islands, that of Tongataboo is by far the best; not only on account of
its great security, but of its capacity, and of the goodness of its
bottom. The risk that we ran in entering it from the north, ought to be
a sufficient caution to every future commander not to attempt that
passage again with a ship of burden; since the other, by which we left
it, is so much more easy and safe. To sail into it by this eastern
channel, steer in for the north-east point of the island, and keep along
the north shore, with the small isles on your starboard, till you are
the length of the east point of the entrance into the _lagoon_; then
edge over for the reef of the small isles; and, on following its
direction, it will conduct you through between Makkahaaa and Monooafai,
or the fourth and fifth isles, which you will perceive to lie off the
west point of the _lagoon_. Or you may go between the third and fourth
islands, that is, between Pangimodoo and Monooafai; but this channel is
much narrower than the other. There runs a very strong tide in both. The
flood, as I have observed before, comes in from the north-west, and the
ebb returns the same way; but I shall speak of the tides in another
place. As soon as you are through either of these channels, haul in for
the shore of Tongataboo, and anchor between it and Pangimodoo, before a
creek leading into the _lagoon_; into which boats can go at half flood.
Although Tongataboo has the best harbour, Annamooka furnishes the best
water; and yet it cannot be called good. However, by digging holes near
the side of the pond, we can get what may be called tolerable. This
island too, is the best situated for drawing refreshments from all the
others, as being nearly in the centre of the whole group. Besides the
road in which we anchored, and the harbour within the south-west point,
there is a creek in the reef, before the eastern sandy cove on the north
side of the island, in which two or three ships may lie very securely,
by mooring head and stern, with their anchors or moorings fast to the
rocks.
I have already described the Hapaee islands; and shall only add to that
description by mentioning, that they extend south-west by south, and
north-east by north, about nineteen miles. The north end lies in the
latitude of 19° 39ʹ S. and 33ʹ of longitude to the east of Annamooka.
Between them are a great many small islands, sand-banks, and breakers;
so that the safest way to arrive at Hapaee is either by the course I
held, or round by the north; according to the situation of the ship
bound thither. Lefooga, off which we anchored, is the most fertile isle
of those that are called Hapaee; and, consequently, is the best
inhabited. There is anchorage along the north-west side of this island;
but it will be necessary to examine the ground well before you moor.
For, although the lead may bring up fine sand, there are, nevertheless,
some sharp coral rocks that would soon destroy the cables.
They who want a more particular description of the Friendly Islands,
must have recourse to the chart that we constructed. There every thing
is delineated with as much accuracy as circumstances would permit.
Recourse must also be had to the same chart for the better tracing the
several stations of the ships, and their route from the one island to
the other. To have swelled my journal with a minute account of bearings,
tackings, and the like, would neither have been entertaining nor
instructive.
What has been here omitted, concerning the geography of these islands,
will be found in the narrative of my last voyage.[201] To that narrative
I must also refer[202] for such particulars concerning the inhabitants,
their manners, and arts, as I had observed then, and about which I saw
no reason to change my judgment. At present I shall confine myself to
such interesting particulars, as either were not mentioned in that
narrative, or were imperfectly and incorrectly represented there; and to
such as may serve to explain some passages in the foregoing account of
our transactions with the natives.
It may, indeed, be expected that, after spending between two and three
months amongst them, I should be enabled to clear up every difficulty,
and to give a tolerably satisfactory account of their customs, opinions,
and institutions, both civil and religious; especially as we had a
person on board, who might be supposed qualified to act the part of an
interpreter, by understanding their language and ours. But poor Omai was
very deficient. For unless the object or thing we wanted to inquire
about was actually before us, we found it difficult to gain a tolerable
knowledge of it from information only, without falling into a hundred
mistakes; and to such mistakes Omai was more liable than we were. For,
having no curiosity, he never gave himself the trouble to make remarks
for himself; and, when he was disposed to explain matters to us, his
ideas appeared to be so limited, and, perhaps, so different from ours,
that his accounts were often so confused, as to perplex, instead of
instructing us. Add to this, that it was very rare that we found,
amongst the natives, a person who united the ability and the inclination
to give us the information we wanted; and we found that most of them
hated to be troubled with what they probably thought idle questions. Our
situation at Tongataboo, where we remained the longest, was likewise
unfavourable. It was in a part of the country where there were few
inhabitants except fishers. It was always holiday with our visitors, as
well as with those we visited; so that we had but few opportunities of
observing what was really the domestic way of living of the natives.
Under these disadvantages it is not surprising that we should not be
able to bring away with us satisfactory accounts of many things; but
some of us endeavoured to remedy those disadvantages by diligent
observation; and I am indebted to Mr. Anderson for a considerable share
of what follows in this and in the following chapter. In other matters I
have only expressed, nearly in his words, remarks that coincided with
mine; but what relates to the religion and language of these people, is
entirely his own.
The natives of the Friendly Islands seldom exceed the common stature
(though we have measured some who were above six feet); but are very
strong and well made, especially as to their limbs. They are generally
broad about the shoulders; and though the muscular disposition of the
men, which seems a consequence of much action, rather conveys the
appearance of strength than of beauty, there are several to be seen who
are really handsome. Their features are very various; insomuch, that it
is scarcely possible to fix on any general likeness by which to
characterize them, unless it be a fulness at the point of the nose,
which is very common. But, on the other hand, we met with hundreds of
truly European faces, and many genuine Roman noses amongst them. Their
eyes and teeth are good; but the last neither so remarkably white, nor
so well set, as is often found amongst Indian nations; though, to
balance that, few of them have any uncommon thickness about the lips, a
defect as frequent as the other perfection.
The women are not so much distinguished from the men by their features
as by their general form, which is, for the most part destitute of that
strong fleshy firmness that appears in the latter. Though the features
of some are so delicate, as not only to be a true index of their sex,
but to lay claim to a considerable share of beauty and expression, the
rule is by no means, so general as in many other countries. But, at the
same time, this is frequently the most exceptionable part; for the
bodies and limbs of most of the females are well proportioned; and some
absolutely perfect models of a beautiful figure. But the most remarkable
distinction in the women, is the uncommon smallness and delicacy of
their fingers, which may be put in competition with the finest in
Europe.
The general colour is a cast deeper than the copper brown; but several
of the men and women have a true olive complexion; and some of the last
are even a great deal fairer; which is probably the effect of being less
exposed to the sun; as a tendency to corpulence, in a few of the
principal people, seems to be the consequence of a more indolent life.
It is also amongst the last, that a soft clear skin is most frequently
observed. Amongst the bulk of the people, the skin is more commonly of a
dull hue, with some degree of roughness, especially the parts that are
not covered; which, perhaps, may be occasioned by some cutaneous
disease. We saw a man and boy at Hapaee, and a child at Annamooka,
perfectly white. Such have been found amongst all black nations; but, I
apprehend that their colour is rather a disease than a natural
phenomenon.
There are, nevertheless, upon the whole, few natural defects or
deformities to be found amongst them; though we saw two or three with
their feet bent inward; and some afflicted with a sort of blindness,
occasioned by a disease of the _cornea_. Neither are they exempt from
some other diseases. The most common of which is the tetter, or
ring-worm, that seems to affect almost one half of them, and leaves
whitish serpentine marks every where behind it. But this is of less
consequence than another disease, which is very frequent, and appears on
every part of the body, in large broad ulcers, with thick white edges,
discharging a thin clear matter; some of which had a very virulent
appearance, particularly those on the face, which were shocking to look
at; and yet we met with some who seemed to be cured of it, and others in
a fair way of being cured; but this was not affected without the loss of
the nose, or of the best part of it. As we know for a certainty[203]
(and the fact is acknowledged by themselves), that the people of these
islands were subject to this loathsome disease before the English first
visited them, notwithstanding the similarity of symptoms, it cannot be
the effect of the venereal contagion; unless we adopt a supposition,
which I could wish had sufficient foundation in truth, that the venereal
disorder was not introduced here from Europe, by our ships in 1773. It
assuredly was now found to exist amongst them; for we had not been long
there before some of our people received the infection; and I had the
mortification to learn from thence, that all the care I took, when I
first visited these islands, to prevent this dreadful disease from being
communicated to their inhabitants, had proved ineffectual. What is
extraordinary, they do not seem to regard it much; and as we saw few
signs of its destroying effects, probably the climate, and the way of
living of these people, greatly abate its virulence. There are two other
diseases frequent amongst them; one of which is an indolent firm
swelling, which affects the legs and arms, and increases them to an
extraordinary size in their whole length. The other is a tumour of the
same sort in the testicles, which sometimes exceed the size of the two
fists. But, in other respects, they may be considered as uncommonly
healthy; not a single person having been seen, during our stay, confined
to the house by sickness of any kind. On the contrary, their strength
and activity are every way answerable to their muscular appearance; and
they exert both, in their usual employment, and in their diversions, in
such a manner, that there can be no doubt of their being as yet little
debilitated by the numerous diseases that are the consequence of
indolence, and an unnatural method of life.
The graceful air and firm step with which these people walk, are not the
least obvious proof of their personal accomplishments. They consider
this as a thing so natural or so necessary to be acquired, that nothing
used to excite their laughter sooner than to see us frequently stumbling
upon the roots of trees, or other inequalities of the ground.
Their countenances very remarkably express the abundant mildness or good
nature which they possess; and are entirely free from that savage
keenness which marks nations in a barbarous state. One would indeed be
apt to fancy, that they had been bred up under the severest
restrictions, to acquire an aspect so settled, and such a command of
their passions as well as steadiness in conduct. But they are at the
same time, frank, cheerful, and good-humoured; though sometimes, in the
presence of their chiefs, they put on a degree of gravity, and such a
serious air as becomes stiff and awkward, and has an appearance of
reserve.
Their peaceable disposition is sufficiently evinced, from the friendly
reception all strangers have met with who have visited them. Instead of
offering to attack them openly or clandestinely, as has been the case
with most of the inhabitants of these seas, they have never appeared in
the smallest degree hostile; but, on the contrary, like the most
civilized people, have courted an intercourse with their visitors by
bartering, which is the only medium that unites all nations in a sort of
friendship. They understand barter (which they call _fukkatou_) so
perfectly, that at first we imagined they might have acquired this
knowledge of it by commercial intercourse with the neighbouring islands;
but we were afterward assured that they had little or no traffic, except
with Feejee, from which they get the red feathers, and the few other
articles mentioned before. Perhaps, no nation in the world traffic with
more honesty and less distrust. We could always safely permit them to
examine our goods, and to hand them about, one to another; and they put
the same confidence in us. If either party repented of the bargain, the
goods were re-exchanged with mutual consent and good-humour. Upon the
whole, they seem possessed of many of the most excellent qualities that
adorn the human mind; such as industry, ingenuity, perseverance,
affability, and, perhaps other virtues which our short stay with them
might prevent our observing.
