Speaking of the Indians of Guiana, an English missionary, who knew them

well, says that the worst feature in their character is their proneness

to blood revenge, "by which a succession of retaliatory murders may be

kept up for a long time. It is closely connected with their system of

sorcery, which we shall presently consider. A person dies,--and it is

supposed that an enemy has secured the agency of an evil spirit to

compass his death. Some sorcerer, employed by the friends of the

deceased for that purpose, pretends by his incantations to discover the

guilty individual or family, or at any rate to indicate the quarter

where they dwell. A near relative of the deceased is then charged with

the work of vengeance. He becomes a _kanaima_, or is supposed to be

possessed by the destroying spirit so called, and has to live apart,

according to strict rule, and submit to many privations, until the deed

of blood be accomplished. If the supposed offender cannot be slain, some

innocent member of his family--man, woman, or little child--must suffer

instead."[10] The same writer tells us that these Indians of Guiana

attribute sickness and death directly to the agency of certain evil

spirits called _yauhahu_, who delight in inflicting miseries upon

mankind. Pain, in the language of the Arawaks (one of the best-known

tribes of Guiana), is called _yauhahu simaira_ or "the evil spirit's

arrow."[11] It is these evil spirits whom wicked sorcerers employ to

accomplish their fell purpose. Thus while the demon is the direct cause

of sickness and death, the sorcerer who uses him as his tool is the

indirect cause. The demon is thought to do his work by inserting some

alien substance into the body of the sufferer, and a medicine-man is

employed to extract it by chanting an invocation to the maleficent

spirit, shaking his rattle, and sucking the part of the patient's frame

in which the cause of the malady is imagined to reside. "After many

ceremonies he will produce from his mouth some strange substance, such

as a thorn or gravel-stone, a fish-bone or bird's claw, a snake's tooth,

or a piece of wire, which some malicious _yauhahu_ is supposed to have

inserted in the affected part. As soon as the patient fancies himself

rid of this cause of his illness his recovery is generally rapid, and

the fame of the sorcerer greatly increased. Should death, however,

ensue, the blame is laid upon the evil spirit whose power and malignity

have prevailed over the counteracting charms. Some rival sorcerer will

at times come in for a share of the blame, whom the sufferer has

unhappily made his enemy, and who is supposed to have employed the

_yauhahu_ in destroying him. The sorcerers being supposed to have the

power of causing, as well as of curing diseases, are much dreaded by the

common people, who never wilfully offend them. So deeply rooted in the

Indian's bosom is this belief concerning the origin of diseases, that

they have little idea of sickness arising from other causes. Death may

arise from a wound or a contusion, or be brought on by want of food, but

in other cases it is the work of the _yauhahu_"[12] or evil spirit.

[Sidenote: Some deaths attributed to sorcery and others to evil spirits:

practical consequence of this distinction.]

