I will allow then, that the Chymists do not causelessly accuse the

Doctrine of the four elements of incompetency to explain the

Properties of Compound bodies. And for this Rejection of a Vulgar

Error, they ought not to be deny'd what praise men may deserve for

exploding a Doctrine whose Imperfections are so conspicuous, that men

needed but not to shut their Eyes, to discover them. But I am

mistaken, if our Hermetical Philosophers Themselves need not, as well

as the Peripateticks, have Recourse to more Fruitfull and

Comprehensive Principles then the _tria Prima_, to make out the

Properties of the Bodies they converse with. Not to accumulate

Examples to this purpose, (because I hope for a fitter opportunity to

prosecute this Subject) let us at present only point at Colour, that

you may guess by what they say of so obvious and familiar a Quality,

how little Instruction we are to expect from the _Tria Prima_ in those

more abstruse ones, which they with the _Aristotelians_ stile Occult.

For about Colours, neither do they at all agree among themselves, nor

have I met with any one, of which of the three Perswasions soever,

that does intelligibly explicate Them. The Vulgar Chymists are wont to

ascribe Colours to Mercury; _Paracelsus_ in divers places attributes

them to Salt; and _Sennertus_,[25] having recited their differing

Opinions, Dissents from both, and referrs Colours rather unto Sulphur.

But how Colours do, nay, how they may, arise from either of these

Principles, I think you will scarce say that any has yet intelligibly

explicated. And if Mr. _Boyle_ will allow me to shew you the

Experiments which he has collected about Colours, you will, I doubt

not, confess that bodies exhibite colours, not upon the Account of the

Predominancy of this or that Principle in them, but upon that of their

Texture, and especially the Disposition of their superficial parts,

whereby the Light rebounding thence to the Eye is so modifi'd, as by

differing Impressions variously to affect the Organs of Sight. I might

here take notice of the pleasing variety of Colours exhibited by the

Triangular glass, (as 'tis wont to be call'd) and demand, what

addition or decrement of either Salt, Sulphur, or Mercury, befalls the

Body of the Glass by being Prismatically figur'd; and yet 'tis known,

that without that shape it would not affor'd those colours as it does.

But because it may be objected, that these are not real, but apparent

Colours; that I may not lose time in examing the Distinction, I will

alledge against the Chymists, a couple of examples of Real and

Permanent Colours Drawn from Metalline Bodies, and represent, that

without the addition of any extraneous body, Quicksilver may by the

Fire alone, and that in glass Vessels, be depriv'd of its silver-like

Colour, and be turn'd into a Red Body; and from this Red Body without

Addition likewise may be obtain'd a Mercury Bright and Specular as it

was before; So that I have here a lasting Colour Generated and

Destroy'd (as I have seen) at pleasure, without adding or taking away

either Mercury, Salt, or Sulphur; and if you take a clean and slender

piece of harden'd steel, and apply to it the flame of a candle at some

little distance short of the point, You shall not have held the Steel

long in the flame, but You shall perceive divers Colours, as Yellow,

Red and Blew, to appear upon the Surface of the metal, and as it were

run along in chase of one another towards the point; So that the same

body, and that in one and the same part, may not only have a new

colour produc'd in it, but exhibite successively divers Colours within

a minute of an hour, or thereabouts, and any of these Colours may by

Removing the Steel from the Fire, become Permanent, and last many

years. And this Production and Variety of Colours cannot reasonably be

suppos'd to proceed from the Accession of any of the three Principles,

to which of them soever Chymists will be pleas'd to ascribe Colours;

especially considering, that if you but suddenly Refrigerate that

Iron, First made Red hot, it will be harden'd and Colourless again;