The only defect sullying their character, that we knew of, is a
propensity to thieving; to which we found those of all ages and both
sexes addicted, and to an uncommon degree. It should, however, be
considered, that this exceptionable part of their conduct seemed to
exist merely with respect to us; for, in their general intercourse with
one another, I had reason to be of opinion, that thefts do not happen
more frequently (perhaps less so) than in other countries, the dishonest
practices of whose worthless individuals are not supposed to authorize
any indiscriminate censure on the whole body of the people. Great
allowances should be made for the foibles of these poor natives of the
Pacific Ocean, whose minds we overpowered with the glare of objects
equally new to them as they were captivating. Stealing amongst the
civilized and enlightened nations of the world, may well be considered
as denoting a character deeply stained with moral turpitude, with
avarice unrestrained by the known rules of right, and with profligacy
producing extreme indigence, and neglecting the means of relieving it.
But at the Friendly and other islands which we visited, the thefts so
frequently committed by the natives, of what we had brought along with
us, may be fairly traced to less culpable motives. They seemed to arise,
solely from an intense curiosity or desire to possess something which
they had not been accustomed to before, and belonging to a sort of
people so different from themselves. And, perhaps, if it were possible,
that a set of beings seemingly as superior in our judgment as we are in
theirs, should appear amongst us, it might be doubted, whether our
natural regard to justice would be able to restrain many from falling
into the same error. That I have assigned the true motive for their
propensity to this practice, appears from their stealing every thing
indiscriminately at first sight, before they could have the least
conception of converting their prize to any one useful purpose. But, I
believe, with us, no person would forfeit his reputation, or expose
himself to punishment, without knowing before-hand, how to employ the
stolen goods. Upon the whole, the pilfering disposition of these
islanders, though certainly disagreeable and troublesome to strangers,
was the means of affording us some information as to the quickness of
their intellects. For their small thefts were committed with much
dexterity; and those of greater consequence with a plan or scheme suited
to the importance of the objects. An extraordinary instance of the last
sort, their attempts to carry away one of the Discovery’s anchors at
mid-day, has been already related.
Their hair is in general straight, thick, and strong; though a few have
it bushy or frizzled. The natural colour, I believe, almost without
exception, is black; but the greatest part of the men, and some of the
women, have it stained of a brown or purple colour; and a few of an
orange cast. The first colour is produced by applying a sort of plaster
of burnt coral, mixed with water; the second by the raspings of a
reddish wood, which is made up with water into a poultice, and laid over
the hair; and the third is, I believe, the effect of _turmeric_ root.
When I first visited these islands, I thought it had been an universal
custom for both men and women to wear the hair short; but, during our
present longer stay, we saw a great many exceptions. Indeed they are so
whimsical in their fashions of wearing it, that it is hard to tell which
is most in vogue. Some have it cut off one side of the head, while that
on the other side remains long; some have only a portion of it cut
short, or perhaps shaved; others have it entirely cut off, except a
single lock, which is left commonly on one side, or it is suffered to
grow to its full length without any of these mutilations. The women in
general wear it short. The men have their beards cut short, and both men
and women strip the hair from their arm-pits. The operation by which
this is performed has been already described. The men are stained from
about the middle of the belly, to about half way down the thighs, with a
deep blue colour. This is done with a flat bone instrument cut full of
fine teeth, which being dipped in the staining mixture, prepared from
the juice of the _dooe dooe_, is struck into the skin with a bit of
stick, and by that means indelible marks are made. In this manner they
trace lines and figures, which, in some are very elegant, both from the
variety, and from the arrangement. The women have only a few small lines
or spots, thus imprinted on the inside of their hands. Their kings, as a
mark of distinction, are exempted from this custom, as also from
inflicting on themselves any of those bloody marks of mourning, which
shall be mentioned in another place.
The men are all circumcised, or rather supercised; as the operation
consists in cutting off only a small piece of the foreskin at the upper
part; which by that means, is rendered incapable, ever after, of
covering the _glans_. This is all they aim at; as they say the operation
is practised from a notion of cleanliness.
The dress of both men and women is the same; and consists of a piece of
cloth or matting (but mostly the former), about two yards wide, and two
and a half long; at least so long as to go once and a half round the
waist, to which it is confined by a girdle or cord. It is double before,
and hangs down like a petticoat, as low as the middle of the leg. The
upper part of the garment above the girdle, is plaited into several
folds; so that when unfolded, there is cloth sufficient to draw up and
wrap round the shoulders, which is very seldom done. This, as to form,
is the general dress; but large pieces of cloth and fine matting, are
worn only by the superior people. The inferior sort are satisfied with
small pieces; and very often wear nothing but a covering made of leaves
of plants, or the _maro_ which is a narrow piece of cloth or matting,
like a sash. This they pass between the thighs and wrap round the waist;
but the use of it is chiefly confined to the men. In their great
_haivas_, or entertainments, they have various dresses made for the
purpose; but the form is always the same; and the richest dresses are
covered, more or less, with red feathers. On what particular occasion
their chiefs wear their large red feather-caps, I could not learn. Both
men and women sometimes shade their faces from the sun with little
bonnets, made of various materials.
As the clothing, so are the ornaments, worn by those of both sexes, the
same. The most common of these are necklaces made of the fruit of the
_pandanus_, and various sweet-smelling flowers, which go under the
general name of _kahulla_. Others are composed of small shells, the wing
and leg-bones of birds, shark’s teeth, and other things; all which hang
loose upon the breast. In the same manner, they often wear a
mother-of-pearl shell neatly polished, or a ring of the same substance
carved on the upper part of the arm; rings of tortoise-shell on the
fingers; and a number of these joined together as bracelets on the
wrists.
The lobes of the ears (though, most frequently, only one,) are
perforated with two holes, in which they wear cylindrical bits of ivory,
about three inches long, introduced at one hole, and brought out of the
other; or bits of reed of the same size, filled with a yellow pigment.
This seems to be a fine powder of _turmeric_, with which the women rub
themselves all over, in the same manner as our ladies use their dry
rouge upon the cheeks.
Nothing appears to give them greater pleasure than personal cleanliness;
to produce which, they frequently bathe in the ponds, which seem to
serve no other purpose.[204] Though the water in most of them stinks
intolerably, they prefer them to the sea; and they are so sensible that
salt water hurts their skin, that when necessity obliges them to bathe
in the sea, they commonly have some cocoa-nut shells filled with fresh
water, poured over them to wash it off. They are immoderately fond of
cocoa-nut oil for the same reason; a great quantity of which they not
only pour upon their head and shoulders, but rub the body all over,
briskly, with a smaller quantity. And none but those who have seen this
practice, can easily conceive how the appearance of the skin is improved
by it. This oil, however, is not to be procured by every one; and the
inferior sort of people, doubtless, appear less smooth for want of it.
CHAP. XI.
EMPLOYMENTS OF THE WOMEN AT THE FRIENDLY ISLANDS.—OF THE MEN.—
AGRICULTURE.—CONSTRUCTION OF THEIR HOUSES.—THEIR WORKING TOOLS.—
CORDAGE, AND FISHING IMPLEMENTS.—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS.—WEAPONS.—FOOD
AND COOKERY.—AMUSEMENTS.—MARRIAGE.—MOURNING CEREMONIES FOR THE DEAD.—
THEIR DIVINITIES.—NOTIONS ABOUT THE SOUL AND A FUTURE STATE.—THEIR
PLACES OF WORSHIP.—GOVERNMENT.—MANNER OF PAYING OBEISANCE TO THE
KING.—ACCOUNT OF THE ROYAL FAMILY.—REMARKS ON THEIR LANGUAGE, AND A
SPECIMEN OF IT.—NAUTICAL AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS.
Their domestic life is of that middle kind, neither so laborious as to
be disagreeable, nor so vacant as to suffer them to degenerate into
indolence. Nature has done so much for their country, that the first can
hardly occur, and their disposition seems to be a pretty good bar to the
last. By this happy combination of circumstances, their necessary labour
seems to yield in its turn to their recreations, in such a manner, that
the latter are never interrupted by the thoughts of being obliged to
recur to the former, till satiety makes them wish for such a transition.
The employment of the women is of the easy kind, and, for the most part,
such as may be executed in the house. The manufacturing their cloth, is
wholly consigned to their care. Having already described the process, I
shall only add, that they have this cloth of different degrees of
fineness. The coarser sort, of which they make very large pieces, does
not receive the impression of any pattern. Of the finer sort they have
some that is striped and chequered, and of other patterns differently
coloured. But how these colours are laid on, I cannot say, as I never
saw any of this sort made. The cloth in general will resist water for
some time; but that which has the strongest glaze will resist longest.
The manufacture next in consequence, and also within the department of
the women, is that of their mats, which excel every thing I have seen at
any other place, both as to their texture and their beauty. In
particular, many of them are so superior to those made at Otaheite, that
they are not a bad article to carry thither by way of trade. Of these
mats, they have seven or eight different sorts, for the purposes of
wearing or sleeping upon, and many are merely ornamental. The last are
chiefly made from the tough membraneous part of the stock of the
plantain tree; those that they wear from the _pandanus_, cultivated for
that purpose, and never suffered to shoot into a trunk; and the coarser
sort, which they sleep upon, from a plant called _evarra_. There are
many other articles of less note, that employ the spare time of their
females; as combs of which they make vast numbers; and little baskets
made of the same substance as the mats, and others of the fibrous
cocoa-nut husk, either plain or interwoven with small beads; but all
finished with such neatness and taste in the disposition of the various
parts, that a stranger cannot help admiring their assiduity and
dexterity.
The province allotted to the men is, as might be expected, far more
laborious and extensive than that of the women. Agriculture,
architecture, boat-building, fishing, and other things that relate to
navigation, are the objects of their care.[205] Cultivated roots and
fruits being their principal support, this requires their constant
attention to agriculture, which they pursue very diligently, and seem to
have brought almost to as great perfection as circumstances will permit.
The large extent of the plantain fields has been taken notice of
already; and the same may be said of the yams; these two together being
at least as ten to one with respect to all the other articles. In
planting both these, they dig small holes for their reception, and
afterward root up the surrounding grass, which, in this hot country is
quickly deprived of its vegetating power, and soon rotting, becomes a
good manure. The instruments they use for this purpose, which they call
_hooo_, are nothing more than pickets or stakes of different lengths,
according to the depth they have to dig. These are flattened and
sharpened to an edge at one end; and the largest have a short piece
fixed transversely, for pressing it into the ground with the foot. With
these, though they are not more than from two to four inches broad, they
dig and plant ground of many acres in extent. In planting the plantains
and yams, they observe so much exactness, that whichever way you look,
the rows present themselves regular and complete.
