The Jew, making money as he knew how to do by trade and industry, was a

valuable source of revenue, and was tolerated only as such, but he was a

valuable possession. Chivalry, the parent of so much good and evil, was

a source of unmitigated wretchedness to the Jew--for religious

fanaticism and chivalry were inseparable, the knight of the Middle Ages

being bound with his good sword to extirpate all the enemies of Christ

and His Virgin Mother. The power of the clergy tended greatly to

increase this general detestation against the unhappy Jew. And when

undisciplined fanatics of the lowest order, under the guidance of Peter

the Hermit and Walter the Penniless, were fired with the spirit of the

Crusades, fearful massacres of Jews were perpetrated in Treves, Metz,

Spiers, Worms, and Cologne. Everywhere the tracks of the Crusaders were

deeply marked with Jewish blood.

Half a century after the shocking massacres of Jews during the First

Crusade, another storm gathered, as the monk Rodolph passed through

Germany preaching the duty of wreaking vengeance on all the enemies of

God. The terrible cry of "Hep!"--the signal for the massacre of

Isrælites--ran through the cities of the Rhine. Countless atrocities

took place as the Crusaders passed on, as the Jews record with triumph,

to perish by plague, famine, and the sword.

_V.--The Jews in England_

In the Dark Ages England was not advanced beyond the other nations of

Europe in the civil or religious wisdom of toleration. There were Jews

in England under the Saxons. And during the days of the Norman kings

they were established in Oxford and in London. They taught Hebrew to

Christian as well as to Jewish students. But they increased in both

wealth and unpopularity, false tales about atrocities committed by them

being bruited abroad. In many towns furious rabbles at different times

attacked the Jewish quarters, burnt the dwellings, and put the inmates

cruelly to death, as at York, where hundreds perished during a riot in

the reign of Richard I. King John by cruel measures extorted large sums

from wealthy Jews.

The Church was also their implacable enemy, securing many repressive

enactments against them. Jewish history has a melancholy

sameness--perpetual exactions, the means of enforcing them differing

only in their cruelty. When parliament refused to maintain the

extravagant royal expenditure, nothing remained but still further to

drain Hebrew veins. In the reign of Henry III. a tale was spread of the

crucifixion of a Christian child, called Hugh of Lincoln. The story

refutes itself, but it created horror throughout the country. For this

crime eighteen of the richest Jews of Lincoln were hanged, and many more

flung into dungeons.

The death of Henry brought no respite, for Edward acted with equal

harshness. At length he issued the famous irrevocable edict of total

expulsion from the realm. Their departure was fixed for October 10,

1290. All who delayed were to be hanged without mercy. The Jews were

pursued from, the kingdom with every mark of popular triumph in their

sufferings. In one day 16,511 were exiled; all their property, debts,

obligations, mortgages were escheated to the king. A like expulsion had

been effected in France; and Spain, where the Jews were of a far nobler

rank, was not to be outdone in bigotry.

During the reign of John I., in 1388 A.D., a fierce popular preacher of

Seville, Ferdinand Martinez, Arch-deacon of Ecija, excited the populace

to excesses against the Jews. The streets of the noble city ran with

blood, and 4,000 victims perished. The cruel spirit spread through the

kingdom, and appalling massacres followed in many cities. A series of

intermittent persecutions followed both in Spain and Portugal, in reign

after reign. Jews and Protestants together went through awful ordeals at

the hands of the Inquisition. When her glory had declined, Spain, even

in her lowest decrepitude, indulged in what might seem the luxury of

persecution.

It was in the reign of Charles II. that the Jews found opportunity to

steal insensibly back into England. Cromwell had felt very favourably

disposed towards them, but had not dared to permit the re-establishment

which they had openly sought. But the necessities of Charles and his

courtiers quietly accomplished the, change, and the race has ever since

maintained its footing, and no doubt contributed a fair share to the

national wealth. Russia throughout her history adhered to her hostility

to the Jews, but expulsion became impossible with such vast numbers. It

is estimated that Russia contains half the Jewish population of the

world, notwithstanding that Russia proper from ancient times has been

sternly inhospitable to the Jewish race, while Poland has ever been

hospitable.

