FOOTNOTES:

[133] Philotas, son of Parmenion, was one of the generals of Alexander

the Great. He was arrested for treason, made a confession under

torture, and was stoned before the troops. Jean Reinhold de Patkul

(1660-1707), a Livonian nobleman in disgrace at the Swedish Court,

found his way to King Augustus, in Poland, and was charged with

having instigated that monarch to attack Livonia. When a treaty of

peace was drawn up, Charles XII. made the surrender of Patkul one of

the conditions; and after much delay he was handed over to General

Meyerfeldt, and broken upon the wheel in October 1707. In the _Review_

for August 20, 1709, Defoe criticised the conduct of Charles XII. in

this matter, and said that since his barbarous action he had had no

success. He paid dear for the blood of Patkul.

[134] This article is printed in Scott's edition of Swift's Works.

[135] See No. 67.

[136] See No. 39.

[137] "Why, let the stricken deer go weep" ("Hamlet," act iii. sc. 2,

l. 282.)

[138] See No. 63.

[139] _Cf._ No. 47.

[140] See No. 19.

[141] "Julius Cæsar," act iv. sc. 3.

[142] Steevens brought forward the fact that the author of the _Tatler_

here quotes from Davenant's alteration of Shakespeare's play as an

argument to prove how little Shakespeare was read. De Quincey made

some excellent remarks on this subject in his "Life of Shakespeare."

("Encyclopædia Britannica," 7th ed.)

[143] "How scaped I killing when I crossed you so?" ("Julius Cæsar,"

act iv. sc. 3.)

[144] _Ars Poetica_, 102.

[145] "There is no criticism of Shakespeare in that day at all

comparable to this of Steele's, at the outset and to the close of the

_Tatler_. With no set analysis or fine-spun theory, but dropped only

here and there, and from time to time with a careless grace, it is yet

of the subtlest discrimination.... He ranks him as high in philosophy

as in poetry, and in the ethics of human life and passion quotes his

authority as supreme. None but Steele then thought of criticising him

in that strain." (Forster.)

[146] Clement XI.

[147] Virgil, "Æneid," ii. 145.

[148] See No. 56, &c.

[149] "The Grounds and Occasion of the Contempt of the Clergy and

Religion Inquired into" was published by Dr. John Eachard in 1670.

No. 69. [STEELE.

From _Thursday, Sept. 15_, to _Saturday, Sept. 17, 1709_.

----Quid oportet

Nos facere, a vulgo longe latèque remotos?

HOR., 1 Sat. vi. 18.

_From my own Apartment, Sept. 16._

It is, as far as it relates to our present being, the great end of

education to raise ourselves above the vulgar; but what is intended by

the vulgar, is not, methinks, enough understood. In me, indeed, that

word raises a quite different idea from what it usually does in others;

but perhaps that proceeds from my being old, and beginning to want the

relish of such satisfactions as are the ordinary entertainment of men.

However, such as my opinion is in this case, I will speak it; because

it is possible that turn of thought may be received by others, who may

reap as much tranquillity from it as I do myself. It is to me a very

great meanness, and something much below a philosopher, which is what I

mean by a gentleman, to rank a man among the vulgar for the condition

of life he is in, and not according to his behaviour, his thoughts

and sentiments, in that condition. For if a man be loaded with riches

and honours, and in that state of life has thoughts and inclinations

below the meanest artificer; is not such an artificer, who within his

power is good to his friends, moderate in his demands for his labour,

and cheerful in his occupation, very much superior to him who lives

for no other end but to serve himself, and assumes a preference in

all his words and actions to those who act their part with much more

grace than himself? Epictetus has made use of the similitude of a

stage-play to human life with much spirit. "It is not," says he, "to be

considered among the actors, who is prince, or who is beggar, but who

acts prince or beggar best."[150] The circumstance of life should not

be that which gives us place, but our behaviour in that circumstance

is what should be our solid distinction. Thus, a wise man should think

no man above him or below him, any further than it regards the outward

order and discipline of the world: for if we take too great an idea

of the eminence of our superiors, or subordination of our inferiors,

it will have an ill effect upon our behaviour to both. But he who

thinks no man above him but for his virtue, none below him but for his

vice, can never be obsequious or assuming in a wrong place, but will

frequently emulate men in rank below him, and pity those above him.

