in his report upon the park roads, says:[46] “At the commencement of the
macadam roads, the experiment was tried of rolling and compacting the
stone by a strict adherence to Macadam’s theory, that of carefully
excluding all dirt and foreign material from the stones, and trusting to
the action of the roller and the travel of teams to accomplish the work
of consolidation. The bottom layer of stone was sufficiently compacted
in this way to form and retain, under the action of the rollers (after
the compression had reached about its practical limit) an even and
regular surface; but the top layer, with the use of the heavy roller
loaded to its greatest capacity, it was found impracticable to solidify
and reduce to such a surface as would prevent the stones from loosening
and being displaced by the action of waggon-wheels and horses’ feet. No
amount of rolling was sufficient to produce a thorough binding effect
upon the stones or to cause such a mechanical union and adjustment of
their sides and angles together, as to enable them mutually to assist
each other in resisting displacement. The rolling was persisted in with
the roller adjusted to different weights up to the maximum load (12
tons) until it was apparent that the opposite effect from that intended
was being produced. The stones became rounded by the excessive attrition
they were subjected to, their more angular parts wearing away, and the
weaker and smaller ones being crushed.”
“The experiment was not pushed beyond this point. It was conclusively
shown, that broken stones of the ordinary sizes, and of the very best
quality for wear and durability, with the greatest care and attention to
all the necessary conditions of rolling and compression, would not
consolidate in the effectual manner required for the surface of a road
while entirely isolated from and independent of other substances. The
utmost efforts to compress and solidify them while in this condition
after a certain limit had been reached, were unavailing.”
From the foregoing it is very evident that some description of binding
material is essential in making a road under a roller. Where traffic is
allowed to consolidate a road it is different, as then the stones are
knocked about and are sufficiently abraded against each other to form a
binding material for themselves. Too much binding material or too much
water should not be used in forming a road with a steam roller. It is
unfortunately frequently the case that a road is made quickly only to go
to pieces with the traffic in a few weeks. The surface of a
well-constructed macadamised roadway should after being rolled look
almost like an encaustic pavement. If there is too much binding material
in the joints of the stones, the first heavy rain washes it out and the
surface of the roadway quickly goes to pieces.
The following description of the manner in which it is recommended that
the roller should be applied is taken from an excellent little pamphlet
on Steam Road Rolling, by Messrs. Aveling and Porter, the well-known
makers of steam-rollers, and although local circumstances must guide the
surveyor in all his works, the particulars may be of use:--
“In the best practice the roadway is excavated, graded, and properly
formed to a depth of 14 inches from the level of the gutters, with a
cross section conforming to the cross section of the road when finished;
it is then thoroughly and repeatedly rolled with the steam roller, all
depressions being carefully filled and rolled before the stone is put
on. On the bed thus formed and consolidated a layer of stones 8 inches
thick is set by hand, and rammed or settled to place by sledge hammers,
all irregularities of surface being broken off and the interstices
wedged with pieces of stone. The intermediate layer of broken stone, of
a size not exceeding 3 inches in diameter, is then evenly spread to a
depth of 4 inches and thoroughly rolled, and this is followed by rolling
in half-an-inch of sand. The surface layer of stone, broken to a size
not larger than 2 inches diameter, and to a form as nearly cubical as
possible, is then put on to a depth of 3 inches, thoroughly rolled, and
followed as before by sand, also rolled. Finally, a binding composed of
clean, sharp sand is then applied, well watered and most thoroughly
rolled with the steam roller, until the surface becomes firm, compact
and smooth, the superfluous binding material being swept off and
removed.”
And the following account of the method adopted in the United States at
Hartford may also be of interest.[47]
“The surface of the road is excavated to a suitable depth--say, 18
inches; preparing the form for the pavement with the precautions as for
a common pavement; 4 inches of gravel and proper drainage where
required, provided blocks of stone of any irregular shape are selected
for the pavement, of about 7 inches in thickness. The blocks are set by
hand with great care, as closely in contact at their base as
practicable. The surface between the blocks is filled with chippings of
stone carefully laid in. A layer of broken stone, 4 inches thick, is
laid over this pavement. The road-covering thus prepared should be
rolled with the steam roller until the upper layer has become perfectly
compact and consolidated. The second layer, about 3 inches in depth, is
then laid on; a coating of clean coarse gravel, 1¹⁄₂ inch thick, termed
‘binding,’ is spread over the surface, and the whole well rolled as
before, and you have the requisites of a good road--viz., clean, hard,
and even at all seasons. No road should be considered made until it is
completely rolled. A road made in the manner above described, and kept
perfectly clean, hard, and even, with materials of a good tough quality,
would show extremely little wear on the surface; indeed, it has been
found in France to be less than ¹⁄₂ an inch in a year, on a road of
great traffic.”
In the neighbourhood of New York the steam roller is used as follows:--
Two and a half inches of trap rock is laid and lightly rolled until the
stones have become a little compacted, then coarse screenings are added,
and it is again rolled; after this a layer of about 2 inches of stones
are added and rolled with coarse screenings as before. Fine screenings
or stone dust is then applied, and the roadway is then rolled until
every interstice is filled up; it is then well watered and again rolled.
With reference to the employment of the steam roller in repairs of
roads, the following description is given of the method adopted by the
Surveyor to the Tottenham Local Board, near London.[48]
“When a road becomes so full of holes or so worn as to require coating
throughout its entire length and width, it should be hacked completely
over and raked into a segmental form in its transverse section to remove
irregularities, and so that the road may have a fall from the crown to
the channel of not less than one inch to a yard. It should then be
coated with stone broken as nearly cubical as possible and to an uniform
gauge. When spread it should be slightly coated with gravel screenings,
or the grit sweepings from the roads, which are equally suitable for the
purpose when in proper condition. The road should then be watered and
rolled, beginning with the road at the channels, and ending at the crown
of the road, until a smooth surface is obtained, more stones being added
to fill up any inequalities that may exist, until the whole is
consolidated. By constantly sweeping the grit from the sides to the
crown of the road as the roller passes over, every stone is thoroughly
grouted into its bed.”
Mr. R. Read, the Surveyor of Gloucester, says:[49] “The road should be
thoroughly well lifted and the metalling spread in three-inch layers
evenly, and rolled once or twice before the gravel or other binding
material is spread; then spread gravel or sand evenly and well watered
with fine distributor until the stone is entirely covered, and the sand
does not adhere to the roller. Dam up the road channels to prevent water
and sand running off into sewers and let men scoop up the water, and
throw it back on the road, as it collects in the gutters.”
In all cases the sides should be rolled first to such a degree of
firmness that when the roller passes over the centre or crown of road,
its weight, which tends to spread the metal or make it work off towards
the sides, may be resisted by their consolidation.
With reference to the effect of the weight of steam road rollers upon
roadways, it may be well here to compare that of a 15-ton roller with
other burdens that a road has to bear, taking each case at per inch of
width of tire.
An ordinary loaded two-wheeled cart presses with a weight of about 9
cwt. per inch width of tire, a loaded wagon about 7¹⁄₂ cwt., a 9-ton
traction engine about 3³⁄₄ cwt., and a 15-ton steam road roller about
3¹⁄₂ cwt. So that as far as the surface of the roadway is concerned, a
roller affects it the least of any of the above loads.
It has, however, been found that where rollers of more weight than 15
tons are used,[50] not only are they unwieldy, but, from their great
weight, the solidity of the foundation of the roadway may be interfered
with, and also there is great danger of damaging gas or water mains and
services, besides any cellars that may be constructed under the roadway.
The steam rollers which are principally used in this country, are those
manufactured by Messrs. Aveling and Porter, and those by Messrs. Green
and Sons, drawings of both of which are here represented.
[Illustration: MESSRS. AVELING AND PORTER’S 15-TON STEAM ROAD ROLLER.]
[Illustration: MESSRS. GREEN AND SON’S 15-TON STEAM ROAD ROLLER AND
TRACTION ENGINE COMBINED.]
In Paris the Gellerat steam roller is used, and another is also known,
which is manufactured by Messrs. Morland and Sons.
A 15-ton steam roller costs about 650_l._ in the first place, the cost
of working it &c., has been given in the early pages of this chapter.
The advantages of steam road rolling may be summed up as follows:--
(1.) The saving of wear and tear to vehicles and horses. Roads should be
made _for_ the traffic, and not _by_ it.[51]
(2.) Economy; as it is said that a saving of from 30 to 50 per cent. is
effected by reason of the roads being better made thus obviating the
necessity for such frequent sweeping and scraping.
(3.) The roads can be made or repaired at any season of the year.
(4.) The avoidance of cruelty to horses, cattle, and sheep, as in the
case of newly metalled unrolled roads.
(5.) A saving of road metal. (_a_) Because it need not be broken so
small. (_b_) Because there are no loose stones to be kicked about and
lost. (_c_) Because there is no abrasion of the stones, only one surface
of the stone being exposed. (_d_) Because no ruts can be formed in which
water can lie to rot the stone. (_e_) Because a thinner coating of metal
can be employed.
(6.) The roller can be advantageously used for other purposes.
(7.) Rolled streets have a better appearance, they are easier of traffic
as having more evenness of surface and superior hardness, and it is
contended that if steam rollers were more general there would not be
such an outcry for other descriptions of pavement for roadways.
(8.) The steam roller soon finds out the good from the bad metal for
roads, it is also contended that it also does this with respect to the
gas and water mains, the latter, however may be looked upon as a rather
doubtful advantage.
(9.) The avoidance of the necessity of the continued employment of men
raking the metal into the ruts.
In Mr. Paget’s valuable little pamphlet upon the subject of steam
rolling[52] may be found the following remarks:--
“One of the main advantages attending the rolling of roads by
steam-power, consists in the diminished proportion of mud or soluble
matter which is then incorporated in the structure of the road surface.
If the surface of an ordinary road that has not been rolled is broken up
and the material washed, it is found that as much as half of it is
soluble matter, mud, dirt, and very fine sand; the stones, having only
been thrown loosely upon the road, have lain so long before becoming
consolidated by the traffic, and have undergone in the meantime such
extensive abrasion that the proportion of mud, dirt, and pulverised
material in the metalling is increased to that extent, and the stones
are really only stuck together by the mud. This accounts for the fact
that although an unrolled macadamised road may indeed, after long use,
have a surface that is pretty good and hard in dry weather, and may
offer then a very slight resistance to traction, yet it will quickly
become soft and muddy when there is any rain. By the employment,
however, of a steam roller upon the newly-laid metalling of a
macadamised road the stones are rolled in and well bedded at once, and
the surface is thus consolidated into a sort of stone felt, capable of
resisting most effectually the action of ordinary traffic, and
containing the smallest quantity of soluble matter to form mud in wet
weather.”
Having given the advantages of steam road rolling, I will now proceed to
give the disadvantages.
(1.) The first cost; this to a small borough or town is often the great
stumbling block. It is a pity that two or three of them could not join,
and procure one between them at joint cost, thus avoiding the
individually heavy burden.
(2.) The risk of damage to gas and water mains and services; or even of
cellars under the streets in some of the older towns.
(3.) The interference to traffic whilst the roller is at work; the
result is generally unsatisfactory if, to avoid this, the machine is
worked during the night.
(4.) The noise and smoke.
(5.) The risk of frightening horses.
(6.) If too heavy a roller is used, the foundation of the roadway may be
injured or the metal may be crushed instead of bedded.
(7.) The necessity of using so much binding material and water.
Before closing this chapter it will be necessary to say a few words upon
rollers drawn by horses.
These are always unsatisfactory: they are expensive to use, as a large
team of horses and a number of attendants are necessary; they are
difficult to turn, and the horses’ feet displace almost as many stones
as the roller compresses into their beds.
They cannot be of greater weight than 10 tons, even when on the
hydrostatic principle, and they are clumsy and difficult of
manipulation.
If a roller is to be used at all, let it be a steam road roller of the
most modern description, and of the best manufacture.
[42] _Vide_ ‘Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers,’ vol. lviii. p. 95. (The first steam roller was made in the
year 1864.)
[43] The first steam roller used in England was, I believe, in the
year 1872; in Paris about 1864.
[44] This should be collected and “weathered” so as to get rid of mud
and any organic matter in it.
