The Court of Vienna, however, did not despair. The Austrian diplomatists

propounded a new scheme of politics, which, it must be owned, was not

altogether {208}without plausibility. The great powers, according to

this theory, had long been under a delusion. They had looked on each

other as natural enemies, while in truth they were natural allies.

A succession of cruel wars had devastated Europe, had thinned the

population, had exhausted the public resources, had loaded governments

with an immense burden of debt; and when, alter two hundred years of

murderous hostility or of hollow truce, the illustrious Houses whose

enmity had distracted the world sat down to count their Rains, to what

did the real advantage on either side amount? Simply to this, that they

had kept each other from thriving. It was not the King of France, it was

not the Emperor, who had reaped the fruits of the Thirty Years’ War, or

of the War of the Enigmatic Sanction. Those fruits had been pilfered by

states of the second and third rank, which, secured against jealousy

by their insignificance, had dexterously aggrandised themselves while

pretending to serve the animosity of the great chiefs of Christendom.

While the lion and tiger were tearing each other, the jackal had run off

into the jungle with the prey. The real gainer by the Thirty Years’ War

had been neither France nor Austria, but Sweden. The real gainer by the

war of the Pragmatic Sanction had been neither France nor Austria, but

the upstart of Brandenburg. France had made great efforts, had added

largely to her military glory, and largely to her public burdens; and

for what end? Merely that Frederic might rule Silesia. For this and

this alone one French army, wasted by sword and famine, had perished in

Bohemia; and another had purchased, with floods of the noblest blood,

the barren glory of Fontenoy. And this prince, for whom France had

suffered so much, was he a grateful, was he even {209}an honest ally?

Had he not been as false to the Court of Versailles as to the Court of

Vienna? Had he not played, on a large scale, the same part which,

in private life, is played by the vile agent of chicane who sets

his neighbours quarrelling, involves them in costly and interminable

litigation, and betrays them to each other all round, certain that,

whoever may be ruined, he shall be enriched? Surely the true wisdom

of the great powers was to attack, not each other, but this common

barrator, who, by inflaming the passions of both, by pretending to serve

both, and by deserting both, had raised himself above the station to

which he was born. The great object of Austria was to regain Silesia;

the great object of France was to obtain an accession of territory on

the side of Flanders. If they took opposite sides, the result would

probably be that, after a war of many years, after the slaughter of many

thousands of brave men, after the waste of many millions of crowns, they

would lay down their arms without having achieved either object;

but, if they came to an understanding, there would be no risk, and no

difficulty. Austria would willingly make in Belgium such cessions as

France could not expect to obtain by ten pitched battles. Silesia would

easily be annexed to the monarchy of which it had long been a part. The

union of two such powerful governments would at once overawe the King

of Prussia. If he resisted, one short campaign would settle his fate.

France and Austria, long accustomed to rise from the game of war both

losers, would, for the first time, both be gainers. There could be no

room for jealousy between them, The power of both would be increased

at once; the equilibrium between them would be preserved; and the only

sufferer would be {210}a mischievous and unprincipled buccaneer, who

deserved no tenderness from either.

These doctrines, attractive from their novelty and ingenuity, soon

became fashionable at the supper-parties and in the coffeehouses of

Paris, and were espoused by every gay Marquis, and every facetious abbé

who was admitted to see Madame de Pompadour’s hair curled and powdered.

It was not, however, to any political theory that the strange coalition

between France and Austria owed its origin. The real motive which

induced the great continental powers to forget their old animosities and

their old state maxims, was personal aversion to the King of Prussia.

This feeling was strongest in Maria Theresa; but it was by no means

confined to her. Frederic, in some respects a good master, was

emphatically a bad neighbour. That he was hard in all dealings, and

quick to take all advantages, was not his most odious fault. His bitter

and scoffing speech had inflicted keener wounds than his ambition.