The cocoa-nut and bread-fruit trees are scattered about without any
order, and seem to give them no trouble after they have attained a
certain height. The same may be said of another large tree which
produces great numbers of a large roundish compressed nut, called
_eeefee_; and of a smaller tree that bears a rounded oval nut two inches
long, with two or three triangular kernels, tough and insipid, called
_mabba_, most frequently planted near their houses.
The _kappe_ is commonly regularly planted, and in pretty large spots;
but the _mawhaha_ is interspersed amongst other things, as the _jeejee_
and _yams_ are; the last of which, I have frequently seen in the
interspaces of the plantain trees at their common distance. Sugar-cane
is commonly in small spots, crowded closely together; and the mulberry,
of which the cloth is made, though without order, has sufficient room
allowed for it, and is kept very clean. The only other plant, that they
cultivate for their manufactures, is the _pandanus_; which is generally
planted in a row close together at the sides of the other fields; and
they consider it as a thing so distinct in this state, that they have a
different name for it; which shows that they are very sensible of the
great changes brought about by cultivation.
It is remarkable that these people, who in many things show much taste
and ingenuity, should show little of either in building their houses;
though the defect is rather in the design, than in the execution. Those
of the lower people are poor huts, scarcely sufficient to defend them
from the weather, and very small. Those of the better sort are larger
and more comfortable; but not what one might expect. The dimensions of
one of a middling size are about thirty feet long, twenty broad, and
twelve high. Their house is, properly speaking a thatched roof or shed,
supported by posts and rafters disposed in a very judicious manner. The
floor is raised with earth smoothed, and covered with strong thick
matting, and kept very clean. The most of them are closed on the weather
side (and some more than two-thirds round), with strong mats or with
branches of the cocoa-nut tree, platted or woven into each other. These
they fix up edgewise, reaching from the eaves to the ground; and thus
they answer the purpose of a wall. A thick strong mat about two and one
half or three feet broad, bent into the form of a semi-circle, and set
upon its edge, with the ends touching the side of the house, in shape
resembling the fender of a fire-hearth, encloses a space for the master
and mistress of the family to sleep in. The lady, indeed, spends most of
her time during the day within it. The rest of the family sleep upon the
floor, wherever they please to lie down; the unmarried men and women
apart from each other; or, if the family be large, there are small huts
adjoining to which the servants retire in the night; so that privacy is
as much observed here, as one could expect. They have mats made on
purpose for sleeping on; and the clothes that they wear in the day,
serve for their covering in the night. Their whole furniture consists of
a bowl or two, in which they make _kava_; a few gourds; cocoa-nut
shells; some small wooden stools which serve them for pillows; and,
perhaps, a large stool for the chief or master of the family to sit
upon.
The only probable reason I can assign for their neglect of ornamental
architecture in the construction of their houses, is their being fond of
living much in the open air. Indeed, they seem to consider their houses,
within which they seldom eat, as of little use but to sleep in, and to
retire to in bad weather. And the lower sort of people who spend a great
part of their time in close attendance upon the chiefs, can have little
use for their own houses, but in the last case.
They make amends for the defects of their houses, by their great
attention to, and dexterity in naval architecture, if I may be allowed
to give it that name. But I refer to the narrative of my last voyage for
an account of their canoes, and their manner of building and navigating
them.[206]
The only tools which they use to construct these boats, are hatchets, or
rather thick adzes, of a smooth black stone that abounds at Toofoa;
augres, made of shark’s teeth, fixed on small handles; and rasps of a
rough skin of a fish, fastened on flat pieces of wood thinner on one
side, which also have handles. The labour and time employed in finishing
their canoes, which are the most perfect of their mechanical productions
will account for their being very careful of them. For they are built
and preserved under sheds; or they cover the decked part of them with
cocoa-leaves, when they are hauled on shore to prevent their being hurt
by the sun.
The same tools are all they have for other works; if we except different
shells, which they use as knives. But there are few of their productions
that require these, unless it be some of their weapons; the other
articles being chiefly their fishing materials, and cordage.
The cordage is made from the fibres of the cocoa-nut husk, which, though
not more than nine or ten inches long, they plat about the size of a
quill or less, to any length that they please, and roll it up in balls;
from which the larger ropes are made, by twisting several of these
together. The lines that they fish with are as strong and even as the
best cord we make, resembling it almost in every respect. The other
fishing implements are large and small hooks. The last are composed
entirely of pearl-shell; but the first are only covered with it on the
back; and the points of both commonly of tortoise-shell; those of the
small being plain, and the others barbed. With the large ones they catch
bonnetos and albicores, by putting them to a bamboo rod twelve or
fourteen feet long, with a line of the same length, which rests in a
notch of a piece of wood, fixed in the stern of the canoe for that
purpose, and is dragged on the surface of the sea, as she rows along,
without any other bait than a tuft of flaxy stuff near the point. They
have also great numbers of pretty small seines, some of which are of a
very delicate texture. These they use to catch fish with, in the holes
on the reefs when the tide ebbs.
The other manual employments consist chiefly in making musical reeds,
flutes, warlike weapons, and stools, or rather pillows, to sleep on. The
reeds have eight, nine, or ten pieces placed parallel to each other, but
not in any regular progression; having the longest sometimes in the
middle, and several of the same length; so that I have seen none with
more than six notes; and they seem incapable of playing any music on
them that is distinguishable by our ears. The flutes are a joint of
bamboo, close at both ends, with a hole near each, and four others; two
of which, and one of the first only, are used in playing. They apply the
thumb of the left hand to close the left nostril, and blow into the hole
at one end with the other. The middle finger of the left hand is applied
to the first hole on the left, and the fore-finger of the right to the
lowest hole on that side. In this manner, though the notes are only
three, they produce a pleasing, yet simple music, which they vary much
more than one would think possible with so imperfect an instrument.
Their being accustomed to a music which consists of so few notes, is
perhaps the reason why they do not seem to relish any of ours, which is
so complex. But they can taste what is more deficient than their own;
for we observed that they used to be well pleased with hearing the chant
of our two young New Zealanders, which consisted rather in mere strength
than in melody of expression.
The weapons which they make are clubs of different sorts (in the
ornamenting of which they spend much time), spears, and darts. They have
also bows and arrows; but these seemed to be designed only for
amusement, such as shooting at birds, and not for military purposes. The
stools are about two feet long, but only four or five inches high, and
near four broad, bending downward in the middle, with four strong legs
and circular feet; the whole made of one piece of black or brown wood,
neatly polished, and sometimes inlaid with bits of ivory. They also
inlay the handles of fly-flaps with ivory, after being neatly carved;
and they shape bones into small figures of men, birds, and other things,
which must be very difficult, as their carving instrument is only a
shark’s tooth.
Yams, plantains, and cocoa-nuts, compose the greatest part of their
vegetable diet. Of their animal food, the chief articles are hogs,
fowls, fish, and all sorts of shell-fish; but the lower people eat rats.
The two first vegetable articles, with bread-fruit, are what may be
called the basis of their food, at different times of the year, with
fish and shell-fish; for hogs, fowls, and turtle, seem only to be
occasional dainties reserved for their chiefs. The intervals between the
seasons of these vegetable productions must be, sometimes, considerable,
as they prepare a sort of artificial bread from plantains, which they
put under ground before ripe, and suffer them to remain, till they
ferment, when they are taken out, and made up into small balls; but so
sour and indifferent, that they often said our bread was preferable,
though somewhat musty.
Their food is generally dressed by baking, in the same manner as at
Otaheite; and they have the art of making, from different kinds of
fruit, several dishes, which most of us esteemed very good. I never saw
them make use of any kind of sauce; nor drink any thing at their meals
but water, or the juice of the cocoa-nut; for the _kava_ is only their
morning draught. I cannot say that they are cleanly either in their
cookery or manner of eating. The generality of them will lay their
victuals upon the first leaf they meet with, however dirty it may be;
but when food is served up to the chiefs, it is commonly laid upon green
plantain leaves. When the king made a meal, he was, for the most part,
attended upon by three or four persons. One cut large pieces of the
joint, or of the fish; another divided it into mouthfuls; and others
stood by with cocoa-nuts, and whatever else he might want. I never saw a
large company sit down to what we should call a sociable meal, by eating
from the same dish. The food, be what it will, is always divided into
portions, each to serve a certain number; these portions are again
subdivided; so that one seldom sees above two or three persons eating
together. The women are not excluded from eating with the men; but there
are certain ranks or orders amongst them, that can neither eat nor drink
together. This distinction begins with the king; but where it ends I
cannot say.
They seem to have no set time for meals; though it should be observed,
that, during our stay amongst them, their domestic economy was much
disturbed by their constant attention to us. As far as we could remark,
those of the superior rank only drink _kava_ in the forenoon, and the
others eat perhaps a bit of yam; but we commonly saw all of them eat
something in the afternoon. It is probable that the practice of making a
meal in the night is pretty common; and their rest being thus
interrupted, they frequently sleep in the day. They go to bed as soon as
it is dark, and rise with the dawn in the morning.[207]
They are very fond of associating together; so that it is common to find
several houses empty, and the owners of them convened in some other one,
or rather upon a convenient spot in the neighbourhood, where they
recreate themselves by conversing, and other amusements. Their private
diversions are chiefly singing, dancing, and music performed by the
women. When two or three women sing in concert, and snap their fingers,
it is called _oobai_; but when there is a greater number, they divide
into several parties, each of which sings on a different key, which
makes a very agreeable music, and is called _heeva_ or _haiva_. In the
same manner, they vary the music of their flutes, by playing on those of
a different size; but their dancing is much the same as when they
perform publicly. The dancing of the men (if it is to be called
dancing), although it does not consist much in moving the feet, as we
do, has a thousand different motions with the hands, to which we are
entire strangers; and they are performed with an ease and grace which
are not to be described, nor even conceived, but by those who have seen
them. But I need add nothing to what has been already said on this
subject, in the account of the incidents that happened during our stay
at the islands.[208]
Whether their marriages be made lasting by any kind of solemn contract,
we could not determine with precision; but it is certain, that the bulk
of the people satisfied themselves with one wife. The chiefs, however,
have commonly several women[209]; though some of us were of opinion that
there was only one that was looked upon as the mistress of the family.
As female chastity at first sight seemed to be held in no great
estimation, we expected to have found frequent breaches of their
conjugal fidelity; but we did them great injustice. I do not know that a
single instance happened during our whole stay.[210] Neither are those
of the better sort, that are unmarried, more free of their favours. It
is true there was no want of those of a different character; and,
perhaps, such are more frequently met with here, in proportion to the
number of people, than in many other countries. But it appeared to me
that the most, if not all of them, were of the lowest class; and such of
them as permitted familiarities to our people, were prostitutes by
profession.
