CHAPTER XXII.

Interruptions through festivals--Opening of the tumulus of

Batiea--Pottery like that of the Trojan stratum at Hissarlik, and

nothing else--No trace of burial--Its age--Further discoveries of

burnt Trojan houses--Proof of their successive ages--Their

construction--Discovery of a double gateway, with the copper bolts

of the gates--The “SCÆAN GATE” of Homer--Tests of the extent of

ancient Troy--The place where Priam sat to view the Greek

forces--Homer’s knowledge of the heroic Troy only

traditional--Description of the gates, the walls, and the “PALACE

OF PRIAM."--Vases, &c., found in Priam’s house--Copper, ivory, and

other implements--The δέπα ἀμφικύπελλα--Houses discovered on the

north platform--Further excavations of the city walls--Statuettes

and vessels of the Greek period--Top of the Tower of Ilium

uncovered, and its height determined--A curious trench in it,

probably for the archers--Further excavations at Bunarbashi: only a

few fragments of Greek pottery--The site of Ilium uninhabited since

the end of the fourth century--The place confused with Alexandria

Troas--No Byzantine remains at Hissarlik--Freshness of the Greek

sculptures.

Pergamus of Troy, May 10th, 1873.

Since my report of the 16th of last month I have had many interruptions,

for the Greek Easter festival lasts six days, then the feast of Saint

George and its after celebrations again took away several days, so that

during all this time I have had only four days of actual work; however,

on these days, with on an average 150 men, I have continued the works

with great energy.

As we have had continual fine weather since the beginning of April, my

men no longer go to the neighbouring villages for the night as they have

hitherto done; but they sleep in the open air and even in the

excavations, which is very convenient for me, as I now have them always

at hand. Besides this, the long days are of great advantage to me, for I

can continue work from a quarter to five till a quarter past seven in

the evening.

On the top of the tumulus, which is half an hour distant from the

Pergamus, and which, according to the Iliad (II. 811-815), was called by

men the tomb of Batiea, and by the gods the tomb of Myrina, I have had a

shaft sunk, 10¾ feet broad and 17½ feet long; and I find that the

layer of soil there is scarcely more than ¾ of an inch thick, and then

follows brown earth as hard as stone, which alternates with strata of

calcareous earth. In the brown earth I found a mass of fragments of

brilliant black, green, and brown vases, of the same description as

those which I find here in the Pergamus at a depth of from 8 to 10

meters (26 to 33 feet); also many fragments of jars (πίθοι). Beyond

these I discovered nothing at all, and at a depth of 4½ meters

(13¾ feet) I came upon the white limestone rock. What is most

surprising to me is that I did not even find any charcoal, much less the

bones of the burnt corpse. That I should have missed the traces of the

funeral pile, if such really existed, is inconceivable to me, when I

consider the size of my cutting and of its perpendicular walls.

Now, although I have failed in the actual object of this excavation,

still it has this important result for archæology, that, by means of all

the fragments of pottery discovered there, it enables us to determine

with some degree of certainty the date of the erection of this mound;

for it evidently belongs to a time when the surface of the Pergamus was

from 26 to 33 feet lower than it is now. It is therefore of the same

date as the Tower-road already described, which is paved with large

flags of stone, and above which I have carried on the excavations with

the greatest industry. I finished these excavations to-day. They have

brought to light two large buildings of different ages, the more recent

of which is erected upon the ruins of the more ancient one. Both have

been destroyed by terrible fires, of which the walls bear distinct

traces; moreover all the rooms of both houses are filled with black,

red, and yellow wood-ashes and with charred remains. The more recent

house was erected when the ruins of the more ancient house were

perfectly covered with ashes and with burnt _débris_, as is obvious from

the fact that the more recent walls run in all directions above the more

ancient ones, never standing directly upon them, and are frequently

separated from them by a layer of calcined _débris_, from 6½ to 10

feet high. The lower, as well as the upper house, is built of stones

joined with earth, but the walls of the lower house are much thicker and

much more solidly built than those of the upper one. The Tower-road can

only have been used when the more ancient house was still inhabited, for

it leads directly into it, and the more recent house was not built till

the street was covered to a height of 10 feet by the ruins of the more

ancient house.

[Illustration: No. 218. Copper Bolts, found exactly in the middle (_a_)

of the first (_b_) of the second Scæan Gates.]

