It was their favourite theme.... Each was possessed of an intellectual

scorn for the mere ritual of an older time; neither descended to an

affirmation nor even condescended to a denial of private property. Both

clearly saw that no organised scheme of production could exist under

modern conditions unless its organisation were to be controlled by the

community. Yet the two friends differed in one most material point,

which was the possibility, men being what they were, of settling thus

the control of _machinery_. Upon land they were agreed. The land must

necessarily be made a national thing, and the conception of ownership

in it, however limited, was, as a man whom they both revered had put

it, “unthinkable.” Indeed, they recognised that the first steps towards

so obvious a reform were now actually taken, and they confidently

expected the final processes in it to be the work of quite the next

few years; but whereas the Economist, with his profound knowledge of

external detail, could see no obstacle to the collective control of

capital as well, the Psychologist, ever dwelling upon the inner springs

of action, saw no hope, no, not even for so evident and necessary a

scheme, save in some ideal despotism of which he despaired. In vain

did the Economist point out that our great railways, our mines, the

main part of our shipping, and even half our textile industry had

now no personal element in their direction save that of the salaried

management; the Psychologist met him at every move with the effect

produced upon man by the mere illusion of a personal element in all

these things. The Economist, not a little inspired as the evening

deepened, remembered and even invented names, figures, cases that

showed the growing unity of the industrial world; the Psychologist

equally inspired, and with an equal increase of fervour, drew picture

after picture, each more vivid and convincing than the last, of

man caught in the tangle of imaginary motive and unobedient to any

industrial control, unless that control could by some miracle be given

the quality of universal tyranny.

Music was added to their debate, and subtly changed, as it must always

change, the colour of thought. In the street without a man with a

fine baritone voice, which evidently he had failed through vice or

carelessness to exploit with success, sang songs of love and war,

and at his side there accompanied him a little organ upon wheels

which a weary woman played. The rich notes of his voice filled “The

Lord Benthorpe” through the opened windows of that hot night, and

drowned or modified the differences of cabmen and others in the Public

Bar; as he sang the two disputants rose almost to the lyric in their

enthusiasm, the one for the new world that was so soon to be, the other

for that gloomy art of his by which he read the hearts of men and saw

their doom.

* * * * *

It has been remarked by many that we mortals are surrounded by

coincidence, and least observe Fate at its nearest approach, so that

friends meet or leave us unexpectedly, and that the accidents of

our lives make part of a continual play. So it was with these two.

For as they warmly debated, and one of them had upset and broken

his glass while the other lay back repeating again and again some

favourite phrase, a third was on his way to meet them. A man much

older than either, a man who did nothing at all and lived when his

sister remembered him, was in that neighbourhood, vaguely wandering

and feeling in every pocket for a coin. His hand trembled with age,

and also a little with anxiety, but to his great joy he felt at last

through the lining of his coat a large round hardness, and very

carefully searching through a tear, and aided by the light that shone

from the windows of “The Lord Benthorpe,” he discovered and possessed

half a crown. With that he entered in, for he knew that his friends

were there. In what respect he held them, their accomplishments, and

their public fame, I need not say, for that respect is always paid by

the simple to the learned. He sat by them at the little table, drinking

also, and for some minutes listened to their stream of affirmation and

of vision, but soon he shook his head in a quavering senile way, as

he very vaguely caught the drift of their contention. “You’ve got the

wrong end of the stick,” he said.... “You’ve got the wrong end of the

stick!... Can’t take away what a man’s got ... ’tis _wrawng_!... ’Vide

it up, all the same next week.... Same hands! Same hands!” he went on

foolishly wagging his head, and still smiling almost like an imbecile.

“All in the same hands again in a week!... ’Vide it up ever so much.”

They neglected him and continued their ardent debate, and as they flung

repeated bolts of theory he, their new companion, still murmured to

himself the security of established things and the ancient doctrine of

ownership and of law.

But now the night and the stars had come to their appointed hour,

and the ending which is decreed of all things had come also to their

carousal. A young man of energy stood before them in his shirt sleeves,

crying, “Time, Time!” as a voice might cry “Doom!” and, by force of

crying and of orders, “The Lord Benthorpe” was emptied, and there was

silence at last behind its shutters and its bolted doors.

These three, not yet in a mood for sleep, sauntered together westward

through the vast landed estates of London, westward, to their distant

homes.