Nothing can be a greater proof of the humanity of these people, than the
concern they show for the dead.[211] To use a common expression, their
mourning is not in words but deeds. For, besides the _tooge_ mentioned
before, and burnt circles and scars, they beat the teeth with stones,
strike a shark’s tooth into the head until the blood flows in streams,
and thrust spears into the inner part of the thigh, into their sides
below the arm-pits, and through the cheeks into the mouth. All these
operations convey an idea of such rigorous discipline, as must require
either an uncommon degree of affection or the grossest superstition, to
exact. I will not say that the last has no share in it; for, sometimes,
it is so universal, that many could not have any knowledge of the person
for whom the concern is expressed. Thus we saw the people of Tongataboo
mourning the death of a chief at Vavaoo; and other similar instances
occurred during our stay. It should be observed, however, that the more
painful operations are only practised on account of the death of those
most nearly connected with the mourners. When a person dies, he is
buried, after being wrapped up in mats and cloth, much after our manner.
The chiefs seem to have the _fiatookas_ appropriated to them as their
burial-places; but the common people are interred in no particular
spot.[212] What part of the mourning ceremony follows immediately after,
is uncertain; but, that there is something besides the general one,
which is continued for a considerable length of time, we could infer,
from being informed, that the funeral of Mareewagee’s wife, as mentioned
before, was to be attended with ceremonies that were to last five days;
and in which all the principal people were to commemorate her.
Their long and general mourning, proves that they consider death as a
very great evil. And this is confirmed by a very odd custom which they
practise to avert it. When I first visited these Islands, during my last
voyage, I observed that many of the inhabitants had one or both of their
little fingers cut off; and we could not then receive any satisfactory
account of the reason of this mutilation.[213] But we now learned that
this operation is performed when they labour under some grievous
disease, and think themselves in danger of dying. They suppose that the
deity will accept of the little finger, as a sort of sacrifice
efficacious enough to procure the recovery of their health. They cut it
off with one of their stone hatchets. There was scarcely one in ten of
them whom we did not find thus mutilated in one or both hands; which has
a disagreeable effect, especially as they sometimes cut so close, that
they encroach upon the bone of the hand which joins to the amputated
finger.[214]
From the rigid severity with which some of these mourning and religious
ceremonies are executed, one would expect to find that they meant
thereby to secure to themselves felicity beyond the grave; but their
principal object relates to things merely temporal. For they seem to
have little conception of future punishment for faults committed in this
life. They believe, however, that they are justly punished upon earth;
and, consequently, use every method to render their divinities
propitious. The Supreme Author of most things they call _Kallafootonga_;
who, they say, is a female residing in the sky, and directing the
thunder, wind, rain; and, in general, all the changes of weather. They
believe, that when she is angry with them, the productions of the earth
are blasted; that many things are destroyed by lightning; and that they
themselves are afflicted with sickness and death, as well as their hogs
and other animals. When this anger abates, they suppose that every thing
is restored to its natural order; and it should seem, that they have a
great reliance on the efficacy of their endeavours to appease their
offended divinity. They also admit a plurality of deities, though all
inferior to _Kallafootonga_. Amongst them, they mention
_Toofooa-boolootoo_, God of the clouds and fog; _Talleteboo_, and some
others, residing in the heavens. The first in rank and power, who has
the government of the sea and its productions, is called _Futtafaihe_,
or, as it was sometimes pronounced, _Footafooa_; who, they say, is a
male, and has for his wife _Fykava kajeea_; and here, as in heaven,
there are several inferior potentates, such as _Vahaa fonooa_,
_Tareeava_, _Mattaba_, _Evaroo_, and others. The same religious system,
however, does not extend all over the cluster of the Friendly Isles; for
the supreme god of _Hapaee_, for instance, is called _Alo Alo_; and
other isles have two or three, of different names. But their notions of
the power and other attributes of these beings, are so very absurd, that
they suppose they have no farther concern with them after death.
They have, however, very proper sentiments about the immateriality and
the immortality of the soul. They call it life, the living principle,
or, what is more agreeable to their notions of it, an _Otooa_; that is,
a divinity, or invisible being. They say, that, immediately upon death,
the souls of their chiefs separate from their bodies, and go to a place
called _Boolootoo_; the chief, or god of which is _Goleho_. This
_Gooleho_ seems to be a personification of death; for they used to say
to us, “You, and the men of Feejee (by this junction, meaning to pay a
compliment, expressive of their confession of our superiority over
themselves,) are also subject to the power and dominion of _Gooleho_.”
His country, the general receptacle of the dead, according to their
mythology, was never seen by any person; and yet, it seems, they know
that it lies to the westward of Feejee; and that they who are once
transported thither, live for ever; or, to use their own expression, are
not subject to death again; but feast upon all the favourite products of
their own country, with which this everlasting abode is supposed to
abound. As to the souls of the lower sort of people, they undergo a sort
of transmigration; or, as they say, are eaten up by a bird called
_loata_, which walks upon their graves for that purpose.
I think I may venture to assert, that they do not worship any thing that
is the work of their own hands, or any visible part of the creation.
They do not make offerings of hogs, dogs, and fruit, as at Otaheite,
unless it be emblematically; for their _morais_ were perfectly free from
every thing of the kind. But that they offer real human sacrifices, is
with me beyond a doubt. Their _morais_ or _fiatookas_ (for they are
called by both names, but mostly by the latter), are, as at Otaheite and
many other parts of the world, burying-grounds, and places of worship;
though some of them seemed to be only appropriated to the first purpose;
but these were small, and in every other respect inferior to the others.
Of the nature of their government, we know no more than the general
outline. A subordination is established among them, that resembles the
feudal system of our progenitors in Europe. But of its subdivisions, of
the constituent parts, and in what manner they are connected, so as to
form a body politic, I confess myself totally ignorant. Some of them
told us that the power of the king is unlimited, and that the life and
property of the subject is at his disposal. But the few circumstances
that fell under our observation, rather contradicted than confirmed the
idea of a despotic government. Mareewagee, old Tooboo, and Feenou, acted
each like petty sovereigns, and frequently thwarted the measures of the
king; of which he often complained. Neither was his court more splendid
than those of the two first, who are the most powerful chiefs in the
islands; and next to them, Feenou, Mareewagee’s son, seemed to stand
highest in authority. But, however independent on the despotic power of
the king the great men may be, we saw instances enough to prove, that
the lower order of people have no property, nor safety for their
persons, but at the will of the chiefs to whom they respectively belong.
Tongataboo is divided into many districts; of above thirty of which we
learned the names. Each of these has its particular chief, who decides
differences, and distributes justice within his own district. But we
could not form any satisfactory judgment about the extent of their power
in general, or their mode of proportioning punishments to crimes. Most
of these chiefs have possessions in other islands, from whence they draw
supplies. At least, we know this is so with respect to the king, who, at
certain established times, receives the product of his distant domains
at Tongataboo; which is not only the principal place of his residence,
but seemingly of all the people of consequence amongst these isles. Its
inhabitants, in common conversation, call it the Land of Chiefs; while
the subordinate isles are distinguished by the appellation of Lands of
Servants.
These chiefs are, by the people, styled not only lords of the earth, but
of the sun and sky; and the king’s family assume the name of Futtafaihe,
from the god so called, who is probably their tutelary patron, and
perhaps their common ancestor. The sovereign’s peculiar earthly title
is, however, simply _Tooee Tonga_.
There is a decorum observed in the presence of their principal men, and
particularly of their king, that is truly admirable. Whenever he sits
down, whether it be in a house or without, all the attendants seat
themselves at the same time, in a semicircle before him; leaving always
a convenient space between him and them, into which no one attempts to
come, unless he has some particular business. Neither is any one allowed
to pass or sit behind him, nor even near him, without his order or
permission; so that our having been indulged with this privilege, was a
significant proof of the great respect that was paid us. When any one
wants to speak with the king, he advances and sits down before him,
delivers what he has to say in a few words, and having received his
answer, retires again to the circle. But if the king speaks to any one,
that person answers from his seat, unless he is to receive some order,
in which case he gets up from his place and sits down before the chief
with his legs across; which is a posture to which they are so much
accustomed, that any other mode of sitting is disagreeable to them.[215]
To speak to the king standing would be accounted here as striking a mark
of rudeness, as it would be with us, for one to sit down and put on his
hat, when he addresses himself to his superior, and that superior on his
feet, and uncovered.
It does not indeed appear that any of the most civilized nations, have
ever exceeded this people in the great order observed on all occasions;
in ready compliance with the commands of their chiefs; and in the
harmony that subsists throughout all ranks, and unites them as if they
were all one man, informed with and directed by the same principle. Such
a behaviour is remarkably obvious, whenever it is requisite that their
chief should harangue any body of them collected together, which is
frequently done. The most profound silence and attention is observed
during the harangue, even to a much greater degree than is practised
amongst us, on the most interesting and serious deliberations of our
most respectable assemblies. And whatever might have been the subject of
the speech delivered, we never saw an instance when any individual
present showed signs of his being displeased, or that indicated the
least inclination to dispute the declared will of a person who had a
right to command. Nay, such is the force of these verbal laws, as I may
call them, that I have seen one of their chiefs express his being
astonished at a person’s having acted contrary to such orders; though it
appeared that the poor man could not possibly have been informed in time
to have observed them.[216]
Though some of the more potent chiefs may vie with the king in point of
actual possessions, they fall very short in rank, and in certain marks
of respect, which the collective body have agreed to pay the monarch. It
is a particular privilege annexed to his sovereignty, not to be
punctured nor circumcised as all his subjects are. Whenever he walks
out, every one whom he meets must sit down till he has passed. No one is
allowed to be over his head; on the contrary, all must come under his
feet; for there cannot be a greater outward mark of submission, than
that which is paid to the sovereign, and other great people of these
islands, by their inferiors. The method is this; the person who is to
pay obeisance squats down before the chief, and bows the head to the
sole of his foot; which, when he sits, is so placed that it can be
easily come at; and having tapped, or touched it with the under and
upper side of the fingers of both hands, he rises up and retires. It
should seem, that the king cannot refuse any one who chooses to pay him
this homage, which is called _moe moea_; for the common people would
frequently take it into their heads to do it when he was walking; and he
was always obliged to stop, and hold up one of his feet behind him, till
they had performed the ceremony. This, to a heavy unwieldy man, like
Poulaho, must be attended with some trouble and pain; and I have
sometimes seen him make a run, though very unable, to get out of the
way, or to reach a place where he might conveniently sit down. The
hands, after this application of them to the chief’s feet, are, in some
cases, rendered useless for a time; for, until they be washed, they must
not touch any kind of food. This interdiction in a country where water
is so scarce, would seem to be attended with some inconvenience; but
they are never at a loss for a succedaneum; and a piece of any juicy
plant, which they can easily procure immediately, being rubbed upon
them, this serves for the purpose of purification, as well as washing
them with water. When the hands are in this state, they call it _taboo
rema_. _Taboo_, in general, signifies forbidden, and _rema_ is their
word for hand.
