CHAPTER V

THE TOWER

_Prince Edward_: "Did Julius Caesar build that place, my lord?"

_Buckingham_: "He did, my gracious lord, begin that place;

Which, since, succeeding ages have re-edified...."

_Richard of York_: "What, will you go unto the Tower, my lord?...

... I shall not sleep in quiet at the Tower."

_Gloucester_: "Why, what should you fear?"

_Richard of York_: "Marry, my uncle Clarence' angry ghost:

My grandam told me he was murder'd there."

--_King Richard III., Act iii, Scene 1._

"Death is here associated, not, as in Westminster Abbey and

Saint Paul's, with genius and virtue, with public veneration

and imperishable renown; not with everything that is most

endearing in social and domestic charities; but with

whatever is darkest in human nature and in human destiny,

with the savage triumph of implacable enemies, with the

inconstancy, the ingratitude, the cowardice of friends, with

all the miseries of fallen greatness and of blighted

fame."--_Macaulay_: "_History of England._"

"Place of doom,

Of execution too, and tomb."--_Scott._

What Londoner has not, from earliest childhood, been acquainted with

the Tower? In the Christmas holidays it presented, as a "treat," rival

attractions with Madame Tussaud's and the "Zoo." When not presented

under the too-informing care of over-zealous pastors and

masters,--when not imbibed as too flagrant material for that

fly-in-the-ointment, a holiday task,--when not made, in a word, too

suggestive of the unpleasant, but necessary paths of learning,--it

offered great fascinations to the youthful mind. The warders, in their

picturesque "Beefeater" dress, were ever an unfailing joy; the

surprise, indeed, with which I first saw one of these mighty beings

descend from his pedestal, and deign to hold simple conversation with

ordinary mortals, is still fresh in my memory. Then, the towers and

dark passages, up which one could run and clatter joyfully, with all

the entrancing and horrid possibility of meeting somebody's headless

ghost; the attractive thumbscrew, model of the rack, and headsman's

mask, all so appealing to the innocent brutality of childhood; the

very wooden and highly coloured "Queen Elizabeth", riding in full

dress, with a page, to Tilbury Fort; the stiff effigies of the

mail-clad soldiers, in rows inside the White Tower,--the live soldiers

drilling in the sun-lit square outside;--the inspiring music of the

band, the roll of the drum, the flocks of wheeling pigeons; how

charming it all was! My first knowledge of Tower history was derived

from a Cockney nursemaid, who had, I suspect, strong affinities with

the before-mentioned "pretty soldiers" (are not "pretty soldiers,"

by-the-way, usually the first words that London children learn to

lisp?). Tragedies, I knew, were connected with that sun-lit square.

Two beautiful ladies, I was told, had had their heads cut off here by

their cruel husband, a gentleman called "'Enery the Eighth," (I

naturally thought of this "'Enery" as Bluebeard); "because they was

that skittish like, and fond of singin' and dancin' on Sundays, which

'e for one never could abear; and so 'e 'ad their 'eds orf, and grass

adn't never grown on the place sence." Which fact I identified as

true, at least for the time being; though how far grass can grow

through paving-stones, is always matter for speculation. And Mary-Anne

further went on to relate how she "'ad a friend who knew a young woman

who was a 'ousekeeper somewhere here, who 'ad seen 'orrible things in

the way of ghostisses, and 'ad the screamin' 'sterrics somethin'

awful;--quite reg'ler, too,--after it!"

[Illustration: _A Beefeater._]

Yet I myself think that it is a pity to treat the classic Tower on

such familiar terms! It should be approached with respect, and not

merely introduced as a juvenile appendix to Madame Tussaud's! The

charm of the old fortress, as of its immediate surroundings, is, in

any case, only realised in maturer years. This has always been the

riverside stronghold of London. Tradition, and poetic license, name,

indeed, Julius Caesar as its founder; however that may be, the Romans

probably had a fort here, as Saxon Alfred after them. The White Tower,

or Keep, raised by William the Conqueror, is built upon a Roman

bastion; and Roman relics have been dug up at intervals in its near

precincts. Nevertheless, the Roman tradition here is but visionary;

the interest of the Tower is bound up with the evolution of the

English race. It is the most interesting mediaeval monument that we

possess, a still vivid piece of English history; a stranded islet of

Time, left forgotten by the raging tide of surrounding London.

