Now, Xerxes had sent to many of the Greek states heralds to demand earth

and water, which many had given; but to Athens and Sparta he had not

sent, because there the heralds of his father Darius had been evilly

entreated. And if it had not been for the resolution of the Athenians at

this time, all Hellas would have been forced to submit to the Great

King; for they, in despite of threatening oracles, held fast to their

defiance, being urged thereto by Themistocles, who showed them how those

oracles must mean that, although they would suffer evil things, they

would be victorious by means of wooden bulwarks, which is to say, ships;

and thus they were encouraged to rely upon building and manning a mighty

fleet. And all the other cities of Greece resolved to stand by them,

except the Argives, who would not submit to the leadership of the

Spartans. And in like manner Gelon, the despot of Syracuse in Sicily,

would not send aid unless he were accepted as leader. Nor were the men

of Thessaly willing to join, since the other Greeks could not help them

to guard Thessaly itself, as the pass of Tempe could be turned.

Therefore the Greeks resolved to make their stand at Thermopylæ on land,

and at the strait of Artemisium by sea. But at the strong pass of

Thermopylæ only a small force was gathered to hold the barbarians in

check, there being of the Spartans themselves only 300, commanded by the

king Leonidas. And when the Persians had come thither and sought to

storm the pass, they were beaten back with ease, until a track was found

by which they might take the defenders in the rear. Then Leonidas bade

the rest of the army depart except his Spartans. But the Thespians also

would not go; and then those Spartans and Thespians went out into the

open and died gloriously.

_V.--Destruction of the Persian Hosts_

During these same days the Greek fleet at Artemisium fought three

several engagements with the Persian fleet, in which neither side had

much the better. And thereafter the Greek fleet withdrew, but was

persuaded to remain undispersed in the bay of Salamis. The

Peloponnesians were no longer minded to attempt the defence of Attica,

but to fortify their isthmus, so that the Athenians had no choice but

either to submit or to evacuate Athens, removing their families and

their goods to Troezen or Aegina or Salamis. In the fleet, their

contingent was by far the largest and best, but the commanding admiral

was the Spartan Eurybiades. Then the Persians, passing through Boeotia,

but, being dispersed before Delphi by thunderbolts and other portents,

took possession of Athens, after a fierce fight with the garrison in the

Acropolis.

Then the rest of the Greek fleet was fain to withdraw from Salamis, and

look to the safety of the Peloponnese only. But Themistocles warned them

that if they did so, the Athenians would leave them and sail to new

lands and make themselves a new Athens; and thus the fleet was persuaded

to hold together at Salamis. Yet he did not trust only to their

goodwill, but sent a messenger to the Persian fleet that the way of

retreat might be intercepted. For the Persian fleet had gathered at

Phalerum, and now looked to overwhelm the Grecian fleet altogether,

despite the council of Queen Artemisia of Halicarnassus, who would have

had them not fight by sea at all. When Aristides, called the Just, the

great rival of Themistocles, came to the Greeks with the news that their

retreat by sea was cut off, then they were no longer divided, but

resolved to fight it out.

In the battle, the Aeginetans and the Athenians did the best of all the

Greeks, and Themistocles best among the commanders; nor was ever any

fleet more utterly put to rout than that of the Persians, among whom

Queen Artemisia won praise unmerited. As for King Xerxes, panic seized

him when he saw the disaster to his fleet, and he made haste to flee. He

consented, however, to leave Mardonius behind with 300,000 troops in

Thessaly, he being still assured that he could crush the Greeks. And it

was well for him that Themistocles was over-ruled in his desire to

pursue and annihilate the fleet, then sail to the Hellespont and destroy

the bridge.

When the winter and spring were passed, Mardonius marched from Thessaly

and again occupied Athens, which the Athenians had again evacuated, the

Spartans having failed to send succour. But when at length the

Lacedæmonians, fearing to lose the Athenian fleet, sent forth an army,

the Persians fell back to Boeotia. So the Greek hosts gathered near

Platæa to the number of 108,000 men, but the troops of Mardonius were

about 350,000. Yet, by reason of doubtful auguries, both armies held

back, till Mardonius resolved to attack, whereof warning was brought to

the Athenians by Alexander of Macedon. But when the Spartan Pausanias,

the general of the Greeks, heard of this, he did what caused no little

wonder, for he proposed that the Athenians instead of the Lacedæmonians

should face the picked troops of the Persians, as having fought them at

Marathon. But Mardonius, seeing them move, moved his picked troops also.

