TWIN-TUNNEL LINING.

The masonry lining for the tunnels was not started until the late fall

of 1906, after excavation had been in progress for a year and a half. At

that time concreting was started in the single tunnels westward from the

First Avenue Shafts, and by spring was in full swing in the Twin

Tunnels.

The plans contemplated the use of a complete concrete lining except

where large quantities of water were encountered; in which case the

arches, beginning at a point 15° above the springing line, were to be

built of vitrified paving brick. By reference to Plate XII it will be

seen that the water-proofing, which in the concrete-roof tunnels

extended the full height of the sides to the 15° line, was carried in

the brick-roof tunnels completely around the extrados of the arch. The

cross-sections also show the location of the electric conduits which

were buried in the mass of the side and core-walls and which limited the

height to which the concrete could be carried in one operation.

The same general scheme of operations was used wherever possible

throughout the Twin-Tunnel work, but was subject to minor modifications

as circumstances dictated. Concrete was first deposited in the bottom,

to the grade of the flow line of the drains; after it had set,

collapsible box forms, of 2-in. plank with 3-in. plank tops, were laid

on it to form the ditch and the shoulders for the flagstone covers. The

track, which had previously been blocked up on the rock between the

ditches, was raised and supported on the ditch boxes above the finished

floor level. At the same time, light forms were braced from the ditch

boxes to the grade of the base of the low-tension and telephone-duct

bank. After depositing the concrete to this level, the telephone ducts

were laid.

The forms for the water-proofing or sand-wall up to the 15° line and for

the main side-walls and core-walls were built in 30-ft. panels and were

supported on carriages, which, traveling on a broad-gauge track above

the ditches, moved along the tunnel, section by section, as the work

advanced. The panels were hung loosely from joists carrying a platform

on the top chord of the carriage trusses, and were adjusted

transversely by bracing and wedging them out from the carriage. The

small forms for the refuge niches, ladders, etc., were collapsible, and

were spiked to the main panel forms just previous to the deposition of

the concrete. The concrete was deposited from the platform on top of the

carriage, to which the cars were elevated in various ways. Plate LXI

shows the details of the carriages, and is self-explanatory.

The concrete for the sand-walls and the core-wall, to the level of the

sidewalk, was deposited at the same time; two carriages in each tunnel,

placed opposite each other, forming a 60-ft. length, were used at each

setting. The floor section of the 4-in. tile drains had been laid with

the floor concrete, and, as the sand-wall concrete was deposited, the

drains were brought up simultaneously, broken stone being deposited

between the tile and the rock to form a blind drain and afford access to

the open joints of the tile for the water entering the tunnel through

seams in the rock. The drains were spaced at intervals not exceeding 25

ft., depending on the wetness of the rock, and were placed at similar

intervals in the core-wall under the lowest projecting points of the

rock on the center line between the tunnels. A small ditch lined with

loose 6-in. vitrified half pipe was provided in the top of the sand-wall

to collect the water from the extrados of the arch and lead it to the

top of the drains. Great difficulty was experienced in maintaining these

drains clear, and, on completion of the work, a large amount of labor

was expended in removing obstructions from the floor sections, the only

portion then accessible.

After water-proofing the sand-walls and laying the low-tension ducts, a

second pair of carriages, with panels on one side only, for 60 ft. of

side-wall and skewback to the 15° line, were set and braced against the

core-wall. These forms are shown in connection with the carriage on

Plate LXI. They were concreted to the base of the high-tension duct

bank, and, after the concrete had hardened and the bank of ducts had

been laid, the concreting was completed in a second operation.

In places where the roof was supported temporarily by posts and heavy

timbering, such as at Fifth Avenue, the form carriages could not be

used, and special methods were devised to suit the local conditions.

Usually, the panels were stripped from the carriages and moved from

section to section by hand, and, when in position, were braced to the

timbering.

The arch centers were built up of two 5 by 3 by 3/8-in. steel angles,

and, when set, were blocked up on the sidewalks opposite each other in

the two tunnels. A temporary platform was laid on the bottom chord

angles of the ribs, on which the concrete was dumped, the same as on the

form carriages. The lagging used was 3 by 3-in. dressed pine or spruce

16 ft. long, and was placed as the concreting of the arch proceeded

above the 15° line on the side-wall and above the sidewalk on the

core-wall. After the arch had reached such a height that the concrete

could not be passed over the lagging directly from the main platform, it

was cast on a small platform on the upper horizontal bracing of the

centers, shown in Fig. 3, Plate LIX, and was thence shoveled into the

work. In the upper part of the arch the face of the concrete was kept on

a radial plane, and, when only 3 ft. remained to be placed, it was keyed

in from one end, the key lagging being set in about 5-ft. lengths. The

arches were concreted usually in 60-ft. lengths.