In this account it is to be observed that while all natural deaths from

sickness and disease are attributed to the direct action of evil

spirits, only some of them are attributed to the indirect action of

sorcerers. The practical consequences of this theoretical distinction

are very important. For whereas death by sorcery must, in the opinion of

savages, be avenged by killing the supposed sorcerer, death by the

action of a demon cannot be so avenged; for how are you to get at the

demon? Hence, while every death by sorcery involves, theoretically at

least, another death by violence, death by a demon involves no such

practical consequence. So far, therefore, the faith in sorcery is far

more murderous than the faith in demons. This practical distinction is

clearly recognised by these Indians of Guiana; for another writer, who

laboured among them as a missionary, tells us that when a person dies a

natural death, the medicine-man is called upon to decide whether he

perished through the agency of a demon or the agency of a sorcerer. If

he decides that the deceased died through the malice of an evil spirit,

the body is quietly buried, and no more is thought of the matter. But if

the wizard declares that the cause of death was sorcery, the corpse is

closely inspected, and if a blue mark is discovered, it is pointed out

as the spot where the invisible poisoned arrow, discharged by the

sorcerer, entered the man. The next thing is to detect the culprit. For

this purpose a pot containing a decoction of leaves is set to boil on a

fire. When it begins to boil over, the side on which the scum first

falls is the quarter in which the supposed murderer is to be sought. A

consultation is then held: the guilt is laid on some individual, and one

of the nearest relations of the deceased is charged with the duty of

finding and killing him. If the imaginary culprit cannot be found, any

other member of his family may be slain in his stead. "It is not

difficult to conceive," adds the writer, "how, under such circumstances,

no man's life is secure; whilst these by no means unfrequent murders

must greatly tend to diminish the number of the natives."[13]

[Sidenote: Among the Indians of Guiana death is oftener attributed to

sorcery than to demons.]

However, it would seem that among the Indians of Guiana sickness and

death are oftener ascribed to the agency of sorcerers than to the agency

of demons acting alone. For another high authority on these Indians, Sir

Everard F. im Thurn, tells us that "every death, every illness, is

regarded not as the result of natural law, but as the work of a

_kenaima_" or sorcerer. "Often indeed," he adds, "the survivors or the

relatives of the invalid do not know to whom to attribute the deed,

which therefore perforce remains unpunished; but often, again, there is

real or fancied reason to fix on some one as the _kenaima_, and then the

nearest relative of the injured individual devotes himself to retaliate.

Strange ceremonies are sometimes observed in order to discover the

secret _kenaima_. Richard Schomburgk describes a striking instance of

this. A Macusi boy had died a natural death, and his relatives

endeavoured to discover the quarter to which the _kenaima_ who was

supposed to have slain him belonged. Raising a terrible and monotonous

dirge, they carried the body to an open piece of ground, and there

formed a circle round it, while the father, cutting from the corpse both

the thumbs and little fingers, both the great and the little toes, and a

piece of each heel, threw these pieces into a new pot, which had been

filled with water. A fire was kindled, and on this the pot was placed.

When the water began to boil, according to the side on which one of the

pieces was first thrown out from the pot by the bubbling of the water,

in that direction would the _kenaima_ be. In thus looking round to see

who did the deed, the Indian thinks it by no means necessary to fix on

anyone who has been with or near the injured man. The _kenaima_ is

supposed to have done the deed, not necessarily in person, but probably

in spirit."[14] For these Indians believe that each individual man has a

body and a spirit within it, and that sorcerers can despatch their

spirits out of their bodies to harm people at a distance. It is not

always in an invisible form that these spirits of sorcerers are supposed

to roam on their errands of mischief. The wizard can put his spirit into

the shape of an animal, such as a jaguar, a serpent, a sting-ray, a

bird, an insect, or anything else he pleases. Hence when an Indian is

attacked by a wild beast, he thinks that his real foe is not the animal,

but the sorcerer who has transformed himself into it. Curiously enough

they look upon some small harmless birds in the same light. One little

bird, in particular, which flits across the savannahs with a peculiar

shrill whistle at morning and evening, is regarded by the Indians with

especial fear as a transformed sorcerer. They think that for every one

of these birds that they shoot they have an enemy the less, and they

burn its little body, taking great care that not even a single feather

escapes to be blown about by the wind. On a windy day a dozen men and

women have been seen chasing the floating feathers of these birds about

the savannah in order utterly to extinguish the imaginary wizard. Even

the foreign substance, the stick, bone, or whatever it is, which the

good medicine-man pretends to suck from the body of the sufferer "is

often, if not always, regarded not simply as a natural body, but as the

materialised form of a hostile spirit."[15]

[Sidenote: Belief of the Tinneh Indians in sorcery as the cause of

death.]