The Economist

A gentleman possessing some three thousand acres of land, the most

of it contiguous, one field with another, or, as he himself, his

agent, his bailiff, his wife, his moneylender, and others called it,

“in a ring fence,” was in the habit of asking down to the country at

Christmas time some friend or friends, though more usually a friend

than friends, because the income he received from the three thousand

acres of land had become extremely small.

He was especially proud of those of his friends who lived neither by

rent from land nor from the proceeds of their business, but by mental

activity in some profession, and of none was he prouder than of an

Economist whom he had known for more than forty years; for they had

been at school together and later at college. Now this Economist was

a very hearty, large sort of a man, and he made an amply sufficient

income by writing about economics and by giving economic advice in the

abstract to politicians, and economic lectures and expert economic

evidence; in fact, there was no limit to his earnings except that

imposed by time and the necessity for sleep. He was not married and

could spend all his earnings upon himself--which he did. He was

tall, lean, and active, with bright vivacious eyes and an upstanding

manner. He had two sharp and healthy grey whiskers upon either side of

his face; his hair was also grey but curly; and altogether he was a

vigorous fellow. There was nothing in economic science hidden from him.

This Economist, therefore, and his friend the Squire (who was a short,

fat, and rather doleful man) were walking over the wet clay land which

one of them owned and on which the other talked. There was a clinging

mist of a very light sort, so that you could not see more than about

a mile. The trees upon that clay were small and round, and from their

bare branches and twigs the mist clung in drops; where the bushes were

thick and wherever evergreens afforded leaves, these drops fell with

a patter that sounded almost like rain. There were no hills in the

landscape and the only thing that broke the roll of the clay of the

park land was the house, which was called a castle; and even this they

could not see without turning round, for they were walking away from

it. But even to look at this house did not raise the heart, for it was

very hideous and had been much neglected on account of the lessening

revenue from the three thousand acres of land. Great pieces of plaster

had fallen off, nor had anything been continually repaired except the

windows.

The Economist strode and the Squire plodded on over the wet grass, and

it gave the Squire pleasure to listen to the things which the Economist

said, though these were quite incomprehensible to him. They came to

a place where, after one had pushed through a tall bramble hedge and

stuck in a very muddy hidden ditch, one saw before one on the farther

side, screened in everywhere and surrounded by a belt or frame of low,

scraggy trees and stunted bushes, a large deserted field. In colour

it was very pale green and brown; myriads of dead thistles stood in

it; there were nettles, and, in the damper hollows, rushes growing.

The Economist took this field and turned his voluble talk upon it. He

appreciated that much he said during their walk, being sometimes of an

abstract and always of a technical nature, had missed the mind of his

friend; he therefore determined upon a concrete instance and waved his

vigorous long arm towards the field and said:

“Now, take this field, for instance.”

“Yes,” said the Squire humbly.

“Now, this field,” said the Economist, “_of itself_ has no value at

all.”

“No,” said the Squire.

“_That_,” said the Economist with increasing earnestness, tapping one

hand with two fingers of the other, “that’s what the layman must seize

first ... every error in economics comes from not appreciating that

things in themselves have no value. For instance,” he went on, “you

would say that a diamond had value, wouldn’t you ... a large diamond?”

The Squire, hoping to say the right thing, said: “I suppose not.”

This annoyed the Economist, who answered a little testily: “I don’t

know what you mean. What _I_ mean is that the diamond has no value in

itself....”

“I see,” broke in the Squire, with an intelligent look, but the

Economist went on rapidly as though he had not spoken:

“It only has a value because it has been transposed in some way from

the position where man could not use it to a position where he can.

Now, you would say that land could not be transposed, but it can be

made from _less_ useful to man, _more_ useful to man.”

The Squire admitted this, and breathed a deep breath.

“Now,” said the Economist, waving his arm again at the field, “take

this field, for instance.”

There it lay, silent and sullen under the mist. There was no noise of

animals in the brakes, the dirty boundary stream lay sluggish and dead,

and the rank weeds had lost all colour. One could note the parallel

belts of rounded earth where once--long, long ago--this field had been

ploughed. No other evidence was there of any activity at all, and it

looked as though man had not seen it for a hundred years.

“Now,” said the Economist, “what is the value of this field?”

The Squire had begun his answer, when his friend interrupted him

testily. “No, no, no; I don’t want to ask about your private affairs;

what I mean is, what is it builds up the economic value of this field?