Where brick arches were used, the core-wall skewback was concreted

behind special forms set up on the sidewalks, or the arch ribs and

lagging were used for forms, and the brick arch was not started until

after the concrete had set. In laying the brick in the arch, the five

courses of the ring were carried up as high as the void between the

extrados and the rock would permit and still leave a working space in

which to place the water-proofing. This was usually not more than 3 ft.,

except on the core-wall side. The felt and pitch water-proofing was then

laid for that height, joined to the previous water-proofing on the

side-walls, and was followed by the brick armor course over the

water-proofing and by the rock packing, after which another lift of

brick was laid and the operations were repeated. The large void (Fig. 1,

Plate LXII) above the core-wall gave convenient access for working on

top of the adjacent sides of the roof, and the keying of the arches and

the water-proofing and rock packing above the core-wall were usually

carried on from that point, the work progressing from one end.

The concrete for all work above the floor was dumped on the platform of

the carriages, to which it was transported in the early part of the work

in cars running on a high-level track laid on long ties, resting on the

finished sidewalks. This arrangement, although requiring a large amount

of timber for the track, permitted the muck to be carried out on the

low-level track without interference. Later, when the advance of the

heading had ceased and the heavy mucking was over, all concrete was

transported on the floor level, and the cars were lifted to the carriage

platforms by elevators and were hauled by hoisting engines up a movable

incline. The latter method is shown by Fig. 3, Plate LIX.

_Water-Proofing._--The water-proofing referred to above was in all cases

felt and pitch laid with six thicknesses of felt and seven of pitch. The

sub-contractor for the work was the Sicilian Asphalt Paving Company. All

joints were lapped at least 1 ft., and, where work was suspended for a

time and a bevel lap could not be made, the edges of the felt were left

unpitched for 1 ft. and the newer work was interlaced with the old. This

method was not always successful, however, on account of the softening

of the unpitched felt on long-continued exposure to the water. The felt

used was mainly "Tunaloid," together with some "Hydrex." It weighed

about 12 lb. per 100 sq. ft. when saturated and coated on one side only,

and contained about 25% of wool. The coal-tar pitch used had a melting

point of 100° Fahr.

After the completion of the tunnel, the concrete arch showed some

leakage and in places unsightly lime deposits. It was determined to

attempt to stop these leaks by the application of a water-proof cement

coating on the intrados of the arch. Extended experimental application

of two varieties of materials used for this purpose--"Hydrolithic"

cement and the U. S. Water-proofing Company's compound--have been made

with apparent success up to the present time, and the results after the

lapse of a considerable period are awaited with interest.

_Duct Laying._--The position of the electric conduits, buried in the

heart of the concrete walls, interfered greatly with the economical and

speedy placing of the lining, and their laying proved to be one of the

most troublesome features of the work. The power conduits were

single-way, with the bank for high-tension cables separated in the

side-walls from the low-tension bank, as shown on Plate XII. The

conduits for telephone and telegraph service were four-way, and were

located in the core-wall. All ducts had 3/4-in. walls and a minimum

clear opening of 3-3/8 in. square, with corners rounded. They were laid

with joints broken in all directions, and in about 1/4-in. beds of

1:2-1/2 mortar. Flat steel bond-irons, 2 by 1/8 in., with split and bent

ends, were placed in the joints at intervals of 3 ft. and projected into

the concrete 3 in. on each side, tying together the concrete on opposite

sides of the ducts. The joints were wrapped with a 6-in. strip of

10-oz. duck saturated with neat-cement grout, and, in addition, the

power conduits were completely covered with a 1/2-in. coat of mortar to

prevent the intrusion of cement and sand from the fluid concrete. The

four-way conduits were plastered only over the wraps. Splicing chambers

were provided at intervals of 400 ft.

[Illustration: PLATE LXII, FIG. 1.--WATER-PROOFING OVER BRICK

ARCHES.]

[Illustration: PLATE LXII, FIG. 2.--TRESTLE USED IN CONCRETING IN

THREE-TRACK TUNNEL.]

[Illustration: PLATE LXII, FIG. 3.--METHOD OF STREET SUPPORT OVER

OPEN-CUT EXCAVATION.]

[Illustration: PLATE LXII, FIG. 4.--JUNCTION OF TWIN AND THREE-TRACK

TUNNELS.]

Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910 The New York Tunnel Extension of the Pennsylvania Railroad. The Cross-Town Tunnels. Paper No. 1158 · 第 14 / 16 题