[Illustration:

PLATE XII.

Tower of Ilium.

Wall of Débris.

Scæan Gate and Paved Road.

Wall of Troy.

Ruins of the Palace of Priam.

_Page 303._

THE DOUBLE SCÆAN GATE, PALACE OF PRIAM, AND TOWER OF ILIUM.

From the North-West.]

I was firmly convinced that this splendid street, paved with large flags

of stone, must proceed from the principal building of the Pergamus, and

I therefore confidently carried on the excavation in order to bring that

edifice to light. To accomplish this, I was most unfortunately compelled

to break down three of the large walls of the more recent house. The

result has, however, far surpassed my expectations, for I not only found

two large gates, standing 20 feet apart, but also the two large copper

bolts belonging to them, of which I give drawings. The first gate is

12¼ feet broad, and is formed by two projections of the wall, one of

which stands out 2½ feet, the other 2¾ feet; both are 3¼ feet

high, and 3¾ feet broad. The street paved with the large flags of

stone ends at the first gate, and the road from this to the second gate,

which is situated a little more than 20 feet further to the north-east,

is very roughly paved with large unhewn stones. The pavement has

probably become uneven through the walls of the more ancient house

having fallen upon it. (_See Plan II., and Plates XII. and XIII._)

The second gate is likewise formed by two projections in the wall, which

are 2 feet high, above 3 feet broad, and project about 2½ feet.

I have cleared the street as far as 5 feet to the north-east of the

second gate, but I have not ventured to proceed further, as this could

not be done without breaking down more of the walls of the second house,

the preservation of which is of the greatest interest to archæology.

For, although it must be of a much more recent date than the lower one

upon the ruins of which it stands, yet, as is proved by the terra-cottas

and the idols with owls’ heads, as well as by its position at a depth of

from 6 to 7 meters (20 to 23 feet) below the surface, it was built

centuries before the time of the Greek settlement, the ruins of which

extend only to a depth of 6½ feet. This upper and later house is

therefore certainly older than the Homeric poems.

In my last report I expressed the firm conviction that the Tower-road,

which inclines abruptly towards the Plain to the south-west, must lead

to the Scæan Gate, which I thought could at most be 492 feet distant. I

now venture positively to assert that the great double gate which I have

brought to light must necessarily be the SCÆAN GATE. For in the mound,

which runs out for to the south-west from the foot of the Pergamus and

in a straight line with the Tower-road--which mound I had supposed to

contain the great city wall of Ilium and the Scæan Gate,--in this

mound, close to the main hill, I have sunk a shaft, nearly 6 feet broad

and 11 feet long. Here I found exclusively Greek fragments of pottery,

and I came upon the rock at the small depth of 7½ feet; thus I

convinced myself that ancient Troy can never have extended so far

towards the Plain. A second excavation, 11¼ feet long and 6½ feet

broad, which I made exactly 443 feet further to the east up the plateau,

had a similar result, for I came upon the rock at a depth of 16½

feet, and here also I found exclusively fragments of Hellenic pottery

(which in the Pergamus I meet with only at a depth of 6½ feet), and

no trace of Trojan pottery.

This sufficiently proves that the ancient city cannot even have extended

as far as this point, and its area must have been connected with the

Pergamus still further eastwards.[258] I am at present occupied in

making fifteen other shafts in this direction, and I hope, in spite of

the great depth I have to sink them, that I shall succeed, at least to

some extent, in determining the topography of Troy. I shall leave all

the shafts open, so that every visitor may convince himself about the

truth of my statements.

Meanwhile the two shafts described above have gained this much for

archæology, that the street which runs down abruptly at an angle of 65

degrees towards the Plain, in a south-western direction from the double

gate and the Great Tower, cannot possibly have led to a second gate, so

that the double gate which I have laid bare must necessarily have been

the Scæan Gate; it is in an excellent state of preservation, not a stone

of it is wanting.

Here, therefore, by the side of the double gate, upon Ilium’s Great

Tower, at the edge of the very abrupt western declivity of the Pergamus,

sat Priam, the seven elders of the city, and Helen; and this is the

scene of the most splendid passage in the Iliad.[259] From this spot

the company surveyed the whole Plain, and saw at the foot of the

Pergamus the Trojan and the Achæan armies face to face about to settle

their agreement to let the war be decided by a single combat between

Paris and Menelaus.

When Homer[260] makes Hector descend from the Pergamus and rush through

the city in order to arrive at the Scæan Gate, this can only have arisen

from the fact that, after the destruction of Troy, the gate, as well as

the street which led down from it to the Plain, were covered with a

layer of _débris_ 10 feet thick, so that the names only were known from

tradition, and their actual site was unknown.

In order not to weary the reader with a detailed description of the

Scæan Gate, I give an exact plan of it, where all the details may be

seen. (Plan III., p. 306.) This gate, as well as the large ancient

building, stands upon the wall or buttress already mentioned as leaning

on the north side of the Tower. At this place the buttress appears to be

about 79 feet thick, and to be made of the _débris_ which was broken off

the primary soil when the Tower was erected. The site of this building,

upon an artificial elevation directly above the gate, together with its

solid structure, leave no doubt that it was the grandest building in

Troy; nay, that it must have been the PALACE OF PRIAM.[261] I am having

an accurate plan made, so far as I can, of the portion that has been

laid bare; I cannot, however, bring to light the whole of it, for in

order to do this I should have to pull down both my stone and my wooden

house, beneath which it extends; and even if I did pull down my own

houses, I should still be unable to make a complete plan of the house

till I had removed the building which stands upon it, and this I cannot

at once make up my mind to do.

[Illustration: PLAN III.--THE TOWER AND THE SCÆAN GATE.

_a a._ The Great Tower of Ilium. _b._ Depression to shelter archers.

_c._ Steps. _d._ The Double Scæan Gate. _e._ Steep paved road leading to

the Plain. _f._ The City Wall. _g._ Place where the Treasure was found.

_h h._ The Palace of Priam.]

Anyone may convince himself that the elevation, upon which stands the

Palace of King Priam above the Scæan Gate, is in reality an artificial

one, by examining my last year’s great cutting, which pierces through a

portion of this elevation. The walls of that cutting, from the shaft as

far as the gate, show that the mound consists of the native earth which

has been thrown up, mixed with fragments of rare pottery and shells.

[Illustration: No. 219. Wonderful Vase of Terra-cotta from the Palace of

Priam (8 M.).[262]]

Now, with regard to the objects found in these houses, I must first of

all mention having discovered, at a depth of 26 feet, in the palace of

Priam, a splendid and brilliant brown vase, 24¼ inches high, with a

figure of the tutelar goddess of Troy, that is, with her owl’s head, two

breasts, a splendid necklace, indicated by an engraved pattern, a very

broad and beautifully engraved girdle, and other very artistic

decorations; there are no arms, nor are there any indications of them.

Unfortunately this exquisite vase has suffered from the weight of stones

which lay upon it, and although I myself cut it with a knife from among

the stones and the stone-hard _débris_ with the greatest care, I did not

succeed in getting it out without breaking it to pieces. I have,

however, carefully collected all the fragments and sent them to Athens

to be put together, that I may give a drawing of it. (This is No. 219.)

[Illustration: No. 220. Terra-cotta Vase from the House of Priam, with

remarkable Decorations (9 M.).]

Among the very remarkable vases discovered in this palace, I must also

mention one nearly a foot high, with two handles, and an encircling row

of cuneiform engravings, above which, on both sides, there is a very

prominent decoration, in the form of spectacles, which is connected with

a kind of necklace by an engraved tree. I must further draw special

attention to an exceedingly remarkable vase, which was found in the same

house, and upon which there are actual letters in a circle round it.

One piece of the vase is wanting, and with it a portion of the

inscription; but, in order to lay before the reader all that has been

preserved of it, I give the inscription separately, for it would be

impossible to give it accurately on the drawing of the vase. (See No. 3,

p. 23.) It would please me immensely if anyone could decipher the Trojan

writing, and thus throw some light upon the great people to whom it

belonged, and upon the epoch at which it was written.[263] I must also

draw attention to a vase, upon which at first sight it seems as if there

were a row of letters; at a closer examination, however, it appears not

to be writing, but symbolical signs, as the cross is conspicuous in

almost every figure.[264]

[Illustration: No. 221. A Terra-cotta Vase with two little Ears, and two

large perforated Handles, marked with eleven strange characters (5½

M.).

The _depth_ must refer to the _upper house_ above the Palace. it is

given as 8½ M. in the Photograph, but corrected in the descriptive

letter-press to 5½ M.; and a like correction seems to have been

neglected in the Book.--{ED.}]

[Illustration: No. 222. A splendidly-decorated Vase of Terra-cotta, with

three Feet and two Ears. From the Palace (7½ M.).]

[Illustration: No. 223. A Terra-cotta Vase, with two Ears and covered

with dots. From the Palace (7 M.).]

In the same house I found three brilliant red vases, with two handles, a

prominent decoration on either side in the form of spectacles, and two

mighty wings, standing erect by the side of the neck;--half-a-dozen

vases of various sizes, with uncommonly long tubes at the sides and with

holes in the mouth for suspending them by strings;--a very large and

brilliant black vase, with two handles and two ornaments in the form of

large ears;--likewise a smaller vase, with large perforated ears for the

string by which it was hung up;--a vase with three feet, rings for

hanging it up, and beautiful engraved decorations, namely, two

encircling stripes with zigzag lines, and five lines round the neck.

(No. 222.) Further, I found a vase rounded at the bottom, with

perforated handles, and completely covered with dots (No. 223);--also

two covers with pretty owls’ heads, one of which has remarkably large

eyes;--also a fragment of the fore part of a vase with a sheep’s

head;--a curious small but very broad vase, with three feet and long

tubes for hanging it up by strings;--a peculiar terra-cotta lamp, with a

perforated handle in the form of a crescent, and two other projecting

handles, with tubes for suspension;--a red jug with a handle, a neck

completely bent back, a beak-shaped mouth, and two eyes;[265]--a small

vase, covered with dots and possessing two handles and two immense erect

ears;--a jug, with two female breasts;--a vase, with the owl’s face and

the body of the Ilian Athena, and two upraised arms;--also the upper

portion of another vase, upon which may be seen a mouth below the beak

of the Trojan tutelary goddess; and a vase, with a large hollow foot,

very long tubes at the sides for hanging it up, and two prominent

decorations in the form of spectacles.

[Illustration: No. 224. Fine decorated Vase of Terra-Cotta, with two

Handles and two great upright Wings. From the Palace (7½ M.).]

Among the smaller terra-cottas found in the palace of Priam, I have

particularly to mention a vessel 2¾ inches long, in a human form,

with the owl’s head of the Ilian Athena and unusually large eyes: two

lines on the temples appear to indicate the helmet, three horizontal

lines on the neck her armour.[266] The body is covered with an arched

shield 1½ inch long, upon which there are ten rows of dots, which are

probably intended to represent the heads of the small nails with which

the layers (πτύχες) were fastened together; the shield of Ajax, for

instance, consisted of seven layers of hides and an outer case of

copper.[267] The Trojan goddess carries on both sides a large wing, in

the form of a bottle, which is decorated with horizontal lines. The long

hair at the back of the goddess’s head is very distinct; it is gathered

into a plait, and falls down almost as far as her ankles, and is wrought

with great care, reminding one extremely of the very similar plaits of

the Caryatides in the Erechtheum of the Acropolis of Athens. Not only is

the idol hollow, but so also are the wings; the latter must positively

have some symbolical significance.

In the palace of Priam I further met with four marble and three bone

idols, with the owl’s head of the tutelar goddess of Troy: one of the

bone idols is painted with a white colour. I likewise discovered there

ten marble idols, without the owl’s head; also the fragment of a sword,

as well as of a lance, a knife, and some copper implements; further, a

dozen long, thin copper nails, which must have served as hair or dress

pins; besides these, a packet of five dress pins, which have been molten

together in the heat of the conflagration: one of the pins has two

heads, one above the other, the lower head being perfectly round. I also

discovered here a perforated cylinder, 1¾ inch long, made of blue

felspar, and ornamented all round with extremely remarkable engraved

symbols. I there also discovered an extremely curious ivory article,

which must be part of a musical instrument;[268] six sling bullets of

loadstone and an arrow-head.

[Illustration: No. 225. Five Copper Dress Pins, molten together by the

conflagration. From the Palace (8 M.).]

[Illustration: No. 226. Engraved Cylinder of blue Felspar. From the

Palace (9 M.).[269]]

[Illustration: No. 227. Terra-cotta, engraved with ten rude Owls’ Faces.

From the Palace (8 M.).]

Of 210 whorls found in the Palace adorned with Aryan religious symbols,

there are 60 with engravings that I have not hitherto met with, and

three terra-cotta balls with symbolical signs. One of these is

especially remarkable[270]: it has ten roughly-engraved owls’ faces, so

coarsely drawn that I should not even know them to be owls’ faces, were

it not that I have occasionally found just as rude representations of

the owl’s head upon idols. I also discovered in the same house six

beautifully-polished axes of diorite; also one of those round

twice-perforated terra-cottas, arched on both sides and flattened on the

edge of one side, the whole of this flat side being filled with a stamp

bearing the impression of an eagle and a stag or an antelope; further,

four of those frequently-described large red goblets, round below and

with two large handles, which can only stand on the mouth. These four

goblets are, unfortunately, all broken, and I shall not be able to have

them repaired till I return to Athens.

I now venture positively to maintain that these goblets, which, from my

former reports and drawings are known to be from 5 to nearly 16 inches

high, must necessarily be the Homeric “δέπα ἀμφικύπελλα,” and that the

usual interpretation of these words by “_double cups, with a common

bottom in the centre_,” is entirely erroneous. It really appears as if

this wrong translation arose solely through Aristotle; for, as is clear

from his _Hist. Anim._ (9, 40), there were in his time double cups with

a common bottom in the centre; and, in fact, many years ago it is said

that such a cup was discovered in Attica, and bought by the Museum in

Copenhagen. But in the Homeric Troy there were no such cups, otherwise I

should have found them. As already remarked in one of my previous

reports (p. 129), I found on the primary soil, at a depth of from 46 to

52½ feet, several fragments of brilliant black goblets, which I then

considered to be fragments of double cups, because there was a hollow

upon both sides of the bottom; but the one hollow was in all cases quite

small in comparison with the other, and must, therefore, have been in

the foot of the cup. If δέπας ἀμφικύπελλον means _double cup_, then

ἀμφιφορεύς must mean _double urn_, which is not possible either in the

Iliad (XIII. 92), the Odyssey (XXIV. 74), or elsewhere in Homer;

moreover, it has never occurred to anyone to translate it otherwise than

“urn with two handles;” consequently, δέπας ἀμφικύπελλον cannot be

translated otherwise than by “cup with two handles.” As an actual double

cup can, of course, only be filled on one side at a time, Homer would

certainly never have constantly described the filled cup as a double

cup, for there would have been no sense in the name. By the term

ἀμφικύπελλον, however, he wished to signify that the filled cup was

presented by one handle and accepted by the other handle. Interpreted in

this manner, there is a great deal of meaning in the name.[271]

The palace of King Priam furnished me also with two large fragments of a

large brilliant yellow urn, adorned in the most beautiful manner with

engraved decorations. Among others, it has several rows of circles

running round it, in each of which there is a triple cross. The elegance

of the vessel is enhanced by the broad handles, which also have circles

with triple crosses. In the king’s palace I also discovered the handle

of a vessel, broken off; it is 4¼ inches long, and in the form of a

serpent.

In the upper and more recent house, above the Scæan Gate, I found the

vase here represented, which is pointed below, has two handles and

decorations in the form of spectacles (No. 228); also the beautiful

vase, with four handles and a lid (No. 229); the large jug, with one

large and two small handles (No. 230); and a number of other vases and

jugs which I shall not describe, as they have already been frequently

met with. Of idols with owls’ faces I have found only one. There also I

discovered many fragments of those large red goblets with two handles,

which I now recognise to be the Homeric δέπας ἀμφικύπελλον.

[Illustration: No. 228. Terra-cotta Vase, with a curious Decoration.

From the upper and later House above the Scæan Gate (6 M.).]

[Illustration: No. 229. Terra-cotta Vase, with four Handles and a Lid.

From the upper House above the Scæan Gate (6 M.).]

[Illustration: No. 230. A great Jug, with Handle and two Ears. From the

upper House above the Scæan Gate (6 M.).]

As the excavation above the Scæan Gate is finished, I am now again

vigorously at work on the great platform on the north side, which I have

lately had worked whenever I had workmen to spare. We now come upon

several houses there at a depth of from 33 to 20 feet; also, as it

seems, upon a great wall of fortification in the lower strata.