In the Tower precincts,--if you are careful not to choose a Monday or

Saturday, which are free days, for your visit--you may enjoy yourself

in your own way and to your heart's content. The warders,--old

soldiers,--are pleasant and unobtrusive people, with manners of really

wonderful urbanity, considering the very mixed, and generally

unwashed, character, of a large portion of their public. The Tower,

apart from the charm of its lurid and romantic history, is a

picturesque place. In winter, it is somewhat exposed to the elements,

and in summer, owing to its proximity to the Temple of the Fisheries,

it is perhaps a trifle odoriferous; but on a fine spring or autumn

morning,--a spring morning uncursed by east wind, an autumn morning

undimmed by river-mist,--you will realise all the beauty, as well as

the interest, of the place. Part of its attraction lies in the fact

that it is neither a ruin nor a fossil; it is a living place still,

and serves for use as well as for show. In old days by turn palace,

state prison, inquisition, and "oubliette," it is now a barrack and

government arsenal. Its threatening ring of walled towers, witnesses

of so many scenes of blood and cruelty, re-echo now to the merry

voices of little School-Board boys, playing foot-ball in the drained

and levelled moat below; its paved courts and gravelled enclosures

still ring to the tramp of soldiers' feet, but soldiers of a newer and

a more humane era. In days when men suffered cheerfully for faith's

sake, when queens and princes passed naturally to the throne through

the blood of their nearest relations, when self-denial, conscience,

and uprightness of life were reckoned as crimes, the Tower was the

place of doom and death. Here, not only political plotters and state

prisoners, guilty of "high treason," were punished, but also children,

young men and maidens, playthings of an unkind fate, were condemned,

unheard, to an early death. Here, also, at the Restoration, perished,

bravely as they had lived, many of the sturdy and loyal followers of a

bad cause, who might say, with Macaulay's typical "Jacobite":

"To my true king I offered, free from stain,

Courage and faith; vain faith, and courage vain."

Later, the martyr annals of the Tower were in a measure defiled by the

introduction of real and noteworthy criminals, and the imprisonment

within its walls of such wretches as the Gunpowder Plot conspirators,

the infamous murderers of Sir Thomas Overbury, and the notorious Judge

Jeffreys. But the desecration of these is past; the Tower has long

ceased to be a State Prison, and the halo of its earlier victims still

is paramount there. The very names of certain localities recall their

tragedies: "Bloody Tower," commemorating the murder of the young

princes, sons of Edward IV., whose bones were found here under a

staircase; Traitor's Gate,--the gate of the doomed,--the grim disused

archway, with a portcullis, looking towards, and in ancient times

opening on to, the river.

The Tower is full of lovely "bits" for the sketcher. The succession of

fine old gates that span the entrance-road, and the ring of encircling

towers called the "Inner Ward," though necessarily restored in places,

have still a fine air of antiquity; which air of antiquity the massive

walls, narrow window-slits, and the close-growing mantle of ivy that,

in places, adds a welcome note of greenery, do much to maintain. The

effect, at any rate, is complete. In the Tower precincts you seem to

be really in mediaeval London. Just so, you imagine, in all essentials,

only still grassy and not quite so shut in by houses, must "Tower

Green" have looked on that terrible day so dramatically described by

Froude:

"A little before noon, on the 19th of May, Anne Boleyn,

Queen of England, was led down to the green where the young

grass and the white daisies of summer were freshly bursting

in the sunshine. A little cannon stood loaded on the

battlements, the motionless cannoneer was ready with smoking

linstock at his side, and when the crawling hand upon the

dial of the great Tower clock touched the midday hour, that

cannon would tell to London that all was over."

On this same spot, so fatal to youth and beauty, two other young

women,--mere girls, indeed,--died; poor silly Katherine Howard, and,

later, Lady Jane Grey, a child of eighteen,--the "queen of nine days,"

a victim of others' offences,--who "went to her death without fear or

pain." Neither age nor youth were, indeed, spared in those cruel days;

for the grey hairs of the aged Countess of Salisbury, last of the

Plantagenets, were here also brought to the same block. This was the

private execution spot, reserved for special victims and near

relations, in contrast to the public one on Great Tower Hill outside;

the exact place is enclosed, and marked by a square patch of darker

stone. In the little adjoining chapel of St. Peter ad Vincula--the

Prisoners' Chapel,--aptly dedicated to St. Peter-in-the-Chains,--were

buried all these poor dishonoured bodies; Queen Anne Boleyn's, so

short a time ago so loved, so adulated, thrown carelessly into an old

arrow-chest, and flung beneath the altar. This chapel,--which is, by

the way, a royal chapel, and therefore under no bishop's

jurisdiction,--is very much restored, but it has a few good monuments;

and its list of victims, numbered on a brass tablet inside the door,

is sufficiently affecting: "In truth," says Macaulay:

"there is no sadder spot on earth than this little cemetery.