[45] In Paris 3 to 3·75 ton miles of roller are applied to every cubic
yard of metal; in America 5 ton miles are thought necessary.
[46] _Vide_ ‘Roads, Streets, and Pavements,’ by Q. A. Gillmore, p. 89.
[47] _Vide_ Aveling and Porter’s pamphlet on ‘Steam Road Rolling,’ p.
32.
[48] _Vide_ Aveling and Porter’s pamphlet on ‘Steam Road Rolling,’ p.
33.
[49] _Vide_ ‘The Use of Steam Rollers,’ by A. W. Parry, Reading.
[50] Some road surveyors contend that for gravelled roads 6-ton
rollers are heavy enough, for macadam roads 12-ton rollers.
[51] Traffic in making a roadway is apt to grind off the sharp edges
and spoil the metal before it is set.
[52] ‘Report on the Economy of Road Maintenance and Horse Draught
through Steam Rolling, with special reference to the Metropolis,’ by
Frederick A. Paget, C.E., etc. etc., London 1870, to which I refer my
readers for many scientific and useful facts upon this subject.
CHAPTER VIII.
PITCHED PAVEMENTS.
It has been asserted that where a roadway has a traffic exceeding 1000
vehicles per diem, that to maintain it as a macadamised roadway is not
economical.[53] However that may be, it is unquestionable that for very
heavy traffic blocks of hammer-dressed stone, laid upon a concrete or
hard gravel bed, have been in use for a great number of years, and
indeed the Romans, who were great road makers, introduced the system
(the Archaic, as it is sometimes called) into this country more than
2000 years ago; the size of the paving stones was, however, much larger
than modern science finds necessary.
There is no doubt that a roadway paved with granite or whinstone setts,
upon a hard concrete foundation, presents a most enduring pavement,
costing but a few pence per annum in repairs[54] and cleansing, and in
other respects it answers nearly all the requirements of traffic except
in two very important particulars--it becomes very greasy and slippery
under certain conditions of the weather after having been laid any time,
and it is an intolerable nuisance in any great thoroughfare, from the
incessant din and clatter arising from the wheels of vehicles and the
iron shoes of the horses striking upon it; so great is the noise in some
thoroughfares thus paved, that tradesmen are compelled to keep their
doors and windows tightly closed in order that they may be able to
conduct their business, and it is known to injuriously affect the nerves
and health of persons who are obliged to live in the vicinity of such
streets. It is a bad pavement too for horses to travel upon, the jar
upon the legs of the unfortunate animals soon telling upon them.
Great improvements, however, have in recent years been introduced to
correct these faults. The setts are now made very narrow, about 3 inches
in width, or 4 setts to 14 inches including the joints: this gives a
better foothold for the horse, the hoof having but a little way to slip
before being arrested by a joint; it also lessens the noise, and helps
besides to prevent the edges of the stones becoming worn or the pavement
wearing unevenly.
Running the joints with an asphaltic composition instead of ordinary
grouting has also materially conduced to deaden the noise.
Taking the question of cost into account--and cost of this description
of paving, be it remembered, is considerably affected by weight, when
carriage of the stone has to be considered--the following sizes of
stones may be taken as satisfactory.[55]
Depth 6 to 8 inches
Width 2¹⁄₂ „ 3 „
Length 5 „ 9 „
The following table,[56] showing the number of square yards that 1 ton
in weight of different sizes of granite setts will cover, may be of
use, but this must vary with the specific gravity of the stone employed.
Depth. Width. Square yards.
5 inches × 3 inches covers 4¹⁄₃
6 „ × 3 „ „ 3²⁄₅
4 „ × 4 „ „ 5¹⁄₃
7 „ × 3 „ „ 3
The question of the best class of stones to employ as a paving material
must to a great measure depend upon local circumstances, but it is
important to select such stones as are very hard and durable, but which
will not wear smooth and slippery nor round by reason of the chipping
off of their edges.
Nearly all granites are suitable for this work, but Carnarvonshire
syenite[57] is said to be the best material that can be used, although,
being denser than granite, it is heavier and consequently more
expensive.
At one time large quantities of paving stones were used in London and
Liverpool which were brought from Bombay and China, as ballast for ships
trading between those ports.
Mount Sorrel from Leicestershire and the Welsh stones are said to wear
slippery[58] as well as porphyry, whereas the presence of felspar in the
granite always keeps it rough under traffic.
Of the granites, that from Dalbeattie in Scotland is said to be the
best.
The table on the next page, prepared by Mr. Walker in 1831, showing the
wear of different stones, may be of interest.
TABLE SHOWING THE RESULT OF EXPERIMENTS MADE BY MR. WALKER ON THE WEAR
OF STONES IN 1830-31, A PERIOD OF 17 MONTHS.
----------------+-------+---------------+-------+-----------+--------
| Super-| |Loss of| |
| ficial| | weight| Loss per |
|area in| Original | by |superficial|Relative
Name of stone. | feet. | weight. | wear.| foot. | losses.
----------------+-------+---------------+-------+-----------+--------
| |cwt. qrs. lbs.| | |
Guernsey | 4·734 | 7 1 12·75| 4·50 | 0·951 | 1·000
Herm | 5·250 | 7 3 24·25| 5·50 | 1·048 | 1·102
Budle | 6·336 | 9 0 15·75| 7·75 | 1·223 | 1·286
Peterhead (blue)| 3·484 | 4 1 7·50| 6·25 | 1·795 | 1·887
Heytor | 4·313 | 6 0 15·25| 8·25 | 1·915 | 2·014
Aberdeen (red) | 5·375 | 7 2 11·50| 11·50 | 2·139 | 2·249
Dartmoor | 4·500 | 6 2 25·0 | 12·50 | 2·778 | 2·921
Aberdeen (blue) | 4·823 | 6 2 16·0 | 14·75 | 3·058 | 3·216
----------------+-------+---------------+-------+-----------+--------
The Aberdeen granite as at present laid in the City of London, 3 inches
wide by 9 inches in depth, has a life of about 15 years.[59] In the City
of Durham whinstone setts of the same width last 17 or 18 years, in
Manchester similar granite setts last 15 to 20 years. On this subject
Mr. Deacon, the then Borough Engineer of Liverpool, has collected some
most valuable information, and I refer my readers to a paper read by him
before the Institution of Civil Engineers in 1879,[60] for a great deal
of useful information on this and other subjects connected with
roadways.
Various methods have been adopted for constructing granite paved
streets, some of which I will proceed to describe.
One of the first really good granite pavements introduced into London
was that known as the “Euston Pavement,” and it was constructed in the
following manner: The foundation was shaped to the intended surface of
the finished roadway; upon this a layer of coarse gravel was spread 4
inches in thickness, this was well rammed,[61] and upon it was spread 4
inches of gravel mixed with a small quantity of chalk to bind it; this
again being well rammed, upon it was placed a similar layer only
composed of finer gravel, and upon this foundation the stones were
placed, being bedded upon about an inch of fine sand. The stones used
were Mount Sorrel granite, which were hammer-dressed and squared, 3
inches in width by 4 inches in depth; they were set close together at
right angles with the lines of the kerb, they were then thoroughly
rammed by the pavior. The whole surface was afterwards covered with
screened gravel which was allowed to find its way into the joints and
thus steady the entire pavement.
The following section will explain this.
[Illustration]
In many cases the foundation is simply formed by shaping the soil to the
required contour, and covering this with 3 or 4 inches of gravel or
cinders, which is afterwards either rammed or consolidated by the
traffic; upon this the setts are placed as closely as possible, the
joints are then filled with fine gravel well worked in with a “cramming
iron,” the whole surface being then covered with a grouting of lime and
sand, which is brushed into the joints with a stumpy broom.[62]
In Leeds, Manchester, Salford, and many other important cities, I
believe the foundations are formed in the manner just described, but of
greater depth, the grouting also is a bituminous mixture, which I will
presently describe, instead of the ordinary lime grouting.
The paved streets of Manchester are proverbial for their excellence,
which is attributable to the manner in which the foundations of the
streets are consolidated by the traffic before any setts are placed on
them; in many cases the old macadamised surface of a street being
utilised as a foundation, this process being almost identical with that
recommended by Sir Henry Parnell fifty years ago.[63]
Where the traffic is heavy, however, a firmer foundation even than this
is necessary, and up to the present time no better foundation has been
introduced than that of good Portland cement concrete. This should be at
least 9 inches in thickness, and be composed of one part of Portland
cement, two parts of clean sharp river sand, and four parts of clean
river ballast, or broken stones, or other suitable material. The surface
of the concrete, after having been placed in position, should be
smoothed over with the shovel, so as to present the proper convexity and
have an even surface for the granite setts to be bedded upon.
Another description of foundation now very extensively used where the
traffic is heavy, is that known as “Bituminous Concrete,” which is made
as follows:
The ground being excavated to the proper depth and contour, broken stone
as for macadam is spread for a depth of 6 or 9 inches; this is then
levelled and thoroughly rolled with a light roller, a boiling mixture of
pitch and tar, or creosote oil is then poured over the whole surface
until every interstice is filled, when a thin layer of small broken
stone is spread upon it, and then well rolled until it consolidates.
It may be well to observe here that in all works involving concrete
foundations and paving in streets, the traffic should be entirely
stopped if at all possible. Streets paved half at a time are never quite
satisfactory, and the concrete should have at least a week to set before
the pavement is placed upon it.
Upon a foundation of either Portland cement or bituminous concrete, the
granite setts themselves should be grouted with a bituminous mixture
instead of cement or lime grouting. This renders the pavement more
impervious to moisture, makes it less noisy, and adds considerably to
its strength; the mode of applying it is nearly similar to that of
ordinary grouting. The setts are placed on about an inch of sand and
well rammed, the boiling mixture is then poured over the whole surface,
which is then covered with a thin coating of small, sharp gravel.
The following table of the proportions necessary for the bituminous
mixture may here be of use.
PROPORTIONS FOR BITUMINOUS MIXTURE.[64]
Creosote
Pitch. Tar. Pitch. oil.
For grouting in pavements 1 to 1 or 3 to 1
For foundations or lower layer 3 to 1 or 3¹⁄₂ to ¹⁄₂
of asphalte macadam
For upper layer of asphalte 2¹⁄₂ to 1¹⁄₂ or 3¹⁄₄ to ³⁄₄
macadam and for foot paths
The objections to this method of paving are only temporary: the nuisance
arising from the fumes of the boiling mixture whilst it is being
applied, and the necessity for dry weather to make the operation
successful. Healey’s Patent Pitch Boilers[65] are said to moderate, if
not entirely to do away with the former, and the latter can be arranged
by only doing the work at favourable seasons, or if the worst come to
the worst, to cover the work with tarpaulins raised on trestles.
Before closing this chapter I should like to draw attention to the
question of provision for wheel tracks, or tramways paved with stone,
asphalte, or other hard material, and a track for horses giving a firmer
foot-hold, similar to those so highly spoken of in Milan and other
Italian cities. An excellent description is given of them by Mr. P. le
Neve Foster, Jun., in an appendix to a report on the Application of
Science and Art to Street Paving and Street Cleansing of the Metropolis
(1872).
The roadway where stone tramways are employed cannot be of convex
section; on the contrary, it should be concave, with the channel,
gutter, or water table in the centre. This is in itself an obvious
advantage, and I trust that the question of these tramways may at some
future date receive more attention from English engineers; the great
objection to them in this country being that the smooth tram-track would
be very slippery and apt to throw horses down when passing on and off,
but they have many advantages which should not be passed over without
consideration.[66]
[53] Birmingham in 1854 had not, I believe, a single mile of paved
streets; the principal ones are now nearly all paved with granite
setts, and over 20,000 square yards were so paved in 1880.
[54] It is said that the cost per annum per square yard of granite
paved roadways is but 3_d._, whereas the same cost for macadamised
roadways under the same circumstances is 1_s._ 6_d._
[55] In Paris after considerable research into the question, the
engineers of the Ponts et Chausseés, decided that the size of the
paving stones, which used formerly to be 9 inches square should be 4
inches wide by 6¹⁄₄ inches long by 6¹⁄₄ inches deep, the stone that is
used being a grit sandstone, from the forest of Fontainebleu.