When the _taboo_ is incurred by paying obeisance to a great personage,
it is thus easily washed off. But in some other cases it must
necessarily continue for a certain time. We have frequently seen women,
who have been _taboo rema_, fed by others. At the expiration of the
time, the interdicted person washes herself in one of their baths, which
are dirty holes, for the most part, of brackish water. She then waits
upon the king, and after making her obeisance in the usual way, lays
hold of his foot and applies it to her breast, shoulders, and other
parts of her body. He then embraces her on each shoulder; after which
she retires purified from her uncleanness. I do not know that it is
always necessary to come to the king for this purpose, though Omai
assured me it was. If this be so, it may be one reason why he is, for
the most part, travelling from island to island. I saw this ceremony
performed by him two or three times; and once by Feenou, to one of his
own women; but as Omai was not then with me, I could not ask the
occasion.
_Taboo_, as I have before observed, is a word of an extensive
signification. Human sacrifices are called _tangata taboo_; and when any
thing is forbidden to be eaten, or made use of, they say that it is
_taboo_. They tell us, that if the king should happen to go into a house
belonging to a subject, that house would be _taboo_, and could never
more be inhabited by the owner; so that wherever he travels, there are
particular houses for his reception. Old Toobou, at this time, presided
over the _taboo_; that is, if Omai comprehended the matter rightly, he
and his deputies inspected all the produce of the island; taking care
that every man should cultivate and plant his quota; and ordering what
should be eaten, and what not. By this wise regulation they effectually
guard against a famine; a sufficient quantity of ground is employed in
raising provisions; and every article thus raised, is secured from
unnecessary waste.
By another prudent regulation in their government, they have an officer
over the police, or something like it. This department, when we were
amongst them, was administered by Feenou; whose business we were told it
was to punish all offenders, whether against the state or against
individuals. He was also generalissimo, and commanded the warriors, when
called out upon service; but, by all accounts, this is very seldom. The
king frequently took some pains to inform us of Feenou’s office; and
among other things, told us that if he himself should become a bad man,
Feenou would kill him. What I understood by this expression of being a
bad man, was, that if he did not govern according to law or custom,
Feenou would be ordered, by the other great men, or by the people at
large, to put him to death. There should seem to be no doubt, that a
sovereign, thus liable to be controled and punished for an abuse of
power, cannot be called a despotic monarch.
When we consider the number of islands that compose this little state,
and the distance at which some of them lie from the seat of government,
attempts to throw off the yoke, and to acquire independency, it should
seem, might be apprehended; but they tell us that this never happens.
One reason why they are not thus disturbed, by domestic quarrels, may be
this; that all the powerful chiefs, as we have already mentioned, reside
at Tongataboo. They also secure the dependence of the other islands by
the celerity of their operations; for if, at any time, a troublesome and
popular man should start up in any of them, Feenou, or whoever holds his
office, is immediately dispatched thither to kill him. By this means,
they crush a rebellion in its very infancy.
The orders or classes amongst their chiefs, or those who call themselves
such, seemed to be almost as numerous as amongst us; but there are few
in comparison that are lords of large districts of territory, the rest
holding their lands under those principal barons, as they may be called.
I was indeed told that when a man of property dies, every thing he
leaves behind him falls to the king; but that it is usual to give it to
the eldest son of the deceased, with an obligation to make a provision
out of it for the rest of the children. It is not the custom here, as at
Otaheite, for the son, the moment he is born, to take from the father
the homage and title; but he succeeds to them at his decease; so that
their form of government is not only monarchical but hereditary.
The order of succession to the crown has not been of late interrupted;
for we know from a particular circumstance, that the Futtafaihes
(Poulaho being only an addition to distinguish the king from the rest of
his family) have reigned in a direct line, for at least one hundred and
thirty-five years. Upon inquiring whether any account had been preserved
amongst them of the arrival of Tasman’s ships, we found that this
history had been handed down to them from their ancestors, with an
accuracy which marks that oral tradition may sometimes be depended upon.
For they described the two ships as resembling ours, mentioning the
place where they had anchored; their having staid but a few days; and
their moving from that station to Annamooka. And by way of informing us
how long ago this had happened, they told us the name of the Futtafaihe
who was then king, and of those who had succeeded down to Poulaho, who
is the fifth since that period; the first being an old man, at the time
of the arrival of the ships.
From what has been said of the present king, it would be natural to
suppose, that he had the highest rank of any person in the islands. But
to our great surprise, we found it is not so; for Latoolibooloo, the
person who was pointed out to me as king when I first visited
Tongataboo, and three women, are, in some respects, superior to Poulaho
himself. On our inquiring who these extraordinary personages were, whom
they distinguish by the name and title of _Tammaha_[217]? we were told
that the late king, Poulaho’s father, had a sister of equal rank, and
elder than himself; that she, by a man who came from the island of
Feejee, had a son and two daughters; and that these three persons, as
well as their mother, rank above Futtafaihe the king. We endeavoured, in
vain, to trace the reason of this singular preeminence of the
_Tammahas_; for we could learn nothing besides this account of their
pedigree. The mother and one of the daughters, called Tooeela-kaipa,
live at Vavaoo. Latoolibooloo, the son, and the other daughter, whose
name is Moungoula-kaipa, reside at Tongataboo. The latter is the woman
who is mentioned to have dined with me on the 21st of June. This gave
occasion to our discovering her superiority over the king, who would not
eat in her presence, though she made no scruple to do so before him, and
received from him the customary obeisance, by touching her foot. We
never had an opportunity of seeing him pay this mark of respect to
Latoolibooloo; but we have observed him leave off eating, and have his
victuals put aside, when the latter came into the same house.
Latoolibooloo assumed the privilege of taking any thing from the people,
even if it belonged to the king; and yet in the ceremony called
_Natche_, he assisted only in the same manner as the other principal
men. He was looked upon by his countrymen, as a madman; and many of his
actions seemed to confirm this judgment. At Eooa, they showed me a good
deal of land, said to belong to him; and I saw there a son of his, a
child whom they distinguished by the same title as his father. The son
of the greatest Prince in Europe could not be more humoured and caressed
than this little _Tammaha_ was.
The language of the Friendly Islands has the greatest affinity
imaginable to that of New Zealand, of Wateeoo, and Mangeea; and,
consequently, to that of Otaheite, and the Society islands. There are
also many of their words the same with those used by the natives of
Cocos Island, as appears from the vocabulary collected there by Le Maire
and Schouten.[218] The mode of pronunciation differs, indeed,
considerably, in many instances, from that both of New Zealand and
Otaheite; but still a great number of words are either exactly the same,
or so little changed, that their common original may be satisfactorily
traced. The language, as spoken at the Friendly Islands, is sufficiently
copious for all the ideas of the people; and we had many proofs of its
being easily adapted to all musical purposes, both in song and in
recitative; besides being harmonious enough in common conversation. Its
component parts, as far as our scanty acquaintance with it enabled us to
judge, are not numerous; and in some of its rules, it agrees with other
known languages. As, for instance, we could easily discern the several
degrees of comparison, as used in the Latin; but none of the inflections
of nouns and verbs.
We were able to collect several hundreds of the words; and, amongst
these, are terms that express numbers as far as a hundred thousand;
beyond which they never would reckon. It is probable, indeed, that they
are not able to go farther; for, after having got thus far, we observed
that they commonly used a word which expresses an indefinite number. A
short specimen, selected from the larger vocabulary, is here inserted,
with the corresponding words, of the same signification as used at
Otaheite, on the opposite column; which, while it will give, as we may
say, ocular demonstration of their being dialects of the same language,
will, at the same time, point out the particular letters by the
insertion, omission, or alteration of which the variations of the two
dialects from each other have been effected.
It must be observed, however, that our vocabularies of this sort must
necessarily be liable to great mistakes. The ideas of those from whom we
were to learn the words were so different from ours, that it was
difficult to fix them to the object of inquiry. Or, if this could be
obtained, to learn an unknown tongue from an instructor who did not know
a single word of any language that his scholar was conversant with,
could not promise to produce much. But even, when these difficulties
were surmounted, there still remained a fruitful source of mistake. I
mean, inaccuracy in catching exactly the true sound of a word to which
our ears had never been accustomed, from persons whose mode of
pronunciation was, in general, so indistinct, that it seldom happened
that any two of us, in writing down the same word from the same mouth,
made use of the same vowels in representing it. Nay, we even very
commonly differed about consonants, the sounds of which are least liable
to ambiguity. Besides all this, we found, by experience, that we had
been led into strange corruptions of some of the most common words,
either from the natives endeavouring to imitate us, or from our having
misunderstood them. Thus, _cheeto_ was universally used by us to express
a thief, though totally different from the real word in the language of
Tongataboo. The mistake arose from a prior one into which we had ran
when at New Zealand; for though the word that signifies thief there, be
absolutely the same that belongs to the dialect of the Friendly Islands
(being _kaeehaa_ at both places), yet, by some blunder, we had used the
word _teete_ first at New Zealand, and afterward at Tongataboo, on our
arrival there. The natives, endeavouring to imitate us as nearly as they
could, and so fabricating the word _cheeto_, this, by a complication of
mistakes, was adopted by us as their own. All possible care has been
taken to make the following table as correct as possible:
English. _Friendly Islands._ _Otaheite._
_The sun_, Elaa, Eraa.
_Fire_, Eafoi, Eahoi.
_Thunder_, Fatoore, Pateere.
_Rain_, Ooha, Eooa.
_The wind_, Matangee, Mataee.
_Warm_, Mafanna, Mahanna.
_The clouds_, Ao, Eao.
_Land_, Fonooa, Fenooa.
_Water_, Avy, Evy.
_Sleep_, Mohe, Moe.
_A man_, Tangata, Taata.
_A woman_, Vefaine, Waheine.
_A young girl_, Taheine, Toonea.
_A servant_, or
_person of mean
rank_, Tooa, Toutou, _or_ teou.
_The dawn_, or
_day-break_, Aho, Aou.
_The hair_, Fooroo, Eroroo.
_The tongue_, Elelo, Erero.
_The ear_, Tareenga, Tareea.