It is not the earth itself; it is the use to which man puts it. It is

the crops and the produce which he makes it bear and the advantage

which it has over other neighbouring fields. It is the _surplus value_

which makes it give you a rent. What gives _this_ field its value is

the competition among the farmers to get it.”

“But----” began the Squire.

The Economist with increasing irritation waved him down. “Now, listen,”

he said; “the worst land has only what is called prairie value.”

The Squire would eagerly have asked the meaning of this, for it

suggested coin, but he thought he was bound to listen to the remainder

of the story.

“That is only true,” said the Economist, “of the worst land. There _is_

land on which no profit could be made; it neither _makes_ nor loses. It

is on what we call the _margin of production_.”

“What about rates?” said the Squire, looking at that mournful stretch,

all closed in and framed with desolation, and suggesting a thousand

such others stretching on to the boundaries of a deserted world.

How various are the minds of men! That little word “rates”--it has but

five letters; take away the “e” and it would have but four--and what

different things does it not mean to different men! To one man the

pushing on of his shop just past the edge of bankruptcy; to another the

bother of writing a silly little cheque; to another the brand of the

Accursed Race of our time--the pariahs, the very poor. To this Squire

it meant the dreadful business of paying a great large sum out of an

income that never sufficed for the bare needs of his life ... to tell

the truth, he always borrowed money for the rates and paid it back out

of the next half year ... he had such a lot of land in hand. Years

ago, when farms were falling in, in the eighties, a friend of his, a

practical man, who went in for silos and had been in the Guards and

knew a lot about French agriculture, had told him it would pay him to

have his land in hand, so when the farms fell in he consoled himself by

what the friend had said; but all these years had passed and it had not

paid him.

Now to the Economist this little word “rates” suggested the hardest

problem--the perhaps insoluble problem--of applied economics in our

present society. He turned his vivacious eyes sharply on to the Squire

and stepped out back for home, for the Castle. For a little time

he said nothing, and the Squire, honestly desiring to continue the

conversation, said again as he plodded by his friend’s side, “What

about rates?”

“Oh, they’ve nothing to do with it!” said the Economist, a little

snappishly. “The proportionate amount of surplus produce demanded

by the community does not affect the basic process of production. Of

course,” he added, in a rather more conciliatory tone, “it _would_ if

the community demanded the total unearned increment and _then_ proposed

taxes beyond that limit. _That_, I have always said, would affect the

whole nature of production.”

“Oh!” said the Squire.

By this time they were nearing the Castle, and it was already dusk;

they were silent during the last hundred yards as the great house

showed more definitely through the mist, and the Economist could note

upon the face of it the coat-of-arms with which he was familiar. They

had been those of his host’s great-grandfather, a solicitor who had

foreclosed. These arms were of stucco. Age and the tempest had made

them green, and the head of that animal which represented the family

had fallen off.

They went into the house, they drank tea with the rather worried but

well-bred hostess of it, and all evening the Squire’s thoughts were of

his two daughters, who dressed exactly alike in the local town, and

whose dresses were not yet paid for, and of his son, whose schooling

was paid for, but whose next term was ahead: the Squire was wondering

about the extras. Then he remembered suddenly, and as suddenly put out

of his mind by an effort of surprising energy in such a man, the date

February 3rd, on which he must get a renewal or pay a certain claim.

They sat at table; they drank white fizzy wine by way of ritual, but it

was bad. The Economist could not distinguish between good wine and bad,

and all the while his mind was full of a very bothersome journey to the

North, where he was to read a paper to an institute upon “The Reaction

of Agricultural Prosperity upon Industrial Demand.” He was wondering

whether he could get them to change the hour so that he could get back

by a train that would put him into London before midnight. And all this

cogitation which lay behind the general talk during dinner and after it

led him at last to say: “Have you a ‘Bradshaw’?”

But the Squire’s wife had no “Bradshaw.” She did not think they could

afford it. However, the eldest daughter remembered an old “Bradshaw” of

last August, and brought it, but it was no use to the Economist.

* * * * *

How various is man! How multiplied his experience, his outlook, his

conclusions!

A Little Conversation in Carthage

HANNO: Waiter! Get me a copy of _The Times_. [_Mutters to himself.