Then Mardonius sent some light horse against the Greeks by a fountain

whence flowed the water for the army; which, becoming choked, it was

needful to move to a new position. But the move being made by night,

most of the allies withdrew into the town. But the Spartans, and Tegeans

and Athenians, perceiving this, held each their ground till dawn.

Now, in the morning the picked Persian troops fell on the Spartans, and

their Grecian allies attacked the Athenians. But, Mardonius being slain,

the Persians fled to their camp, which was stormed by the Spartans and

Tegeans, and the Athenians, who also had routed their foes; and there

the barbarians were slaughtered, so that of 300,000 men not 3,000 were

left alive. But Artabazus, who, before the battle, had withdrawn with

40,000 men, escaped by forced marches to the Hellespont.

And on that same day was fought another fight by sea at Mycale in Ionia,

where also the barbarians were utterly routed, for the fleet had sailed

thither. And thence the Greeks sailed to Sestos, captured the place, and

so went home.

* * * * *

THUCYDIDES

The Peloponnesian War

The Athenian historian, Thucydides, was born about 471 B.C.,

within ten years of the great repulse of the Persian invasion.

Before he was thirty, the great political ascendancy of

Pericles was completely established at Athens, and the

ascendancy of Athens among the Greek states was unchallenged,

except by Sparta. He was forty at the beginning of the

Peloponnesian War. Thucydides was appointed to a military

command seven years later, but his failure in that office

caused his banishment. From that time he remained an exiled

spectator of events; the date of his death is uncertain. His

great work is the history of the Peloponnesian War to its

twentieth year, where his history is abruptly broken off. To

Herodotus, history presented itself as a drama; Thucydides

views it with the eyes of a philosophical statesman, but

writes it also with extraordinary descriptive power, not only

in pregnant sentences which have never been effectively

rendered in translation, but in passages of sustained

intensity, of which it would be vain to reproduce fragments.

The abridged translation given here has been made direct from

the Greek.

_I.--The Beginning of the War_

I have written the account of the war between Athens and Sparta, since

it is the greatest and the most calamitous of all wars hitherto to the

Greeks. For the contest with the Medes was decided in four battles; but

this war was protracted over many years, and wrought infinite injury and

bloodshed.

Of the immediate causes of the war the first is to be found in the

affairs of Epidamnus, Corcyra, and Corinth, of which Corcyra was a

colony. Of the Greek states, the most were joined either to the Athenian

or the Peloponnesian league, but Corcyra had joined neither. But having

a quarrel with Corinth about Epidamnus, she now formed an alliance with

Athens, whose intervention enraged the Corinthians.

They then helped Potidæa, a Corinthian colony, but an Athenian

tributary, to revolt from Athens. Corinth next appealed to Sparta, as

the head of Hellas, to intervene ere it should be too late and check the

Athenian aggression, which threatened to make her the tyrant of all

Greece. At Sparta the war party prevailed, although King Archidamus

urged that sufficient pressure could be brought to bear without actual

hostilities.

The great prosperity and development of Athens since the Persian war had

filled other states with fear and jealousy. She had rebuilt her city

walls and refortified the port of Piræus after the Persian occupation;

Sparta had virtually allowed her to take the lead in the subsequent

stages of the war, as having the most effective naval force at command.

Hence she had founded the Delian league of the maritime states, to hold

the seas against Persia. At first these states provided fixed

contingents of ships and mariners; but Athens was willing enough to

accept treasure in substitution, so that she might herself supply the

ships and men.

Thus the provision of forces by each state to act against Persia was

changed in effect into a tribute for the expansion of the Athenian

fleet. The continuous development of the power of Athens had been

checked only momentarily by her disastrous Egyptian expedition. Her

nominal allies found themselves actually her tributary dependencies, and

various attempts to break free from her yoke had made it only more

secure and more burdensome.

Hence the warlike decision of Sparta was welcomed by others besides

Corinth. But diplomatic demands preceded hostilities. Sparta and Athens

sent to each other summons and counter-summons for the "expulsion of the

curse," that is of all persons connected with certain families which lay

under the curse of the gods.