Hither have been carried through successive ages, by the

rude hands of gaolers, without one mourner following, the

bleeding relics of men who had been the captains of armies,

the leaders of parties, the oracles of senates, and the

ornaments of courts."

"No, I can't say I've ever seen any ghosts," said the affable Warder

who showed me the chapel: "though an American family lately, they were

so anxious to see Queen Anne Boleyn's ghost, that they went and sat

opposite the execution-spot, at all hours, day-and-night; but they

must have got disappointed, for I never heard that anything came of

it.... Being from America," he added thoughtfully, "I suppose they

felt they'd like to see all there was to be seen.... No, ghosts don't

trouble us much; we all live in the Towers and round about, and the

worst you can say of our lodgin's is that they're a bit draughty-like,

in winter and spring, having them slits of winders all round. And then

they don't allow you to paper the walls, or stick up a picture nail,

or anything to make the place look a bit homely! One does get a bit

tired, too," he confessed, "of them dark stone walls, and even of

prisoners' inscriptions; but there it is, you mayn't so much as touch

'em, or even cover 'em up.... However," he continued magnanimously, "I

own that we're lucky to live in the days we do; our 'eds is our own,

at any rate!"

Between Tower Green and the outer moat, on the western side of the

gravelled square, are the old-fashioned and comfortable-looking

dwelling houses of the Tower officials; the residences of the

Governor, the doctor, the Chaplain, &c.; houses mainly of darkened

brick,--like the citadel itself,--fitted in between the "Beauchamp"

and the "Bell" towers. The greater part of the fortress is, as we have

seen, utilised as arsenal, barracks, or private dwellings; and thus,

of its many towers, the "White Tower," (the "Keep" of the ancient

castle), and the "Beauchamp Tower," are the only ones now viewed by

the general public; though other antiquities and places worthy of a

visit may, on application to the Governor, be shown to those "really

interested." The Beauchamp Tower, though "restored" in 1854 (when all

its inscriptions were placed together in one room), is still most

interesting. Certainly, the draughts, on a windy day, of that room, go

far to suggest the justice of my friend the warder's complaint. And

the poor prisoners of old days did not know the modern comfort of

"slow-combustion" stoves! Poor creatures! torn by the rack and

torture, crushed by long, hopeless imprisonment, with no friend to

turn to in their need, they have left us, deeply cut into the prison

walls, their most pathetic complaint. Philosophy, on the whole, seems

here to have been of the most availing comfort. Like Socrates, the

wretched victims tried hard to be stoical. "The most unhappie man in

the world," runs one inscription, "is he that is not pacient in

adversitie." Then, in old Norman-French: "Tout vient apoient, quy

peult attendre." "A passage perillus maketh a port pleasant." It was

here, in the Beauchamp Tower, that the five Dudley brothers, sons of

the Duke of Northumberland, were imprisoned for their share in the

Lady Jane Grey rebellion; here are their pictured emblems and

hieroglyphics; also the word "Jane," supposed to have been cut by her

husband, Lord Guildford. To the longer victims of the Tower, time must

have passed hardly. Was it agony of mind that guided the stroke, or

did they find it some solace in their anguish? Poets, philosophers,

men of science, all the best and noblest in the land; hours of solace

after torture, no doubt, were theirs, given by that good Angel who,

"Brought the wise and great of ancient days

To cheer the cell where Raleigh pined alone."

Had they books, journals, writing materials? Probably but rarely.

There was Raleigh, who spent such a large part of a chequered life in

prison here, dying here too at last, and writing his "History" with

admirable stoicism, in the face of death. But Lady Jane Grey,

imprisoned in the "Brick Tower," had, we know, to inscribe her last

message to her sister Katherine, on the blank leaves of her Greek

Testament. What vivid, what painful interest would attach to a "Tower"

diary, such as Pepys's, in cipher, could one have been written by any

of these prisoners!