_The beard_, Koomoo, Ooma.
_The sea_, Tahee, Taee.
_A boat_, or
_canoe_, Wakka, Evaa.
_Black_, Oole, Ere.
_Red_, Goola, Oora, oora.
_A lance or spear_, Tao, Tao.
_A parent_, Motooa, Madooa.
_What is that?_ Kohaeea? Yahaeea?
_To hold fast_, Amou, Mou.
_To wipe or clean
any thing_ Horo, Horoee.
_To rise up_, Etoo, Atoo.
_To cry or shed
tears_, Tangee, Taee.
_To eat_ or _chew_, Eky, Ey.
_Yes_, Ai, Ai.
_No_, Kaee, Aee.
_You_, Koe, Oe.
_I_, Ou, Wou.
_Ten_, Ongofooro, Ahooroo.
Having now concluded my remarks on these islands and people, I shall
take my final leave of them, after giving some account of the
astronomical and nautical observations that were made during our stay.
And first I must take notice, that the difference of longitude between
Annamooka and Tongataboo, is somewhat less than was marked in the chart
and narrative of my last voyage. This error might easily arise, as the
longitude of each was then found without any connection with the other.
But now the distance between them is determined to a degree of precision
that excludes all possibility of mistake; which the following table will
illustrate:
The latitude of the observatory at Tongataboo, by
the mean of several observations, 21° 8ʹ 19ʺ south.
The longitude, by the mean of one hundred and
thirty-one sets of lunar observations, amounting
to above a thousand observed distances, between
the moon, sun, and stars, 184° 55ʹ 18ʺ east.
The difference of longitude, made by the
time-keeper, between the above observatory, and
that at Annamooka, 0 16 0
Hence, the longitude of Annamooka is 185 11 18 east.
By the time-keeper it is, Greenwich rate, 186 12 27
New Zealand rate, 184 37 0
Its latitude 20 15 0
N. B.—The observatory at Tongataboo was near the middle of the north
side of the island; and that it Annamooka, on its west side; but the
chart will elucidate this.
The time-keeper was too slow for mean time at Greenwich, on the first of
July at noon, by 12^h 34^m 33^s,2; and her daily rate, at that time, was
loosing, on mean time, 1^m,783 _per_ day. This rate will now be used for
finding the longitude by the time-keeper; and 184° 55ʹ 18ʺ, or 12^h 19^m
41^s,2, will be taken as the true longitude of Tongataboo, east from
Greenwich.
By the mean of several observations, the south end of the needle was
found to dip
{Lefooga, one of the Hapaee
At { islands, 36° 55ʹ
{Tongataboo, 39 1-1/2
The variation of the compass was found to be,
{Annamooka, on board, 8° 30ʹ 3-1/2ʺ east.
{Anchor off Kotoo, between }
At { Annamooka and Hapaee, } 8 12 29-1/2
{Anchor off Lefooga, 10 11 40
{Tongataboo, on board, 9 44 5-1/2
{Ditto, on shore, 10 12 58
The variation of the compass was found to be,
I can assign no reason why the variation is so much less at and near
Annamooka, than at either of the other two places. I can only say, that
there is no fault in the observations; and that the variation ought to
be more at Annamooka than the above, as it has been found to be so to
the northward, southward, eastward, and westward of it. But
disagreements in the variation, greater than this, even in the same
needle, have been often observed. And I should not have taken notice of
this instance, but from a belief that the cause, whatever it is, exists
in the place, and not in the needles; for Mr. Bayly found the same, or
rather more difference.
The tides are more considerable at these islands, than at any other of
my discoveries in this ocean, that lie within the tropics. At Annamooka
it is high water, on the full and change days, nearly at six o’clock;
and the tide rises and falls there, upon a perpendicular, about six
feet. In the harbour of Tongataboo, it is high water, on the full and
change days, at fifty minutes past six. The tide rises and falls on
those days, four feet nine inches; and three feet six inches at the
Quadratures. In the channels between the islands, which lie in this
harbour, it flows near tide and half-tide; that is, the flood continues
to run up near three hours, after it is high water by the shore; and the
ebb continues to run down, after it is flood by the shore. It is only in
these channels, and in a few other places near the shores, that the
motion of the water or tide is perceivable; so that I can only guess at
the quarter from which the flood comes. In the road of Annamooka, it
sets west south-west, and the ebb the contrary; but it tails into the
harbour of Tongataboo from the north-west, passes through the two narrow
channels, on each side of Hoolaiva, where it runs with considerable
rapidity, and then spends itself in the _lagoon_. The ebb returns the
same way, and runs with rather greater force. The north-west tide is met
at the entrance of the _lagoon_, by one from the east; but this, as I
have before observed, was found to be very inconsiderable.
END OF THE FIFTH VOLUME.
LONDON:
Printed by A. & R. Spottiswoode,
New-Street-Square.
Footnotes
Footnote 1:
Two voyages for discovering a North-West passage, through Hudson’s
Bay, were then performed; one under the command of Captain Middleton,
in his Majesty’s ships the Furnace, and the Discovery Pink, in 1741
and 1742; the other under the direction of Captains Smith and Moore,
in the ships Dobbs and California, fitted out by subscription, in 1746
and 1747.
Footnote 2:
Captain, now Admiral, Byron had under his command the Dolphin and
Tamer. He sailed in June, 1764, and returned in May, 1766.
Footnote 3:
Captain Wallis had under his command the Dolphin and Swallow. He
sailed in August, 1766, and returned, with the Dolphin, in May, 1768.
Footnote 4:
The Swallow, commanded by Captain Carteret, having been separated from
Wallis, and, by keeping a different route, having made different
discoveries, this may be considered as a distinct voyage. The Swallow
returned to England in March 1769.
Footnote 5:
Captain Cook, in the Endeavour, sailed in August 1768, and returned in
July, 1771.
In his second voyage, he had the Resolution and Adventure under his
command. They sailed from England in July, 1772, and returned on the
30th of July, 1775.
Footnote 6:
The account of the four first of these voyages, compiled by Dr.
Hawkesworth, from the Journals of the several commanders, was
published in 1772, in three volumes quarto; and Captain Cook’s own
account of the fifth, in 1777, in two volumes quarto.
Footnote 7:
See Lord Anson’s Voyage, quarto edition, p. 91.
Footnote 8:
These are Captain Cook’s words, _Introduction to his Voyage_, vol.
iii. p. 7.; and the evidence on which he forms this judgment may be
met with in Hawkesworth’s Journal of Byron’s Voyage, vol. i. p. 23,
24, 51, 52, 53, 54.
Footnote 9:
See the Chart of Discoveries in the South Atlantic. Cook’s Voyage,
vol. iv. p. 211.
Footnote 10:
Magalhaen’s Voyage was undertaken in 1519.
Footnote 11:
See the particulars of their discoveries in Mr. Dalrymple’s valuable
Collection of Voyages in the South Pacific Ocean.
Footnote 12:
Bougainville, in 1768, did no more than discover that the land here
was not connected but composed of islands. Captain Cook, in 1774,
explored the whole group. See vol. iv. p. 88.
Footnote 13:
Vol. iv. p. 219.
Footnote 14:
See vols. i. and ii.
Footnote 15:
See vol. ii. p. 69.
Footnote 16:
Vol. iii. chap. 7.
Footnote 17:
Vol. ii. p. 202.
Footnote 18:
From October 6. 1769, to March 31. 1770.
Footnote 19:
Its southern extremity nearly in latitude 47°, and its northern in
35-1/2°. See Captain Cook’s chart, in Hawkesworth, vol. ii. p. 281.
Footnote 20:
See the track of Torré, in one of Quiros’s ships, in 1606, between New
Holland and New Guinea, upon Mr. Dalrymple’s Chart of Discoveries in
the South Pacific Ocean, before 1764.
Footnote 21:
M. de Brosses says of New Guinea: “C’est une longue isle, ou presqu’
isle, si elle touche à la Nouvelle Hollande.” _Navigations aux Terres
Australes_, tom. i. p. 434.
Footnote 22:
“Le triste état où nous étions réduits, ne nous permettoit de chercher
en faisant route a l’ouest, un passage au sud de la Nouvelle Guinée,
qui nous frayât par le Golfe de la Carpenterie une route nouvelle &
courte aux iles Moluques. _Rien n’étoit à la vérité plus problématique
que l’existence de ce passage._” Voyage autour du Monde, p. 259.
Footnote 23:
Hawkesworth, vol. iii. p. 660.
Footnote 24:
Hawkesworth, vol. i. p. 563.
Footnote 25:
The position of the Solomon Islands, Mendana’s celebrated discovery,
will no longer remain a matter in debate amongst geographers, Mr.
Dalrymple having, on the most satisfactory evidence, proved, that they
are the cluster of islands which comprizes what has since been called
New Britain, New Ireland, &c. The great light thrown on that cluster
by Captain Carteret’s discovery, is a strong confirmation of this. See
Mr. Dalrymple’s Collection of Voyages, vol. i. p. 16-21.
Footnote 26:
It must be observed, however, that Monsieur le Monier, in the Memoirs
of the French Academy of Sciences for 1776, pleads for the existence
of Cape Circumcision, seen by Bouvet in 1738, which our English
navigator sought for in vain, and supposes to have been only an island
of ice. Mr. Wales, in a paper read before the Royal Society, very
forcibly replied to M. le Monier’s objections; and the attack having
been repeated, he has drawn up a more extended defence of this part of
Captain Cook’s Journal, which he hath very obligingly communicated,
and is here inserted.
_Arguments, tending to prove that Captain Cook sought for Cape
Circumcision under the proper Meridian; and that the objections which
have been made to his conduct, in this respect, are not well founded._
In the Memoirs of the Royal Academy of Sciences at Paris for 1776,
printed in 1779, _M. Le Monier_ has made some remarks with a design to
show that Captain Cook sought the land, usually called Cape
Circumcision, in a wrong place; and that, instead of looking for it
under the meridian of 9-1/2° or 10° of east longitude, he ought to
have looked for it under a meridian which is only 3°, or 3-1/2° to the
eastward of the meridian of Greenwich; and consequently that this land
may exist, notwithstanding all that has yet been done to find it. _M.
Le Monier_ has also two additional Memoirs on the same subject, in the
volume for 1779, occasioned, as it appears, by some objections which
have been made to his former Memoir before the Academy. For some
reason or other, the Academy has not thought proper to print the
objections which have been made to _M. Le Monier_’s hypothesis; nor
has he been particular enough in his two Memoirs which reply to them,
to enable me to say of what importance the objections are. I can only
gather, that they contain some exceptions to the quantity by which _M.
Le Monier_ asserts the variation alters in 10° of longitude, under the
parallel of 54° south; and which, I conceive, has little to do in the
dispute.