In the case of Athens, this amounted to requiring the banishment of her

greatest citizen and statesman, Pericles. To this the Spartans added the

demand that the Athenians should "restore the freedom of Hellas," and

should specifically remove certain trading disabilities imposed on the

people of Megara.

At this crisis Pericles laid down the rules of policy on which Athens

ought to act--rules which required her to decline absolutely to submit

to any form of dictation from Sparta. When a principle was at stake, it

made no difference whether the occasion was trivial or serious. Athens

could face war with confidence. Her available wealth was far greater--a

matter of vital importance in a prolonged struggle. Her counsels were

not divided by the conflicting interests of allies all claiming to

direct military movements and policy. Her fleet gave her command of the

sea, and enabled her to strike when and where she chose. If

Peloponnesian invaders ravaged Attica, still no permanent injury would

be done comparable to that which the Athenians could inflict upon them.

The one necessity was to concentrate on the war, and attempt no

extension of dominion while it was in progress.

War was not yet formally declared when the Thebans attempted to seize

Platæa, a town of Boeotia, which had long been closely allied to Athens.

The attempt failed, and the Thebans were put to death; but the Platæans

appealed to Athens for protection against their powerful neighbour, and

when the Athenian garrison was sent to them, this was treated as a

_casus belli_.

Preparations were urged on both sides; Sparta summoned her allies to

muster their contingents on the Isthmus for the invasion of Attica,

nearly all the mainland states joining the Peloponnesian league. The

islanders and the cities in Asia Minor, on the other hand, were nearly

all either actually subject to Athens or in alliance with her.

As Pericles advised, the Athenians left the country open to the ravages

of the invading forces, and themselves retired within the city. In spite

of the resentment of those who saw their property being laid waste,

Pericles maintained his ascendency, and persuaded the people to devote

their energies to sending out an irresistible fleet, and to establishing

a great reserve both of ships and treasure, which were to be an annual

charge and brought into active use only in the case of dire emergency.

The fleet sailed round the Peloponnese, and the ravages it was able to

inflict, with the alarm it created, caused the withdrawal of the forces

in Attica.

In that winter Pericles delivered a great funeral oration, or panegyric,

in memory of the Athenians who had so far fallen gloriously in defence

of their country, in which he painted the characteristic virtues of the

Athenian people in such a fashion as to rouse to the highest pitch the

patriotic pride of his countrymen, and their confidence in themselves,

in their future, and in their leader.

_II.--Early Successes of Athens_

In the second year of the war, Athens suffered from a fearful visitation

of the plague, which, however, made no way in the Peloponnese. It broke

out also among the reinforcements dispatched to Potidæa; and it required

all the skill of Pericles to reconcile the Athenians to the continuation

of the war, after seeing their territories overrun for the second time

for six weeks. By dint of dwelling on the supreme importance of their

decisive command of the sea, and on the vast financial resources which

secured their staying power, he maintained his ascendency until his

death in the following year, though he had to submit to a fine. The

events which followed his death only confirmed the profundity of his

political judgment, and the accuracy with which he had gauged the

capacities of the state. In that winter Potidæa was forced to capitulate

to the Athenians.

In the summer of the third year, the Lacedæmonians called on the

Platæans to desert the Athenian alliance. On their refusal, Platæa was

besieged by the allied forces of the Peloponnesians. With splendid

resolution, the Platæans defeated the attempt of the allies to force an

entry till they were able to complete and withdraw behind a second and

more easily tenable line of defence, when the Peloponnesians settled

down to a regular investment. The same year was marked by the brilliant

operations of the Athenian admiral Phormio in the neighbourhood of

Naupactus.

On the other hand, a Peloponnesian squadron threatened the Piræus,

caused some temporary panic, and awakened the Athenians to the necessity

of maintaining a look-out, but otherwise effected little. The year is

further noted for the invasion of Macedonia by the Thracian or Scythian

king Sitalces, who was, however, induced to retire.

In the next year, Lesbos revolted against the Athenian supremacy. As a

result, an Athenian squadron blockaded Mitylene. The Lacedaæonians were

well pleased to accept alliance with a sea-power which claimed to have

struck against Athens, not as being subject to her, but in anticipation

of attempted subjugation. The prompt equipment, however, of another

Athenian fleet chilled the naval enthusiasm of Sparta.

During this winter the Platæans began to feel in straits from shortage

of supplies, and it was resolved that a party of them should break

through the siege lines, and escape to Athens, a feat of arms which was

brilliantly and successfully accomplished.