The waiter brings the copy of_ The Times. _As he gives it to Hanno he

collides with another member of the Club, and that member, already

advanced in years, treads upon Hanno’s foot._]

HANNO: Ah! Ah! Ah!... Oh! [_with a grunt_]. Bethaal, it’s you, is it?

BETHAAL: Gouty?

HANNO [_after saying nothing for some time_]: ’Xtraordinary thing....

Nothing in the papers.

BETHAAL: Nothing odd about that! [_He laughs rather loudly, and

Hanno, who wishes he had said the witty thing, smirks gently without

enthusiasm. Then he proceeds on another track._] I find plenty in the

papers! [_He puffs like a grampus._]

HANNO: Plenty about yourself!... That’s the only good of politics, and

precious little good either.... What I can’t conceive--as you _do_

happen to be the in’s and not the out’s--is why you don’t send more men

from somewhere; he has asked for them often enough.

BETHAAL [_wisely_]: They’re all against it; couldn’t get anyone to

agree but little Schem [_laughs loudly_]; he’d agree to anything.

HANNO [_wagging his head sagely_]: He’ll be Suffete, my boy! He’ll be a

Sephad all right! He’s my sister’s own boy.

BETHAAL [_surlily_]: Shouldn’t wonder! All you Hannos get the pickings.

HANNO: You talk like a book.... Anyhow, what about the

reinforcements?--that _does_ interest me.

BETHAAL [_wearily_]: Oh, really. I’ve heard about it until I’m tired.

It isn’t the reinforcements that are wanted really; it’s money, and

plenty of it. That’s what it is. [_He looks about the room in search

for a word._] That’s what it is. [_He continues to look about the

room._] That’s what it is ... er ... really. [_Having found the word

Bethaal is content, and Hanno remains silent for a few minutes, then_:]

HANNO: He doesn’t seem to be doing much.

BETHAAL [_jumping up suddenly with surprising vigour for a man of close

on seventy, and sticking his hands into his pockets, if Carthaginians

had pockets_]: That’s it! That’s exactly it! That’s what I say, What

Hannibal really wants is money. He’s got the _men_ right enough. The

_men_ are splendid, but all those putrid little Italian towns are

asking to be bribed, and I _can’t_ get the money out of Mohesh.

HANNO [_really interested_]: Yes, now? Mohesh has got the old

tradition, and I do believe it’s the sound one. Our money is as

important to us as our Fleet, I mean our _credit’s_ as important to

us as our Fleet, and he’s perfectly right is Mohesh.... [_Firmly_] I

wouldn’t let you have a penny if I were at the Treasury.

BETHAAL [_surlily_]: Well, he’s bound to take Rome at last anyway, so I

don’t suppose it matters whether he has the money or not; but it makes

_me_ look like a fool. When everything was going well I didn’t care,

but I do care now. [_He holds up in succession three fat fingers_].

First there was Drephia----

HANNO [_interrupting_]: Trebbia.

BETHAAL: Oh, well, I don’t care.... Then there was Trasimene; then

there was that other place which wasn’t marked on the map, and little

Schem found for me in the very week in which I got him on to the Front

Bench. You remember his speech?

[HANNO _shakes his head_.]

BETHAAL [_impatiently_]: Oh well, anyhow you remember Cannae, don’t you?

HANNO: Oh yes, I remember Cannae.

BETHAAL: Well, he’s bound to win. He’s bound to take the place, and

then [_wearily_], then, as poor old Hashuah said at the Guildhall,

“Annexation will be inevitable.”

HANNO: Now, look here, may I put it to you shortly?

BETHAAL [_in great dread_]: All right.

HANNO [_leaning forward in an earnest way, and emphasising what he

says_]: All you men who get at the head of a Department only think

of the work of that Department. That’s why you talk about Hannibal’s

being bound to win. Of course he’s bound to win; but Carthage all

hangs together, and if he wins at too great a price in money _you’re_

weakened, and your _son_ is weakened, and _all_ of us are weakened. We

shall be paying five per cent where we used to pay four. Things don’t

go in big jumps; they go in gradations, and I do assure you that if you

don’t send more men----

BETHAAL [_interrupting impatiently_]: Oh, curse all that! One can

easily see where _you_ were brought up; you smell of Athens like a

Don, and you make it worse by living out in the country, reading books

and publishing pamphlets and putting people’s backs up for nothing. If

you’d ever been in politics--I mean, if you hadn’t got pilled by three

thousand at....

