coarse and

vulgar age? Would it not be safer to charge Moses with vulgarity,

instead of God? Is it not altogether more probable that some ignorant

Hebrew would write the vulgar words? The Christians tell me that God is

the author of these vile and stupid things? I have examined the question

to the best of my ability, and as to God my verdict is:--Not guilty.

Faith should not rest in filth.

Every foolish and immodest thing should be expunged from the Bible.

Let us keep the good. Let us preserve every great and splendid thought,

every wise and prudent maxim, every just law, every elevated idea, and

every word calculated to make man nobler and purer, and let us have the

courage to throw the rest away. The souls of children should not

be stained and soiled. The charming instincts of youth should not be

corrupted and defiled. The girls and boys should not be taught that

unclean words were uttered by "inspired" lips. Teach them that these

words were born of savagery and lust. Teach them that the unclean is the

unholy, and that only the pure is sacred.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 02 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Lectures · 第 53 / 95 题