This sense of mankind is so far from a levelling principle, that it

only sets us upon a true basis of distinction, and doubles the merit

of such as become their condition. A man in power, who can, without

the ordinary prepossessions which stop the way to the true knowledge

and service of mankind, overlook the little distinctions of fortune,

raise obscure merit, and discountenance successful indesert,[151]

has, in the minds of knowing men, the figure of an angel rather than

a man, and is above the rest of men in the highest character he can

be, even that of their benefactor. Turning my thoughts as I was taking

my pipe this evening after this manner, it was no small delight to me

to receive advice from Felicia,[152] that Eboracensis was appointed a

governor of one of their plantations.[153] As I am a great lover of

mankind, I took part in the happiness of that people who were to be

governed by one of so great humanity, justice, and honour. Eboracensis

has read all the schemes which writers have formed of government and

order, and been long conversant with men who have the reins in their

hands; so that he can very well distinguish between chimerical and

practical politics. It is a great blessing (when men have to deal with

such different characters in the same species as those of free-men

and slaves) that they who command have a just sense of human nature

itself, by which they can temper the haughtiness of the master, and

soften the servitude of the slave. "Hæ tibi erunt artes."[154] This is

the notion with which those of the plantation receive Eboracensis: and

as I have cast his nativity, I find it will be a record made of this

person's administrations; and on that part of the shore from whence he

embarks to return from his government, there will be a monument with

these words: "Here the people wept, and took leave of Eboracensis, the

first governor our mother Felicia sent, who, during his command here,

believed himself her subject."

_White's Chocolate-house, Sept. 16._

The following letter wants such sudden despatch, that all things else

must wait for this time.

"SIR,

_Sept. 13, equal day and night._

"There are two ladies, who, having a good opinion of your taste

and judgment, desire you to make use of them in the following

particular, which perhaps you may allow very particular. The two

ladies before mentioned have a considerable time since contracted

a more sincere and constant friendship than their adversaries the

men will allow consistent with the frailty of female nature; and

being from a long acquaintance convinced of the perfect agreement

of their tempers, have thought upon an expedient to prevent their

separation, and cannot think any so effectual (since it is common

for love to destroy friendship) as to give up both their liberties

to the same person in marriage. The gentleman they have pitched

upon, is neither well-bred nor agreeable, his understanding

moderate, and his person never designed to charm women; but

having so much self-interest in his nature, as to be satisfied

with making double contracts, upon condition of receiving double

fortunes; and most men being so far sensible of the uneasiness

that one woman occasions, they think him for these reasons

the most likely person of their acquaintance to receive these

proposals. Upon all other accounts, he is the last man either of

them would choose, yet for this preferable to all the rest. They

desire to know your opinion the next post, resolving to defer

further proceeding, till they have received it. I am, Sir,

"Your unknown, unthought-of,

Humble Servant,

BRIDGET EITHERSIDE."

#/

This is very extraordinary, and much might be objected by me,

who am something of a civilian, to the case of two marrying the

same man; but these ladies are, I perceive, free-thinkers, and

therefore I shall speak only to the prudential part of this design,

merely as a philosopher, without entering into the merit of it in

the ecclesiastical or civil law. These constant friends, Piledea

and Orestea, are at a loss to preserve their friendship from the

encroachments of love, for which end they have resolved upon a fellow

who cannot be the object of affection or esteem to either, and

consequently cannot rob one of the place each has in her friend's

heart. But in all my reading (and I have read all that the sages in

love have written), I have found the greatest danger in jealousy. The

ladies indeed, to avoid this passion, choose a sad fellow; but if they

would be advised by me, they had better have each their worthless

man; otherwise, he that was despicable while he was indifferent to

them, will become valuable when he seems to prefer one to the other.

