And in what light he was looked upon by the lazy pensioned lackeys of

the court, who hardly knew his face, and not at all his worth, is

shown by this extract from one of their manuscript chronicles:

"_Jeudi, le 15 Octobre, 1684. On apprit à Chambord la mort du bonhomme

Corneille._"

* * * * *

JEAN RACINE came to Paris, from his native La Ferté-Milon in the old

duchy of Valois--by way of a school at Beauvais, and another near

Port-Royal--in 1658, a youth of nineteen, to study in the Collége

d'Harcourt. That famous school was in the midst of the Scholars'

Quarter, in that part of narrow, winding Rue de la Harpe which is now

widened into Boulevard Saint-Michel. On the site of the ancient

college, direct heir of its functions and its fame, stands the Lycée

Saint-Louis. The buildings that give on the playground behind, seem to

belong to the original college, and to have been refaced.

Like Boileau-Despréaux, three years his senior here, the new student

preferred poetry to the studies commonly styled serious, and his

course in theology led neither to preaching nor to practising. He was

a wide and eager reader in all directions, and developed an early and

ardent enthusiasm for the Greeks and the Latins.

As early as 1660 he had made himself known by his ode in celebration

of the marriage of Louis XIV.; while he remained unknown as the author

of an unaccepted and unplayed drama in verse, sent to the Théâtre du

Marais.

Racine's Paris homes were all in or near the "_Pays Latin_," for he

preserves its ancient appellation in his letters. On leaving college,

in 1660-61, he took up quarters with his uncle Nicolas Vitart, steward

and intendant of the Duchesse de Chevreuse, and secretary of her son

the Duc de Luynes. Vitart lived in the Hôtel de Luynes, a grand

mansion that faced Quai des Grands-Augustins, and stretched far back

along Rue Gît-le-Coeur. It was torn down in 1671. La Fontaine had

lodgings, during his frequent visits to Paris at this period, a little

farther west on Quai des Grands-Augustins, and he and Racine, despite

the eighteen years' difference of age, became close companions. La

Fontaine made his young friend acquainted with the _cabarets_ of the

quarter, and Racine studied them not unwillingly. Just then, too,

Racine doubtless met Molière, recently come into the management of the

theatre of the Palais-Royal. An original edition of "Les Précieuses

Ridicules," played a while before this time at the Hôtel du

Petit-Bourbon, bears on its title-page "_Privilège au Sr. de Luyne_."

This was Guillaume de Luyne, bookseller and publisher in the Salle des

Merciers of the Palais de Justice; and at his place, a resort for

book-loving loungers, we may well believe that the actor-manager made

acquaintance with the young poet, coming from his home with the Duc de

Luynes, within sight across the narrow arm of the river.

Not as a poet was he known in this ducal house, but as assistant to

his uncle, and the probable successor of that uncle, who tried to

train him to his future duties. Among these duties, just then, was the

construction of the new Hôtel de Luynes for the Duchesse de Chevreuse.

This is the lady who plays so prominent a rôle in Dumas's authentic

history of "The Three Musketeers." The _hôtel_ that was then built for

her stands, somewhat shorn of its original grandeur, at No. 201

Boulevard Saint-Germain, and you may look to-day on the walls

constructed under the eye of Jean Racine, acting as his uncle's

overseer. This uncle was none too rigid of rule, nor was the

household, from the duchess down, unduly ascetic of habit; and young

Racine, "nothing loath," spent his days and eke his nights in somewhat

festive fashion. His anxious country relatives at length induced him

to leave the wicked town, and in November, 1661, he went to live at

Uzés, near Nîmes, in Languedoc. Here he was housed with another uncle,

of another kidney; a canon of the local cathedral, able to offer

church work and to promise church preferment to the coy young cleric.

Racine was bored by it all, and mitigated his boredom, during the two

years he remained, only by flirting and by stringing rhymes. The

ladies were left behind, and the verses were carried to the capital,

on his return in November, 1663. He showed some of them, first to

Colbert and then to Molière, who received the verse with scant praise,

but accepted, paid for, and played "La Thébaïde"--a work of promise,

but of no more than promise, of the future master hand. It was at this

period, about 1664, that Racine, of his own wish, first met Boileau,

who had criticised in a kindly fashion some of the younger poet's

verses. Thus was begun that friendship which was to last unmarred so

many years, and to be broken only by Racine's death.