In the next--the fifth--summer, Mitylene capitulated; the fate of the

inhabitants was to be referred to Athens. Here Cleon had now become the

popular leader, and he persuaded the Athenians to order the whole of the

adult males to be put to death. The opposition, however, succeeded in

getting this bloodthirsty resolution rescinded. The second dispatch,

racing desperately after the first, did not succeed in overtaking it,

but was just in time to prevent the order for the massacre from being

carried out. Lesbos was divided among Athenian citizens, who left the

Lesbians in occupation as before, but drew a large rental from them.

In the same summer the remaining garrison of Platæa surrendered to the

Lacedæmonians, on terms to be decided by Lacedæmonian commissioners.

Before them the Platæans justified their resistance, but the

commissioners ignored the defence, and, on the pretext that the only

question was whether they had suffered any "wrong" at the hands of the

Platæans, and that the answer to that was obvious, put the Platæans to

death and razed the city to the ground.

Meanwhile, at Corcyra, the popular and the oligarchical parties, who

favoured the Athenians and Peloponnesians respectively, had reached the

stage of murderous hostility to each other. The oligarchs captured the

government, and were then in turn attacked by the popular party; and

there was savage faction fighting. An attempt was made by the commander

of the Athenian squadron at Naupactus to act as moderator; the

appearance of a Peloponnesian squadron and a confused sea-fight,

somewhat in favour of the latter, brought the popular party to the verge

of a compromise. But the Peloponnesians retired on the reported approach

of a fresh Athenian fleet, and a democratic reign of terror followed.

"The father slew the son, and the supplicants were torn from the temples

and slain near them." And thus was initiated the peculiar horror of this

war--the desperate civil strife in one city after another, oligarchs

hoping to triumph by Lacedæmonian and democrats by Athenian, support,

and either party, when uppermost, ruling by terror. It was at this time

also that the Ionian and Dorian cities of Sicily, headed by Leontini and

Syracuse respectively, went to war with each other, and an Athenian

squadron was first induced to participate in the struggle.

Among the operations of the next, or sixth, summer was a campaign which

the Athenian commander Demosthenes conducted in Ætolia--successful at

the outset, but terminating in disaster, which made the general afraid

to return to Athens. He seized a chance, however, of recovering his

credit by foiling a Lacedæmonian expedition against Naupactus; and in

other ways he successfully established a high military reputation, so

that he was no longer afraid to reappear at Athens.

Next year, the Athenians dispatched a larger fleet with Sicily for its

objective. Demosthenes, however, who had a project of his own in view,

was given an independent command. He was thus enabled to seize and

fortify Pylos, a position on the south-west of Peloponnese, with a

harbour sheltered by the isle of Sphacteria. The Spartans, in alarm,

withdrew their invading force from Attica, and attempted to recover

Pylos, landing over 400 of their best men on Sphacteria. The locality

now became the scene of a desperate struggle, which finally resulted in

the Spartans on Sphacteria being completely isolated.

So seriously did the Lacedæmonians regard this blow that they invited

the Athenians to make peace virtually in terms of an equal alliance; but

the Athenians were now so confident of a triumphant issue that they

refused the terms--chiefly at the instigation of Cleon. Some supplies,

however, were got into Sphacteria, owing to the high rewards offered by

the Lacedæmonians for successful blockade-running. At this moment,

Cleon, the Athenian demagogue, having rashly declared that he could

easily capture Sphacteria, was taken at his word and sent to do it. He

had the wit, however, to choose Demosthenes for his colleague, and to

take precisely the kind of troops Demosthenes wanted; with the result

that within twenty days, as he had promised, the Spartans found

themselves with no other alternatives than annihilation or surrender.

Their choice of the latter was an overwhelming blow to Lacedæmonian

prestige.

_III.--Victories of Lacedæmon_

The capture of the island of Cythera in the next summer gave the

Athenians a second strong station from which they could constantly

menace the Peloponnese. On the other hand, in this year the Sicilians

were awakening to the fact that Athens was not playing a disinterested

part on behalf of the Ionian states, but was dreaming of a Sicilian

empire. At a sort of peace congress, Hermocrates of Syracuse

successfully urged all Sicilians to compose their quarrels on the basis

of _uti possidetis,_ and thus deprive the Athenians of any excuse for

remaining. Thus for the time Athenian aspirations in that quarter were

checked.

At Megara this year the dissensions of the oligarchical and popular

factions almost resulted in its capture by the Athenians. The

Lacedæmonian Brasidas, however--who had distinguished himself at

Pylos--effected an entry, so that the oligarchical and Peloponnesian

party became permanently established in power. The most important

operations were now in two fields. Brasidas made a dash through Thessaly

into Macedonia, in alliance with Perdiccas of Macedon, with the hope of

stirring the cities of Chalcidice to throw off the Athenian yoke; and

the democrats of Boeotia intrigued with Athens to assist in a general

revolution. Owing partly to misunderstandings and partly to treachery,

the Boeotian democrats failed to carry out their programme, the

Athenians were defeated at Delium, and Delium itself was captured by the

Boeotians.

Meanwhile, Brasidas succeeded in persuading Acanthus to revolt, he

himself winning the highest of reputations for justice and moderation as

well as for military skill. Later in the year he suddenly turned his

forces against the Athenian colony of Amphipolis, which he induced to

surrender by offering very favourable terms before Thucydides, who was

in command of Thasos, arrived to relieve it. The further successes of

Brasidas during this winter made the Athenians ready to treat for peace,

and a truce was agreed upon for twelve months. Brasidas, however,

continued to render aid to the subject cities which revolted from

Athens--this being now the ninth year of the war--but he failed in an

attempt to capture Potidæa.

The period of truce terminating without any definite peace being arrived

at, the summer of the tenth year is chiefly notable for the expedition

sent under Cleon to recover Amphipolis, and for a recrudescence of the

old quarrel in Sicily between Leontini and Syracuse. Before Amphipolis,

the incompetent Cleon was routed by the skill of Brasidas; but the

victor as well as the vanquished was slain, though he lived long enough

to know of the victory. Their deaths removed two of the most zealous

opponents of the peace for which both sides were now anxious. Hence at

the close of the tenth year a definite peace was concluded.

The Lacedæmonians, however, were almost alone in being fully satisfied

by the terms, and the war was really continued by an anti-Laconian

confederation of the former Peloponnesian allies, who saw in the peace a

means to the excessive preponderance of Athens and Sparta. Argos was

brought into the new confederacy in the hope of establishing her nominal

equality with Sparta. For some years from this point the combinations of

the states were constantly changing, while Athens and Sparta remained

generally on terms of friendliness, the two prominent figures at Athens

being the conservative Nicias and the restless and ambitious young

intriguer Alcibiades.

In the fourteenth year there were active hostilities between Argos, with

which by this time Athens was in alliance, and Lacedæmon, issuing in

the great battle of Mantinea, where there was an Athenian contingent

with the Argives. This was notable especially as completely restoring

the prestige of the Lacedæmonian arms, their victory being decisive. The

result was a new treaty between Sparta and Argos, and the dissolution of

the Argive-Athenian alliance; but this was once more reversed in the

following year, when the Argive oligarchy was attacked successfully by

the popular party.

The next year is marked by the high-handed treatment of the island of

Melos by the Athenians. This was one of the very few islands which had

not been compelled to submit to Athens, but had endeavoured to remain

neutral. Thither the Athenians now sent an expedition, absolutely

without excuse, to compel their submission.

The Melians, however, refused, and gave the Athenians a good deal of

trouble before they could be subdued, when the adult male population was

put to death, and the women and children enslaved. At this time the

Athenians resolved, under colour of an appeal for assistance from the

Sicilian city of Egesta, deliberately to set about the establishment of

their empire in Sicily. The aggressive policy was vehemently advocated

by Alcibiades, and opposed by Nicias. Nevertheless, he, with Alcibiades

and Lamachus, was appointed to command the expedition, which was

prepared on a scale of unparalleled magnificence. It was on the point of

starting, when the whole city was stirred to frenzy by the midnight

mutilation of the sacred images called Hermæ, an act laid at the door of

Alcibiades, along with many other charges of profane outrages. Of set

purpose, however, the enemies of Alcibiades refused to bring him to

trial. The expedition sailed. The Syracusans were deaf to the warnings

of Hermocrates until the great fleet had actually arrived at Rhegium.

The World's Greatest Books — Volume 11 — Ancient and Mediæval History · 第 7 / 25 段