The most important measures of amelioration in the lot of the Jews in

England were passed in 1723, when they acquired the right to possess

land; in 1753, when parliament enacted the Naturalisation Bill; in 1830,

when they were admitted to civic corporations; in 1833, when they were

admitted to the profession of advocates; in 1845, when they were

rendered eligible for the office of alderman and lord mayor; and in

1858, when the last and crowning triumph of the principle was achieved

by the admission of Jews into parliament.

In Asia, the Jews are still found in considerable numbers on the verge

of the continent; in China, they are now found in one city alone, and

possess only one synagogue. In Mesopotamia and Assyria the ancient seats

of the Babylonian Jews are still occupied by 5,270 families. But England

and Anglo-Saxon countries generally have been the most favourable to the

race. Perhaps the most remarkable fact in the history of modern Judaism

is the extension of the Jews in the United States. Writing in 1829, I

stated, on the best authority then attainable, their numbers at 6,000.

They are now [in 1863] reckoned at 75,000.

* * * * *

HERODOTUS

History

The "Father of History," as Herodotus has been styled, was

born at Halicarnassus, the centre of a Greek colony in Asia

Minor, between the years 490 and 480 B.C., and lived probably

to sixty, dying about the year 425 B.C. A great part of his

life was occupied with travels and investigations in those

lands with which his history is mainly concerned. His work is

the earliest essay in history in a European language. It is a

record primarily of the causes and the course of the first

great contest between East and West; and is a storehouse of

curious and delightful traveller's gossip as well as a

faithful record of events. The canons of evidence in his day

were defective, for obvious reasons; a miscellaneous divine

interposition in human affairs was taken for granted, and

science had not yet reduced incredible marvels to ordinary

natural phenomena. Nevertheless, Herodotus was a shrewd and

careful critic, honest, and by no means remarkably credulous.

If he had not acquired the conception of history as an exact

science, he made it a particularly attractive form of

literature, to which his simplicity of style gives a slight

but pleasant archaic flavour. This epitome has been specially

prepared far THE WORLD'S GREATEST BOOKS from the Greek text.

_I.--The Rise of Persian Power_

I will not dispute whether those ancient tales be true, of Io and Helen,

and the like, which one or another have called the sources of the war

between the Hellenes and the barbarians of Asia; but I will begin with

those wrongs whereof I myself have knowledge. In the days of Sadyattes,

king of Lydia, and his son Alyattes, there was war between Lydia and

Miletus. And Croesus, the son of Alyattes, made himself master of the

lands which are bounded by the river Halys, and he waxed in power and

wealth, so that there was none like to him. To him came Solon, the

Athenian, but would not hail him as the happiest of all men, saying that

none may be called happy until his life's end.

Thereafter trouble fell upon Croesus by the slaying of his son when he

was a-hunting. Then Cyrus the Persian rose up and made himself master of

the Medes and Persians, and Croesus, fearing his power, was fain to go

up against him, being deceived by an oracle; but first he sought to make

alliance with the chief of the states of Hellas. In those days,

Pisistratus was despot of Athens; but Sparta was mighty, by the laws of

Lycurgus. Therefore Croesus sent envoys to the Spartans to make alliance

with them, which was done very willingly. But when Croesus went up

against Cyrus, his army was put to flight, and Cyrus besieged him in the

city of Sardis, and took it, and made himself lord of Lydia. He would

have slain Croesus, but, finding him wise and pious, he made him his

counsellor.

Now, this Cyrus had before overthrown the Median king, Astyages, whose

daughter was his own mother. For her father, fearing a dream, wedded her

to a Persian, and when she bore a child, he gave order for its slaying.

But the babe was taken away and brought up by a herdsman of the

hill-folk. But in course of time the truth became known to Astyages, and

to Harpagus, the officer who had been bidden to slay the babe, and to

Cyrus himself. Then Harpagus, fearing the wrath of Astyages, bade Cyrus

gather together the Persians--who in those days were a hardy people of

the mountains--and made himself king over the Medians; which things

Cyrus did, overthrowing his grandfather Astyages. And in this wise began

the dominion of the Persians.

The Ionian cities of Asia were zealous to make alliance with Cyrus when

he had overthrown Croesus. But he held them of little account, and

threatened them, and the Lacedæmonians also, who sent him messengers

warning him to let the Ionians alone. And he sent Harpagus against the

cities of the Ionians, of whom certain Phocæans and Teians sailed away

to Rhegium and Abdera rather than become the slaves of the barbarians;

but the rest, though they fought valiantly enough, were brought to

submission by Harpagus.