Beliefs and practices of the same general character are reported to have

formerly prevailed among the Tinneh or Déné Indians of North-west

America. When any beloved or influential person died, nobody, we are

told, would think of attributing the death to natural causes; it was

assumed that the demise was an effect of sorcery, and the only

difficulty was to ascertain the culprit. For that purpose the services

of a shaman were employed. Rigged out in all his finery he would dance

and sing, then suddenly fall down and feign death or sleep. On awaking

from the apparent trance he would denounce the sorcerer who had killed

the deceased by his magic art, and the denunciation generally proved the

death-warrant of the accused.[16]

[Sidenote: Belief of the Australian aborigines in sorcery as the cause

of death.]

Again, similar beliefs and customs in regard to what we should call

natural death appear to have prevailed universally amongst the

aborigines of Australia, and to have contributed very materially to thin

the population. On this subject I will quote the words of an observer.

His remarks apply to the Australian aborigines in general but to the

tribes of Victoria in particular. He says: "The natives are much more

numerous in some parts of Australia than they are in others, but nowhere

is the country thickly peopled; some dire disease occasionally breaks

out among the natives, and carries off large numbers.... But there are

two other causes which, in my opinion, principally account for their

paucity of numbers. The first is that infanticide is universally

practised; the second, that a belief exists that no one can die a

natural death. Thus, if an individual of a certain tribe dies, his

relatives consider that his death has been caused by sorcery on the part

of another tribe. The deceased's sons, or nearest relatives, therefore

start off on a _bucceening_ or murdering expedition. If the deceased is

buried, a fly or a beetle is put into the grave, and the direction in

which the insect wings its way when released is the one the avengers

take. If the body is burnt, the whereabouts of the offending parties is

indicated by the direction of the smoke. The first unfortunates fallen

in with are generally watched until they encamp for the night; when they

are buried in sleep, the murderers steal quietly up until they are

within a yard or two of their victims, rush suddenly upon and butcher

them. On these occasions they always abstract the kidney-fat, and also

take off a piece of the skin of the thigh. These are carried home as

trophies, as the American Indians take the scalp. The murderers anoint

their bodies with the fat of their victims, thinking that by that

process the strength of the deceased enters into them. Sometimes it

happens that the _bucceening_ party come suddenly upon a man of a

strange tribe in a tree hunting opossums; he is immediately speared, and

left weltering in his blood at the foot of the tree. The relatives of

the murdered man at once proceed to retaliate; and thus a constant and

never-ending series of murders is always going on.... I do not mean to

assert that for every man that dies or is killed another is murdered;

for it often happens that the deceased has no sons or relatives who care

about avenging his death. At other times a _bucceening_ party will

return without having met with any one; then, again, they are sometimes

repelled by those they attack."[17]

[Sidenote: Belief of the natives of Western Australia in sorcery as a

cause of death. Beliefs of the tribes of Victoria and South Australia.]

Again, speaking of the tribes of Western Australia, Sir George Grey

tells us that "the natives do not allow that there is such a thing as a

death from natural causes; they believe, that were it not for murderers

or the malignity of sorcerers, they might live for ever; hence, when a

native dies from the effect of an accident, or from some natural cause,

they use a variety of superstitious ceremonies, to ascertain in what

direction the sorcerer lives, whose evil practices have brought about

the death of their relative; this point being satisfactorily settled by

friendly sorcerers, they then attach the crime to some individual, and

the funeral obsequies are scarcely concluded, ere they start to revenge

their supposed wrongs."[18] Again, speaking of the Watch-an-die tribe of

Western Australia, another writer tells us that they "possess the

comfortable assurance that nearly all diseases, and consequently deaths,

are caused by the enchantments of hostile tribes, and that were it not

for the malevolence of their enemies they would (with a few exceptions)

live for ever. Consequently, on the first approach of sickness their

first endeavour is to ascertain whether the _boollia_ [magic] of their

own tribe is not sufficiently potent to counteract that of their foes.