As it is extremely important to know what were the fortifications on the

west and north-west of the Pergamus at the time of the Trojan war, and

as I see another wall, 11½ feet thick, running in a north-western

direction from the Scæan Gate, which however it is impossible to follow

from this side,--during the last eight days I have been making a

cutting, 33 feet broad and 141 long, on the north-west side of the hill,

at the point where, in April 1870, I made the first cutting, which

therefore my men call ἡ μάμμη τῶν ἀνασκαφῶν ("the grandmother of the

excavations”). I am having the _débris_ removed simultaneously by a

small platform, made at a depth of 34¼ feet on the declivity of the

hill, and by three galleries. The distance is not great, and the

wheel-barrows proceed across level ground, and moreover the _débris_

here is very light, and only requires to be thrown down the declivity;

so the work advances very rapidly. Upon the lower platform I came upon

the surrounding wall built by Lysimachus, which is 13 feet high and 10

feet thick, and is composed of large hewn blocks of limestone laid upon

one another without any kind of cement. I have just finished breaking

through this wall. Directly behind it I came upon an older wall, 8¾

feet high and 6 feet thick, which is composed of large hewn stones

joined with earth, and which of course I am also having broken through.

This second wall is immediately followed by that wall of large hewn

stones which I laid bare three years ago, and which I have hitherto

regarded as a bastion; it is, however, probable that it will prove to be

something else, and I shall describe it in detail in my next report.

This part of the Pergamus was evidently much lower in ancient times; as

seems to be proved not only by the surrounding wall, which must at one

time have risen to a considerable height above the surface of the hill,

whereas it is now covered with 16½ feet of _débris_, but also by the

remains of the Hellenic period, which here extend down to a great depth.

It appears, in fact, as if the rubbish and refuse of habitations had

been thrown down here for centuries, in order to increase the height of

the place. This also explains how it is that I find here a quantity of

small but interesting objects from the Greek period. Among others are 24

heads of terra-cotta figures, 17 of which are of great beauty; also a

great number of other fragments of statuettes of the same description,

which display skilful workmanship; a terra-cotta slab 5½ inches in

length, upon which is a representation of a woman; also eight small

terra-cotta slabs, nearly 2 inches in length, upon which I find very

curious and to me utterly unknown objects in high relief.[272] I also

found here the fragments of some vessels of exquisite workmanship; two

beautifully decorated lamps; and a leaden plate, 2¾ inches long and

broad, with a pig’s head in bas-relief, which, as I conjecture, may have

been a coin. We also discovered here a vessel 28¾ inches long, of an

extremely fanciful shape, with a long and very thin foot, a long thin

neck, and two enormous handles.

[Illustration: No. 231. A remarkable Terra-cotta Cup (4 M.).]

Upon the great platform, at a depth of 4 meters (13 feet), we found a

very remarkable cup, which has a handle, and in its hollow foot four

oval holes, pierced opposite to one another. Last year I repeatedly

found the feet of cups of this sort at a depth of from 46 to 52½

feet, but hitherto I have never met with an entire goblet of this form.

As I no longer require the surface of the Tower for removing the

_débris_, I have had it quite cleared, and I find in the centre of it a

depression, 45¼ feet long, from 8¼ to 14¾ feet broad, and

barely 3 feet deep, which may have been used for the archers.[273] It

has now become evident to me that what I last year considered to be the

ruins of a second storey of the Great Tower are only benches made of

stones joined with earth, three of which may be seen rising behind one

another like steps.[274] From this, as well as from the walls of the

Tower and those of the Scæan Gate, I perceive that the Tower never can

have been higher than it now is.

The excavations of the north side of the field belonging to Mr. Calvert,

which I opened to discover other sculptures, have been stopped for some

time, as I can no longer come to terms with him. At present, I have only

two foremen, for I was obliged to dismiss Georgios Photidas, three weeks

ago, for urgent reasons.

In conclusion, I have to mention that, during the Greek Easter festival,

accompanied by my esteemed friend, Judge Schells of Ratisbon, and my

wife, I visited Bunarbashi and the neighbouring heights. In their

presence, I made some small excavations, and I have proved that even in

the village the accumulation of _débris_ amounts only to 1¾ foot in

the court-yards of the buildings, and that upon and beside the street

there is nothing but the virgin earth; further, that upon the small site

of Gergis, at the end of the heights, which was formerly regarded as

identical with Troy, the naked rock projects everywhere; and besides, in

the accumulation of _débris_, which nowhere amounts to 1¾ foot in the

town itself, and to only a little more in the Acropolis, I found nothing

but fragments of pottery from the Hellenic period, that is, from the

third and fifth centuries B.C.