While Harpagus was completing the subjugation of the West, Cyrus was

making conquest of Upper Asia, and overthrew the kingdom of Assyria, of

which the chief city was Babylon, a very wonderful city, wherein there

had ruled two famous queens, Semiramis and Nitocris. Now, this queen had

made the city wondrous strong by the craft of engineers, yet Cyrus took

it by a shrewd device, drawing off the water of the river so as to gain

a passage. Thus Babylon also fell under the sway of the Persian. But

when Cyrus would have made war upon Tomyris, the queen of the Massagetæ,

who dwelt to the eastward, there was a very great battle, and Cyrus

himself was slain and the most part of his host. And Cambyses, his son,

reigned in his stead.

_II.--Wars of Egypt and Persia_

Cambyses set out to conquer Egypt, taking in his army certain of the

Greeks. But of all that I shall tell about that land, the most was told

to me by the priests whom I myself visited at Memphis and Thebes and

Heliopolis. They account themselves the most ancient of peoples. If the

Ionians are right, who reckon that Egypt is only the Nile Delta, this

could not be. But I reckon that the whole Egyptian territory is. Egypt,

from the cataracts and Elephantiné down to the sea, parted into the

Asiatic part and the Libyan part by the Nile.

For the causes of the rising and falling of the Nile, the reasons that

men give are of no account. And of the sources whence the river springs

are strange stories told of which I say not whether they be true or

false: but the course of it is known for four months' journey by land

and water, and in my opinion it is a river comparable to the Ister.

The priests tell that the first ruler of Egypt was Menes, and after him

were three hundred and thirty kings, counting one queen, who was called

Nitocris. After them came Sesostris, who carried his conquest as far as

the Thracians and Scythians; and later was Rhampsinitus, who married his

daughter to the clever thief who robbed his treasure-house; and after

him Cheops, who built the pyramid, drawing the stones from the Arabian

mountain down to the Nile. Chephren also, and Mycerinus built pyramids,

and the Greeks have a story--which is not true--that another was built

by Rhodopis. And in the reign of Sethon, Egypt was invaded by

Sennacherib the Assyrian, whose army's bowstrings were eaten by

field-mice.

A thing more wonderful than the pyramids is the labyrinth near Lake

Moeris, and still more wonderful is Lake Moeris itself, all which were

made by the twelve kings who ruled at once after Sethon. And after them,

Psammetichus made himself the monarch; and after him his great grandson

Apries prospered greatly, till he was overthrown by Amasis. And Amasis

also prospered, and showed favour to the Greeks. But for whatever

reason, in his day Cambyses made his expedition against Egypt, invading

it just when Amasis had died, and his son Psammenitus was reigning.

Cambyses put the Egyptian army to rout in a great battle, and conquered

the country, making Psammenitus prisoner. Yet he would have set him up

as governor of the province, according to the Persian custom, but that

Psammenitus was stirred up to revolt, and, being discovered, was put to

death. Thereafter Cambyses would have made war upon Carthage, but that

the Phoenicians would not aid him; and against the Ethiopians, who are

called "long-lived," but his army could get no food; and against the

Ammonians, but the troops that went were seen no more.

Now, madness came upon Cambyses, and he died, having committed many

crimes, among which was the slaying of his brother Smerdis. And there

rose up one among the Magi who pretended to be Smerdis, and was

proclaimed king. But this false Smerdis was one whose ears had been cut

off, and he was thus found out by one of his wives, the daughter of a

Persian nobleman, Otanes. Then seven nobles conspired together, since

they would not be ruled over by one of the Magi; and having determined

that it was best to have one man for ruler, rather than the rule of the

people or of the nobles, they slew Smerdis and made Darius, the son of

Hystaspes, their king.

Then Darius divided the Persian empire into twenty satrapies, whereof

each one paid its own tribute, save Persia itself, and he was lord of

all Asia, and Egypt also.