The wonderful collection of historic armour in the imposing "White

Tower" is, even to those who are not connoisseurs on the subject, of

great interest and beauty. It is true that there are a great many very

narrow and steep stone stairs to be climbed; but in the end you are

duly rewarded for your trouble. The ancient chapel of St. John, at the

top of the winding stairway, is most strikingly picturesque, and

especially so on a sunny day, when the light plays among the bare

stone columns. This "most perfect Norman chapel in England" is

striking in its unadorned severity of style; and the stilted horseshoe

arches of its apse are somewhat like those of St. Bartholomew the

Great, at Smithfield. The chapel dates from the year 1078, and has

been the scene of many royal pageants and lyings-in-state. The

Banqueting Hall adjoins it; here are to be seen, among other

curiosities, models of the rack and thumbscrew, and the block used for

the execution of old Lord Lovat, with Lords Balmerino and

Kilmarnock--the last Royalists executed here--in 1745. The hall

contains also much armour and many weapons. Above is the "Council

Chamber," where King Richard II. abdicated his throne in favour of his

cousin Henry Bolingbroke.

"I think men must really have got bigger since these old days,"

remarked a burly policeman, to whom I was communicating my

impressions: "Now, you wouldn't think it, but there's only two suits

of armour in the whole place that I could even manage to get on me,

that's old Henry VIII.'s, and his brother-in-law what's beside 'im,

Charles Brandon, Dook o' Suffolk--you see 'em? over there, in the

middle. Not but what they must have been strong too, of their size, to

bear all that there weight of steel on 'em. I'd be sorry to do it

myself, I know that. It's a wonder they didn't faint, and their poor

horses, too!"

One of the most beautiful pieces of armour in the collection is that

made for Henry VIII. on his marriage with Katharine of Arragon. It is

of German manufacture, with deep and heavy skirts, on the edge of

which is a pierced border, with the initials "H" and "K" entwined in a

true-love knot. This suit of armour is, further, adorned with

elaborate designs, probably from Hans Burgmair or one of his school,

from the lives of St. George and St. Barbara, patron saints of England

and of armourers. In Stuart times the suits of mail, and armour

generally, became less heavy; and vizors and breastplates are often of

open-work; most picturesque of all, perhaps, is the dress of the

link-bearers of Charles I.'s time. The armour, and arms generally, are

kept in a fine state of polish, wonderful to see in a land of fog and

river mist. "The soldiers, you see, they have a turn at the spears and

things when they want a job; but, of course, the armour, and such as

that, is left to two or three people's special business."

There is a certain barbaric splendour about the State vessels and

Coronation jewels, commonly called the "Regalia," kept in the "Record"

or "Wakefield" Tower. These, like the menagerie formerly exhibited

here are separated (and quite as necessarily) from the outer world by

strong railings. This shining treasure of gold-plate and precious

stones recalls the story of Colonel Blood's famous and nearly

successful attempt at robbery, in the time of Charles II., for which

he was, somewhat inconsistently, rewarded by a landed estate and "cash

down." History is a sad series of injustices, and Colonel Blood's

crime was, for reasons of state possibly, suppressed. Certain it is

that the kings of England have not always been above stealing, or, at

any rate, pledging their own treasure.

If the Tower looks a grim enough fortress now, it must have seemed

grimmer still in ancient times, when every murder and cruelty--every

crime that blackens the page of English history--took place within

its gloomy walls. Surely, in old days, the bloody reputation of the

Tower may well have made those shrink and tremble who passed under its

doomed gateways! By the "Traitor's Gate," that waterway now disused,

but which then opened directly on to the river highway, was brought

that living freight of illustrious persons destined here to suffer and

to die:

"That gate misnamed, through which before

Went Sidney, Russell, Raleigh, Cranmer, More."

So far, indeed, from being a "traitor's" way, all the valour and

chivalry of mediaeval England seem, at one time and another, to have

passed that dreadful gate. Here, the "Lieutenant" or "Constable" of

the Tower, "receipted" the arrival of the yet living bodies of men and

women, soon to be bleeding and dismembered corpses.... Such a

"receipt," given for the person of the condemned Duke of Monmouth,

"the people's darling," is still extant. The "Traitor's Gate" had,

moreover, an added horror; for in its walls are certain loopholes,

through which the Lieutenant of the Tower could watch, unseen, the

prisoner's arrival from his trial at the House of Lord's, and could

ascertain, as he ascended the stone steps, whether the fatal Axe of

Office, carried in front of him, were reversed or otherwise--reversal

signifying death. Here, when Sir Thomas More was being led back to

prison with the reversed axe carried before him, his beloved daughter

Margaret burst through the guarding soldiers and embraced him,

beseeching his blessing--a scene that melted even those stern guards

to tears.