[56] _Vide_ ‘Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers,’ vol. lviii. p. 66.
[57] Syenite is a hard, greenish-grey metamorphic rock, composed
principally of silica, alumina, and lime, in conjunction with
magnesia, iron, etc. Its specific gravity is 2·96.
[58] Mr. Boyle, District Surveyor of Manchester, says: “I would
caution you against the use of the old blue Penmaenmawr stone as being
an extremely slippery stone, and one which makes a dangerous
pavement.” _Vide_ ‘Proceedings of the Association of Municipal and
Sanitary Engineers,’ vol. iii. p. 58.
[59] The old granite paving of London used only to last eight years.
_Vide_ ‘Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers,’
vol. ix. p. 222.
[60] _Vide_ ‘Street Carriageway Pavements,’ by George Frederick
Deacon, M. Inst. C.E., ‘Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of
Civil Engineers,’ vol. lviii. p. 1 _et seq._
[61] The pavior’s rammer is about 55 lb. in weight, with an iron ring
at its foot; this is swung with some dexterity between the legs, and
is allowed to fall with great force upon the earth or stones it is in
use upon.
[62] The usual specifications for the Guidet paving blocks (in New
York) require that they shall be of granite, equal in hardness to the
Quincy granite, of durable and uniform quality, each measuring not
less than 3¹⁄₂ nor more than 4¹⁄₂ inches in width on the upper surface
or face, and not less than 10 nor more than 15 inches in length, and
not less than 8 nor more than 9 inches in depth. Blocks of 3¹⁄₂ inches
in width on the face to be not less than 3 inches in width at the
base; all other blocks to measure on the base not more than 1 inch
less in width or in length than on the face. The blocks are set
upright in close contact on their edges in courses, with the longest
dimensions and the continuous joints running across the street,
breaking joints lengthwise of the street.
The ends of the blocks are dressed off so as to give close joints in
the direction of the draught, while the broad vertical sides of the
blocks are left rugged or uneven, or with the split rock-face so that
the continuous joints running across the street are somewhat open.
_Vide_ ‘Roads, Streets, and Pavements’ by Q. A. Gillmore, p. 157.
[63] _Vide_ ‘A Treatise on Roads,’ by Sir Henry Parnell, p. 130.
[64] As these ingredients often vary very much in their constitution,
the surveyor must use his judgment to a great extent as to these
proportions.
[65] These boilers are now much used for such purposes, they hold from
60 to 500 gallons and are light and portable; the temper of the
bituminous mixture also remains uniform whilst being drawn off, and
there is very little evaporation or waste arising from them.
[66] Since writing the above, the Liverpool and Manchester tram-road
was designed I believe on this principle.
CHAPTER IX.
WOOD PAVING.
In the year 1843 Mr. Charles Cochrane, the President of the ‘Association
for the promotion of Improved Street Paving, etc.,’ in a paper which he
read before the Institution of Civil Engineers, on the State of the
Streets of the Metropolis, said that there existed at that date 100,000
yards of wood pavement.[67] He further states that it is said to be
slippery, but that he approves of it as the best material hitherto used,
“both as regards its general economy and durability as well as its
facility of traction, and more especially its extreme cleanliness.”
Two years previous to this date, Mr. Edward Lomas condemned wood
pavement as slippery, and recommended granite pavement for horses with
wood tram-tracks for the wheels of vehicles.[68]
Since these dates the question of wood paving has made giant strides,
many companies and private firms having started business as wood
paviors, with many various methods, which they strongly advocate as
being superior to the others; amongst them I will enumerate and describe
the following:
_The Improved Wood Pavement Company._--The ground being consolidated, a
layer of sand is made the basis of the pavement, and assumes the shape
the surface of the street is intended to take. Red-wood boards 1-inch in
thickness are then laid across the roadway, from kerb to kerb, placed
together so as to break joint; boards of the same material and
thickness are then laid longitudinally, and breaking joint in the same
manner.[69] On this foundation red-wood blocks are placed in rows,
taking the same direction as the under flooring.
Between each row of blocks, a strip of wood ³⁄₄ × ³⁄₄ inch is nailed to
the block and flooring, the blocks in all cases breaking joint; the
spaces thus formed between the rows of blocks are then run with a thick
composition which fills all vacant spaces there may be between the strip
and the block, covering the strip about ¹⁄₈ of an inch. Gravel, dried
and sifted through ³⁄₄-inch mesh, is then put in, solidly rammed, and
composition poured in; the pavement is then covered to a depth of ¹⁄₂ an
inch with dried gravel and composition for the purpose of indurating the
surface, and filling the spaces flush with the top of the block, a
slight covering of sand is then spread, when the traffic may immediately
pass over.
_The Asphaltic Wood Pavement Company._--After the ground is properly
prepared, 6 or 9 inches of concrete is laid, on this is laid a bed of
asphalte not less than ¹⁄₂-inch in thickness; then wood blocks 3 by 8 by
5 inches or 3 by 9 by 5 inches, of good, sound, yellow Baltic timber are
laid with joints ¹⁄₂-inch in width, these joints are filled from 2
inches up with heated asphalte, the remaining 3 inches being filled with
a grouting of hydraulic lime, and clean, sharp, fine river grit or sand,
the whole being covered with a top dressing of fine, sharp sand, which
wears in with the traffic.
_Croskey’s Wood Pavement._--Upon a bed of concrete, cross grained planks
were to be placed side by side and be forced together by pressure so as
to form a compact homogeneous surface of wood.[70]
_Lloyd’s Patent Keyed Wood Pavement._--The special feature of this
system is that _Pitch Pine_ blocks are used laid _direct_ upon the
concrete foundation, the blocks being grooved on each side so that the
grouting (composed of Portland cement) shall run in and form a key.
_Harrison’s Wood Pavement._--This system consists of a concrete
foundation, upon which strips of wood 2 inches wide by ¹⁄₂ an inch in
thickness are laid. Upon these, wood blocks 3 inches in breadth are
placed, and then hot asphalte is poured into the joints, which
conglomerates the whole.
_Henson’s Wood Pavement._--The main feature of this patent consists in
placing common felt on the concrete bed, and between the joints of the
wood blocks; thus, it is contended, giving elasticity and allowing for
the expansion and contraction of the blocks. The blocks are also
bevelled on the top and grooved in a particular manner.
_Carey’s Wood Pavement._--In this case the blocks are cut 4 inches wide
by 9 inches long, and 5 or 6 inches deep, according to the traffic;
these blocks are shaped with alternate convex and concave ends, and are
laid on a bed of sand about 2 inches thick, the joints between the
blocks, which have been left about ³⁄₈ inch wide, being filled with a
grouting of lime and sand.
_Messrs. Mowlem and Company’s_ method of laying wood paving is to form a
foundation of concrete, varying in thickness according to the nature of
the subsoil and the traffic; then to pave with blocks of yellow deal, 3
inches wide and 6 or 7 inches deep; the joints, which vary from ³⁄₈ to
¹⁄₂ inch, are filled in with sand and lias lime, and the surface is
afterwards indurated by strewing it with shingle.
_Patent Ligno-Mineral Paving Company._--This company lays claim to the
speciality of using hard woods as well as pine, and that the pine blocks
they employ are preserved or mineralised so as to be more durable than
the wood in its natural state.[71]
_Nicholson’s Wood Pavement._--This is principally in use in the United
States, and consists of rectangular blocks of pine laid upon a close
flooring of pine boards, 1 inch thick, laid lengthwise with the line of
street, their ends resting on similar boards laid transversely from kerb
to kerb, the boards being thoroughly tarred and laid upon a bed of sand.
The joints of the wood blocks are run with an asphaltic mixture, and the
whole surface is finally covered with hot coal tar and sprinkled with
fine sand and gravel.
_Stowe’s Wood Pavement._--This is also American, the blocks resting
directly upon sand or gravel about 6 inches in thickness.[72] “The
blocks are set in courses transversely across the street, so as to break
joint lengthwise of the street, the courses being separated from each
other 1 inch by a continuous course of wooden wedges placed close
together edge to edge, and extending from kerb to kerb. These wedges are
set in the first instance with their tops flush with the top surface of
the blocks. After the whole pavement shall have been well rammed, so as
to give each block a firm bed, the wedges are driven down about 3
inches, and the open joints thus formed above them between the courses
are filled in with a concrete composed of hot coal tar and fine roofing
sand and gravel. The surface of the pavement may then be coated with
coal tar prepared by boiling with pitch, and finished off with a thin
layer of sand.”
_Wood Paving in Norwich._--Mr. P. Marshall, the City Surveyor of
Norwich, states[73] that the wood pavement in that city is “simply laid
on the road formation levelled up with shingle. The blocks are grouted
in with blue lias lime and well rammed down. This makes a splendid road,
and is superior to any portion of the road that has been laid with
concrete. This wood paving, 5 inches deep, laid as described, costs
7_s._ per yard super. We have had some down here now for 2 years, and
have had no settlement whatever. It is a very important matter, for it
makes wood paving possible for country towns.”
_Shiel’s Composite Block Paving._--This pavement consists of composite
blocks 12 inches by 15 inches, cast in iron moulds with two rows of wood
placed at an equal distance from either side and each other, the vacant
spaces being filled with granite broken as for macadam; over all is
poured a boiling composition of pitch, chalk, and sand. The blocks are
thus treated at the works, and are, when cool, taken to the street, laid
on a concrete foundation, and grouted with cement grouting.
_Prosser’s Wood Pavement._--This is composed of blocks sawn at an angle
of 60°, the grain of the wood running in the same direction. Each end of
the block rests on the other, transversely to line of street. Between
the rows of blocks a plank, the same depth as the blocks, but with the
grain of the wood horizontal, is placed. The blocks, which on one side
of the plank lean in an opposite direction to those on the other, are
secured or dowelled together by wooden pins running through the plank
and piercing the blocks about an inch.
In Chicago, U.S.A., cedar blocks 6 inches square, set on a composition
of tar and gravel, are used, and are said to make a very durable
pavement.
The following sanitary objections to wood as a material for pavements
are made in the Report on the Application of Science and Art to Street
Paving and Street Cleansing of the Metropolis (1872) page 17.
“The General Board of Health set aside wood as an ineligible material
for this amongst other reasons, that street surfaces ought to be
impermeable; and for roads of light traffic and cheap construction, they
looked to modifications of macadam, with bituminous binders of mineral
tar. Since then wood has been reproduced for the purpose, and strongly
pressed in improved forms for trial. It certainly offers the advantage
of a great gain in noiselessness over granite, more especially from the
horses’ feet, though with some disadvantage from a dead rumble and
vibration; and further it has the advantage of being more available than
smooth pavements for inclines. But hygienists object to its use on
grounds which, in the absence of sanitary science, are overlooked, but
which it is important to particularise as showing the dangerous state of
ignorance and incompetency of the authorities by whom they are not
entertained or are disregarded.”
The sum total of these charges against wood as a pavement consists in
the following: “Wood is porous, it is composed of bundles of fibres, it
absorbs and retains wet, foul wet especially.” Why _foul_ wet should be
absorbed more than ordinary wet does not transpire.
There is no doubt that wood in its natural state does absorb a large
quantity of water,[74] but this can be avoided in wood paving by
preserving the wood of which it is composed by one of the following
processes.
(1) Burnetising Chloride of zinc is used in this process.
(2) Kyanising Corrosive sublimate is used.
(3) Renwickising Boiling in coal tar.
(4) Boucherising Sulphate of copper is used.
(5) Bethelising Creosote heated to 200° F. is used.
(6) Seelyising Creosote is also used, the wood being first boiled.
(7) Hayfordising Creosote is also used, wood being unseasoned.
The fibres of the wood are also compressed, and no open joints between
the blocks are permitted, by paving the blocks transversely, with butt
joints closely packed together, and by filling the cross joints with an
asphaltic or other impervious grouting.
Wood paving should, however, be laid in streets with moderate traffic,
and plenty of sun and air. In confined spaces such as courts, it soon
rots and becomes a source of much unhealthiness.[75]
Many reports have been from time to time made on the advantages and
disadvantages of wood paving, and much has been said and written upon
the subject, so that I will only touch upon some of the principal
questions at issue.
The first of importance is that of durability, and although the life of
a hard wood constantly exposed to attrition is amazing, as may be seen
on the stairs of the Metropolitan Railway Stations, and in many cog
wheels of old machinery, still some diversity of opinion exists as to
what may be fairly put down as the wear per annum of the surface of a
street paved with wood blocks.
It must be remembered that to arrive at any fixed ratio of wear, a
standard of traffic should be fixed; but this unfortunately has not
hitherto been done, so that the results of observations are bound to
differ considerably. It must also not be lost sight of that the reason
of excessive wear in a wood pavement generally arises from wide joints
being the means of causing the edges of the blocks to abrade and become
worn.
Mr. D. T. Hope, in a paper he laid before the Scottish Society of Arts,
upon some most careful investigations he had made on this subject, gives
the wear as ¹⁄₈ of an inch in 18 months on blocks laid with vertical
fibre, which he proved was the best manner of laying them to ensure the
longest life.
Mr. Deacon estimated the wear at from 1³⁄₈ inch to 2⁵⁄₁₆ inches per
annum.[76]
Mr. Copland estimated the wear at ³⁄₁₆ of an inch per annum.[77]
Mr. Howorth estimates the life of wood paving at 25 years per inch of
wood, if an absolutely uniform quality of wood fibre could be
assumed.[78]
Mr. Haywood says,[79] “Wood pavements with repairs have in this City
(London) had a life varying from 6 to 19 years, and that with repairs,
an average life of about 10 years may be obtained.”
The life of wood is no doubt extended by being preserved by one of the
processes I have enumerated, but as its life may be taken as an average
of 8 to 10 years, and as the blocks are bound to wear unevenly, they
should be made as shallow as is consistent with stability; as it is an
undisputed fact that the foundation of a roadway is the important
carrier of the traffic, the surface material, of whatever it may be
constructed, only acting as a skin to preserve it. If the blocks are too
thick, unnecessary capital is locked up.
Wood pavement was laid in Sunderland[80] in 1859 with strips of
creosoted red pine, creosoted beech wood, and unpreserved oak, the bulk
of the paving being unpreserved red deal, and this was replaced in 1867.
In 1877, on renewing the pavement, it was found that the creosoted wood
suffered less from wear and tear than the unpreserved, so the whole was
done with creosoted red pine, the original strip of creosoted red pine
was left untouched, the strip of oak was turned, and the beech was
merely raised; and there is no doubt that the best wood pavement is that
which can be constructed in the simplest manner, as for instance deal
blocks 4 or 5 inches deep, laid with a close joint upon a Portland
cement concrete bed, the blocks being well grouted in with Portland
cement grouting, their surface being afterwards sprinkled or strewn with
sand or sharp gravel.
The woods employed for paving are beech and oak, both of which are said
to be too slippery, elm, which is not durable, pitch pine and Baltic
fir. Memel and Dantzic timber is better than Riga, the best wood for the
purpose being said to be Wyborg or St. Petersburgh red deals.
All sappy wood must be at once rejected as unsuitable. This is a great
objection to creosoting or other preserving processes, as it hides
defects in the wood.
The advantages of wood paving may be summed up as follows:--
(1.) It is the quietest of all known pavements, wheels make scarcely any
noise upon it and there is no clatter of horses’ hoofs.
(2.) It is much safer than either asphalte or granite pavements for
horses travelling upon it and if a horse falls he can rise more easily.
(3.) The traction necessary upon it, though slightly greater than upon
asphalte, is compensated for by the better foothold given to horses.
(4.) It is clean. If well constructed there should be no mud made upon
it; all that appears upon its surface should arise either from its being
imported upon it, or from the gravel with which it is sometimes
necessary to dress the surface.
(5.) It presents a uniform and slight elasticity, which is of great
benefit to vehicles passing over it.
(6.) It may be laid on a gradient of 1 in 20 with safety to the traffic.
The principal objections to wood as a paving are:--
(1.) It is said to absorb moisture and to smell offensively, but this
has often been refuted.[81] (2.) It is said to be difficult to cleanse
without the aid of water, as dirt adheres to the wood, and lingers in
the joints.
(3.) It is not easy to open it or repair it, for the purposes of gas and
water pipes, etc., and rather a large surface has to be removed for this
purpose, and it has to be left a little time after repairs before
traffic is again allowed on it.
(4.) The wood swells if wet, and cases are on record of the side kerbs
of streets being raised, and lamp posts thrown down, by the pressure of
the wood thus swelling.[82]
With regard to the cost of wood paving. This must vary in different
localities, according to the value of labour, of materials, and in the
manner in which the work is done.
The practice of most of the companies engaged in this class of work is
to make a fixed charge per square yard for the pavement, including the
concrete but excluding the excavation, and they also guarantee to keep
the pavement in repair free of charge for one or two years, and then
for so many years after, at so much per yard per annum.
About 14_s._ per square yard is generally the first charge for
constructing, and 1_s._ per square yard is the annual charge for
maintenance.
Upon the subject of cost the following tables[83] may be useful.
TABLE SHOWING THE ACTUAL DURATION AND COST OF CERTAIN WOOD PAVEMENTS IN
THE CITY OF LONDON.
-----------+----------+----------+-----------+-----------+-----------
| | | | Total Cost| Average
| | | First Cost| of Repairs| Cost
| | | per | per Square| per Square
|Date when | | Square |Yard during| Yard per
Situation.|laid New. | Life. | Yard. | Life. | Annum.
-----------+----------+----------+-----------+-----------+-----------
| |Yrs. Mths.|£ _s._ _d._|£ _s._ _d._|£ _s._ _d._
Cornhill |May, 1855 | 10 2 |0 12 2 |0 17 4¹⁄₂|0 2 11
|July, 1865| 6 8 |0 11 6 |0 8 9³⁄₄|0 3 0¹⁄₂
| | | | |
Gracechurch|Nov. 1853 | 11 7 |0 12 8 |0 17 1¹⁄₂|0 2 6³⁄₄
Street |June, 1865| 6 0 |0 11 6 |0 6 11 |0 3 0³⁄₄
| | | | |
Lombard |May, 1851 | 9 4 |0 9 6 |0 6 0 |0 1 7³⁄₄
Street |Sept. 1860| 10 7 |0 9 2 |1 0 2 |0 2 9
| | | | |
Lothbury |May, 1854 | 12 3 |0 12 6 |1 8 4³⁄₄|0 3 4
|Aug. 1866 | 6 1 |0 12 6 |0 3 5³⁄₄|0 2 7¹⁄₂
| | | | |
Mincing |July, 1841| 19 1 |0 14 4 |0 13 4 |0 1 5¹⁄₄
Lane |Aug. 1860 | 13 0 |0 9 2 |1 2 6³⁄₄|0 2 5¹⁄₄
| | | | |
Bartholomew|May, 1854 | 12 3 |0 12 6 |0 17 5³⁄₄|0 2 5¹⁄₄
Lane |Aug. 1866 | 5 5 |0 12 6 |0 3 11¹⁄₄|0 3 0¹⁄₄
-----------+----------+----------+-----------+-----------+-----------
Foundations are included, but no excavation.
TABLE SHOWING FIRST COST, AND TENDERED COST PER ANNUM FOR MAINTAINING
CERTAIN WOOD CARRIAGEWAY PAVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF LONDON.
-----------------+----------+-------------+------------+------------+
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |Years to be | |
| | | maintained | First Cost |
| Date when| Name of | by | per |
Situation. | Laid. | Contractor. |Contractor. |Square Yard.|
-----------------+----------+-------------+------------+------------+
| | | | £ _s._ _d._|
King William |Feb. 1873 |Improved Wood| 16 | 0 18 0 |
Street | | Paving Co. | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Ludgate Hill |Nov. 1873 | Ditto | 16 | 0 18 0 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Portions of Great| | | | |
Tower Street and |Sept. 1873| Ditto | 16 | 0 16 0 |
| | | | |
Seething Lane | | | | |
| | | | |
Bartholomew Lane |Jan. 1872 | Carey |No agreement| 0 12 6 |
| | | | |
Ditto |Dec. 1871 |Improved Wood| 3 | 0 16 0 |
| | Paving Co. | | |
| | | | |
Duke Street |May, 1873 | Mowlem and | [84]5 | 0 15 0 |
| | Co. | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Houndsditch | Not yet | Ditto | [84]7 | 0 17 0 |
| laid | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Ditto | Ditto | Carey | [84]7 | 0 13 6 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
-----------------+----------+-------------+------------+------------+
-----------------+------------------------+------------+------------
| | Total Cost |
| |of Pavements|
| | during |
| Agreed Cost of | Contract |Average Cost
| maintenance per | Term, | per Square
| Square Yard for the | per Square | Yard per
Situation. | Contract Term. | Yard. | Annum.
-----------------+------------------------+------------+------------
| | £ _s._ _d._| £ _s._ _d._
King William | 1 year free | 2 0 6 | 0 2 6¹⁄₄
Street |15 years at 1_s._ 6_d._ | |
| = 1_l._ 2_s._ 6_d._ | |
| | |
Ludgate Hill | 1 year free | 2 0 6 | 0 2 6¹⁄₄
|15 years at 1_s._ 6_d._ | |
| = 1_l._ 2_s._ 6_d._ | |
| | |
Portions of Great| 1 year free | 1 14 9 | 0 2 2
Tower Street and |15 years at 1_s._ 3_d._ | |
| = 18_s._ 9_d._ | |
Seething Lane | | |
| | |
Bartholomew Lane | ---- | ---- | ----
| | |
Ditto | 3 years free | 0 16 0 | ----
| | |
| | |
Duke Street | 2 years free |{
| 3 years at 1_s._ |{
| = 3_s._ |{
| |{These pavements
Houndsditch | 2 years free |{will no doubt last
| 5 years at 9_d._ |{some years longer
| = 3_s._ 9_d._ |{than the contract
| |{term of maintenance.
Ditto | 2 years free |{
| 5 years at 1_s._ |{
| = 5_s._ |{
-----------------+------------------------+-------------------------
In the wood pavements the cost of the foundation is included, but no
excavation.
The pavements at the end of each financial year are to be in a good
sound condition.
The following table[85] is also given as showing the comparative cost
of wood paving with macadam and bituminous concrete paving in
Liverpool.
----------+--------+----------------------------+-----------+---------
| | Deductions from | | Sinking
| | First Cost to determine |Interest on| Fund
|Original| Cost of Renewal. | Original |invested
|Cost per+-------------+--------------+ Cost at |at 3
Des- | Square | Cost of |Allowances for| 4¹⁄₂ per |per
cription | Yard at| Foundation |old Materials | cent. per |cent.
of | present|not requiring| at date |Square Yard|Compound
Pavement.| prices.| renewal. | of renewal. |per Annum. |Interest.
----------+--------+-------------+--------------+-----------+---------
| _s. d._| _s. d._ | _s. d._ | _d._ | _d._
No. 6. | | | | |
Bituminous| | | | |
Concrete | 3 9 | Nil | Nil | 2·0 | Nil
Pavement | | | | |
| | | | |
No. 7. | | | | |
Wood |15 1·5| 2 0 | Nil | 7·5 | 4·3
Pavement | | | | |
| | | | |
No. 8. | | | | |
Macadam | 6 9 | Nil | Nil | 3·4 | Nil
Pavement | | | | |
----------+--------+-------------+--------------+-----------+---------
----------+-----------+----------+----------+---------
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | Total
Des- |Maintenance|Scavenging|Gravelling| Annual
cription |per Square |per Square|per Square|Cost per
of | Yard per | Yard per | Yard per | Square
Pavement.| Annum. | Annum. | Annum. | Yard.
----------+-----------+----------+----------+---------
| _s._ _d._ | _d._ | _d._ |_s._ _d._
No. 6. | | | |
Bituminous| | | |
Concrete | 0 9 | 2·4 | .. | 1 1·4
Pavement | | | |
| | | |
No. 7. | | | |
Wood | 0 1·0 | 2·7 | 5·0 | 1 8·5
Pavement | | | |
| | | |
No. 8. | | | |
Macadam | 1 0 | 8·0 | Nil | 1 11·4
Pavement | | | |
----------+-----------+----------+----------+---------
In concluding this chapter upon wood paving, I will give a specimen
specification for work of this description.
_Excavation._--Excavate the ground to a depth of -- inches below the
level of the proposed finished surface of the roadway.[86] The formation
surface thus excavated must be well watered and rolled or punned if
found necessary, and any soft or made earth removed to such a depth as
may be found to be sufficient.[87]
_Foundation._--Upon the excavated formation surface a bed -- inches
thick of concrete is to be laid, composed of one part of good approved
Portland cement to two of fine, sharp river sand, and three of clean
river ballast or broken stone. The concrete to be finished off with an
even and smooth top surface conforming with the contour line of proposed
finished roadway.
_Wood Blocks._--Upon the concrete thus laid, and after it has
sufficiently set, wood blocks are to be laid.[88] These blocks must be
of the best description of Baltic red timber[89] (or such other timber
as shall be specified), sound and thoroughly well seasoned, free from
all sap, shakes, large and loose knots or other defects, and any that
may be rejected by the surveyor as unfitted for the work shall be at
once removed from the works or broken up. The blocks must not be less
than 6 inches or more than 12 inches in length by 3 inches in width and
6 inches in depth, they are to be carefully laid with the fibre of the
wood placed vertically, their ends must butt with close joints to each
other, and each course must be kept ³⁄₈ of an inch apart by means of
wooden laths, which are afterwards removed.
_Joints._--The joints are then to be carefully run with a grouting
composed of one part of best approved Portland cement to two parts of
fine, sharp, clean river sand. (In some cases a hot bituminous mixture
or asphalte is run between the joints as a grouting.)
_Top Dressing._--The whole surface of the pavement is then to be spread
with a coating, at least ¹⁄₂-inch in thickness, of fine sharp gravel or
chippings.
The following heads of general conditions under such a contract may also
be useful.
Alteration of gullies, sewer man-holes etc., will be done at the expense
of the sanitary authority.
Contractor must make good at once any damage caused to gas or water
mains or services--time penalty for delay.
Maintenance of work after completion for a specified time.
Power must be reserved to surveyor to suspend work during bad weather or
from other causes.
Heavy time penalties for non-completion of contract by a certain date.
Payments to be made to contractor on surveyor’s certificate, up to 80
per cent. of whole contract, remaining 20 per cent. to be paid at end of
(say) 2 years after completion.
With the above specimen specification I conclude the chapter on Wood
Paving.
[67] The first wood pavement laid in London was in front of the Old
Bailey, in 1839.
[68] _Vide_ ‘Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers,’ vol. i. p. 131.
[69] This specification is the company’s own, as advertised when they
first began business; for many reasons the boards have since been
discontinued, and other alterations introduced into the system.
[70] I am unable to ascertain if this plan has ever been tried
anywhere.
[71] It is also affirmed by the Borough Surveyor of Sunderland that
this process dispenses with watering. _Vide_ ‘Proceedings of the
Association of Municipal and Sanitary Engineers and Surveyors,’ vol.
iii. p. 72.
[72] _Vide_ ‘A Practical Treatise on Roads, Streets, and Pavements,’
by Q. A. Gillmore, p. 166, which see also for a good account of wood
pavements in the United States.
[73] _Vide_ ‘Wood Pavements,’ by Henry Allnutt, 1880, p. 22.
[74] The power of absorbing water by wood varies from 9·37 to 174·86
per cent. in dry wood. In its ordinary state the power varies from
4·36 to 150·64 per cent. The quantity of water contained in wood in
its natural state varies from 4·61 to 13·56 per cent. _Vide_ ‘Minutes
of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers,’ vol. lvi. p.
300.
[75] _Vide_ ‘Roads and Roadways,’ by George Waller Wilcocks, 1879, p.
34.
[76] _Vide_ ‘Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers,’ vol. lviii. p. 82.
[77] _Ibid_, vol. lx. p. 293.
[78] _Ibid_, vol. lviii. p. 45.
[79] ‘Report upon Asphalte and Wood Pavements,’ by William Haywood,
(1874) p. 44.
[80] See ‘Paper on Wood Pavements,’ by R. S. Rounthwaite, Boro’
Surveyor, Sunderland, ‘Proceedings of the Association of Municipal and
Sanitary Engineers and Surveyors,’ vol. vii. p. 48.
[81] The surveyor of the parish of St. George’s Hanover Square,
London, says, “My experience of wood, and I have laid down 25,000
yards, is that it is perfectly free from smells, even on a cab rank.”
Report of a Committee of the Paddington Vestry on Wood and other
Pavements (1878) p. 30.
[82] Mr. Allnutt says on this: “As to the swelling of the wood, it has
been remarked that even brick walls have been forced out. We do not
see what provision can be made for this; but leaving the channel by
the kerb stone for the last work may relieve the lateral pressure, and
perhaps it would be as well for the blocks not to be so dry when being
laid down.” _Vide_ ‘Wood Pavement as carried out on Kensington High
Road, Chelsea, etc.’ by Henry Allnutt (1880) p. 15.
[83] _Vide_ ‘Report on Asphalte and Wood Pavements,’ by William
Haywood, 1874, pp. 38 and 41.
[84] The Ligno-Mineral Paving Company and the Improved Wood Paving
Company offered to maintain their pavements, if laid, for terms of ten
years and fourteen years respectively; their tenders were not
accepted.
[85] _Vide_ ‘Paper on Street Carriageway Pavements,’ by G. F. Deacon,
‘Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers,’ vol.
lviii. p. 23.
[86] If the road material thus excavated is macadam, it may be
screened and used as concrete in the foundation, if approved by the
surveyor. The granite pitching of crossings, channel gutters, etc.,
must remain the property of the sanitary authority, as well as the
surplus macadam.
[87] It is important to give sufficient notice to gas and water
companies in order that they may attend to their mains and services
before the foundations are put in.
[88] Sometimes about half an inch of fine sand is spread upon the
surface of the concrete upon which the wood blocks are bedded.
[89] If the blocks are to be creosoted, the number of pounds of
creosote that should be absorbed in a cubic foot of the wood should be
specified; this is generally about 10 lb. of creosote to 1 cubic foot
of wood.
CHAPTER X.
COMPRESSED ASPHALTE ROADWAYS.
The word asphalte in its generally accepted sense implies a natural rock
consisting of pure carbonate of lime, intimately combined and
impregnated with mineral bitumen in very variable proportions; that used
for roads or footpaths should not contain less than 7 or more than 12
per cent. of bitumen.
The rock when broken takes an irregular fracture without definite
cleavage; it is principally derived from Val de Travers, Seyssel,
Sicily, Chieti, Auvergne, Lobsann, and Limmer. Its grain should be
regular and homogeneous, the finer the grain the better.[90]
When exposed to the atmosphere asphalte gradually assumes a grey tint,
by reason of the bitumen evaporating from the surface leaving a thin
film of limestone behind. The stone is usually taken from open quarries,
but at Val de Travers shafts are sunk and the general treatment is
similar to a coal mine.
Bitumen, it must be borne in mind, is itself a mineral product found in
Trinidad and some other places; it is composed of carbon, hydrogen, and
oxygen.
The weight of a cubic yard of natural asphalte is about 3874 lbs., its
specific gravity is 2·114, but this of course varies with its percentage
of bitumen.
The following is a test for asphalte given by Mr. Deland in a paper he
read before the Institution of Civil Engineers in the year 1880.[91]
“A specimen of the rock freed from all extraneous matter, having been
pulverised as finely as possible, should be dissolved in sulphurate of
carbon, turpentine, ether or benzine, placed in a glass vessel and
stirred with a glass rod. A dark solution will result, from which will
be precipitated the pulverised limestone. The solution of bitumen should
then be poured off. The dissolvent speedily evaporates, leaving the
constituent parts of the asphalte, each of which should be weighed so as
to determine the exact proportion. The bitumen should be heated in a
lead bath and tested with a porcelain or Baumé thermometer to 428° Fahr.
There will be little loss by evaporation if the bitumen is good, but if
bituminous oil is present the loss will be considerable--gritted mastic
should be heated to 450° Fahr. The limestone should next be examined. If
the powder is white and soft to the touch it is a good component part of
asphalte, but if rough and dirty on being tested with reagents it will
be found to contain iron pyrites, silicates, clay, etc. Some asphaltes
also are of a spongy or hygrometrical nature. Thus, as an analysis which
merely gives so much bitumen and so much limestone may mislead, it is
necessary to know the quality of the limestone and of the bitumen.
“For a good compressed roadway an asphalte composed of pure limestone
and 9 to 10 per cent. of bitumen, non-evaporative at 428° Fahr., is the
most suitable. Asphaltes containing much more than 10 per cent. of
bitumen get soft in summer and wavy, those containing much less have not
sufficient bind for heavy traffic, although asphalte containing 7 per
cent. of bitumen properly heated does well for court yards, as it sets
hard when cold.”
For roadways “compressed” asphalte should be used and not “mastic,”
which is only fitted for footpaths, court-yards, etc. Compressed
asphalte roadways are constructed as follows:
The asphalte rock is first crushed in a “Blake’s” or other suitable
crusher, then pulverised in what is known as a “Carr’s disintegrator,”
until it is reduced to a powder; this powder is then heated up to
between 212° and 250° Fahr. in revolving cylinders and is laid about
2¹⁄₂ inches in thickness upon a concrete foundation previously prepared
for its reception, the powder is carefully raked to the required contour
and then either rolled or punned with iron punners previously heated to
prevent the adhesion of the powder to them.
A roadway thus prepared presents many advantages over macadam, granite
setts or wood, the following passage amply describing one of them:[92]
“An indispensable feature of a weight-carrying pavement must be the
absolute exclusion of water at the surface as nearly as it can be
insured, and in this one respect it cannot be questioned that a surface
like asphalte has no equal, the absorption being so gradual as to be
inappreciable during any possible continuance of moisture.”
In addition to this indisputable fact the advantage of durability is
claimed for asphalte, but this must vary considerably with the quality
of the material and of the work. Mr. Hayward estimates the life of an
asphaltic Val de Travers compressed roadway at 17 years, and it is
claimed for it that it will wear until it becomes quite thin, very heavy
traffic breaking it up when it is worn to about ³⁄₄ of an inch thick.
Another advantage claimed for asphalte is cleanliness, and this is
evidently indisputable, as, being impervious, none but imported mud or
dust can be formed upon it.
In addition to the foregoing the following advantages are also claimed:
Pedestrians can walk on asphaltic roadways as well as on the footways.
It is comparatively noiseless under traffic, though in this case wood
is better, as the clatter of the iron-shod horses’ feet upon asphalte is
very apparent.
It is expeditiously laid, and when repairs are necessary they can easily
be effected; no pavement shows less signs of openings being made in it
for gas and water-pipe repairs than asphalte.
The rapid laying causes less inconvenience to traffic in the streets.
Ease of traction; but here steps in the one great objection to asphalte
as a roadway paving, viz. danger to horses by slipping and falling, of
which I shall say more hereafter.
Cellars and vaults under the streets are kept dry, by reason of its
impermeability to moisture.
Easily cleansed, especially by mechanical sweeping, and snow is easily
removed.
It is very pleasing to the eye, being so uniformly regular and of good
colour.
There is no vibration or concussion in travelling over it, and apart
from the question of safety it is delightful to drive over it.
It is a cool pavement at night; it does not absorb heat during the day,
and consequently none radiates from it after the sun has gone down.[93]
The great objection to asphalte as a material for roadways arises from
the fact that it is extremely slippery when damp,[94] irrespective of
temperature, and this in the climate of England is frequently the case.
The result of this slipperiness is, that not only do horses frequently
fall upon it, but it is also difficult to stop a horse when drawing a
load, thus causing more risk to foot-passengers of being run over, and
straining the horse considerably in its efforts. Again, in thoroughfares
crowded with vehicular traffic, constant stoppages occur, and in
starting again it is painful to witness the struggles of the horses to
keep their footing and overcome the inertia of their load. When a horse
falls he has very great difficulty in rising, but on the other hand,
although he may be strained, a horse never breaks his knees upon this
class of pavement. How far this might be altered if _all_ the streets of
a town were paved with asphalte, is a fair matter for argument, as it is
asserted that horses are very nervous on going from one pavement to
another, and accidents frequently happen in consequence.
The strewing of sand upon asphalte renders it less slippery, but in
addition to the interference of the traffic whilst this is being done,
there are the further objections, of the possible injury of the sand
cutting into the asphalte, the expense of labour and materials, and the
mud caused thereby which has afterwards to be removed. Another plan is
to frequently wash the asphalte with water, but this is expensive and
only of temporary benefit.
Another objection to asphaltic roadways is that they cannot with safety
be constructed of greater gradient than 1 in 60, and it must also be
borne in mind that fine weather is necessary both for the construction
and repairs of a roadway of this description.
Very little smell, and that not of an unpleasant character, arises from
the work when compressed asphalte is being used, the mastic is however
temporarily unpleasant to those who dislike the odour.
With reference to the question of the cost of compressed asphalte for
roadways: it is of course a matter depending upon local circumstances as
to the first cost, but it must be remembered that the compressed
asphalte hitherto laid has been nearly all that of the Val de Travers
Company, who charge a fixed price per square yard for laying according
to thickness required, the distance of the locality from London, and
other local circumstances. With reference to maintenance, this is a
question dependent mainly upon traffic, but here again the company will
undertake to keep in repair at so much per square yard per annum for a
certain number of years.
It would, however, perhaps be a better plan not to enter into such an
agreement, but to arrange for repairs under a schedule of prices, but
this must greatly depend upon the character of the work in the first
place, and other local considerations.
Mr. Ellice Clarke gives the following as the cost of Val de Travers
compressed asphalte.[95]
The cost is reduced to 100,000 tons per annum per yard of width.
----+-------------+-----------+-----------+----------+---------+----
|Original Cost| Interest |Maintenance|Scavenging| |
| per Square |on original|per Square |per Square| |
| Yard. | Cost. | Yard. | Yard. | Total. |
+-------------+-----------+-----------+----------+---------+
| _s._ _d._ | _d._ | _d._ | _d._ |_s._ _d._|
| 18 0 | 9·7 | 3·6 | 0·4 | 1 1·7|
----+-------------+-----------+-----------+----------+---------+----
Nothing is charged for renewal, as the annual sum for maintenance
provides the asphalte in perpetuity.[96]
The following table[97] may here be of use:
TABLE SHOWING THE AGREED COST PER ANNUM OF CERTAIN ASPHALTE CARRIAGEWAY
PAVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF LONDON.
-----------+------------+--------+----------+-----------------------+
| |Years to| First | Agreed Cost of |
| |be main-| Cost | maintenance |
| | tained | per | per Square |
|Description | by Con-| Square | Yard for the |
Situation.|of Asphalte.|tractor.| Yard. | Contract Term. |
-----------+------------+--------+----------+-----------------------+
| | |£ _s. d._| |
Cheapside | Val de | 17 |0 18 0 | 2 years free |
and Poultry| Travers | | |15 years at 1_s._ 6_d._|
|(Compressed)| | | = £1 2_s._ 6_d._ |
| | | | |
Gracechurch| Ditto | 17 |0 17 0 | 2 years free |
Street | | | |15 years at 1_s._ |
| | | | = 15_s._ 0_d._ |
| | | | |
Finsbury | Ditto | 17 |0 16 0 | 2 years free |
Pavement | | | |15 years at 9_d._ |
| | | | = 11_s._ 3_d._ |
| | | | |
Moorgate | Ditto | 17 |0 16 0 | 2 years free |
Street | | | |15 years at 9_d._ |
| | | | = 11_s._ 3_d._ |
| | | | |
Ditto | Limmer | 17 |0 16 0 | 2 years free |
| (Mastic) | | |15 years at 9_d._ |
| | | | = 11_s._ 3_d._ |
| | | | |
Lombard | Ditto | 17 |0 16 0 | 2 years free |
Street | | | |15 years at 9_d._ |
| | | | = 11_s._ 3_d._ |
| | | | |
Cornhill | Ditto | 17 |0 15 0 | 2 years free |
| | | |15 years at 9_d._ |
| | | | = 11_s._ 3_d._ |
| | | | |
Mincing | Ditto | 17 |0 12 0 | 2 years free |
Lane | | | |15 years at 9_d._ |
| | | | = 11_s._ 3_d._ |
-----------+------------+--------+----------+-----------------------+
-----------+---------------+------------
| Total Cost of |
| Pavements |Average Cost
|during Contract| per Square
| Term per | Yard per
Situation.| Square Yard. | Annum.
-----------+---------------+------------
| £ _s._ _d._ | £ _s._ _d._
Cheapside | 2 0 6 | 0 2 4¹⁄₂
and Poultry| |
| |
| |
Gracechurch| 1 12 0 | 0 10 1¹⁄₂
Street | |
| |
| |
Finsbury | 1 7 3 | 0 1 7¹⁄₄
Pavement | |
| |
| |
Moorgate | 1 7 3 | 0 1 7¹⁄₄
Street | |
| |
| |
Ditto | 1 7 3 | 0 1 7¹⁄₄
| |
| |
| |
Lombard | 1 7 3 | 0 1 7¹⁄₄
Street | |
| |
| |
Cornhill | 1 6 3 | 0 1 6¹⁄₂
| |
| |
| |
Mincing | 1 3 3 | 0 1 4¹⁄₂
Lane | |
| |
-----------+---------------+------------
The cost of foundations is included in this table, but their thickness
is not mentioned; the excavation was done for the contractors.
With the one serious objection of slipperiness, compressed asphalte
seems a most suitable material for the surface of a roadway, but that
objection is of considerable weight when we reflect that the great
object of roadways is that of “traffic,” and it is for that purpose they
are constructed; still, in cities where a heavy _business_ traffic is
going on, this class of roadway has so many advantages that where cheap
horses are driven it might be used; where, however, valuable horses are
used for pleasure driving, as in the west end of London and the
corresponding better parts of cities, some other description of roadway
should be maintained.
Mastic asphalte will be described in the chapter on footpaths.
_Specimen Specification for a Compressed Asphalte Roadway._
_Excavation and Concrete._--The excavation and concrete[98] foundation
may be specified to be executed in a manner similar to that contained in
the specimen specification for wood paving,[99] except of course that
the excavation will be shallower in this case.
_Asphalte._--The asphalte to be used shall be the pure unadulterated
natural rock known as the Val de Travers, and be unmixed with any
foreign or other matter whatever. The rock after being properly broken,
shall be ground in a Carr’s disintegrator to a powder of such fineness,
that not more than per cent. shall be left on a sieve containing
meshes to the square inch and decrepitation by heat will not be
accepted. This powder shall be heated to 240° F. or such other
temperature as shall be found desirable, so as to eliminate all
moisture, and carefully transported to the street in covered iron carts,
in order that not more than 20° F. of heat shall be lost in transit. The
powder must be spread upon the concrete inches in thickness[100] and
carefully raked so as to have regularity of depth and surface.
_Ramming._--The powder must then be rammed with iron punners of not less
weight than 10 lb. heated so as to prevent the adhesion of the asphalte.
The ramming must be done lightly at first, so as to ensure equality of
thickness, and afterwards augmented to heavy blows. Where the rammers
are not available a T tool must be employed.
To meet some of the objections to compressed asphalte as a material for
roadways the “Imperishable Stone Paving Blocks” have been introduced in
America; they consist of asphalte formed into rectangular blocks under
pressure of about one ton to the square inch, these are laid close
together without any grouting, and a pavement of this description is
said to combine all the advantages of wood and asphalte, though
sufficient time has not yet elapsed to prove this.
In Salford, Manchester, etc., I believe “Woodward’s Patent Molten
Ironstone Blocks” are used with some success where there is not any very
exceptionally heavy traffic.
One of the principal reasons of durability in asphalte pavement is its
elasticity, and it should be remembered that compressed asphalte does
not begin to “wear” until all compression has ceased; this is the case
with no other system of pavement--stone and wood both begin “wearing”
from the day the traffic commences. Under ordinarily heavy traffic it
may be estimated that it will take two years to complete the compression
of asphalte, and the weight of a square foot of this pavement will at
the expiration of that time be nearly the same as on the day it was
laid, though the thickness is reduced during the first two years as
much as it will be in the following eight.
Much is said about the advisability of _good_ and _dry_ concrete, but it
may be as well to explain the reasons that necessitate so much care in
the foundation. First, it should be always borne in mind that asphalte
pavement is nothing more than a tough “carpet,” and has no power of
itself of offering resistance to heavy traffic; consequently, if the
substratum or concrete is not thoroughly solid and resisting, the weight
of traffic will crush it, and the asphalte will at once give way in all
directions. The concrete should be made strong enough to resist the
traffic, and the asphalte is a simple covering to protect the concrete
from direct contact with the wear and friction caused by the traffic. So
much for the strength, but the dryness is of even still greater
importance; for the best asphalte, laid by skilled workmen, on
thoroughly first-rate but damp concrete, will rapidly go to pieces--a
phenomenon takes place, which, although quite natural, is little
realised by most engineers. When the hot asphalte is laid, the water is
immediately sucked up and turned into steam, which tries to escape
through the heated powder, and the result is that although the surface
of the asphalte is smooth, the mass is really disintegrated from
underneath by its bitter enemy “water,” and as soon as the surface
begins to wear, the fissures formed by the passing of the steam appear
on the surface and the whole pavement falls to pieces: thus accounting
for some of the failures this description of roadway has met with under
unskilled treatment.
This completes the subject of roadways; I will turn to that of footpaths
in the next chapter.
[90] In this respect the Seyssel is the best, being of a very fine
grain.
[91] _Vide_ ‘Minutes of Proceedings of Institution of Civil
Engineers,’ vol. lx.
[92] _Vide_ Mr. Howarth’s paper on ‘Wood as a Paving Material under
Heavy Traffic,’ ‘Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers, vol. lviii. p. 35.
[93] In Paris and other cities liable to civil war or internal
commotions, it is contended as an advantage of asphalte that it cannot
be used for the construction of barricades, breastworks, or rifle
pits.
[94] _Vide_ Mr. Haywood’s Report upon Asphalte and Wood Pavements,
also Report on the Application of Science and Art to Street Paving and
Cleansing of the Metropolis,’ and numerous other pamphlets and reports
by eminent authorities upon the subject.
[95] _Vide_ ‘Asphalte and its Application to Street Paving,’ by E. B.
Ellice Clarke, ‘Proceedings of the Association of Municipal and
Sanitary Engineers,’ vol. vi. p. 52.
[96] The asphaltic roadways of Paris, of which there were 290,000
square yards in the year 1878, cost from 10_s._ to 12_s._ per square
yard to lay, and about 8·83 pence per square yard per annum to
maintain, including the charge for renewing ¹⁄₁₅th part of the surface
every year, which is the method adopted there. _Vide_ ‘Annales
Industrielles,’ 1878.
[97] _Vide_ Mr. Haywood’s report on asphalte and wood pavements, 1874.
[98] “Lime concrete ruins compressed work.” _Vide_ ‘Asphalte and its
Application to Street Paving,’ by B. Ellice Clarke. ‘Proceedings of
the Association of Municipal and Sanitary Engineers and Surveyors,’
vol. vi. p. 46.
[99] See p. 94 _ante_.
[100] It must be ²⁄₅ths more in thickness than that specified as
finished.
CHAPTER XI.
FOOTPATHS.
As in the case of roadways, so with footpaths: the foundation is of
primary importance, whatever material may be used for the surface. Where
this material may be classed under the head of “Paving,” concrete[101]
makes the best foundation. For gravel, tar paving, or other similar
surface, a hard core bottom well drained is sufficient. The materials of
which a footpath can be formed are almost innumerable, but the following
may be given as embodying most of them:
(1.) Natural asphalte, compressed and mastic.
(2.) Yorkshire flagging--Caithness flagging.
(3.) Blue lias, and Devonian limestone flagging.
(4.) Concrete.
(5.) Bricks.
(6.) Granite slabs.
(7.) Artificial asphaltes, including tar pavement.
(8.) Gravel.
First on the list stands natural asphalte, compressed and mastic.
The compressed has been thoroughly described in the preceding chapter;
it is sometimes used for footpaths where there is a very heavy traffic,
and answers admirably.
I will, however, now deal solely with mastic asphalte, which means the
rock ground to powder, mixed with a certain proportion of bitumen to act
as a flux, and then subjected to heat; this is sometimes used in
conjunction with fine sharp clean river sand, but more often with finely
crushed stone about the size of peppercorns, and is styled “gritted
asphalte.”
As long ago as the year 1838, Mr. F. W. Simms speaks of asphalte mastic
from Pyrimont, near Seyssel, and says “it may be considered a species of
mineral leather”[102]--a very good description of its surprisingly
tough, hard, durable and pliant properties.
The usual method of the preparation of the mastic is as follows:--
According to the amount of bitumen contained in the natural stone, from
5 to 8 per cent. of refined Trinidad bitumen[103] is placed in a large
caldron which is usually provided with agitators driven by steam power;
when this is thoroughly melted, the powdered asphalte is added little by
little, the heat being raised to between 390° and 480° F., the mixture
kept well stirred and “cooked” for about five hours. It is then turned
out into iron moulds, most companies having a special pattern with a
trade mark for this purpose.
The caldrons generally used contain from 1¹⁄₂ to 2 tons of mastic.
Some companies in large towns are provided with caldrons on wheels,
commonly called “Locomobiles,” in which case the grit is mixed with the
mastic in the fixed caldrons, and the whole mass run out into the
locomobiles (which are also provided with agitators worked by an endless
chain attached to the axle of the wheels), and transported direct to
where the work has to be done. This system, though undoubtedly the best,
is not practicable except in large towns; the more usual method of
laying mastic footpaths is to send the asphalte cakes to the works,
where they are remelted in small round street caldrons, containing from
8 to 12 cakes each, weighing from 40 to 50 lbs., the grit being
sometimes added in the fixed caldrons, sometimes in the street caldrons,
this amount of grit varying from 20 to 60 per cent. according to the
nature of the work.
The grit makes the asphalte more difficult to spread, but it lessens the
cost and makes a very durable path. The affinity between the asphalte
and grit is so great that, in breaking a sample, the actual pieces of
grit will be found broken in half.
The asphalte should be spread from ¹⁄₂ to ⁷⁄₈ of an inch in thickness
(if compressed 1 inch is the minimum), and should be brought hot on to
the works in covered caldrons on wheels, the test of its being ready and
fit to lay being made by plunging a wooden spatula into it, which should
come out without any of the asphalte adhering to it, and also by jets of
light smoke darting out of the mixture.
The mastic should be taken from the caldron with a warmed ladle, and put
into buckets previously heated, then thrown out on the concrete (which
should be perfectly dry) near the spreader, who spreads it skilfully
with a wooden stave, spreader, or spatula. The surface should then be
floated and dusted over with fine sand, portland cement, or stone dust.
Dishonest contractors sometimes substitute inferior materials for
natural asphalte, such imitations being made of ground chalk, fire-clay,
and pitch or gas tar, or ground limestone mixed with bitumen.
A sample of the footpath after it is laid should be cut out (this is
easily effected by heating the surface with a piece of hot mastic), in
order to see that the proper thickness is given, and by applying a light
to the sample, the smell will readily tell if real asphalte or any
inferior material has been used. Stockholm tar or common pitch should
not be allowed to be substituted for Trinidad bitumen, or it will spoil
the mastic.
Asphalte mastic footpaths are excellent in every way, the only
objections to them being the necessity for the grit, and the temporary
unpleasant smoke and smell whilst being laid. It is also necessary to
put stone sills round the cellar openings and coal shutes, etc., for it
to butt against, but it makes an invaluable pavement, especially for
courts, alleys, back yards, etc., for sanitary and other reasons.
The proportions of asphalte, bitumen and grit are given as follows by
Mr. Delano in his translation of a paper by M. Ernest Chabrier, on the
applications of asphalte.[104]
“One ton of sanded mastic requires 13 cwt. of pure block mastic, 2 qrs.
12 lb. of bitumen, 7 cwt. of grit or sand washed and dried,” and it
takes 2 cwt. of coal to heat it. He further says that one workman can
easily prepare 3 tons of material in 12 hours.
The following table gives the number of square yards that a ton of
prepared Sicilian rock asphalte will spread.
----+--------------+---------------------+----------+----
| | With about | |
|Without grit. |25 per cent. of grit.|Thickness.|
+--------------+---------------------+----------+
|square yards. | square yards. | inches. |
| 63 | 80 | ³⁄₈ |
| 51 | 65 | ¹⁄₂ |
| 32 | 40 | ³⁄₄ |
| 26 | 33 | 1 |
| 16 | 20 | 1¹⁄₂ |
| 12¹⁄₂ | 16 | 2 |
----+--------------+---------------------+----------+----
A skilled workman properly assisted can lay 140 to 180 square yards in a
day.[105]
With regard to the price of asphalte mastic footpaths, this is quite a
local question, and is not worth while discussing. The life of a
footpath thus treated may be reckoned at about 15 years under ordinary
traffic; the concrete will remain untouched and what is left of the
asphalte may be remelted, so that a renewal is not so costly as the
first expense.
_Yorkshire Flagging._--This pavement is too well known to need any
description from me; it is an excellent pavement in many ways, and is
most pleasant to walk upon, there being a cling or foothold not
experienced in any other material.
The objections to this description of pavement are:--
(1.) Its first cost, which is undoubtedly high as compared to its
durability.
(2.) The fact of uneven wearing: one stone will be found soft next to a
hard one; the former wears, leaving a pit which forms a pool for water
in due course, and has to be removed.
(3.) Unless very carefully bedded, a stone will see-saw; this is very
unpleasant in wet weather, water accumulates beneath, and as the
pedestrian treads on one end of the stone a squirt of dirty water up to
his knees, and a stumble, remind him that the stone is loose.
(4.) Liability to crack when any heavy goods are thrown upon it.
The following specimen specification for Yorkshire flagging pavement may
be of use.
_Specimen Specification for Yorkshire Flagging Foot Pavements._
The old flagging (where and when directed) to be taken up, refaced,
squared, and relaid.
The new flagging is to be chisel-dressed to a fair face, true, out of
winding, and not less than 3 inches thick,[106] to be properly squared
and not pitched off only, or undercut, but to hold good to the square;
to have not more than fourteen pieces to the hundred superficial feet;
the joints must be set flush, and bedded and pointed with the best blue
lias mortar.
The bed for the flagging both old and new, if any is required, to be
made with proper earth, gravel, or dry rubbish, and all surplus earth
and rubbish to be carted from the streets as it arises from the works.
The flagging to be properly cut and rebated to receive all area
gratings, coal shoots, rain water troughs, &c.
Any damage done to gas or water service pipes in digging for the
flagging, or in any way connected with the work, to be made good by the
contractor, as also all and every other damage to windows, wood, or
glass work; and the contractor will be held responsible for, and will
make compensation for any injury that the public may sustain through the
negligence of his workmen, or otherwise.
The whole of the flags to be of the very best quality, from Halifax, the
quarries in the neighbourhood of Bradford or in Yorkshire, and subject
to the approval of the surveyor.
The contractor to provide all lights and proper guards at night, and
when old paving is to be taken up the work is to be done under the
direction of the surveyor, and if considered necessary, the stones are
to be removed from the streets to be re-faced and squared. No stone to
be stacked in the streets.
The flagging to be measured after the work is completed.
The contractor to provide all stone, materials, tools, implements, horse
and cart hire, and pay all railway dues, freightages, etc., and also to
provide all labour of every kind for properly completing the work to the
full and entire satisfaction of the surveyor. Payment will be made as
the work proceeds, on the certificate of the surveyor.
Should the contractor fail to perform the work to the satisfaction of
the surveyor, he then shall have power to execute the work and charge
the same to the contractor, and deduct the cost from any amount that may
be due to him; and in the event of the cost being more than the amount
due, or if there shall then be no sum due to the contractor, such cost
shall be paid by the contractor to the mayor, aldermen, and citizens,
and the same shall be recoverable from him as liquidated and ascertained
damages.
_Caithness Flagging_ is now used very largely instead of Yorkshire; it
comes from Thurso in Scotland, and it is contended for it that it
possesses many excellent qualities, amongst others may be enumerated the
following:
(1). It is impervious to wet.
(2.) It is not slippery nor does it wear so.
(3.) It does not scale or flake.
(4.) It dries rapidly after rain.
(5.) Its appearance is cheerful.
(6.) Great durability, as it does not abrade.
(7.) Frost has no effect upon it.
(8.) Can be re-used when half worn.
(9.) Cleanliness; for, not being porous, no dirt or dust can adhere to
it.
(10.) Vehicular traffic may be turned over it without injury to the
path.
(11.) Economy; as natural forces can be used, thus saving labour, and it
can be laid from 1¹⁄₂ to 2 inches thick only.
(12.) Having sawn edges, the joints are expeditiously and well made.
(13.) Its whole surface wears evenly.
The following table was compiled by the well-known firm of Kirkaldy, by
direction of Mr. Tarbotton the Borough Engineer of Nottingham, in order
to ascertain the resistance to a gradually increased bending stress upon
Yorkshire flagging as compared with Caithness.
YORKSHIRE.
--------+-------+---------------------------+--------
| | Dimensions. |
| +-------+--------+----------+Ultimate
Test No.|Weight.|Length.|Breadth.|Thickness.|Stress.
--------+-------+-------+--------+----------+--------
K | lbs. |inches.| inches.| inches. | lb.
1918 | 184 | 36 | 24·07 | 2·46 | 4·744
1919 | 163 | 36 | 24·03 | 2·22 | 3·398
1920 | 107 | 36 | 23·90 | 1·50 | 1·459
+-------+-------+--------+----------+--------
Mean | 151 | 36 | 24·00 | 2·06 | 3·200
--------+-------+-------+--------+----------+--------
CAITHNESS.
--------+-------+---------------------------+--------
| | Dimensions. |
| +-------+--------+----------+Ultimate
Test No.|Weight.|Length.|Breadth.|Thickness.|Stress.
--------+-------+-------+--------+----------+--------
K | lb. |inches.| inches.| inches. | lb.
1921 | 215 | 36 | 24·06 | 2·59 | 17·274
1922 | 178 | 36 | 24·05 | 2·15 | 12·711
1923 | 114 | 36 | 23·90 | 1·38 | 6·211
+-------+-------+--------+----------+--------
Mean | 169 | 36 | 24·00 | 2·04 | 12·065
--------+-------+-------+--------+----------+--------
By which it appears that the balance in favour of Caithness flagging is
8·865 lbs.
The objection to this style of flagging is, that however varied the
sizes of the stones selected may be, as they have sawn edges and are
very hard to cut with a chisel, a difficulty sometimes arises in
finishing rounded corners of footpaths, and against uneven frontages of
shops or buildings abutting on the footpath; this is especially the case
in old towns.
_Blue Lias Flagging._--A blue lias flagging does not make a first-rate
pavement, as although it is very cheap, durable, clean, and has many
other good qualities, it sometimes wears slippery and is then dangerous
to pedestrians; but the Devonian limestone, which is much used in the
west of England, has not apparently this defect.
_Concrete Footpaths._--These have been tried in this country, but
generally without success; the concrete or cement cracks, and in
addition to this the paths wear slippery and greasy, and as some time is
necessary in order to allow the concrete to thoroughly set before the
traffic can be allowed on them, they have not found much favour.
In the United States, however, concrete footpaths seem to be made
successfully; the following detail particulars of such a foot-pavement
will, I think, be of great interest and use.[107]
“Concrete footpaths should be laid upon a form of well-compacted sand,
or fine gravel, or a mixture of sand, gravel and loam. The natural soil,
if sufficiently porous to provide thorough sub-drainage, will
answer.[108]
“It is not usual to attempt to guard entirely against the lifting
effects of frost, but to provide for it by laying the concrete in
squares or rectangles, each containing from 12 to 16 superficial feet,
which will yield to upheaval individually, like flagging stones, without
breaking and without producing extensive disturbance in the general
surface.
“When a case arises, however, where it is deemed necessary to prevent
any movement whatever, it can be done by underlying the pavement with a
bed of broken stone, or a mixture of broken stone and gravel, or with
ordinary pit gravel containing just enough of detritus and loam to bind
it together. In high latitudes this bed should be 1 foot and upwards in
thickness, and should be so thoroughly subdrained that it will always be
free from standing water. It is formed in the usual manner of making
broken stone or gravel roads already described, and finished off on top
with a layer of sand or fine gravel, about 1 inch in depth, for the
concrete to rest upon.
“The concrete should not be less than 3¹⁄₂, and need rarely exceed 4 to
4¹⁄₂ inches in thickness, the upper surface to the depth of ¹⁄₂ an inch
should be composed of hydraulic cement and sand only. Portland cement is
best for this top layer. For the rest, any natural American cement of
standard quality will answer. The following proportions are recommended
for this bottom layer.
Rosendale or other American cement 1 measure
Clean sharp sand 2¹⁄₂ „
Stone and gravel 5 „
“It is mixed from time to time as required for use, and is compacted
with an iron-shod rammer in a single layer to a thickness less by ¹⁄₂ an
inch than that of the required pavement. As soon as this is done and
before the cement has had time to set, the surface is roughened by
scratching, and the top layer, composed of,
1 volume of Portland cement, and
2 to 2¹⁄₂ volumes of clean fine sand,
is spread over it to a uniform thickness of about 1¹⁄₂ inch, and then
compacted by rather light blows, with an iron-shod rammer. By this means
its thickness is diminished to ¹⁄₂ an inch. It is then smoothed off and
polished with a mason’s trowel and covered up with hay, grass, sand, or
other suitable material to protect it from the rays of the sun, and
prevent its drying too rapidly.
“It should be kept damp and thus protected for at least 10 days, and
longer if circumstances will permit; and even after it is opened to
travel, a layer of damp sand should be kept upon it for two or three
weeks, to prevent wear while tender.
“At the end of one month from the date of laying, the Portland cement
mixture forming the top surface will have attained nearly one-half its
ultimate strength and hardness, and may then be subjected to use by
foot-passengers without injury.
“The rammers for compacting the concrete should weigh from 15 to 20 lb.,
those used on the surface layer from 10 to 12 lb. They are made by
attaching rectangular blocks of hard wood shod with iron to wood handles
about 3 feet long, and are plied in an upright position. Certain
precautions are necessary in mixing and ramming the materials in order
to secure the best results. Especial care should be taken to avoid the
use of too much water in the manipulation. The mass of concrete, when
ready for use, should appear quite incoherent, and not wet and plastic,
containing water however in such quantities that a thorough ramming with
repeated though not hard blows will produce a thin film of moisture upon
the surface under the rammer, without causing in the mass a gelatinous
or quicksand motion.”
Under the head of Concrete may be included many artificial stone
pavements, such as “Bucknell’s Granite Breccia” “Ransome’s Artificial
Stone,” “Eureka Concrete,” “Granolithic,” and the “Silicated Victoria
Stone,” this last being worth a description. The stone is really a
concrete, formed by mixing very superior Portland cement with crushed
Thames gravel, furnace or iron slag, Kentish rag-stone, granite
chippings, or other suitable material carefully washed. This fine
concrete, after being mixed in the moulds forming the slabs, is
thoroughly incorporated by being rocked or jiggled in a trembling
machine; this motion, as can be easily understood, making the whole mass
even and homogeneous when it sets. The cost of the slabs is about 9_d._
per square foot, 3 inches in thickness, and they make an excellent
footpath.
_Brick Footpaths._--These are sometimes constructed of ordinary bricks
laid on their sides, but soon wear, and are unsuitable for the
purpose.[109] Staffordshire blue paving bricks make an excellent
footpath. These are bricks made of stoneware highly vitrified; they
should be about 12 inches in length by 6 inches wide, by about 2⁷⁄₈
inches in thickness, their surface being chequered with a diamond
pattern so as to prevent their being slippery. They are exceedingly
hard and durable if well burnt, and to ascertain this a brick should be
broken across and the colour, etc., noted.
They should be laid in cement mortar upon a bed of concrete or sand. The
objections to this class of pavement are as follows:
(1.) The colour is objectionable; being very dark, the footpaths give a
street the appearance of mourning.
(2.) The difficulty of breaking up the path for gas or water services,
or for other purposes.
(3.) The hardness of the bricks makes them awkward to cut to rounded
corners, or for water trunks, coal-holes, etc.
(4.) A loaded hand-barrow driven over them will sometimes break off the
chequered pattern.
(5.) They are slippery in a frost after snow.
But notwithstanding these disadvantages, they make a most wonderfully
durable and useful pavement for back streets.
_Granite Slab Pavement._--This is sometimes adopted, large granite
slabs, 6 inches in thickness being laid; they are very useful when there
are cellars underneath, or where heavy vehicular traffic is intended to
cross the foot pavement. Granite is of course excessively durable, but
it wears very slippery with traffic and must then be tooled or axed; in
process of time this wears it out, and its first cost is heavy.
This description of pavement can be laid with advantage in front of
markets or similar buildings.
_Artificial Asphalte Pavements._--The cost of obtaining natural rock
asphalte from the mines, and the knowledge that it is composed of two
very simple ingredients, limestone and bitumen, has led to a great
number of artificial asphaltes being introduced, especially for foot
pavements. “British Rock Asphalte” is a name by which many of the
compositions are known; “Beauchamp’s Mendip Mountain Machine-made
Granite Asphalte” is a high-sounding title; “Prentice’s Mineral Foreign
Rock Asphalte” is another.
All these, and many more of the same description, are really what may be
better and more correctly described as “tar concrete” or “tar paving,”
and consist of different modifications of the homely coal-tar and
limestone.
So long ago as the year 1840, “Lord Stanhope’s Composition” was well
known; it was made as follows:
Three gallons of Stockholm tar, 2 bushels of well-dried chalk, 1 bushel
of fine, sharp, clean sifted sand, the whole being boiled in an iron
caldron.
Tar paving is now made in many and various ways by different surveyors
of towns, some making it with hot compositions, some with cold. A
description will be found in the chapter on Macadamised Roadways, page
46, of one method of making it, a modification of this being all that is
necessary for foot pavements.
The best paths of this description that I have seen are to be found at
Torquay, and by the kind permission of Mr. John Little, County Surveyor
of Devon, and late Surveyor of Torquay, I give his useful specification
in detail, as follows:
_Tar Concrete for Footpaths._
PROPORTIONS OF MATERIALS.
12 barrow loads of engine ashes.
4 „ „ screened slaked blue lias lime.
4 „ „ small spar or sharp grit.
34 gallons of best gas tar.
20 bucketsful, say 70 to 80 gallons of water.
_Method of Mixing._--On a clean flagged or wooden floor spread three
barrow-loads of ashes, then about one barrow-load of lime, and so on
until the whole of the dry materials (or one mixing) has been spread;
then throw over them about three bucketfuls of tar, and before mixing it
with them add (say) six bucketfuls of water; then mix as for concrete,
and when the liquids are pretty well absorbed add a similar quantity,
mix again, and so on until all the liquids have been absorbed; the mass
will then be something of the consistency of ordinary mortar. Next pass
the whole three times _at least_ through a pug mill: if this be not done
the concrete will be a failure. An ordinary hand pug-mill will not be
sufficient; the knives are not strong enough, nor will it incorporate
the materials thoroughly, but an upright pug-mill, worked by steam power
where practicable, or by at least one horse, should be used.
It will be found that as the mass emerges from the pug-mill a large
proportion of the water will run from it; means should therefore be
provided for allowing the water to escape freely from the floor.
_Method of Laying._--Prepare the path for a layer of concrete 3 inches
in thickness, on a hard dry bottom, inclining from the inside to the
kerb, at the rate of ¹⁄₂ an inch to a foot for pathways not more than 6
or 7 feet wide, but for wider pathways an inclination of ³⁄₈ of an inch
to a foot will be sufficient.
A template the full width of the path having been provided, lay concrete
with a shovel on the inner side of the path for a length of (say) 15
feet and a width of 1 foot, at such a height that when it has been well
rammed and patted with shovels it shall be the exact height intended for
the path; this is to form a resting-place for one end of the template,
the kerb forming that for the other end; then fill the intervening space
with concrete up to the template, treading and ramming it solidly for
about twenty minutes, and as it gets into shape, patting it with shovels
and smoothing with a trowel; then, with an iron (not stone) roller
weighing about 5 cwts., roll for two hours, trimming and filling up
hollows where necessary; then go on with another length, and
occasionally roll the first for half-an-hour, and so on. Experience
alone will decide the quantity of rolling necessary after the first day
or two, as weather and other causes tend to a more rapid solidification
of the concrete at some times than at others.
On the third day, sprinkle a small quantity of sea or other very fine
sand on the concrete, and allow it to remain for two or three days after
the path has been in use--it should then be removed.
_General Remarks._--The ashes should not be those from a saw-mill or
other place where wood ashes would be mixed with them. All ashes, spar
or grit, and lime, should be passed through a screen of ³⁄₈-inch mesh.
The lime should be the best blue lias, slaked under cover; it should be
allowed to lie for at least four days, but not more than six days,
before it is used. The spar or grit should be sharp and angular.
Great care should be taken to keep the concrete free from mud or dust;
it should be tipped from the carts or barrows, either directly into
place, or, if this cannot be done, a few slabs or boards should be laid
down, on which it may be tipped.
The path should not be used until the concrete is sufficiently solid to
bear a man’s weight without taking the impression of his boots.
It has been found by experience that the laying of this concrete should
not be commenced before May, and that it should not be continued beyond
the end of September (or middle of October, if the weather is very
fine). Frost is fatal to it before it has become hard, and continuous
cold wet weather retards considerably the hardening.
There can be no doubt that a pavement of this description for traffic
that is not too heavy answers every requirement; for streets of greater
traffic, genuine mastic asphalte should be used.
Before closing my remarks on artificial asphalte pavements, the
following description of an American method may be interesting:
On a dry foundation is placed a coat of rough clinkers from anthracite
coal or iron clinkers from a foundry, mixed with sand and tar in the
proportions of 15 cubic feet of fine sifted ashes, 14¹⁄₂ cubic feet of
pit sand, and 1¹⁄₂ cubic feet or 9 gallons of tar. This is laid about 3
to 4 inches thick and well rolled. Over this is placed a coating from 1
inch to 1¹⁄₂ inch thick, composed of 15 cubic feet of coarse sifted
ashes, 15 cubic feet of clinkers, and 1¹⁄₄ cubic feet or 8 gallons of
tar. It must be then well rolled and sanded, care having been taken that
the materials are thoroughly mixed.
_Gravel Footpaths._--For the suburbs of a town and in the country,
nothing looks so pretty as a gravel footpath.
The same rules that apply to a macadamised roadway apply to a gravel
footpath. They must be well “bottomed,” and well drained and well
rolled. Limestone or other stone chippings may with advantage be used
with a pit gravel for constructing paths of this description, and a
barrelled surface looks better and is more enduring than a hanging path.
The following cross sections of footpaths will explain themselves better
than any long description:
[Illustration]
Gravel footpaths are sometimes tarred over when thoroughly consolidated.
This must be done only when the weather is quite settled and fine: the
least rain will spoil the whole operation; it consists in simply tarring
over the surface of the footpath in the same manner that a gate or wall
or any other substance would be tarred. The surface of the path must
previously have been swept perfectly clean, and immediately as the
tarring is completed, fine stone dust must be sprinkled on its surface;
the traffic should be diverted from it for a few hours, and it is then
ready.
Care must be taken that the tar is not too thin in consistency, and that
the coat is not put on too thick. Treating a path in this manner saves
gravel, which is washed or kicked off it if left with an ordinary
surface; but a cold night, a slight shower, or inferior tar will make
the whole process abortive, and the path will be in a fearful mess in
the winter.
[101] Concrete is especially necessary as a foundation for asphalte,
as it has little or no power of resistance to vertical pressure in
itself, and indentations in its surface would be very unsightly as
well as hold water. The concrete should be perfectly dry and
thoroughly set before the asphalte is laid on it.