Should the patient recover, they are, of course, proud of the

superiority of their enchantment over that of their enemies: but should

the _boollia_ [magical influence] within the sick man prove stronger

than their own, as there is no help for it, he must die, the utmost they

can do in this case is to revenge his death."[19] But the same writer

qualifies this general statement as follows: "It is not true," he says,

"that the New Hollanders impute _all_ natural deaths to the _boollia_

[magic] of inimical tribes, for in most cases of persons wasting visibly

away before death, they do not entertain the notion. It is chiefly in

cases of sudden death, or when the body of the deceased is fat and in

good condition, that this belief prevails, and it is only in such

contingencies that it becomes an imperative duty to have revenge."[20]

Similarly, speaking of the tribes of Victoria in the early days of

European settlement among them, the experienced observer Mr. James

Dawson says that "natural deaths are generally--but not

always--attributed to the malevolence and the spells of an enemy

belonging to another tribe."[21] Again, with regard to the Encounter Bay

tribe of South Australia we read that "there are but few diseases which

they regard as the consequences of natural causes; in general they

consider them the effects of enchantment, and produced by

sorcerers."[22] Similarly of the Port Lincoln tribes in South Australia

it is recorded that "in all cases of death that do not arise from old

age, wounds, or other equally palpable causes, the natives suspect that

unfair means have been practised; and even where the cause of death is

sufficiently plain, they sometimes will not content themselves with it,

but have recourse to an imaginary one, as the following case will

prove:--A woman had been bitten by a black snake, across the thumb, in

clearing out a well; she began to swell directly, and was a corpse in

twenty-four hours; yet, another woman who had been present when the

accident occurred, stated that the deceased had named a certain native

as having caused her death. Upon this statement, which was in their

opinion corroborated by the circumstance that the snake had drawn no

blood from the deceased, her husband and other friends had a fight with

the accused party and his friends; a reconciliation, however, took place

afterwards, and it was admitted on the part of the aggressors that they

had been in error with regard to the guilty individual; but nowise more

satisfied as to the bite of the snake being the true cause of the

woman's death, another party was now suddenly discovered to be the real

offender, and accordingly war was made upon him and his partisans, till

at last the matter was dropped and forgotten. From this case, as well as

from frequent occurrences of a similar nature, it appears evident that

thirst for revenge has quite as great a share in these foul accusations

as superstition."[23]

[Sidenote: Other testimonies as to the belief of the natives of South

Australia and Victoria.]