Brutal, indeed, were the age and the time. If Plantagenets, Yorkists,

and Lancastrians were frankly murderous, Tudors and Stuarts had more

refinement of cruelty, dignifying it, more or less, under the name of

law. The accession of each fresh sovereign was the signal for arrests,

life-long imprisonments, and executions. Favourites, now deposed from

favour, paid here the penalty for a few years of feverish greatness;

here suffered not only men of unscrupulous self-seeking, but also

those whose chief fault was, like Caesar's, ambition, and who were

condemned to answer for it as grievously as Caesar. Nor did past

affliction teach present mercy. The Princess Elizabeth narrowly

herself escaped a tragic fate in early youth; yet her former

imprisonment in the "Bell" Tower made her scarcely less cruel, in the

after-time, to her real or imaginary enemies. Partly in self-defence,

partly as a question of faith, partly in revenge, both rivals, and

also those suspected of possible rivalry, were effectually suppressed.

Even continuation of the hated race of rivals seemed prohibited. Thus,

Lady Jane Grey's poor sister, Katherine, was imprisoned till her death

for the crime of secret marriage with the Earl of Hertford; Thomas

Howard, Duke of Norfolk, was executed for having aspired to the hand

of the Queen of Scots; Lady Arabella Stuart, James I.'s unhappy

cousin, having married, "with the love that laughs at privy councils,"

Sir William Seymour, was caught while escaping with him through Calais

Roads, and languished here for four years, till her mind left her, and

she died. The elder D'Israeli tells the story:

"What passed in that dreadful imprisonment cannot perhaps be

recovered for authentic history; but enough is known, that

her mind grew impaired, that she finally lost her reason;

and if the duration of her imprisonment (four years) was

short, it was only terminated by her death. Some loose

effusions, often begun and never ended, written and erased,

incoherent and rational, yet remain in the fragments of her

papers. In a letter she proposed addressing to Viscount

Fenton, to implore for her his Majesty's favour again, she

says, 'Good my lord, consider the fault cannot be

uncommitted; neither can any more be required of any earthly

creature but confession and most humble submission.' In a

paragraph she had written, but crossed out, it seems that a

present of her work had been refused by the king, and that

she had no one about her whom she might trust."

Of the few stories of escapes from the Tower, none is more romantic

than that of Lord Nithsdale, saved by his wife's devotion. Failing to

obtain a pardon from King George I. she, in her love and despair,

bethought herself of a desperate plan. Under the pretence of a last

visit, and with the connivance of a faithful servant, she managed to

disguise her husband as her Welsh maid, and got him past the Tower

sentries into safety; the next morning he would have perished with

Lord Derwentwater, "the pride of the North," and the rest of the

Scotch Jacobites.

Yet the Tower, even in mediaeval times, was not all tragedy; for here,

from Henry III.'s era, a royal menagerie was kept,--a menagerie of

which the famous "Tower Lions," that existed here up to 1853, were the

eventual outcome. (From the Tower Lions comes originally the phrase,

"to see the Lions," or the sights, of a place.) The beasts are still

commemorated in the Tower by the "Lions' Gate,"--or principal

entrance. The Tower Moat, the broad ditch that encircled the building,

and added to its mediaeval impregnability, was drained in 1843, and its

banks are now planted, on the north-east, with a pleasant shrubbery;

through which winds a foot-path with comfortable seats and delightful

views, much enjoyed and appreciated by the very poor. Thus, the old

age of the Tower,--Julius Caesar's traditional fortress, and the scene

of England's darkest national crimes,--is, as often that of Man

himself, full of benevolence and serenity. Its brutal youth, its

sanguinary middle life, are alike far behind it; and "that which

should accompany old age, as honour, love, and troops of friends," it

may now look to have. And the long roll of the Tower victims, lying,

many of them, in nameless graves, their very bones sometimes

uncoffined; these have at any rate, by their death often achieved an

immortality greater than any they could ever have gained by their

lives. They were, in a sense, as was that old Roman, Marcus Curtius,

sacrifices to their country's gods; for by such throes as overthrew

them, have all nations reached peace and salvation. "I see," they

might, like Sydney Carton, have cried prophetically at the block,

"I see a beautiful city and a brilliant people rising from

this abyss, and, in their struggles to be truly free, in

triumphs and defeats, through long years to come, I see the

evil of this time and of the previous time ... gradually

making expiation for itself."