[_At this moment an obese and exceedingly stupid Carthaginian of the

name of Matho strolls into the smoking-room of the club, sees the two

great men, becomes radiant with a mixture of reverence, admiration, and

pride of acquaintance, and makes straight for them._]

HANNO: Who on earth’s that? Know him?

BETHAAL [_in a whisper astonishingly vivacious and angry for so old a

man_]: Shut your mouth, can’t you? He’s the head of my association!

He’s the Mayor of the town!

MATHO: Room for little un? [_He laughs genially and sits down,

obviously wanting an introduction to Hanno._]

BETHAAL [_nervously_]: I haven’t seen you for ages, my dear fellow! I

hope Lady Matho’s better? [_Turning to Hanno_] Do you know Lady Matho?

HANNO [_gruffly_]: Lady _Who_?

BETHAAL [_really angry, and savage on that half of his face which is

turned towards Hanno_]: This gentleman’s wife!

MATHO [_showing great tact and speaking very rapidly in order to bridge

over an unpleasant situation_]: Wonderful chap this Hannibal! Dogged

does it! No turning back! Once that man puts his hand to the plough he

won’t take it off till he’s [_tries hard, and fails to remember what a

plough does--then suddenly remembering_] till he’s finished his furrow.

That’s where blood tells! Same thing in Tyre, same thing in Sidon, same

thing in Tarshish; I don’t care who it is, whether it’s poor Barca, or

that splendid old chap Mohesh, whom they call “Sterling Dick.” They’ve

all got the blood in them, and they don’t know when they’re beaten.

Now [_as though he had something important to say which had cost him

years of thought_], shall I tell you what I think produces men like

Hannibal? I don’t think it’s the climate, though there’s a lot to be

said for _that_. And I don’t think it’s the sea, though there’s a lot

to be said for _that_. I think it’s our old Carthaginian home-life

[_triumphantly_]. That’s what it is! It isn’t even hunting, though

there’s a lot to be said for that. It’s the old---- [_Hanno suddenly

gets up and begins walking away._]

BETHAAL [_leaning forwards to Matho_]: Please don’t mind my cousin.

You know he’s a little odd when he meets anyone for the first time;

but he’s a really good fellow at heart, and he’ll help anyone. But,

of course [_smiling gently_], he doesn’t understand politics any more

than---- [_Matho waves his hand to show that he understands._] But such

a good fellow! Do you know Lady Hanno? [_They continue talking, chiefly

upon the merits of Hannibal, but also upon their own._]

The Strange Companion

It was in Lichfield, now some months ago, that I stood by a wall that

flanks the main road there and overlooks a fine wide pond, in which you

may see the three spires of the Cathedral mirrored.

As I so gazed into the water and noted the clear reflection of the

stonework a man came up beside me and talked in a very cheery way.

He accosted me with such freedom that he was very evidently not from

Europe, and as there was no insolence in his freedom he was not a

forward Asiatic either; besides which, his face was that of our own

race, for his nose was short and simple and his lips reasonably thin.

His eyes were full of astonishment and vitality. He was seeing the

world. He was perhaps thirty-five years old.

I would not say that he was a Colonial, because that word means so

little; but he talked English in that accent commonly called American,

yet he said he was a Brittishur, so what he was remains concealed;

but surely he was not of this land, for, as you shall presently see,

England was more of a marvel to him than it commonly is to the English.

He asked me, to begin with, the name of the building upon our left, and

I told him it was the Cathedral, to which his immediate answer was,

was I sure? How could there be a cathedral in such a little town?

I said that it just was so, and I remembered the difficulty of the

explanation and said no more. Then he looked up at the three spires and

said: “Wondurful; isn’t it?” And I said: “Yes.”

Then I said to him that we would go in, and he seemed very willing; so

we went towards the Close, and as we went he talked to me about the

religion of those who served the Cathedral, and asked if they were

Episcopalian, or what. So this also I told him. And when he learnt that

what I told him was true of all the other cathedrals, he said heartily:

“Is thet so?” And he was silent for half a minute or more.

We came and stood by the west front, and looked up at the height of it,

and he was impressed.

He wagged his head at it and said: “Wondurful, isn’t it?” And then he

added: “Marvlurs how they did things in those old days!” but I told him

that much of what he was looking at was new.

On Everything · 第 3 / 15 段