However, other experienced observers of the Australian aborigines admit

no such limitations and exceptions to the native theory that death is an

effect of sorcery. Thus in regard to the Narrinyeri tribe of South

Australia the Rev. George Taplin, who knew them intimately for years,

says that "no native regards death as natural, but always as the result

of sorcery."[24] Again, to quote Mr. R. Brough Smyth, who has collected

much information on the tribes of Victoria: "Mr. Daniel Bunce, an

intelligent observer, and a gentleman well acquainted with the habits of

the blacks, says that no tribe that he has ever met with believes in the

possibility of a man dying a natural death. If a man is taken ill, it is

at once assumed that some member of a hostile tribe has stolen some of

his hair. This is quite enough to cause serious illness. If the man

continues sick and gets worse, it is assumed that the hair has been

burnt by his enemy. Such an act, they say, is sufficient to imperil his

life. If the man dies, it is assumed that the thief has choked his

victim and taken away his kidney-fat. When the grave is being dug, one

or more of the older men--generally doctors or conjurors

(_Buk-na-look_)--stand by and attentively watch the laborers; and if an

insect is thrown out of the ground, these old men observe the direction

which it takes, and having determined the line, two of the young men,

relations of the deceased, are despatched in the path indicated, with

instructions to kill the first native they meet, who they are assured

and believe is the person directly chargeable with the crime of causing

the death of their relative. Mr. John Green says that the men of the

Yarra tribe firmly believe that no one ever dies a natural death. A man

or a woman dies because of the wicked arts practised by some member of a

hostile tribe; and they discover the direction in which to search for

the slayer by the movements of a lizard which is seen immediately after

the corpse is interred."[25] Again, speaking of the aborigines of

Victoria, another writer observes: "All deaths from natural causes are

attributed to the machinations of enemies, who are supposed to have

sought for and burned the excrement of the intended victim, which,

according to the general belief, causes a gradual wasting away. The

relatives, therefore, watch the struggling feet of the dying person, as

they point in the direction whence the injury is thought to come, and

serve as a guide to the spot where it should be avenged. This is the

duty of the nearest male relative; should he fail in its execution, it

will ever be to him a reproach, although other relatives may have

avenged the death. If the deceased were a chief, then the duty devolves

upon the tribe. Chosen men are sent in the direction indicated, who kill

the first persons they meet, whether men, women, or children; and the

more lives that are sacrificed, the greater is the honour to the

dead."[26] Again, in his account of the Kurnai tribe of Victoria the

late Dr. A. W. Howitt remarks: "It is not difficult to see how, among

savages, who have no knowledge of the real causes of diseases which are

the common lot of humanity, the very suspicion even of such a thing as

death from disease should be unknown. Death by accident they can

imagine; death by violence they can imagine; but I question if they can,

in their savage condition, imagine death by mere disease. Rheumatism is

believed to be produced by the machinations of some enemy. Seeing a

Tatungolung very lame, I asked him what was the matter? He said, 'Some

fellow has put _bottle_ in my foot.' I asked him to let me see it. I

found he was probably suffering from acute rheumatism. He explained that

some enemy must have found his foot track, and have buried in it a piece

of broken bottle. The magic influence, he believed, caused it to enter

his foot.... Phthisis, pneumonia, bowel complaints, and insanity are

supposed to be produced by an evil spirit--Brewin--'who is like the

wind,' and who, entering his victims, can only be expelled by suitable

incantations.... Thus the belief arises that death occurs only from

accident, open violence, or secret magic; and, naturally, that the

latter can only be met by counter-charms."[27]

[Sidenote: Belief of the aborigines of New South Wales in sorcery as the

cause of sickness and death.]

The beliefs and practices of the aborigines of New South Wales in

respect of death were similar. Thus we are told by a well-informed

writer that "the natives do not believe in death from natural causes;

therefore all sickness is attributed to the agency of sorcery, and

counter charms are used to destroy its effect.... As a man's death is

never supposed to have occurred naturally, except as the result of

accident, or from a wound in battle, the first thing to be done when a

death occurs is to endeavour to find out the person whose spells have

brought about the calamity. In the Wathi-Wathi tribe the corpse is asked

by each relative in succession to signify by some sign the person who

has caused his death. Not receiving an answer, they watch in which

direction a bird flies, after having passed over the deceased. This is

considered an indication that the sorcerer is to be found in that

direction. Sometimes the nearest relative sleeps with his head on the

corpse, which causes him, they think, to dream of the murderer. There

is, however, a good deal of uncertainty about the proceedings, which

seldom result in more than a great display of wrath, and of vowing of

vengeance against some member of a neighbouring tribe. Unfortunately

this is not always the case, the man who is supposed to have exercised

the death-spell being sometimes waylaid and murdered in a most cruel

manner."[28] With regard to the great Kamilaroi tribe of New South Wales

we read that "in some parts of the country a belief prevails that death,

through disease, is, in many, if not in all cases, the result of an

enemy's malice. It is a common saying, when illness or death comes, that

some one has thrown his belt (_boor_) at the victim. There are various

modes of fixing upon the murderer. One is to let an insect fly from the

body of the deceased and see towards whom it goes. The person thus

singled out is doomed."[29]

[Sidenote: Belief of the aborigines of Central Australia in sorcery as

the cause of death.]

The Belief in Immortality and the Worship of the Dead, Volume 1 (of 3) The Belief Among the Aborigines of Australia, the Torres Straits Islands, New Guinea and Melanesia · 第 5 / 51 段