Once outside the Tower precincts, all is changed, and you are, again,

in the bustle and the din of modern London. "Great Tower Hill," on the

rising ground north of the Tower, and close to Mark Lane Station, is

hardly an idyllic spot, or one at all suitable to meditation, being

generally much invaded by the shouts of draymen and the rumble of

van-wheels. Close by, in Trinity Square gardens, marked by a stone, is

the spot which for some centuries shared with "Tyburn" the honour, or

dishonour, of being the public execution-place; but, while Great Tower

Hill was mostly the last bourne of political and state prisoners,

Tyburn (the present "Marble Arch"), was reserved for common murderers,

robbers, and their like. England, in those days, must have enjoyed

rare galas in the way of executions! Of that old rogue, Lord Lovat,

beheaded here in 1747, it is recorded, that just before the fatal axe

fell, a scaffolding, containing some thousand persons, set there to

enjoy the spectacle, collapsed, killing twelve of them; a sight at

which, the old man, even at that terrible moment, chuckled merrily,

"enjoying, no doubt, the downfall of so many Whigs."

Trinity Square has still a pleasant, old-fashioned air of seclusion;

although all around and about it are grimy lanes and warehouses,

suggesting the close proximity of wharves and docks. Yet Trinity

Square, like Charterhouse Square, is no longer residential; the look

of "home," of comfortable family life, about its sober brick houses,

is merely a hollow sham; they are mainly offices. Near by is the Royal

Mint, "where," so Mark Tapley informed his American friends, "the

Queen lives, to take care of all the money." At the end of the big,

noisy street called the Minories, leading from the Tower to Aldgate,

rises the tall, black, three-storied spire of St. Botolph's Church,

built by Dance in 1744, on an old site. This church is hardly

beautiful in itself; yet its effect, as seen from the Minories, is

good. The jurisdiction of St. Botolph, always a popular London saint,

is now extended to the tiny Church of Holy Trinity, in the Minories, a

small yellowish building, somewhat like St. Ethelburga in Bishopsgate

Street, with the same kind of abbreviated turret. When you have

succeeded in finding this church (which is difficult, as it is hidden

down a side street off the Minories, and, as usual in London, no

single inhabitant appears to know where it is), you then usually find

it locked, with a saddening notice to the effect that the keys are in

some equally unknown and distant region. Yet you must not despair.

Such drawbacks are inseparable from the pursuit of historical

antiquities in London. It seems, however, a pity to have recently

changed the identity of this small church, thus rendering it still

more difficult to find. Originally, it gave its name to the whole

district; having belonged to an abbey of "Minoresses," or nuns of the

order of St. Clare; the living, and also the name, are amalgamated

with that of St. Botolph, Aldgate, which now possesses also its chief

claim to fame. For, though the little church still possesses some good

monuments, the relic formerly shown here, the dessicated head of a

man, said to be the Duke of Suffolk, father of Lady Jane Grey, is now

removed to the larger church. The decapitated head is certainly

sufficiently ghastly, with the neck still showing the usual first

stroke of the bungling executioner, and the loose teeth, yellow skin,

and mouth with "the curve of agony" to which attention is usually

drawn. The evidence for the head being that of the Duke of Suffolk

rests mainly on the fact that the Church of "Holy Trinity" was the

chapel of the Duke of Suffolk's town-house, and the place whither his

head would naturally be brought after decapitation on Tower-hill.

At No. 9, Minories, over the shop of one John Owen, nautical

instrument-maker, is the figure of the "Little Midshipman," described

by Dickens in _Dombey and Son_. But it is difficult to walk in the

Minories; everywhere crates and cranes seem to threaten you, and paper

from printing offices bristles from windows on to your devoted

head.... This must always have been a noisy quarter. In old days it

was famous for its gunsmiths, as witness Congreve's lines:

"The mulcibers who in the Minories sweat,

And massive bars on stubborn anvils beat--"

You leave the Minories without regret, and turn your face again

Citywards. The church of All Hallows, Barking (so called from the nuns

of old Barking Abbey), is further west, in Great Tower Street, close

to the Tower precincts. It is another church that escaped the Great

Fire, and it contains the graves of some of the Tower victims. It has

also some good monumental brasses, one especially, of fine Flemish

workmanship, in the pavement in the centre of the nave. These old City

churches are now most of them well served and tended, the Sunday

services in some of them being much sought after. They are also

probably kept in better repair than in Dickens's time, when,

overgrown, dirty, and isolated in the midst of traffic and bustle,

they struck the novelist only with their weird desolation,--a

desolation as of some sentient and human thing. Thus vividly he

described his feelings while attending service in one of them:

"There is a pale heap of books in the corner of my pew, and

while the organ, which is hoarse and sleepy, plays in such

fashion that I can hear more of the rusty working of the

stops than of any music, I look at the books, which are

mostly bound in faded baize and stuff. They belonged, in

1754, to the Dowgate family; and who were they? Jane Comport

must have married Young Dowgate, and come into the family

that way; Young Dowgate was courting Jane Comport when he

gave her her prayer-book, and recorded the presentation on

the fly-leaf. If Jane were fond of Young Dowgate, why did

she die and leave the book here? Perhaps at the rickety

altar, and before the damp commandments, she, Comport, had

taken him, Dowgate, in a flush of youthful hope and joy, and

perhaps it had not turned out in the long run as great a

success as was expected.

"The opening of the service recalls my wandering

thoughts.... I find that I have been taking a kind of

invisible snuff ... I wink, sneeze and cough ... snuff made

of the decay of matting, wood, cloth, stone, iron, earth and

something else ... the decay of dead citizens.... Dead

citizens stick on the walls and lie pulverised on the

sounding-board over the clergyman's head, and, when a gust

of air comes, tumble down upon him."

And, further, with regard to the surrounding bustle and merchandise in

the busy streets:

"In the churches about Mark Lane there was a dry whiff of

wheat; and I accidentally struck an airy sample of barley

out of an aged hassock in one of them. From Rood Lane to

Tower Street, and thereabouts, there was often a subtle

flavour of wine,--sometimes of tea. One church, near Mincing

Lane, smelt like a druggist's drawer. Behind the Monument,

the service had a flavour of damaged oranges, which, a

little farther down towards the river, tempered into

herrings, and gradually toned into a cosmopolitan blast of

fish. In one church, the exact counterpart of the church in

the _Rake's Progress_, where the hero is being married to

the horrible old lady, there was no specialty of atmosphere,

until the organ shook a perfume of hides all over us from

some adjacent warehouse."

(The church depicted in Hogarth's _Rake's Progress_ was, however, the

older church of St. Marylebone, now rebuilt.)

The next turning on the right from Great Tower Street is Seething

Lane, leading to Hart Street, noted principally for that ancient

church of St. Olave that was one of the Great Fire's few survivals.

Its little churchyard opens on to the muddy, narrow alley called

Seething Lane, by a picturesque gateway, grimly decorated with carven

skulls; tradition says in the memory of the many plague victims buried

here. Indeed it is a grisly monument of the time when the plague-cart

rumbled in the streets, when a red cross marked the infected houses,

and when the stones echoed to the hoarse and terrible cry, "Bring out

your dead!" Perhaps Seething Lane was less muddy and slummy in Samuel

Pepys's time; for that authority lived here, in a house "adjoining the

Navy Office," where he held the position of "Clerk of the Acts,"--and

surely he was nothing if not fussy. The locality, owing to the

successive distractions of Plague and Fire, cannot have been exactly

peaceful. In his "Diary" entry for January 30th, 1665-6, Pepys says:

"It frighted me indeed to go through the church, more than I

thought it could have done, to see so many graves lie so

high upon the churchyard where people have been buried of

the Plague. I was much troubled at it, and do not think to

go through it again a good while."

The quaint names of old London churches are very attractive. This St.

Olave, or Olaf, was a favourite saint of ancient London; he was an

eleventh-century Scandinavian king, canonised because of his zealous

propagation of Christianity among his people. Three other London

churches, in Southwark, Jewry, and Silver Street (the last two no

longer existing), were called after him. The immediate purlieus of St.

Olave's, Hart Street, are not exactly savoury, its proximity to the

river traffic and warehouses making it occasionally somewhat

odoriferous as well as muddy; it were better, therefore, to choose a

fine, dry day for this excursion. It is not always easy to get inside

the church; on week-days, the street seems to be more or less of a

stagnant back-water; and should your fate compel you to find St.