Whether the land, usually called Cape Circumcision, exists or not, is
a point of small importance to geography; as the most strenuous
asserters of its existence must allow it to be a very inconsiderable
island, and of no use. This, therefore, is not in itself a matter
worthy of dispute; but in asserting this, _M. Le Monier_ has, and I am
sorry to observe it, with some asperity too, particularly in his
second Memoir, endeavoured to censure the judgment and conduct of
Captain Cook, whose memory I have every reason to revere, as well as
the judgment of those who were with him; and, on this account, I
cannot help feeling myself called on to explain the motives which
induced _Captain Cook_ to place no dependence on the arguments now
adduced by _M. Le Monier_ in support of his supposition; and which,
_M. Le Monier_ must know, were not unattended to at that time, from
what the Captain has said, p. 236. Vol. II. of his account of the
voyage. And it may be proper to observe here, that what fell from
_Captain Cook_ on this subject, was to show that this circumstance was
then attended to, and not to throw blame on _M. Bouvet_, for whose
memory and abilities _Captain Cook_ entertained great respect: nor is
it incompatible with the utmost respect, for a man to have a
favourable opinion of his own labours; or to endeavour to show why he
thinks the disagreement between them and those of another person, when
there is one, does not arise from an error committed by himself. There
could, therefore, be no occasion for _M. Le Monier_ to express himself
as he has done in several parts of his second Memoir.
The substance of _M. Le Monier_’s argument is this. In 1739, when _M.
Bouvet_’s discovery is supposed to have been made, the methods for
determining the longitude of a ship at sea were very defective; and,
of course, the longitude of any land which happened accidentally to be
seen by one, was equally uncertain. On a presumption that this was the
case with respect to Cape Circumcision, _M. Le Monier_ enquires into
the quantity of the variation of the magnetic needle, observed by M.
Bouvet at that place, and also into observations of the same kind,
made at other places in the neighbourhood of it, about the same time,
as well as both before and since. And by comparing these observations
together, he concludes, that at the time when Captain Cook was in
these seas, the variation of the needle at Cape Circumcision must have
been 10° westerly: whereas, in the most westerly point of Captain
Cook’s track, where he was sufficiently near the parallel of 54°
south, to have seen land situated in it, the variation was 13-1/2°
westerly. This difference of 3-1/2°, in the variation, answers to
about 7° of longitude, in this part of the parallel of 54° south: and
by so much did Captain Cook fall in with this parallel to the eastward
of what he ought to have done to see the land in question. “Hence (M.
Le Monier infers), that it is not surprising the British navigator
should not find Cape Circumcision under a meridian which is 28-1/2° to
the eastward of Ferro, when it is really situated under a meridian
which is but 21-1/2° to the eastward of it.”
In replying to these allegations, I shall first show, that, granting
the dependence which _M. Le Monier_ supposes may be placed on
observations of the variation made at sea, he has stated the quantity
of the variation observed on board the Resolution, very erroneously.
Secondly, I shall prove, beyond contradiction, that observations of
the variation, made at sea, cannot be depended on for the purposes to
which _M. Le Monier_ has applied them.
And, lastly, that no material error had crept into _M. Bouvet_’s
reckoning; but that if any error did exist, it must have been of a
contrary nature to that which _M. Le Monier_ supposes.
That _M. Le Monier_ has not given altogether a true representation of
the matter, will appear from hence. On the 16th of February, at
noon[27], the Resolution was in latitude 54° 31-1/2ʹ south, which is
sufficiently near the parallel of 54° south, to see high land, the
northern extremity of which lies to the southward of that parallel;
and at that time we were in 6° east of Greenwich, or 23-3/4° east of
the island of Ferro: that is, 4-3/4° less than is assigned for our
situation by _M. Le Monier_. On the evening of the same day, the ship
being in latitude 54° 24ʹ, and longitude 6° 30ʹ, or 24-1/4° east of
Ferro, the variation was no more than 12° 7ʹ west, which also is near
a degree and a half less then _M. Le Monier_ says it was, when we
first arrived in a proper parallel for seeing Cape Circumcision. It is
true, the next morning, in latitude 54° 21-1/2ʹ south, longitude 8° 6ʹ
east, we had 13° 42ʹ west variation; but this was after we had run
more than two degrees within sight of the parallel of 54° south. It
is, moreover, highly probable, that both these variations were too
great; for, on the 17th, in the evening, latitude 54° 25ʹ south, and
longitude 9° 20ʹ east; that is, 1-1/4° more to the eastward, and after
we had run 3-1/3° on the parallel we were then on, the variation was
no more than 13° 16ʹ west. It is also worthy of remark, that on the
14th, in the evening, latitude 56° 14-1/2ʹ south, and longitude 4° 50ʹ
east, which is but 1° 10ʹ to the westward of the point, where the
Resolution came first into a proper situation to see land, situated in
the parallel of 54° south, the variation observed was no more than 6°
50ʹ west. And we may further add, that on the 1st of March, 1774, the
Adventure had no more than 12-3/4° west variation, though she was then
considerably both to the northward and eastward of our situation on
the 17th of February in the morning, on both which accounts the
variation ought to have been greater, instead of a whole degree less.
From all these circumstances, there can be little doubt but that the
two variations, observed by us on the 16th and 17th of February, were
too great; or that the variation, at the point where the Resolution
first came sufficiently near the parallel of 54° south, to see land,
the northern extremity of which is situated in that parallel, could
not be more than 11-1/2° west, instead of 13-1/2°, as _M. le Monier_
has represented it.
Under this head of enquiry, I may also observe, that, although the
Resolution was too much to the southward of the parallel of 54° south,
when she crossed the meridian which is 21-1/2° to the eastward of
Ferro, that is, 3-3/4° east of Greenwich, the longitude which _M. Le
Monier_ assigns for Cape Circumcision, to see if it had been in that
situation, yet her consort, the Adventure, was for several degrees on
each side of that meridian; and especially when she had 10-1/2° of
west variation, full as near to the parallel of 54° south as _M.
Bouvet_ was to the land when he saw it[28]; and on the day that she
actually passed that meridian, had fine clear weather.[29] Hence,
therefore, granting _M. Le Monier_ his own arguments, which, however,
I have proved to be erroneous, and that observations made at sea, for
the variation of the compass, may be depended on for the purpose of
finding the longitude, it is utterly impossible that both the
Resolution and Adventure could have passed Cape Circumcision without
seeing it. But I shall now show, that these observations are liable to
a much greater error than the whole quantity, so vigorously insisted
on by this gentleman.
I will not here run the risk of incurring _M. Le Monier_’s
displeasure, by calling the accuracy of _M. Bouvet_’s observations in
question; but will admit every thing that he himself can think due to
the instruments and observations of that deserving navigator. It is
enough for my argument, and it is but too evident from the
observations themselves, that ours were by no means capable of
determining the variation to so small a quantity as that which _M. Le
Monier_ rests his whole cause upon; and if so, his arguments, which
depend wholly on a supposition, that not only they, but _M. Bouvet_’s
also, were capable of determining it with the utmost exactness, must
fall to the ground.
1st, It appears, from various instances, that the variations observed
by the same compass would differ 3° to 5°, 6°, and sometimes even 10°,
from no other cause whatever, but putting the ship’s head a contrary
way.[30]
2d, That the same compass, in the same situation in every respect,
within a few miles, but at two different times of the same day, would
give variations differing from one another, 3°, 4°, 5°, 6°, and even
7°[31].
3d, That the same compass, on the same day, and in the hands of the
same observer, will give variations differing from one another by 5°,
on board the same ship, when under sail, and when at anchor in a
road-stead.[32]
4th, Compasses made by the same artists at the same time and place,
but on board different ships, differed 3°, 4°, and even 5° in the
variation.[33]
5th, The same compasses, on board the same ship, and within a few
miles of the same situation, but at different times of our being
there, gave variations differing by 4° and 5°, or upwards.[34]
6th, Different compasses, at the same time, on board the same ship,
and in every respect under the same circumstances, will give
variations differing from one another, 3°, 4°, 5°, and 6°.[35]
These differences, several of which happened very near the place in
question, are all of them at least equal to, most of them much
greater, and some of them double that which _M. Le Monier_ founds his
argument on, even according to his own account of it, which I have
already shown is by no means admissible, and, therefore, totally
invalidate it. To allege that the instruments made use of in Captain
Cook’s two voyages were bad, or that the observers were not expert in
the use of them, will answer no purpose: they are the instruments and
observers which _M. Le Monier_’s argument must rest on; and,
therefore, let those of the French, or any other navigator, have been
ever so much better than they were (which few will be hardy enough to
assert, and fewer still found weak enough to believe), it will avail
nothing to the point in dispute, which must evidently fall to the
ground, if the observations made for finding the variation in Captain
Cook’s voyage are not sufficient to support it. What then must become
of it, if _M. Bouvet_’s observations, of this kind, were liable to an
equal, or a greater error? which, without any reasonable cause for
offence, we might suppose they were.
It is not necessary to account for these differences in the observed
variations in this place, nor yet to point out the reasons why such
anomalies have not been noticed in observations of this kind before. I
shall, however, remark, that I have hinted at some of the causes in my
introduction to the observations which were made in Captain Cook’s
second voyage; and many others will readily offer themselves to
persons who have had much practice in making these observations, and
who have attentively considered the principles on which the
instruments are constructed, and the manner in which they are
fabricated. Nor is it at all surprising, that the errors to which the
instruments and observations of this kind are liable, should not have
been discovered before, since no navigators before us ever gave the
same opportunity, by multiplying their observations, and making them
under such a variety of circumstances as we did.
Having now fully shown, that the circumstances, brought forward by _M.
Le Monier_, in support of his argument, are neither such as can be
depended on, nor yet fairly represented, I shall next attempt to
demonstrate, that it is utterly improbable M. Bouvet could be out, in
his account of longitude, so much as is here supposed, in the short
run which had been made from the island of St. Catherine, the place
they took their departure from: on the contrary, that there is
sufficient reason to believe the error, of whatever magnitude it might
be, was of a different nature from that contended for, and that the
two ships, instead of being to the westward of their account of
longitude, were actually to the eastward of it. For according to their
journals, extracted from the archives of the French East-India
Company, by _M. D’ Apres_, printed under his inspection, and published
by Mr. Dalrymple, F. R. S. amongst other voyages made for the purpose
of examining the southern parts of the Atlantic Ocean, the longitude,
according to the Eagle’s run from St. Catherine’s, was, 26° 27ʹ, and
according to the Mary’s, 26° 20ʹ east of Teneriff; that is, 9° 57ʹ,
and 9° 50ʹ east of Greenwich, or 27° 43ʹ, and 27° 36ʹ east of Ferro.