I must also add that I now positively retract my former opinion, that

Ilium was inhabited up to the ninth century after Christ, and I must

distinctly maintain that its site has been desolate and uninhabited

since the end of the fourth century. I had allowed myself to be deceived

by the statements of my esteemed friend, Mr. Frank Calvert, of the

Dardanelles, who maintained that there were documents to prove that the

place had been inhabited up to the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries

after Christ. Such documents, if they really do exist, must necessarily

refer to Alexandria Troas, which is always, as for instance in the New

Testament, simply called Troas; for on its site quantities of Byzantine

antiquities are found even on the surface, which seem to prove that the

city was inhabited up to the fourteenth century, or still longer. Here

in Ilium, on the other hand, there is no trace of Byzantine

architecture, of Byzantine sculpture, of Byzantine pottery, or of

Byzantine coins. Altogether I found only two copper medals of Byzantine

monasteries, which may have been lost by shepherds. I found hundreds of

coins belonging to the time of Constantine the Great, Constans II., but

no medals whatever of the later emperors.

As hitherto it was in the Pergamus alone that I found no trace of the

Byzantine period, I thought that it was only the fortress that was

uninhabited during that period, but that the region of the city had been

occupied. But my fifteen shafts, which I am having made on the most

various points of the site of Ilium, as well as the two shafts made upon

the primary soil, prove, as anyone may convince himself, that below the

surface there is no trace of the Byzantine period, nay that, beyond a

very thin layer of earth, which however only exists in some parts, the

ruins of the Greek period extend up to the very surface, and that in

several of the shafts I came upon the walls of Greek houses even on the

surface.

It is impossible that a Byzantine town or a Byzantine village, nay, that

even a single Byzantine house, can have stood upon this hilly and

stone-hard ground, which covers the ruins of a primeval city, without

leaving the most distinct traces of its existence, for here, where for

nine or ten months of the year it never rains, except during rare

thunderstorms, the productions of human industry do not become

weather-beaten and destroyed, as in other countries where there is

frequent rain. The very fragments of sculptures and inscriptions, which

I find here in the Pergamus and in the other districts of the city, upon

the surface, and which have lain exposed to the open air for at least

1500 years, are still almost as fresh as if they had been made

yesterday.

Trusting to the statements of Mr. Frank Calvert, and under the

impression that Ilium had been inhabited for a long time under the

Byzantine dominion, I described the wall, composed of Corinthian pillars

and cement, 10 feet thick, and which gave me so much trouble to break

through at the south-east corner of the Pergamus, as of Byzantine

architecture. (Pp. 230, 250.) I am now, however, forced to believe that

the Temple of Athena, to which these pillars belong, was destroyed by

the religious zeal of the first Christians as early as the reign of

Constantine the Great, or at latest during that of Constantine II., and

that this wall was built of its ruins about the same time.

[Illustration:

No. 232 (8 M.). No. 233 (7 M.).

Curious Terra-cottas from the Trojan Stratum. Dr. Schliemann takes No.

232 for a pair of pegs for hanging up clothes. No. 233 is a strange

animal figure, solid, except for a tube passing through the body and

open at both ends, so that it cannot have been a vessel. Dr. Schliemann

thinks it may represent the _chimæra_ (_Iliad_, VI. 179, foll., “In

front a lion, behind a serpent, and in the middle a chimæra”). In one

sense, certainly, the name seems appropriate.]

[Illustration:

PLATE XIII.

Samothrace.

Imbros.

Dr. Schliemann’s Houses.

Plain of Troy, seen through the great Trench.

Later but Pre-Hellenic Buildings, partly over the Ruins of Priam’s Palace.

TOWER OF ILIUM.

Paved Road.

Wall of Troy, Scæan Gate, and Paved Road to the Plain.

_a_ Place where the Treasure was found.

Greek Tower (where the man stands).

Scamander.

Plain of Troy.

Hellespont.

_Page 321._

THE SCÆAN GATE AND PAVED ROAD, THE TOWER OF ILIUM, CITY WALL, PALACE OF

PRIAM, AND THE WALLS OF A TOWER OF THE GREEK AGE.

From the South-East.]

Troy and Its Remains A Narrative of Researches and Discoveries Made on the Site of Ilium and in the Trojan Plain · 第 22 / 23 章