Olave's locked, you may stand and knock all day, but nobody will heed

you; or, if they do heed, will probably put you down as a wandering

lunatic. Nevertheless, St. Olave's should be visited; for its

monuments are many and interesting. Samuel Pepys, as parishioner and

near neighbour, used to attend service here, with his pretty wife; and

Mrs. Pepys's bust, in white marble, erected by her husband, stands on

the north side of the chancel, above her tablet and long epitaph. Poor

Elizabeth Pepys! She was only twenty-nine when she died, and that

long, artificial Latin screed seems all too long and laboured for her

lovely and poetic youth. Perhaps her husband, whose pew faces the

monument, liked during his long widowhood to gaze at that charming

memorial, and--who knows?--to enjoy his fine Latin composition. Pepys

himself was buried here later; his own monument, however, only dates

from 1883, when it was raised by public subscription.

In St. Olave's church occurs that curious and often-quoted epitaph of

1584, inscribed to "John Orgene and Ellyne, his wife":

"As I was, so be ye;

As I am, you shall be;

That I gave, that I have;

That I spent, that I had;

Thus I ende all my coste,

That I lefte, that I loste."

Wandering along Great Tower Street,--and Eastcheap, reminiscent of

Falstaff and Dame Quickly,--we reach the ever-fishy region of the

Monument. The Monument is so tall that it is difficult to see it;

indeed, I cannot tell exactly why the Monument seems always as

difficult of discovery as the middle of a maze; you seem continually

close upon it, and yet you hardly ever reach it. No one can ever

direct the pedestrian to it; though this, indeed, may not be the fault

of the Monument, but simply because the average Londoner never does

know anything about the immediate neighbourhood he inhabits. He has

even been known to live in the next street to the British Museum for

years, and then be ignorant that such an institution exists. Such

superiority to external facts is, no doubt, noble; but it has its

drawbacks. And sometimes the individuals questioned take refuge in a

crushing silence. The last time, indeed, that I myself visited the

Monument, I inquired politely of two fishy youths in turn of its

whereabouts, and received no answer. Possibly this was merely their

courteous way of informing me that they were really too busy to attend

to such trivialities. To return, however, to the deluding Monument:

Dickens, it is true, in _Martin Chuzzlewit_ makes Mr. Tom Pinch and

Miss Pecksniff find their way thither (Tom, having lost his way, very

naturally finds himself at the Monument):

"The Man in the Monument was quite as mysterious a being to

Tom as the Man in the Moon. It immediately occurred to him

that the lonely creature who held himself aloof from all

mankind in that pillar, like some old hermit, was the very

man of whom to ask his way.... If Truth didn't live in the

base of the Monument, notwithstanding Pope's couplet about

the outside of it, where in London was she likely to be

found?

"Coming close below the pillar, it was a great encouragement

to Tom to find that the Man in the Monument had simple

tastes; that stony and artificial as his residence was, he

still preserved some rustic recollections; that he liked

plants, hung up bird-cages, was not wholly cut off from

fresh groundsel, and kept young trees in tubs. The Man in

the Monument was sitting outside his own door, the Monument

door; and was actually yawning, as if there were no Monument

to stop his mouth, and give him a perpetual interest in his

own existence.... Two people came to see the Monument, a

gentleman and lady; and the gentleman said, 'How much

a-piece?'

"The Man in the Monument replied, 'A Tanner.'

"It seemed a low expression, compared with the Monument.

"The gentleman put a shilling into his hand, and the Man in

the Monument opened a dark little door. When the gentleman

and lady had passed out of view, he shut it again, and came

slowly back to his chair.

"He sat down and laughed.

"'They don't know what a many steps there is!' he said.

'It's worth twice the money to stop here. Oh, my eye!'

"The Man in the Monument was a Cynic...."

The charge for the Monument is (I may remark _en passant_), now

changed from a "tanner" to the humble threepence. (Its summit gallery

is now closed in, because of the disagreeable mania for committing

suicide from it.) The original inscription on its pedestal, now

effaced, was a curious relic of religious intolerance; showing, by its

absurd reference to the "horrid plott" of "the Popish factio," the

barbarous and primitive state of popular feeling as late as 1681.

Wherefore it was that, as Pope said:

"... London's Column, pointing to the skies,

Like a tall bully, lifts its head and lies."

One must not, however, forget that this attempt to attribute the dire

calamity to private malice must have been infinitely comforting to

the public mind, that ever, even in our own enlightened day, needs a

scapegoat. In still older days, the scapegoats took a more

conveniently personal form, and were usually, as we have seen, brought

to the block on Great Tower Hill: which was, of course, a much simpler

mode of dealing with them.

Highways and Byways in London · 第 5 / 18 章