But the Mary, which went to the Cape of Good Hope, made 7° 13ʹ east
longitude from the land in question, to that place. Consequently the
Cape of Good Hope being in longitude 18° 23ʹ east of Greenwich, Cape
Circumcision will be in 11° 10ʹ east of Greenwich, or 1° 20ʹ more to
the eastward than the run by the same ship from the island of St.
Catherine’s makes it. Again the Eagle made the difference of longitude
between Cape Circumcision and the island of Rodrigues 49° 44ʹ; and by
the observations of _M. Pingre_, this island is in 62° 50ʹ of east
longitude from Greenwich: Cape Circumcision is therefore in 13° 6ʹ
east of Greenwich, or 2° 9ʹ more to the eastward than by the Eagle’s
run from St. Catherine’s. Hence, therefore, as the longitude of this
land resulting from a comparison of that shown by each of the ships,
on their making land at places where the longitude is exceedingly well
determined, is greater than that which results from their run from St.
Catherine’s, the longitude of which is not known with certainty within
several degrees, we may infer, with great safety, that whatever the
quantity of M. Bouvet’s error might be, when he is supposed to have
seen Cape Circumcision, it must have been in defect, and not in
excess, as _M. Le Monier_ supposes it.
CHRIST’S HOSPITAL,
April 20. 1784. W. WALES.
Footnote 27:
I here go by the dates in “The Original Astronomical Observations,”
printed by order of the Board of Longitude; which, after the 14th of
February, 1775, differ one day from Captain Cook’s date.
Footnote 28:
See The Original Astronomical Observations, p. 185., and Bouvet’s
Voyage, published by Mr. Dalrymple, p. 4. and 11.
Footnote 29:
See the Observations p. 218.
Footnote 30:
See the Original Astronomical Observations, made in the second voyage,
March 11. 1773, p. 372., January 24. 1774, p. 375., and July 28. p.
378.
Footnote 31:
Observations in the second voyage, February 2. 1773, p. 371., and
January 19. 1775, p. 382. Also observations in last voyage, July 17.
1776, p. 179 August 30. p. 131., January 24. 1777, p. 192., and
September 15. 1778 p. 205.
Footnote 32:
Astronomical Observations of second voyage, July 14. 1775, p. 385.
Footnote 33:
Compare the Astronomical Observations, made in the second voyage,
August 8. and 9. and September 4. 1772, p. 181., with those of the
same dates, p. 369. Those of January 11. and 14. and February 7. 1773,
p. 182., with those of the same dates, p. 371. Also Astronomical
Observations, made in the last voyage, of December 27. 1776, p. 191,
February 22. 1778, p. 201., May 5. and 8. p. 102, July 9. and 24.
1779, p. 209., and January 16. 1780, p. 212., with those of the same
dates, p. 291., 293., 294., 297., and 298.
Footnote 34:
Compare Astronomical Observations, made in the second Voyage, February
10. p. 375., with Observations of December 11. 1774, p. 381. Also
Observations made in the last Voyage, May 3. and June 18. 1779, p.
208.
Footnote 35:
Observations made in the second Voyage, February 2. 1773. p. 371.
March 18. p. 372., and January 24. 1774, p. 375. See also Observations
made last Voyage, August 18. 1776, p. 180. October 7. and 14. p. 189,
and 190. December 12. p. ibid. January 24. 1777, p. 192. March 10. p.
195. July 9. and 17. 1779, p. 209. January 16. 1780, p. 212. March 24.
p. 213. and May 19. p. 214.
Footnote 36:
The judgment of the ingenious Author of _Recherches sur les
Américains_, on this question, seems to be very deserving of a place
here: “Qu’on calcule, comme on voudra, on sera toujours contraint
d’avouer, qu’il y a une plus grande portion de continent située dans
la latitude septentrionale, que dans la latitude australe.
“C’est fort mal à-propos, qu’on a soutenu que cette répartition
inégale ne sauroit exister, sous prétexte que le globe perdroit son
équilibre, faute d’un contrepoids suffisant au pole méridionale. Il
est vrai qu’un pied cube d’eau salée ne pese pas autant qu’un pied
cube de terre; mais on auroit dû réfléchir, qu’il peut y avoir sous
l’ocean des lits & des couches de matières, dont la pésanteur
spécifique varie à l’infini, & que le peu de profondeur d’une mer,
versée sur une grande surface, contrebalance les endroits où il y a
moins de mer, mais où elle est plus profonde.” _Recherches
Philosophiques_, tom. ii. p. 375.
Footnote 37:
See Vol. IV. p. 219.
Footnote 38:
See the history of former attempts to sail toward the north pole, in
the introduction to Lord Mulgrave’s Journal. Mr. Barrington has
collected several instances of ships advancing to very high latitudes.
See his Miscellanies, p. 1-124.
Footnote 39:
See the Statutes at Large, 18 George II. chap. 17.
Footnote 40:
See the Statutes at Large, 1776, 16 George III. chap. 6.
Footnote 41:
From his MS. Instructions, dated May 14. 1776.
Footnote 42:
In the Philosophical Transactions, Vol. lxviii. p. 1057, we have the
track of Pickersgill’s voyage, which, probably, may be of use to our
Greenland ships, as it contains many observations for fixing the
longitude and latitude of the coasts in Davis’s Straits. But it
appears that he never entered Baffin’s Bay, the highest northern
latitude to which he advanced being 68° 14ʹ. As to Young’s
proceedings, having failed absolutely in making any discovery, it is
of less consequence, that no communication of his journal could be
procured.
Footnote 43:
See the Abstract of his Journal, published by Mr. Dobbs.
Footnote 44:
Ellis’s Voyage, p. 328.
Footnote 45:
Ibid. p. 330.
Footnote 46:
Account of the voyage, by the clerk of the California, Vol. ii. p.
273. Mr. Dobbs himself says, that _he thought the passage would be
impracticable, or, at least, very difficult, in case there was one
farther North than 67°_.—Account of Hudson’s Bay, p. 99.
Footnote 47:
Printed for Jeffreys, in 1768. His words are, “There remains then to
be searched for the discovery of a passage, the opening called Pistol
Bay, in Hudson’s Bay.” P. 122.
Footnote 48:
Mr. Hearne’s Journey, back from the Copper-mine river, to Fort Prince
of Wales, lasted till June 30. 1772. From his first setting out till
his return, he had employed near a year and seven months. The
unparalleled hardships he suffered, and the essential service he
performed, met with a suitable reward from his masters, and he is now
the Governor of Fort Prince of Wales, where he was taken prisoner by
the French in 1782; and last summer returned to his station.
Footnote 49:
The Hudson’s Bay Company have a trading post called _Hudson’s House_,
above five hundred miles up the country, in lat. 53° 0ʹ 32ʺ, and in
long. 106° 27ʹ 30ʺ.
Footnote 50:
This day, Jan. 11. 1772, as the Indians were hunting, some of them saw
a strange snow-shoe track, which they followed, and at a considerable
distance came to a little hut, where they found a young woman sitting
alone. They brought her to the tents; and, on examining her, found
that she was one of the western _Dog-ribbed_ Indians, and had been
taken prisoner by the _Arathapescow_ Indians in the summer 1770; and,
when the Indians who took her prisoner, were near this part in the
summer 1771, she eloped from them, with an intent to return to her own
country; but _it being so far off_, and, after being taken prisoner,
having come the whole way in canoes, with the winding of rivers and
lakes, she had forgot the way; and had been in this little hut ever
since the first setting in of the fall. By her account of the moons
past since her elopement, it appears to be the middle of last July
when she left the Arathapescow Indians, and had not seen a human face
ever since. She supported herself very well by snaring of rabbits,
partridges, and squirrels, and was now in good health and flesh; and,
I think, as fine a woman of a real Indian, as I have seen in any part
of North America. She had nothing to make snares of but the sinews of
rabbits’ legs and feet, which she twisted together for that purpose;
and of the rabbits’ skins had made herself a neat and warm winter’s
clothing. The stock of materials she took with her when she eloped,
consisted of about five inches of an iron hoop for a knife; a stone
steel, and other hard stones as flints, together with other
fire-tackle, as tinder, &c.; about an inch and half of the shank of
the shoeing of an arrow of iron, of which she made an awl. She had not
been long at the tents, when half a score of men wrestled to see who
should have her for their wife. She says, when the Arathapescow
Indians took her prisoner, that they stole on the tents in the night,
when the inhabitants were all asleep, and killed every soul except
herself and three other young women. Her father, mother, and husband
were in the same tent with her, and they were all killed. Her child,
of about five months old, she took with her, wrapped in a bundle of
her clothing, undiscovered, in the night. But, when arrived at the
place where the Arathapescows had left their wives, which was not far
off, it being then day-break, these Indian women immediately began to
examine her bundle; and having there found the child, took it from her
and killed it immediately. The relation of this shocking scene only
served the savages of my gang for laughter. _Her country is so far to
the Westward_, that she says she never saw any iron, or other kind of
metal, till taken prisoner; those of her tribe making their hatchets
and chisels of deers’ horns, and knives of stone and bone; their
arrows are shod with a kind of slate, bones, and deers’ horns; and
their instruments, to make their wood work, are nothing but beavers’
teeth. They have frequently heard of the useful materials the nations
to the east of them are supplied with from the English; but, instead
of drawing nearer to be in the way of trading for iron work, &c. are
obliged to retreat farther back, to avoid the Arathapescow Indians, as
they make surprising slaughter amongst them every year, both winter
and summer. HEARNE’s MS. Journal.
Footnote 51:
Journal of a Voyage in 1775 by Don Francisco Antonio Maurelle, in Mr.
Barrington’s Miscellanies, p. 508.
Footnote 52:
_Ibid._ p. 507. We learn from Maurelle’s Journal that another voyage
had been some time before performed upon the coast of America; but the
utmost northern progress of it was to latitude 55.
Footnote 53:
Dr. Campbell, speaking of Beering’s voyage in 1741, says, “Nothing can
be plainer than this truth, that his discovery does not warrant any
such supposition, as that the country he touched at was a great
continent making part of North America.”
Footnote 54:
See Coxe’s Russian Discoveries, pp. 26, 27, &c. The fictions of
speculative geographers in the Southern hemisphere, have been
continents; in the northern hemisphere, they have been seas. It may be
observed, therefore, that if Captain Cook in his first voyages
annihilated imaginary southern lands, he has made amends for the
havock in his third voyage, by annihilating imaginary northern seas,
and filling up the vast space, which had been allotted to them, with
the solid continents of his new discoveries of American land farther
west and north than had hitherto been traced.
Footnote 55: