270. Futile Efforts of Duke John Albrecht.

Four weeks later Duke John Albrecht of Mecklenburg sent messengers to

Wittenberg for the same purpose, _viz._, of mediating between

Melanchthon and Flacius, Melanchthon in particular having previously

requested him to frame articles which might serve as a basis of peace.

The articles, composed by the theologians and counselors of the Duke,

were more severe than those of the Lower Saxons. George Venetus,

professor at Rostock, and Counselor Andrew Mylius were commissioned to

present them, first at Wittenberg, then at Magdeburg. When the articles

were submitted to Melanchthon, he again fell into a state of violent

agitation. The report says: "As soon as he noticed that Adiaphorism was

criticized, and that he was requested to reject it even if only in a

mild form, he instantly sprang up with great impatience and would not

permit them [the delegates] to finish their speech (although they most

earnestly, in the name of their prince, requested to be heard), but

burst forth into invectives and denunciations of Illyricus and others,

and finally also declaimed against the prince himself and his delegates,

vociferating that Illyricus secretly entertained many repulsive errors,

etc." On February 27, Melanchthon delivered his answer to the delegates.

When these urged him to give a more favorable reply, he again

interrupted them, exclaiming: "Oppress me, if you so desire; such is the

lot of the peaceful.... I commend myself to God." After Melanchthon had

left, Peucer, who had accompanied him, harshly told the delegates:

"Don't trouble my father-in-law any more with such matters. _Ihr sollt

forthin meinen Schwaeher zufrieden lassen mit solchen Haendeln_." (9,

106f.)

Regarding the last (8) of the articles submitted by the delegates of

Duke Albrecht which dealt with the Adiaphora, Melanchthon declared in

his answer of February 27: "I should not be astonished to have these two

conditions [to confess the Adiaphoristic errors, etc.] imposed on me if

I had been an enemy. The action of the Saxon pastors was milder. I may

have been lukewarm in some transactions, but I certainly have never been

an enemy.... Therefore I clearly state that I do not assent to these

presentations [of Duke Albrecht], which are cunningly framed so that, if

I accept them, I myself may cut my throat (_ut me, si eas recepero, ipse

iugulem_)." (_C. R._ 9, 104.)

The Magdeburgers refused to participate in these efforts of Count

Albrecht, chiefly because, as they said, there was no hope for peace as

long as Melanchthon remained under the influence of his Wittenberg

friends. But even now Flacius did not entirely abandon his attempts to

bring about a godly peace. In 1557 he asked Paul Vergerius, who passed

Jena on his way to Wittenberg, to treat with Melanchthon on the

Adiaphoristic question. Melanchthon, however is reported to have said:

"Omit that; let us treat of other things." Flacius also wrote to King

Christian III of Denmark to influence Elector August to abolish the

Adiaphoristic errors, but apparently without any result.

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 289 / 313 题