With Corneille, too, Racine made acquaintance, in 1665, and submitted

to him his "Alexandre." He was greatly pleased by the praise of the

author of the "Cid"; praise freely given to the poetry of the play,

but along with it came the set-off that no talent for tragedy was

shown in the piece. It was not long before the elder poet had to own

his error, and it is a sorrow to record his growing discontent with

the younger man's triumphs. Racine believed then and always, that

Corneille was easily his master as a tragic dramatist; a belief shared

with him by us of to-day, who find Corneille's tragedies as

impressive, his comedies as spirited, as ever, on the boards of the

Comédie Française; while Racine's tragic Muse seems to have outlived

her day on those boards, and to have grown aged and out of date, along

with the social surroundings amid which she queened it.

Racine's reverence for his elder and his better never wore away, and

on Corneille's death--when, to his place in the Academy, his lesser

brother Thomas was admitted--it fell to Racine, elected in 1673, to

give the customary welcome to the new Academician, and to pay the

customary tribute to his great forerunner. He paid it in words and in

spirit of loyal admiration, and no nobler eulogy of a corrival has

been spoken by any man.

On his return to town, in 1663, Racine had found his uncle-crony

Vitart living in the new Hôtel de Luynes, and in order to be near him

he took lodging in Rue de Grenelle. It was doubtless at the eastern

end of that street, not far from the Croix-Rouge--a step from Boileau

in Rue du Vieux-Colombier, and not far from La Fontaine on Quai

Malaquais. Here he stayed for four years, and in 1667 he removed to

the Hôtel des Ursins. This name had belonged to a grand old mansion on

the north bank of Île de la Cité, presented by the City of Paris to

Jean Juvénal des Ursins, _Prévôt des Marchands_ under Charles VI. In

the old prints, we see its two towers rising sheer from the river,

and behind them its vast buildings and spacious grounds extending far

away south on the island. According to Edouard Fournier, a painstaking

topographer, all this structure was demolished toward the end of the

eighteenth century, and over its site and through its grounds were cut

the three streets bearing its name of des Ursins--Haute, Milieu,

Basse. Other authorities claim that portions of the hotel still stand

there, among them that portion in which Racine lived; his rooms having

remained unaltered up to 1848. The street is narrow and dark, all its

buildings are of ancient aspect, and on its south side is a row of

antiquated houses that plainly date back to Racine's day and even

earlier. It is in one of these that we may establish his lodgings.

The house at No. 5, commonly and erroneously pointed out as his

residence, is of huge bulk, extending through to Rue Chanoinesse on

the south. No. 7 would seem to be still more ancient. No. 9 is simply

one wing of the dark stone structure, of which No. 11 forms the other

wing and the central body, massive and gloomy, set back from the

street behind a shallow court, between these wings. In the low wall of

this court, under a great arch, a small forbidding door shuts on the

pavement, and behind, in a recess, is an open stairway leading to the

floor above. No. 13 was undoubtedly once a portion of the same fabric.

All these street windows are heavily barred and sightless. These three

houses evidently formed one entire structure at first, and this was

either an outlying portion of the Hôtel des Ursins, or a separate

building, erected after the demolition of that _hôtel_, and taking the

old name. In either case, there can be no doubt that these are the

walls that harbored Racine. The tenants of his day were mostly men of

the law who had their offices and residential chambers here, by reason

of their proximity to the Palais de Justice. With these inmates Racine

was certainly acquainted--the magistrates, the advocates, the clerks,

of whom he makes knowing sport in his delightful little comedy, "Les

Plaideurs." It was played at Versailles, "by royal command," before

King and court in 1668. This was not its original production, however;

it had had its first night for the Paris public a month earlier, and

had failed; possibly because it had not yet received royal approval.

Molière, one of the audience on that first night, was a more competent

critic of its quality, and his finding was that "those who mocked

merited to be mocked in turn, for they did not know good comedy when

they saw it." This verdict gives striking proof of his innate loyalty

to a comrade in trade, for he and the author were estranged just then,

not by any fault of Molière, and he had the right to feel wronged, and

by this unasked praise he proved himself to be the more manly of the

two.

The piece was an immediate success at Versailles. The _Roi Soleil_

beamed, the courtiers smiled, the crowd laughed. The players,

unexpectedly exultant, climbed into their coaches as soon as they were

free, and drove into town and to Racine, with their good news. This

whole quiet street was awakened by their shouts of congratulation,

windows were thrown open by the alarmed burghers, and when they

learned what it meant, they all joined in the jubilation.

Racine lived here from 1667 to 1677, and these ten years were years of

unceasing output and of unbroken success. Beginning with his

production of "Andromaque" in the first-named year, he went, through

successive stage triumphs, to "Phèdre," his greatest and his last play

for the public stage, produced on New Year's Day of 1677, at the Hôtel

de Bourgogne. It was on these boards that almost all his plays were

first given.

Then, at the age of thirty-seven, at the top of his fame, in the

plenitude of his powers, he suddenly ceased to write for the stage.

This dis-service to dramatic literature was brought about by his

forthcoming marriage, by his disgust with the malice of his rivals, by

his weariness of the assaults of his enemies, by his somewhat sudden

and showy submission to the Church--that sleepless assailant of player

and playwright. He hints at the attitude of the godly in his preface

to "Phèdre," assuring them that they will have to own--however, in

other respects, they may or may not esteem this tragedy--that it

castigates Vice and punishes Badness as had no previous play of his.

Doubtless he was hardened in this decision, already made, by the hurt

he had from the reception of this play in contrast with the reception

of a poorer play for which his own title was stolen, which was

produced within three nights of his piece, and was acclaimed by the

cabal that damned the original. Nor was it only his rivals and

enemies who decried him. "_Racine et le café passeront_," was La

Harpe's contemptuous coupling of the playwright with the new and

dubious drink, just then on its trial in Paris. His _mot_ has been

mothered on Madame de Sévigné, for she, too, took neither to Racine

nor to coffee. And a century later it pleased Madame de Staël to

prove, to her own gratification, that his tragedies had already gone

into the limbo of out-worn things.

Racine's whole life--never notably sedate hitherto, with its frequent

escapades and its one grand passion--was turned into a new current by

his love match with Catherine de Romenet. On his marriage in June,

1677--among the _témoins_ present were Boileau-Despréaux and Uncle

Vitart, this latter then living in the same house with his

nephew--Racine ranged himself on the side of order and of domestic

days and nights. He gave proof of a genuine devotedness to his wife; a

good wife, if you will, yet hardly a companion for him in his work at

home and in the world outside. It is told of her, that she never saw

one of his pieces played, nor heard one read; and Louis, their

youngest son, says that his mother did not know what a verse was.

The earliest home of the new couple was on Île Saint-Louis. Neither

the house nor its street is to be identified to-day, but both may

surely be seen, so slight are the changes even now since that

provincial village, in the heart of Paris, was built up from an island

wash-house and wood-yard under the impulse of the plans prepared for

Henri IV., by his right hand, Sully. And in this parish church,

Saint-Louis-en-l'Île--a provincial church quite at home here--we find

Racine holding at the font his first child, Jean-Baptiste, in 1678.

Two years later he moved again, and from early in 1680 to the end of

1684 we find him at No. 2 Rue de l'Eperon, on the corner of Rue

Saint-André-des-Arts. Here his family grew in number, and the names of

three of his daughters, Marie-Catherine, Anne, and Élisabeth--all born

in this house--appeared on the baptismal register of his parish church,

Saint-André-des-Arts. This was the church of the christening of

François-Marie Arouet, a few years later. The Place Saint-André-des-Arts,

laid out in 1809, now covers the site of that very ancient church,

sold as National Domain in 1797, and demolished soon after.

This residence of Racine was left intact until within a few years,

when it was replaced by the Lycée Fénelon, a government school for

girls. There they read their "Racine," or such portions as are

permitted to the Young Person, not knowing nor caring that on that

spot the author once lived.

From here he removed, at the beginning of the year 1685, to No. 16 Rue

des Maçons. That street is now named Champollion, and the present

number of his house cannot be fixed. It still stands on the western

side of the street, about half way up between Rue des Écoles and Place

de la Sorbonne; for none of these houses have been rebuilt, and the

street itself is as secluded and as quiet as when Racine walked

through it. Here were born his daughters Jeanne and Madeleine, both

baptized in the parish church of Saint-Séverin--a venerable sanctuary,

still in use and quite unaltered, except that it has lost its

cloisters. And in this home in Rue des Maçons he brought to life two

plays finer than any of their forerunners, yet, unlike them, not

intended for public performance. "Esther" was written in 1689 to

please Madame de Maintenon, and was performed several times by the

girls at her school of Saint-Cyr; first before King and court, later

before friends of the court and those who had sufficient influence to

obtain the eagerly sought invitation. "Athalie," written for similar

semi-public production, two years later, failed to make any

impression, when played at Versailles by the same girls of Saint-Cyr.

After two performances, without scenery or costumes, it was staged no

more, and had no sale when published by the author. Yet Boileau told

him that it was his best work, and Voltaire said that it was nearer

perfection than any work of man. Indeed, "Athalie," in its grandeur

and its simplicity, may easily outrank any production of the French

pen during the seventeenth century. And, as literature, these two

plays are almost perfect specimens of Racine's almost perfect art and

diction; of that art, wherein he was so exquisite a craftsman; of that

diction, so rich, so daring, so pliable, so passionate, yet

restrained, refined, judicious.

In May, 1692, we learn by a letter to Boileau, Racine was still in Rue

des Maçons, but he must have left it shortly after, for in November of

this year he brought to be christened, in Saint-Sulpice, his youngest

child, Louis. This is the son who has left us an admirable biography

of his father, and some mediocre poems--"La Religion" and "La Grâce"

being those by which he is best known. So that Saint-Sulpice was,

already in November, 1692, the church of his new parish; and the house

to which he had removed in that parish, wherein the boy was born,

stands, quite unchanged to-day, in Rue Visconti. That street was then

named Rue des Marais-Saint-Germain, having begun life as a country

lane cut through the low marshy lands along the southern shore. It

extends only from Rue de Seine to Rue Bonaparte, then named Rue des

Petits-Augustins. Near its western end, at the present number 21, the

Marquis de Ranes had erected a grand mansion; and this, on his death

in 1678, was let out in apartments. It is asserted that it is the

house of whose second floor Racine became a tenant. Within the great

concave archway that frames the wide entrance door is set a tablet,

containing the names of Racine, of La Champmeslé, of Lecouvreur, and

of Clairon, all of whom are claimed to have been inhabitants of this

house. That tablet has carried conviction during the half-century

since it was cut and set, about 1855, but its word is to be doubted,

and many of us believe that the more ancient mansion at No. 13 of the

street was Racine's home. Local tradition makes the only proof at

present, and the matter cannot be absolutely decided until the lease

shall be found in that Parisian notary's office where it is now filed

away and forgotten. We know that Mlle. Lecouvreur lived in the

house formerly tenanted by Racine, and that she speaks of it as being

nearly at the middle of the street, and this fact points rather to No.

13 than to No. 21. And we know that Mlle. Clairon had tried for a long

time to secure an apartment in the house honored by memories of the

great dramatist and the great actress; for whose sake she was willing

to pay the then enormous rental of 200 francs. But the tablet's claim

to La Champmeslé as a tenant is an undue and unpardonable excess of

zeal. Whatever Racine may have done years before in his infatuation

for that bewitching woman, he did not bring her into his own dwelling!

[Illustration: Rue Visconti.

On the right is the Hôtel de Ranes, and in the distance is No. 13.]

She had come from Rouen, a young actress looking for work, along with

her husband, a petty actor and patcher-up of plays; for whose sake she

was admitted to the Théâtre du Marais. How she made use of this chance

is told by a line in a letter of Madame de Sévigné, who had seen her

play Atalide in "Bajazet," and pronounced "_ma belle fille_"--so she

brevets her son's lady-love--as "the most miraculously good

_comédienne_ that I have ever seen." It was on the boards of the Hôtel

de Bourgogne that she showed herself to be also the finest

_tragédienne_ of her time. She shone most in "Bajazet," and in others

of Racine's plays, creating her rôles under his admiring eye and under

his devoted training. He himself declaimed verse marvellously well,

and had in him the making of a consummate comedian, or a preacher, as

you please. La Champmeslé was not beautiful or clever, but her stature

was noble, her carriage glorious, her voice bewitching, her charm

irresistible. And La Fontaine sang praises of her _esprit_, and this

was indeed fitting at his age then. She lived somewhere in this

quarter, when playing in the troupe of the widow Molière at the

Théâtre Guénégaud. When she retired from those boards, she found a

home with her self-effacing husband in Auteuil, and there died in

1698.

The first floor in the right wing of the court of both 13 and 21 is

said to be the residence of Adrienne Lecouvreur. She had appeared in

1717 at the Comédie Française, in Rue de l'Ancienne-Comédie, and had

won her place at once. The choice spirits of the court, of the great

world, of the greater world of literature, were glad to meet in

fellowship around her generous and joyous table. Among them she found

excuse for an occasional caprice, but her deepest and most lasting

passion was given to the superb adventurer, Maurice de Saxe. His

quarters, when home from the wars--for which her pawned jewels

furnished him forth--were only a step down Rue Bonaparte from her

house, on Quai Malaquais. They were at No. 5, the most ancient mansion

left on the quay, with the exception of No. 1, hid behind the wing of

the Institute. He died at Chambord on November 30, 1750, and at this

house, May 17, 1751, there was an auction of his effects.

There came a time when the meetings of these two needed greater

secrecy, and he removed to Rue de Colombier, now named Rue Jacob. The

houses on the north side of this ancient street had--and some of them

still have--gardens running back to the gardens of the houses on the

south side of Rue Visconti. These little gardens had, in the dividing

fence, gates easily opened by night, for others besides Adrienne and

Maurice, as local legend whispers. Scribe has put their story on the

stage, where it is a tradition that the actress was actually poisoned

by a great lady, for the sake of the fascinating lover. He stood by

her bedside, with Voltaire and the physician, when she was dying in

1730, at the early age of thirty-eight, in one of the rooms on this

first floor over the court. Voltaire had had no sneers, but only

praise for the actress, and smiles for the woman whose kind heart had

brought her to his bedside, when he was ill, where she read to him the

last book out, the translation of the "Arabian Nights." He was stirred

to stinging invective of the churlish priest of Saint-Sulpice, who

denied her church-burial. In the same verse he commends that good man,

Monsieur de Laubinière, who gave her body hasty and unhallowed

interment. He came, by night, with two coaches and three men, and

drove with the poor body along the river-bank, turning up Rue de

Bourgogne to a spot behind the vast wood-yards that then lined the

river-front. There, in a hole they dug, they hid her. The fine old

mansion at No. 115 Rue de Grenelle, next to the southeast corner of

Rue de Bourgogne, covers her grave. In its garret, thrown into one

corner and almost forgotten, is a marble tablet, long and narrow, once

set in a wall on this site, to mark the spot so long ignored--as its

inscription says--where lies an actress of admirable _esprit_, of

good heart, and of a talent sublime in its simplicity. And it recites

the efforts of a true friendship, which got at last only this little

bit of earth for her grave.

Yet a few years further on, the same wing on the court of this dingy

old house sparkled with the splendid personality of Hippolyte Clairon,

who outshines all other stars of the French stage, unless it be

Rachel. Here she lived the life of one of those prodigal princesses,

in whose rôles she loved to dazzle on the boards of the Comédie

Française, where she first appeared in 1743. It was her public and not

her private performances that shocked the sensitive Church into a

threat of future terrors for her. When, in the course of a theatrical

quarrel, she refused to play, she was sent to prison, being one of

"His Majesty's Servants," disobedient and punishable. She preferred

possible purgatory to present imprisonment, and went back to her duty.

To this house again came Voltaire, as her visitor this time, along

with Diderot and Marmontel and many such men. Garrick came, too, when

in Paris--came quietly, less eager to proclaim his ardent admiration

for the woman than his public and professional acclamation of the

actress in the theatre. Her parts all played, she left the stage when

a little past forty, and, sinking slowly into age and poverty and

misery, she died at the age of eighty in 1803.

The Stones of Paris in History and Letters, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 9 / 16 段