and not only by the Flame of a Candle, but by any other equivalent

heat Conveniently appli'd, the like Colours will again be made to

appear and succeed one another, as at the First. But I must not any

further prosecute an Occasional Discourse, though that were not so

Difficult for me to do, as I fear it would be for the Chymists to give

a better Account of the other Qualities, by their Principles, then

they have done of Colours. And your _Sennertus_ Himself (though an

Author I much value) would I fear have been exceedingly puzl'd to

resolve, by the _Tria Prima_, halfe that Catalogue of Problems, which

he challenges the Vulgar Peripateticks to explicate by their four

Elements.[26] And supposing it were true, that Salt or Sulphur were

the Principle to which this or that Quality may be peculiarly

referr'd, yet though he that teaches us this teaches us something

concerning That quality, yet he Teaches us but something. For indeed

he does not Teach us That which can in any Tollerable measure satisfie

an inquisitive Searcher after Truth. For what is it to me to know,

that such a quality resides in such a Principle or Element, whilst I

remain altogether ignorant of the Cause of that quality, and the

manner of its production and Operation? How little do I know more then

any Ordinary Man of Gravity, if I know but that the Heaviness of mixt

bodies proceeds from that of the Earth they are compos'd of, if I know

not the reason why the Earth is Heavy? And how little does the Chymist

teach the Philosopher of the Nature of Purgatition, if he only tells

him that the Purgative Vertue of Medicines resides in their Salt? For,

besides that this must not be conceded without Limitation, since the

purging parts of many Vegetables Extracted by the Water wherein they

are infus'd, are at most but such compounded Salts, (I mean mingl'd

with Oyle, and Spirit, and Earth, as Tartar and divers other Subjects

of the Vegetable Kingdom afford;) And since too that Quicksilver

precipitated either with Gold, or without Addition, into a powder, is

wont to be strongly enough Cathartical, though the Chymists have not

yet prov'd, that either Gold or Mercury have any Salt at all, much

less any that is Purgative; Besides this, I say, how little is it to

me, to know That 'tis the Salt of the Rhubarb (for Instance) that

purges, if I find That it does not purge as Salt; since scarce any

Elementary Salt is in small quantity cathartical. And if I know not

how Purgation in general is effected in a Humane Body? In a word, as

'tis one thing to know a mans Lodging, and another, to be acquainted

with him; so it may be one thing to know the subject wherein a Quality

principally resides, and another thing to have a right notion and

knowledg of the quality its self. Now that which I take to be the

reason of this Chymical Deficiency, is the same upon whose account I

think the _Aristotelian_ and divers other Theories incompetent to

explicate the Origen [Errata: origine] of Qualities. For I am apt to

think, that men will never be able to explain the _Phaenomena_ of

Nature, while they endeavour to deduce them only from the Presence and

Proportion of such or such material Ingredients, and consider such

ingredients or Elements as Bodies in a state of rest; whereas indeed

the greatest part of the affections of matter, and consequently of the

_Phaenomena_ of nature, seems to depend upon the motion and the

continuance [Errata: contrivance] of the small parts of Bodies. For

'tis by motion that one part of matter acts upon another; and 'tis,

for the most part, the texture of the Body upon which the moving parts

strike, that modifies to motion or Impression, and concurrs with it

to the production of those Effects which make up the chief part of the

Naturalists Theme.

[Footnote 25: _De Cons. & dissen. cap. 11. pag. 186._]

[Footnote 26: _Sennert. de Con. seus. [Transcriber's Note: Consens.] &

Dissens. pag. 165. 166._]

But (sayes _Eleutherius_) me thinks for all this, you have left some

part of what I alledg'd in behalf of the three principles, unanswer'd.

For all that you have said will not keep this from being a useful

Discovery, that since in the Salt of one Concrete, in the Sulphur of

another and the Mercury of a third, the Medicinal vertue of it

resides, that Principle ought to be separated from the rest, and there

the desired faculty must be sought for.

I never denyed (Replyes _Carneades_) that the Notion of the _Tria

Prima_ may be of some use, but (continues he laughing) by what you now

alledg for it, it will but appear That it is useful to Apothecaries,

rather than to Philosophers, The being able to make things Operative

being sufficient to those, whereas the Knowledge of Causes is the

Thing looked after by These. And let me Tell You, _Eleutherius_, even

this it self will need to be entertained with some caution.

