XVIII

If the division of the home, and the inevitable consequences that

followed on that division, had done nothing more than teach some of us

to value our health and respect our brains we should have very good

cause to bless the break-up of that over-estimated institution. But,

as a matter of fact, our contact with the wider world is doing a great

deal more for us than that. It is testing our powers in new directions;

it is bringing new interests into our lives; it is teaching us how very

like we are unto our brothers—given similar environment; and, most

important of all, it is sweeping away with a steady hand that distrust

and ignorance of each other which was alike the curse and the natural

result of age-long isolation in the home and immemorial training in the

service, not of each other, but only of our masters.

It may be true that women in general once disliked and meanly despised

each other. At any rate, man has always desired that it should be

true; so, the aim and object of woman’s life being the gratification of

his desires, such mutual dislike and contempt was no doubt cultivated

and affected by her. But if it was true once, it is not true now;

except, maybe, amongst the silly angel class—a class already growing

rarer, and soon, one hopes, to be well on the way to extinction. The

working-woman, the woman with wider interests than her mother’s, in

learning to respect herself is learning to respect her counterpart—the

human being, like unto herself, who, under the same disadvantages,

fights the same battle as her own. And recognizing the heaviness, the

unfairness of those disadvantages, she recognizes the bond of common

interest that unites her to her sister. In short, for the first time in

her history she is becoming actively class-conscious.

We speak best of that which we have seen with our own eyes and heard

with our own ears; therefore I make no excuse for obtruding my personal

experiences in this connection. For many years the women who came

into my life intimately and closely were, with few exceptions, women

who had to work—journalists, artists, typists, dressmakers, clerks;

practically all of them dependent on their own work and practically all

of them poor—some bitterly poor. And that class, because I know it so

well, I have learned to respect. It is a class which has few pleasures

in life, because it has so little money to spend on them; which, as a

rule, works harder than a man would work in the same position, because

its pay is less; which is not unexposed to temptation, but holds

temptation as a thing to be resisted; yet which is tolerant to those

who fail under it, knowing the excuse to be made for them. The woman

belonging to that class does not turn away from the sinner who walks

the street with a painted face; likely enough she remembers that she,

too, was brought up to believe that the awakening of sexual desire must

be her means of livelihood, and she knows that, if she had not cast

that belief behind her, she, too, when need pressed upon her, might

have walked the streets for hire. Wherefore she is more inclined to say

to herself, “But for the grace of God, there go I.” She has learned to

know men as the sheltered woman seldom knows them; to know more of

the good in them, more of the ill; she has met and talked with them

without compliment and without ceremony; has taken orders from and been

rebuked by them; has been to them fellow-worker and sometimes friend;

has sometimes met and fought the brute in them. In the same way she

has worked with women and learned to know them; and the result of her

experience is, that she has lost any natural distrust of her own sex

which she may once have possessed; has come to rely upon her own sex

for the help which she herself is willing enough to render. The sense

of a common interest, the realization of common disabilities, have

forced her into class-consciousness and partisanship of her class.

I know many women of the type I have described—women who have gone

through the mill, some married, some unmarried. And of them all I know

hardly one whose life is not affected, to an appreciable extent, by the

sense of fellowship with her sisters.

The average man, it seems to me, fails utterly to realize how strong

this sense of fellowship, of trade unionism, can be in us; he has (as

I have already pointed out) explained away its manifestations in the

match-making industry by accounting for them on other grounds. He has

forgotten that it was a woman who, for the sake, not of a man, but of

another woman, went out into a strange land, saying: “Whither thou

goest I will go; thy people shall be my people and thy God my God.” To

him, one imagines, that saying must always have been a dark one; to us

there seems nothing strange in it.

A friend of my own (who will forgive me for repeating her confidence)

told me the other day of a happening in her life that, to my mind,

exactly illustrates the awakening of class-consciousness amongst women.

It was the careless speech of a man, addressed to her while she was

still a very young girl, to the effect that all women over fifty should

be shot. The words were lightly spoken, of course, and were probably

intended half as a compliment to her manifest youth; certainly they

were not intended as an insult. But their effect was to rouse in her

a sense of insult and something akin to a passion of resentment that

she and her like should only be supposed to exist so long as they were

pleasing, only so long as they possessed the power of awakening sexual

desire. She took them as an insult to herself because they were an

insult to women in general; and, lightly spoken as they were they made

upon her an impression which helped to mould her life.

I give my friend’s experience because it seems to me to be typical;

because amongst women of my own class I know others who have felt the

same rush of anger at the revelation of a similar attitude towards the

sex they belong to; who have raged inwardly as they recognized that

character, worth, intellect were held valueless in woman, that nothing

counted in her but the one capacity—the power of awaking desire. That

is an attitude which we who have become conscious of our class resent

with all our souls; since we realize that to that attitude on the

part of man, to compliance with it on the part of woman, we owe the

degradation of our class.

Most important of all, the knowledge of each other and the custom and

necessity of working side by side in numbers is bringing with it the

consciousness of a new power—the power of organization. It is a power

that we have hitherto lacked, not because we were born without the

seed of it in our souls, but because our fenced-in, isolated lives

have given small opportunity for its growth and development. And it

is a power which we are now acquiring because we have been forced to

recognize the need of it, because we can no longer do without it. It

is being borne in on us that if we are to have fair play, if our wages

are to rise above subsistence point, if we are to be anything more

than hewers of wood, drawers of water, and unthinking reproducers of

our kind, we have to stand together; that if we are to have any share

of our own in the world into which we were born, if our part in it is

to be anything more than that of the beggar with outstretched hand

awaiting the crumbs that fall from another’s table, we have to work

together. And it is work in the mill, the factory, the office that is

teaching us the lesson of public spirit, of combination for a common

purpose—a lesson that was never taught us in the home where we once

lived narrowly apart.

Marriage as a Trade · 第 27 / 31 题