In the days of Cambyses, Polycrates was despot of Samos, being the first

who ever thought to make himself a ruler of the seas. And he had

prospered marvellously. But Oroetes, the satrap of Sardis, compassed his

death by foul treachery, and wrought many other crimes; whom Darius in

turn put to death by guile, fearing to make open war upon him. And not

long afterwards, he sent Otanes to make conquest of Samos. And during

the same days there was a revolt of the Babylonians; and Darius went up

against Babylon, yet for twenty months he could not take it. Howbeit, it

was taken by the act of Zopyrus, who, having mutilated himself, went to

the Babylonians and told them that Darius had thus evilly entreated him,

and so winning their trust, he made easy entry for the Persian army, and

so Babylon was taken the second time.

_III.--Persian Arms in Europe_

Now, Darius was minded to make conquest of the Scythians--concerning

which people, and the lands beyond those which they inhabit, there are

many marvels told, as of a bald-headed folk called Argippæi; and the

Arimaspians or one-eyed people; and the Hyperborean land where the air

is full of feathers. Of these lands are legends only; nothing is known.

But concerning the earth's surface, this much is known, that Libya is

surrounded by water, certain Phoenicians having sailed round it. And of

the unknown regions of Asia much was searched out by order of Darius.

The Scythians themselves have no cities; but there are great rivers in

Scythia, whereof the Ister is the greatest of all known streams, being

greater even than the Nile, if we reckon its tributaries. The great god

of the Scythians is Ares; and their war customs are savage exceedingly,

and all their ways barbarous. Against this folk Darius resolved to

march.

His plan was to convey his army across the Bosphorus on a bridge of

boats, while the Ionian fleet should sail up to the Ister and bridge

that, and await him. So he crossed the Bosphorus and marched through

Thrace, subduing on his way the Getse, who believe that there is no true

death. But when he passed the Ister, he would have taken the Ionians

along with him; but by counsel of Coes of Mitylene, he resolved to leave

them in charge of the bridge, giving order that, after sixty days, they

might depart home, but no sooner.

Then the Scythians, fearing that they could not match the great king's

army, summoned the other barbaric peoples to their aid; among whom were

the Sauromatians, who are fabled to be the offspring of the Amazons. And

some were willing, but others not. Therefore the Scythians retired

before Darius, first towards those peoples who would not come to their

help; and so enticed him into desert regions, yet would in no wise come

to battle with him.

Now, at length, Darius found himself in so evil a plight that he began

to march back to the Ister. And certain Scythians came to the Ionians,

and counselled them to destroy the bridge, the sixty days being passed.

And this Miltiades, the Athenian despot of the Chersonese, would have

had them do, so that Darius might perish with all his army; but

Histiæus of Miletus dissuaded them, because the rule of the despots was

upheld by Darius. And thus the Persian army was saved, Megabazus being

left in Europe to subdue the Hellespontines. When Megabazus had subdued

many of the Thracian peoples, who, indeed, lack only union with each

other to make them the mightiest of all nations, he sent an embassy to

Amyntas, the king of Macedon, to demand earth and water. But because

those envoys insulted the ladies of the court, Alexander, the son of

Amyntas, slew them all, and of them or all their train was never aught

heard more.

Now Darius, with fair words, bade Histiseus of Miletus abide with him at

the royal town of Susa. Then Aristagoras, the brother of Histiæus,

having failed in an attempt to subdue Naxos, and fearing both

Artaphernes, the satrap of Sardis, and the Persian general Megabazus,

with whom he had quarrelled, sought to stir up a revolt of the Ionian

cities; being incited thereto by secret messages from Histiseus.

To this end, he sought alliance with the Lacedæmonians; but they would

have nothing to do with him, deeming the venture too remote. Then he

went to Athens, whence the sons of Pisistratus had been driven forth

just before. For Hipparchus had been slain by Harmodius and Aristogiton,

and afterwards Hippias would hardly have been expelled but that his

enemies captured his children and so could make with him what terms they

chose. But the Pisistratidse having been expelled, the city grew in

might, and changes were made in the government of it by Cleisthenes the

Alcmæonid. But the party that was against Cleisthenes got aid from

Cleomenes of Sparta; yet the party of Cleisthenes won.

Then, since they reckoned that there would be war with Sparta, the

Athenians had sought friendship with Artaphernes at Sardis; but since he

demanded earth and water they broke off. But because Athens was waxing

in strength, the Spartans bethought them of restoring the despotism of

the Pisistratidæ. But Sosicles, the Corinthian, dissuaded the allies of

Sparta from taking part in so evil a deed. Then Hippias sought to stir

up against the Athenians the ill-will of Artaphernes, who bade them take

back the Pisistratidæ, which they would not do.