For first, it will not presently follow, That if the Purgative or

other vertue of a simple may be easily extracted by Water or Spirit of

Wine, it Resides in the Salt or Sulphur of the Concrete; Since unlesse

the Body have before been resolved by the Fire, or some Other Powerful

Agent, it will, for the most part, afford in the Liquors I have named,

rather the finer compounded parts of it self, Than the Elementary

ones. As I noted before, That Water will dissolve not only pure Salts,

but Crystals of Tartar, Gumme Arabick, Myrr'h, and Other Compound

Bodies. As also Spirit of Wine will Dissolve not only the pure Sulphur

of Concretes, but likewise the whole Substance of divers Resinous

Bodies, as Benzoin, the Gummous parts of Jallap, Gumme Lacca, and

Other bodies that are counted perfectly Mixt. And we see that the

Extracts made either with Water or Spirit of Wine are not of a simple

and Elementary Nature, but Masses consisting of the looser Corpuscles,

and finer parts of the Concretes whence they are Drawn; since by

Distillation they may be Divided into more Elementary substances.

Next, we may consider That even when there intervenes a Chymical

resolution by he [Transcriber's Note: the] Fire, 'tis seldom in the

Saline or Sulphureous principle, as such, that the desir'd Faculty of

the Concrete Resides; But, as that Titular Salt or Sulphur is yet a

mixt body, though the Saline or Sulphureous Nature be predominant in

it. For, if in Chymical Resolutions the separated Substances were pure

and simple Bodies, and of a perfect Elementary Nature; no one would be

indued with more Specifick Vertues, than another; and their qualities

would Differ as Little as do those of Water. And let me add this upon

the bye, That even Eminent Chymists have suffer'd themselves to be

reprehended by me for their over great Diligence in purifying some of

the things they obtain by Fire from mixt Bodies. For though such

compleatly purifyed Ingredients of Bodies might perhaps be more

satisfactory to our Understanding; yet others are often more useful to

our Lives, the efficacy of such Chymical Productions depending most

upon what they retain of the Bodies whence they are separated, or gain

by the new associations of the Dissipated among themselves; whereas

if they were meerly Elementary, their uses would be comparatively very

small; and the vertues of Sulphurs, Salts, or Other such Substances of

one denomination, would be the very same.

And by the Way (_Eleutherius_) I am inclin'd upon this ground to

Think, That the artificial resolution of compound bodies by Fire does

not so much enrich mankind, as it divides them into their supposed

Principles; as upon the score of its making new compounds by now

[Transcriber's Note: new] combinations of the dissipated parts of the

resolv'd Body. For by this means the Number of mixt Bodies is

considerably increased. And many of those new productions are indow'd

with useful qualities, divers of which they owe not to the body from

which they were obtein'd, but to Their newly Acquired Texture.

But thirdly, that which is principally to be Noted is this, that as

there are divers Concretes whose Faculties reside in some one or other

of those differing Substances that Chymists call their Sulphurs,

Salts, and Mercuries, and consequently may be best obtain'd, by

analyzing the Concrete whereby the desired Principles may be had

sever'd or freed from the rest; So there are other wherein the noblest

properties lodge not in the Salt, or Sulphur, or Mercury, but depend

immediately upon the form (or if you will) result from the determinate

structure of the Whole Concrete; and consequently they that go about

to extract the Vertues of such bodies, by exposing them to the

Violence of the Fire, do exceedingly mistake, and take the way to

Destroy what they would obtain.

I remmember that _Helmont_ himself somewhere confesses, That as the

Fire betters some things and improves their Vertues, so it spoyles

others and makes them degenerate. And elsewhere he judiciously

affirmes, that there may be sometimes greater vertue in a simple, such

as Nature has made it, than in any thing that can by the fire be

separated from it. And lest you should doubt whether he means by the

vertues of things those that are Medical; he has in one place[27] this

ingenuous confession; _Credo_ (sayes he) _simplicia in sua

simplicitate esse sufficientia pro sanatione omnium morborum._ Nag.

[Errata: Nay,] Barthias, even in a Comment upon _Beguinus_,[28]

scruples not to make this acknowledgment; _Valde absurdum est_ (sayes

he) _ex omnibus rebus extracta facere, salia, quintas essentias;

praesertim ex substantiis per se plane vel subtilibus vel homogeneis,

quales sunt uniones, Corallia, Moscus, Ambra, &c._ Consonantly

whereunto he also tells Us (and Vouches the famous _Platerus_, for

having candidly given the same Advertisement to his Auditors,) that

some things have greater vertues, and better suited to our humane

nature, when unprepar'd, than when they have past the Chymists Fire;

as we see, sayes my Author, in Pepper; of which some grains swallowed

perform more towards the relief of a Distempered stomack, than a great

quantity of the Oyle of the same spice.

[Footnote 27: Helmont Pharm. & Dispens. Nov. p. 458.]

[Footnote 28: Vide Jer. ad Begu. Lib. 1. Cap. 17.]

It has been (pursues _Carneades_) by our Friend here present observ'd

concerning Salt-petre, that none of the substances into which the Fire

is wont to divide it, retaines either the Tast, the cooling vertue, or

some other of the properties of the Concrete; and that each of those

Substances acquires new qualities, not to be found in the Salt-Petre

it self. The shining property of the tayls of gloworms does survive

but so short a time the little animal made conspicuous by it, that

inquisitive men have not scrupled publickly to deride _Baptista Porta_

and others; who deluded perhaps with some Chymical surmises have

ventur'd to prescribe the distillation of a Water from the tayles of

Glowormes, as a sure way to obtain a liquor shining in the Dark. To

which I shall now add no other example than that afforded us by Amber;

which, whilst it remains an intire body, is endow'd with an Electrical

faculty of drawing to it self fethers, strawes, and such like Bodies;

which I never could observe either in its Salt, its Spirit, its Oyle,

or in the Body I remember I once made by the reunion of its divided

Elements; none of these having such a Texture as the intire Concrete.

And however Chymists boldly deduce such and such properties from this

or that proportion of their component Principles; yet in Concretes

that abound with this or that Ingredient, 'tis not alwayes so much by

vertue of its presence, nor its plenty, that the Concrete is qualify'd

to perform such and such Effects; as upon the account of the

particular texture of that and the other Ingredients, associated after

a determinate Manner into one Concrete (though possibly such a

proportion of that ingredient may be more convenient than an other for

the constituting of such a body.) Thus in a clock the hand is mov'd

upon the dyal, the bell is struck, and the other actions belonging to

the engine are perform'd, not because the Wheeles are of brass or

iron, or part of one metal and part of another, or because the weights

are of Lead, but by Vertue of the size, shape, bigness, and

co-aptation of the several parts; which would performe the same things

though the wheels were of Silver, or Lead, or Wood, and the Weights of

Stone or Clay; provided the Fabrick or Contrivance of the engine were

the same: though it be not to be deny'd, that Brasse and Steel are

more convenient materials to make clock-wheels of than Lead, or Wood.

And to let you see, _Eleutherius_, that 'tis sometimes at least, upon

the Texture of the small parts of a body, and not alwaies upon the

presence, or recesse, or increase, or Decrement of any one of its

Principle, that it may lose some such Qualities, and acquire some

such others as are thought very strongly inherent to the bodies they

Reside in. [Errata: in;] I will add to what may from my past discourse

be refer'd to this purpose, this Notable Example, from my Own

experience; That Lead may without any additament, and only by various

applications of the Fire, lose its colour, and acquire sometimes a

gray, sometimes a yellowish, sometimes a red, sometimes an

_amethihstine_ [Transcriber's Note: amethistine] colour; and after

having past through these, and perhaps divers others, again recover

its leaden colour, and be made a bright body. That also this Lead,

which is so flexible a metal, may be made as brittle as Glasse, and

presently be brought to be again flexible and Malleable as before. And

besides, that the same lead, which I find by _Microscopes_ to be one

of the most opacous bodies in the World, may be reduced to a fine

transparent glasse; whence yet it may returne to an opacous Nature

again; and all this, as I said, without the addition of any extraneous

body, and meerly by the manner and Method of exposing it to the Fire.

But (sayes _Carneades_) after having already put you to so prolix a

trouble, it is time for me to relieve you with a promise of putting

speedily a period to it; And to make good that promise, I shall from

all that I have hitherto discoursed with you, deduce but this one

proposition by way of Corollary. [_That it may as yet be doubted,

whether or no there be any determinate Number of Elements; Or, if you

please, whether or no all compound bodies, do consist of the same

number of Elementary ingredients or material Principles._]

This being but an inference from the foregoing Discourse, it will not

be requisite to insist at large on the proofs of it; But only to point

at the chief of Them, and Referr You for Particulars to what has been

already Delivered.

In the First place then, from what has been so largely discours'd, it

may appear, that the Experiments wont to be brought, whether by the

common Peripateticks, or by the vulgar Chymists, to demonstrate that

all mixt bodies are made up precisely either of the four Elements, or

the three Hypostatical Principles, do not evince what they are

alledg'd to prove. And as for the other common arguments, pretended to

be drawn from Reason in favour of _Aristotelian Hypothesis_ (for the

Chymists are wont to rely almost altogether upon Experiments) they are

Commonly grounded upon such unreasonable or precarious Suppositions,

that 'tis altogether as easie and as just for any man to reject them,

as for those that take them for granted to assert them, being indeed

all of them as indemonstrable as the conclusion to be inferr'd from

them; and some of them so manifestly weak and prooflesse; that he must

be a very courteous adversary, that can be willing to grant them; and

as unskilful a one, that can be compelled to do so.

In the next place, it may be considered, if what those Patriarchs of

the _Spagyrists_, _Paracelsus_ and _Helmont_, do on divers occasions

positively deliver, be true; namely that the _Alkahest_ does Resolve

all mixt Bodies into other Principles than the fire, it must be

decided which of the two resolutions (that made by the _Alkahest_, or

that made by the fire) shall determine the number of the Elements,

before we can be certain how many there are.

And in the mean time, we may take notice in the last place, that as

the distinct substances whereinto the _Alkahest_ divides bodies, are

affirm'd to be differing in nature from those whereunto they are wont

to be reduc'd by fire, and to be obtain'd from some bodies more in

Number than from some others; since he tells us, he could totally

reduce all sorts of Stones into Salt only, whereas of a coal he had

two distinct Liquors.[29] So, although we should acquiesce in that

resolution which is made by fire, we find not that all mixt bodies are

thereby divided into the same number of Elements and Principles; some

Concretes affordding more of them than others do; Nay and sometimes

this or that Body affording a greater number of Differing substances

by one way of management, than the same yields by another. And they

that out of Gold, or Mercury, or Muscovy-glasse, will draw me as many

distinct substances as I can separate from Vitriol, or from the juice

of Grapes variously orderd, may teach me that which I shall very

Thankfully learn. Nor does it appear more congruous to that variety

that so much conduceth to the perfection of the Universe, that all

elemented bodies be compounded of the same number of Elements, then it

would be for a language, that all its words should consist of the same

number of Letters.

[Footnote 29: _Novi saxum & lapides omnes in merum salem suo saxo aut

lapidi & aequiponderantem reducere absque omni prorsus sulphure aut

Mercurio._ Helmont. pag. 409.]

THE

SCEPTICAL CHYMIST

OR,

_A Paradoxical Appendix to the Foregoing Treatise._

_The Sixth Part._

Here _Carneades_ Having Dispach't what he Thought Requisite to oppose

against what the Chymists are wont to alledge for Proof of their three

Principles, Paus'd awhile, and look'd about him, to discover whether

it were Time for him and his Friend to Rejoyne the Rest of the

Company. But _Eleutherius_ perceiving nothing yet to forbid Them to

Prosecute their Discourse a little further, said to his Friend, (who

had likewise taken Notice of the same thing) I halfe expected,

_Carneades_, that after you had so freely declar'd Your doubting,

whether there be any Determinate Number of Elements, You would have

proceeded to question whether there be any Elements at all. And I

confess it will be a Trouble to me if You defeat me of my Expectation;

especially since you see the leasure we have allow'd us may probably

suffice to examine that Paradox; because you have so largly Deduc'd

already many Things pertinent to it, that you need but intimate how

you would have them Apply'd, and what you would inferr from them.

_Carneades_ having in Vain represented that their leasure could be but

very short, that he had already prated very long, that he was

unprepared to maintain so great and so invidious a Paradox, was at

length prevail'd with to tell his Friend; Since, _Eleutherius_, you

will have me Discourse _Ex Tempore_ of the Paradox you mention, I am

content, (though more perhaps to express my Obedience, then my

Opinion) to tell you that (supposing the Truth of _Helmonts_ and

_Paracelsus's_ Alkahestical Experiments, if I may so call them) though

it may seem extravagant, yet it is not absurd to doubt, whether, for

ought has been prov'd, there be a necessity to admit any Elements, or

Hypostatical Principles, at all.

And, as formerly, so now, to avoid the needless trouble of Disputing

severally with the _Aristotelians_ and the Chymists, I will address my

self to oppose them I have last nam'd, Because their Doctrine about

the Elements is more applauded by the Moderns, as pretending highly to

be grounded upon Experience. And, to deal not only fairly but

favourably with them, I will allow them to take in Earth and Water to

their other Principles. Which I consent to, the rather that my

Discourse may the better reach the Tenents of the Peripateticks; who

cannot plead for any so probably as for those two Elements; that of

fire above the Air being Generally by Judicious Men exploded as an

Imaginary thing; And the Air not concurring to compose Mixt Bodies as

one of their Elements, but only lodging in their pores, or Rather

replenishing, by reason of its Weight and Fluidity, all those Cavities

of bodies here below, whether compounded or not, that are big enough

to admit it, and are not fill'd up with any grosser substance.

And, to prevent mistakes, I must advertize You, that I now mean by

Elements, as those Chymists that speak plainest do by their

Principles, certain Primitive and Simple, or perfectly unmingled

bodies; which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another,

are the Ingredients of which all those call'd perfectly mixt Bodies

are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately

resolved: now whether there be any one such body to be constantly met

with in all, and each, of those that are said to be Elemented bodies,

is the thing I now question.

By this State of the controversie you will, I suppose, Guess, that I

need not be so absur'd [Errata: absurd] as to deny that there are such

bodies as Earth, and Water, and Quicksilver, and Sulphur: But I look

upon Earth and Water, as component parts of the Universe, or rather

of the Terrestrial Globe, not of all mixt bodies. And though I will

not peremptorily deny that there may sometimes either a running

Mercury, or a Combustible Substance be obtain'd from a Mineral, or

even a Metal; yet I need not Concede either of them to be an Element

in the sence above declar'd; as I shall have occasion to shew you by

and by.

To give you then a brief account of the grounds I intend to proceed

upon, I must tell you, that in matters of Philosophy, this seems to me

a sufficient reason to doubt of a known and important proposition,

that the Truth of it is not yet by any competent proof made to appear.

And congruously herunto, if I shew that the grounds upon which men are

perswaded that there are Elements are unable to satisfie a considering

man, I suppose my doubts will appear rational.

Now the Considerations that induce men to think that there are

Elements, may be conveniently enough referr'd to two heads. Namely,

the one, that it is necessary that Nature make use of Elements to

constitute the bodies that are reputed Mixt. And the other, That the

Resolution of such bodies manifests that nature had compounded them of

Elementary ones.

In reference to the former of these Considerations, there are two or

three things that I have to Represent.

And I will begin with reminding you of the Experiments I not long

since related to you concerning the growth of pompions, mint, and

other vegetables, out of fair water. For by those experiments its

seems evident, that Water may be Transmuted into all the other

Elements; from whence it may be inferr'd, both, That 'tis not every

Thing Chymists will call Salt, Sulphur, or Spirit, that needs alwayes

be a Primordiate and Ingenerable body. And that Nature may contex a

Plant (though that be a perfectly mixt Concrete) without having all

the Elements previously presented to her to compound it of. And, if

you will allow the relation I mention'd out of _Mounsieur De Rochas_

to be True; then may not only plants, but Animals and Minerals too, be

produced out of Water, And however there is little doubt to be made,

but that the plants my tryals afforded me as they were like in so

many other respects to the rest of the plants of the same

Denomination; so they would, in case I had reduc'd them to

putrefaction, have likewise produc'd Wormes or other insects, as well

as the resembling Vegetables are wont to do; so that Water may, by

Various Seminal Principles, be successively Transmuted into both

plants and Animals. And if we consider that not only Men, but even

sucking Children are, but too often, Tormented with Solid Stones, but

that divers sorts of Beasts themselves, (whatever _Helmont_ against

Experience think to the contrary) may be Troubled with great and Heavy

stones in their Kidneys and Bladders, though they Feed but upon Grass

and other Vegetables, that are perhaps but Disguised Water, it will

not seem improbable that even some Concretes of a mineral Nature, may

Likewise be form'd of Water.

We may further Take notice, that as a Plant may be nourisht, and

consequently may Consist of Common water; so may both plants and

Animals, (perhaps even from their Seminal Rudiments) consist of

compound Bodies, without having any thing meerly Elementary brought

them by nature to be compounded by them: This is evident in divers

men, who whilst they were Infants were fed only with Milk, afterwards

Live altogether upon Flesh, Fish, wine, and other perfectly mixt

Bodies. It may be seen also in sheep, who on some of our English Downs

or Plains, grow very fat by feeding upon the grasse, without scarce

drinking at all. And yet more manifestly in the magots that breed and

grow up to their full bignesse within the pulps of Apples, Pears, or

the like Fruit. We see also, that Dungs that abound with a mixt Salt

give a much more speedy increment to corn and other Vegetables than

Water alone would do: And it hath been assur'd me, by a man

experienc'd in such matters, that sometimes when to bring up roots

very early, the Mould they were planted in was made over-rich, the

very substance of the Plant has tasted of the Dung. And let us also

consider a Graft of one kind of Fruit upon the upper bough of a Tree

of another kind. As for instance, the Ciens of a Pear upon a

White-thorne; for there the ascending Liquor is already alter'd,

either by the root, or in its ascent by the bark, or both wayes, and

becomes a new mixt body: as may appear by the differing qualities to

be met with in the saps of several trees; as particularly, the

medicinal vertue of the Birch-Water (which I have sometimes drunk upon

_Helmonts_ great and not undeserved commendation) Now the graft, being

fasten'd to the stock must necessarily nourish its self, and produce

its Fruit, only out of this compound Juice prepared for it by the

Stock, being unable to come at any other aliment. And if we consider,

how much of the Vegetable he feeds upon may (as we noted above) remain

in an Animal; we may easily suppose, That the blood of that Animal who

Feeds upon this, though it be a Well constituted Liquor, and have all

the differing Corpuscles that make it up kept in order by one

praesiding form, may be a strangely Decompounded Body, many of its

parts being themselves decompounded. So little is it Necessary that

even in the mixtures which nature her self makes in Animal and

Vegetable Bodies, she should have pure Elements at hand to make her

compositions of.

The Sceptical Chymist or Chymico-Physical Doubts & Paradoxes, Touching the Spagyrist's Principles Commonly call'd Hypostatical; As they are wont to be Propos'd and Defended by the Generality of Alchymists. Whereunto is præmis'd Part of another Discourse relating to the same Subject. · 第 16 / 20 段