I remember in the history of Don Quixote of the Manca, there is a

memorable passage which opens to us the weakness of our nature in

such particulars. The Don falls into discourse with a gentleman[155]

whom he calls the Knight of the Green Cassock, and is invited to his

house. When he comes there, he runs into discourse and panegyric upon

the economy, the government and order of his family, the education of

his children; and lastly, on the singular wisdom of him who disposed

things with that exactness. The gentleman makes a soliloquy to himself,

"Oh irresistible power of flattery! Though I know this is a madman, I

cannot help being taken with his applause."

The ladies will find this much more true in the case of their lover;

and the woman he most likes, will certainly be more pleased; she whom

he flights, more offended, than she can imagine before she has tried.

Now I humbly propose, that they both marry coxcombs whom they are

sure they cannot like, and then they may be pretty secure against the

change of affection, which they fear; and by that means, preserving the

temperature under which they now write, enjoy during life, "equal day

and night."

_St. James's Coffee-house, Sept. 16._

There is no manner of news; but people now spend their time in

coffee-houses in reflections upon the particulars of the late glorious

day,[156] and collecting the several parts of the action, as they are

produced in letters from private hands, or notices given to us by

accounts in public papers. A pleasant gentleman, alluding to the great

fences through which we pierced, said this evening, "The French thought

themselves on the right side of the hedge, but it proved otherwise."

Mr. Kidney, who has long conversed with, and filled tea for the most

consummate politicians, was pleased to give me an account of this piece

of ribaldry, and desired me on that occasion to write a whole paper

on the subject of valour, and explain how that quality, which must be

possessed by whole armies, is so highly preferable in one man rather

than another, and how the same actions are but mere acts of duty in

some, and instances of the most heroic virtue in others. He advised me

not to fail in this discourse to mention the gallantry of the Prince

of Nassau in this last engagement, who (when a battalion made a halt

in the face of the enemy) snatched the colours out of the hands of the

ensign, and planted them just before the line of the enemy, calling to

that battalion to take care of their colours, if they had no regard to

him. Mr. Kidney has my promise to obey him in this particular on the

first occasion that offers.

* * * * *

Mr. Bickerstaff is now compiling exact accounts of the pay of the

militia, and the commission officers under the respective Lieutenancies

of Great Britain: in the first place, of those of London and

Westminster; and in regard that there are no common soldiers, but all

house-keepers, or representatives of house-keepers in these bodies,

the sums raised by the officers shall be looked into, and their

fellow-soldiers, or rather fellow-travellers from one part of the

town to the other, not defrauded of the ten pounds allowed for the

subsistence of the troops.

Whereas not very long since, at a tavern between Fleet Bridge and

Charing Cross, some certain polite gentlemen thought fit to perform

the bacchanalian exercises of devotion, by dancing without clothes on,

after the manner of the pre-Adamites; this is to certify those persons,

that there is no manner of wit or humour in the said practice, and that

the beadles of the parish are to be at their next meeting, where it is

to be examined, whether they are arrived at want of feeling, as well as

want of shame.

Whereas a chapel clerk was lately taken in a garret on a flock-bed

with two of the fair sex, who are usually employed in sifting cinders;

this is to let him know, that if he persists in being a scandal both

to laity and clergy (as being as it were both and neither), the names

of the nymphs who were with him shall be printed; therefore he is

desired, as he tenders the reputation of his ladies, to repent.

Mr. Bickerstaff has received information, that an eminent and noble

preacher in the chief congregation of Great Britain, for fear of being

thought guilty of presbyterian fervency and extemporary prayer, lately

read his, before sermon; but the same advices acknowledging that he

made the congregation large amends by the shortness of his discourse,

it is thought fit to make no further observation upon it.[157]

The Tatler, Volume 2 · 第 30 / 99 题