Therefore, when Aristagoras came thither, the Athenians were readily

persuaded to promise him aid. And he, having gathered the troops of the

Ionians, who were at one with him, marched with them and the Athenians

against Sardis and took the city, which by a chance was set on fire. But

after that the Athenians refused further help to the Ionians, who were

worsted by the Persians. But the ruin of the Ionians was at the

sea-fight of Lade, where the men of Chios fought stoutly; but they of

Samos and Lesbos deserting, there was a great rout.

_IV.--Marathon and Thermopylæ_

Thereafter King Darius, being very wroth with the Athenians for their

share in the burning of Sardis, sent a great army across the Hellespont

to march through Thrace against Athens, under his young kinsman

Mardonius. But disaster befell these at the hands of the Thracians, and

the fleet that was to aid them was shattered in a storm; so that they

returned to Asia without honour. Then Darius sent envoys to demand earth

and water from the Greek states; and of the islanders the most gave

them, and some also of the cities on the mainland; and among these were

the Aeginetans, who were at feud with Athens.

But of those who would not give the earth and water were the Eretrians

of Eubcea. So Darius sent a great armament by sea against Eretria and

Athens, led by Datis and Artaphernes, which sailed first against

Eretria. The Athenians, indeed, sent aid; but when they found that the

counsels of the Eretrians were divided, so that no firm stand might be

made, they withdrew. Nevertheless, the Eretrians fought valiantly behind

their walls, till they were betrayed on the seventh day. But the

Persians, counselled by Hippias, sailed to the bay of Marathon.

Then the Athenians sent the strong runner Pheidippides to call upon the

Spartans for aid; who promised it, yet for sacred reasons would not move

until the full moon. So the Athenian host had none to aid them save the

loyal Platæans, valiant though few. Yet in the council of their generals

the word of Miltiades was given for battle, whereto the rest consented.

Then the Athenians and Platæans, being drawn up in a long line, charged

across the plain nigh a mile, running upon the masses of the Persians;

and, breaking them upon the wings, turned and routed the centre also

after long fighting, and drove them down to the ships, slaying as they

went; and of the ships they took seven. And of the barbarians there fell

6,400 men, and of the Athenians, 192. But as for the story that the

Alcmæonidæ hoisted a friendly signal to the Persians, I credit it not

at all.

Now, Darius was very wroth with the Greeks when he heard of these

things, and made preparation for a mighty armament to overthrow the

Greeks, and also the Egyptians, who revolted soon afterwards. But he

died before he was ready, and Xerxes, his son, reigned in his stead.

Then, having first crushed the Egyptians, he, being ruled by Mardonius,

gathered a council and declared his intent of marching against the

Hellenes; which resolution was commended by Mardonius, but Artabanus,

the king's uncle, spoke wise words of warning. Then Xerxes would have

changed his mind, but for a dream which came to him twice, and to

Artabanus also, threatening disaster if he ceased from his project; so

that Artabanus was won over to favour it.

Then Xerxes made vast provision for his invasion for the building of a

bridge over the Hellespont, and the cutting of a canal through the

peninsula of Athos, where the fleet of Mardonius had been shattered. And

from all parts of his huge empire he mustered his hosts first in

Cappadocia, and marched thence by way of Sardis to the Hellespont. And

because, when the bridge was a building, a great storm wrecked it, he

bade flog the naughty waves of the sea. Then, the bridge being finished,

he passed over with his host, which took seven days to accomplish.

And when they were come to Doriscus he numbered them, and found them to

be 1,700,000 men, besides his fleets. And in the fleet were 1,207 great

ships, manned chiefly by the Phoenicians and the Greeks of Asia, having

also Persian and Scythian fighting men on board. But when Demaratus, an

exiled king of Sparta, warned Xerxes of the valour of all the Greeks,

but chiefly of the Spartans, who would give battle, however few they

might be, against any foe, however many, his words seemed to Xerxes a

jest, seeing how huge his own army was.

The World's Greatest Books — Volume 11 — Ancient and Mediæval History · 第 6 / 25 段