In his character of wit he was under less restraint than even in

his character of ruler. Satirical verses against all the princes

and ministers of Europe were ascribed to his pen. In his letters and

conversation he alluded to the greatest potentates of the age in terms

which would have better suited Collé, in a war of repartee with young

Crébillon at Pelletier’s table, than a great sovereign speaking of great

sovereigns. About women he was in the habit of expressing himself in a

manner which it was impossible for the meekest of women to forgive; and,

unfortunately for him, almost the whole Continent was then governed

by women who were by no means conspicuous for meekness. Maria Theresa

herself had not escaped his scurrilous jests. The Empress Elizabeth of

Russia knew {211}that her gallantries afforded him a favourite theme for

ribaldry and invective. Madame de Pompadour, who was really the head

of the French Government, had been even more keenly galled. She had

attempted, by the most delicate flattery, to propitiate the King of

Prussia; but her messages had drawn from him only dry and sarcastic

replies. The Empress Queen took a very different course. Though the

haughtiest of princesses, though the most austere of matrons, she forgot

in her thirst for revenge, both the dignity of her race and the

purity of her character, and condescended to flatter the low-born and

low-minded concubine, who having acquired influence by prostituting

herself, retained it by prostituting others. Maria Theresa actually

wrote with her own hand a note, full of expressions of esteem and

friendship to her dear cousin, the daughter of the butcher Poisson, the

wife of the publican D’Etioles, the kidnapper of young girls for the

harem of an old rake, a strange cousin for the descendant of so many

Emperors of the West! The mistress was completely gained over, and

easily carried her point with Lewis, who had, indeed, wrongs of his own

to resent. His feelings were not quick; but contempt, says the eastern

proverb, pierces even through the shell of a tortoise; and neither

prudence nor decorum had ever restrained Frederic from expressing his

measureless contempt for the sloth, the imbecility, and the baseness of

Lewis. France was thus induced to join the coalition; and the example

of France determined the conduct of Sweden, then completely subject to

French influence.

The enemies of Frederic were surely strong enough to attack him openly;

but they were desirous to add to all their other advantages, the

advantage of a surprise. {212}He was not, however, a man to be taken off

his guard. He had tools in every court; and he now received from

Vienna, from Dresden, and from Paris, accounts so circumstantial and so

consistent, that he could not doubt of his danger. He learnt that he was

to be assailed at once by France, Austria, Russia, Saxony, Sweden, and

the Germanic body; that the greater part of his dominions was to

be portioned out among his enemies; that France, which from her

geographical position could not directly share in his spoils, was to

receive an equivalent in the Netherlands; that Austria was to have

Silesia, and the Czarina East Prussia; that Augustus of Saxony expected

Magdeburg; and that Sweden would be rewarded with part of Pomerania. If

these designs succeeded, the House of Brandenburg would at once sink in

the European system to a place lower than that of the Duke of Wurtemburg

or the Margrave of Baden.

And what hope was there that these designs would fail? No such union

of the continental powers had been seen for ages. A less formidable

confederacy had in a week conquered all the provinces of Venice, when

Venice was at the height of power, wealth, and glory. A less formidable

confederacy had compelled Lewis the Fourteenth to bow down his haughty

head to the very earth. A less formidable confederacy has, within our

own memory, subjugated a still mightier empire, and abased a still

prouder name. Such odds had never been heard of in war. The people whom

Frederic ruled were not five millions. The population of the countries

which were leagued against him amounted to a hundred millions. The

disproportion in wealth was at least equally great. Small communities,

actuated by strong sentiments of patriotism or {213}loyalty, have

sometimes made head against great monarchies weakened by factions and

discontents. But small as was Frederic’s kingdom, it probably contained

a greater number of disaffected subjects than were to be found in

all the states of his enemies. Silesia formed the fourth part of his

dominions; and from the Silesians, born under Austrian princes, the

utmost that he could expect was apathy. From the Silesian Catholics he

could hardly expect any thing but resistance.

Some states have been enabled, by their geographical position, to defend

themselves with advantage against immense force. The sea has repeatedly

protected England against the fury of the whole Continent. The Venetian

government, driven from its possessions on the land, could still bid

defiance to the confederates of Cambray from the Arsenal amidst the

lagoons. More than one great and well appointed army, which regarded the

shepherds of Switzerland as an easy prey, has perished in the passes of

the Alps. Frederic had no such advantage. The form of his states, their

situation, the nature of the ground, all were against him. His long,

scattered, straggling territory seemed to have been shaped with an

express view to the convenience of invaders, and was protected by no

sea, by no chain of hills. Scarcely any corner of it was a week’s march

from the territory of the enemy. The capital itself, in the event of

war, would be constantly exposed to insult. In truth, there was hardly a

politician or a soldier in Europe who doubted that the conflict would

be terminated in a very few days by the prostration of the house of

Brandenburg.

Nor was Frederic’s own opinion very different. He anticipated nothing

short of his own ruin, and of the ruin of his family. Yet there was

still a chance, a {214}slender chance, of escape. His states had at

least the advantage of a central position; his enemies were widely

separated from each other, and could not conveniently unite their

overwhelming forces on one point. They inhabited different climates, and

it was probable that the season of the year which would be best suited

to the military operations of one portion of the league, would be

unfavourable to those of another portion. The Prussian monarchy, too,

was free from some infirmities which were found in empires far more

extensive and magnificent. Its effective strength for a desperate

struggle was not to be measured merely by the number of square miles

or the number of people. In that spare but well-knit and well-exercised

body, there was nothing but sinew, and muscle, and bone. No public

creditors looked for dividends. No distant colonies required defence. No

court, filled with flatterers and mistresses, devoured the pay of fifty

battalions. The Prussian army, though far inferior in number to the

troops which were about to be opposed to it, was yet strong out of

all proportion to the extent of the Prussian dominions. It was also

admirably trained and admirably officered, accustomed to obey and

accustomed to conquer. The revenue was not only unincumbered by debt,

but exceeded the ordinary outlay in time of peace. Alone of all

the European princes, Frederic had a treasure laid up for a day of

difficulty. Above all, he was one, and his enemies were many. In

their camps would certainly be found the jealousy, the dissension, the

slackness inseparable from coalitions; on his side was the energy, the

unity, the secrecy of a strong dictatorship. To a certain extent the

deficiency of military means might be supplied by the resources of

military art. Small as the King’s army was, when {215}compared with

the six hundred thousand men whom the confederates could bring into

the field, celerity of movement might in some degree compensate for

deficiency of bulk. It was thus just possible that genius, judgment,

resolution, and good luck united, might protract the struggle during a

campaign or two; and to gain even a month was of importance. It

could not be longer before the vices which are found in all extensive

confederacies would begin to show themselves. Every member of the league

would think his own share of the war too large, and his own share of the

spoils too small. Complaints and recriminations would abound. The Turk

might stir on the Danube; the statesmen of France might discover the

error which they had committed in abandoning the fundamental principles

of their national policy. Above all, death might rid Prussia of its most

formidable enemies. The war was the effect of the personal aversion with

which three or four sovereigns regarded Frederic; and the decease of any

one of those sovereigns might produce a complete revolution in the state

of Europe.

In the midst of a horizon generally dark and stormy, Frederic could

discern one bright spot. The peace which had been concluded between

England and France in 1748, had been in Europe no more than an

armistice; and had not even been an armistice in the other quarters of

the globe. In India the sovereignty of the Carnatic was disputed between

two great Mussulman houses; Fort Saint George had taken one side,

Pondicherry the other; and in a series of battles and sieges the troops

of Lawrence and Clive had been opposed to those of Dupleix. A struggle

less important in its consequences, but not less likely to produce

irritation, was carried on between those French and {216}English

adventurers, who kidnapped negroes and collected gold dust on the coast

of Guinea. But it was in North America that the emulation and mutual

aversion of the two nations were most conspicuous. The French attempted

to hem in the English colonists by a chain of military posts, extending

from the Great Lakes to the mouth of the Mississippi. The English took

arms. The wild aboriginal tribes appeared on each side mingled with the

Pale Faces. Battles were fought; forts were stormed; and hideous stories

about stakes, scalpings, and death-songs reached Europe, and inflamed

that national animosity which the rivalry of ages had produced. The

disputes between France and England came to a crisis at the very time

when the tempest which had been gathering was about to burst on Prussia.

The tastes and interests of Frederic would have led him, if he had been

allowed an option, to side with the house of Bourbon. But the folly of

the Court of Versailles left him no choice. France became the tool of

Austria; and Frederic was forced to become the ally of England. He could

not, indeed, expect that a power which covered the sea with its fleets,

and which had to make war at once on the Ohio and the Ganges, would be

able to spare a large number of troops for operations in Germany. But

England, though poor compared with the England of our time, was far

richer than any country on the Continent. The amount of her revenue, and

the resources which she found in her credit, though they may be thought

small by a generation which has seen her raise a hundred and thirty

millions in a single year, appeared miraculous to the politicians of

that age. A very moderate portion of her wealth, expended by an able

and economical prince, in a country where prices were low. {217}would be

sufficient to equip and maintain a formidable army.

Such was the situation in which Frederic found himself. He saw the whole

extent of his peril. He saw that there was still a faint possibility of

escape; and, with prudent temerity, he determined to strike the first

blow. It was in the month of August, 1756, that the great war of the

Seven Years commenced. The King demanded of the Empress Queen a distinct

explanation of her intentions, and plainly told her that he should

consider a refusal as a declaration of war. “I want,” he said, “no

answer in the style of an oracle.” He received an answer at once haughty

and evasive. In an instant the rich electorate of Saxony was overflowed

by sixty thousand Prussian troops. Augustus with his army occupied a

strong position at Pirna. The Queen of Poland was at Dresden. In a few

days Pirna was blockaded and Dresden was taken. The first object of

Frederic was to obtain possession of the Saxon State Papers; for those

papers, he well knew, contained ample proofs that, though apparently an

aggressor, he was really acting in self-defence. The Queen of Poland, as

well acquainted as Frederic with the importance of those documents, had

packed them up, had concealed them in her bed-chamber, and was about to

lend them off to Warsaw, when a Prussian officer made his appearance. In

the hope that no soldier would venture to outrage a lady, a queen,

the daughter of an emperor, the mother-in-law of a dauphin, she

placed herself before the trunk, and at length sat down on it. But all

resistance was vain. The papers were carried to Frederic, who found in

them, as he expected, abundant evidence of the designs of the coalition.

The most important documents were instantly published, {218}and the

effect of the publication was great. It was clear that, of whatever

sins the King of Prussia might formerly have been guilty, he was now

the injured party, and had merely anticipated a blow intended to destroy

him.

The Saxon camp at Pirna was in the mean time closely invested; but the

besieged were not without hopes of succour. A great Austrian army

under Marshal Brown was about to pour through the passes which separate

Bohemia from Saxony. Frederic left at Pirna a force sufficient to deal

with the Saxons, hastened into Bohemia, encountered Brown at Lowositz,

and defeated him. This battle decided the fate of Saxony. Augustus and

his favourite Bruhl fled to Poland. The whole army of the electorate

capitulated. From that time till the end of the war, Frederic treated

Saxony as a part of his dominions, or, rather, he acted towards the

Saxons in a manner which may serve to illustrate the whole meaning

of that tremendous sentence, “subjectos tanquam suos, viles tanquam

alienos.” Saxony was as much in his power as Brandenburg; and he had

no such interest in the welfare of Saxony as he had in the welfare of

Brandenburg. He accordingly levied troops and exacted contributions

throughout the enslaved province, with far more rigour than in any part

of his own dominions. Seventeen thousand men who had been in the camp

at Pirna were half compelled, half persuaded to enlist under

their conqueror. Thus, within a few weeks from the commencement of

hostilities, one of the confederates had been disarmed, and his weapons

were now pointed against the rest.

The winter put a stop to military operations. All had hitherto gone

well. But the real tug of war was {219}still to come. It was easy to

foresee that the year 1757 would be a memorable era in the history of

Europe.

The King’s scheme for the campaign was simple, bold, and judicious. The

Duke of Cumberland with an English and Hanoverian army was in Western

Germany, and might be able to prevent the French troops from attacking

Prussia. The Russians, confined by their snows, would probably not stir

till the spring was far advanced. Saxony was prostrated. Sweden could do

nothing very important. During a few months Frederic would have to deal

with Austria alone. Even thus the odds were against him. But ability and

courage have often triumphed against odds still more formidable.

Early in 1757 the Prussian army in Saxony began to move. Through four

defiles in the mountains they came pouring into Bohemia. Prague was

the King’s first mark; but the ulterior object was probably Vienna. At

Prague lay Marshal Brown with one great army. Daun, the most cautious

and fortunate of the Austrian captains, was advancing with another.

Frederic determined to overwhelm Brown before Daun should arrive. On the

sixth of May was fought, under those walls which, a hundred and thirty

years before, had witnessed the victory of the Catholic league and the

flight of the unhappy Palatine, a battle more bloody than any which

Europe saw during the long interval between Malplaquet and Evlau. The

King and Prince Ferdinand of Brunswick were distinguished on that day by

their valour and exertions. But the chief glory was with Schwerin.

When the Prussian infantry wavered, the stout old marshal snatched the

colours from an ensign, and, waving them in the air, {220}led back his

regiment to the charge. Thus at seventy-two years of age he fell in the

thickest battle, still grasping the standard which bears the black eagle

on the field argent. The victory remained with the King; but it had been

dearly purchased. Whole columns of his bravest warriors had fallen.

He admitted that he had lost eighteen thousand men. Of the enemy,

twenty-four thousand had been killed wounded, or taken.

Part of the defeated army was shut up in Prague. Part fled to join

the troops which, under the command of Daun, were now close at hand.

Frederic determined to play over the same game which had succeeded at

Lowositz. He left a large force to besiege Prague, and at the head

of thirty thousand men he marched against Daun. The cautious Marshal,

though he had a great superiority in numbers, would risk nothing. He

occupied at Kolin a position almost impregnable, and awaited the attack

of the King.

It was the eighteenth of June, a day which, if the Greek superstition

still retained its influence, would be held sacred to Nemesis, a day

on which the two greatest princes of modern times were taught, by

a terrible experience, that neither skill nor valour can fix the

inconstancy of fortune. The battle began before noon; and part of the

Prussian army maintained the contest till after the midsummer sun had

gone down. But at length the King found that his troops, having been

repeatedly driven back with frightful carnage, could no longer be led

to the charge. He was with difficulty persuaded to quit the field. The

officers of his personal staff were under the necessity of expostulating

with him, and one of them took the liberty to say, “Does your Majesty

mean to storm {221}the batteries alone?” Thirteen thousand of his

bravest followers had perished. Nothing remained for him but to retreat

in good order, to raise the siege of Prague, and to hurry his army by

different routes out of Bohemia.

This stroke seemed to be final. Frederic’s situation had at best been

such, that only an uninterrupted run of good luck could save him, as it

seemed, from ruin. And now, almost in the outset of the contest, he had

met with a check which, even in a war between equal powers, would have

been felt as serious. He had owed much to the opinion which all Europe

entertained of his army. Since his accession, his soldiers had in many

successive battles been victorious over the Austrians. But the glory had

departed from his arms. All whom his malevolent sarcasms had wounded,

made haste to avenge themselves by scoffing at the scoffer. His soldiers

had ceased to confide in his star. In every part of his camp his

dispositions were severely criticized. Even in his own family he had

detractors. His next brother, William, heir-presumptive, or rather, in

truth, heir-apparent to the throne, and great-grandfather of the present

king, could not refrain from lamenting his own fate and that of the

house of Hohenzollern, once so great and so prosperous, but now, by

the rash ambition of its chief, made a by-word to all nations. These

complaints, and some blunders which William committed during the retreat

from Bohemia, called forth the bitter displeasure of the inexorable

King. The prince’s heart was broken by the cutting reproaches of his

brother; he quitted the army, retired to a country seat, and in a short

time died of shame and vexation.

Critical, Historical, and Miscellaneous Essays; Vol. 5 With a Memoir and Index · 第 15 / 38 段