264. The Antitrinitarians.

The first article of the _Augsburg Confession_ makes a special point of

rejecting not only the ancient, but also the "modern Samosatenes,"

_i.e._, the Antitrinitarians, who in the beginning of the Reformation

began their activity in Italy, Spain, Switzerland, and Germany. Most of

these "modern Arians and Antitrinitarians," as they are called in the

Twelfth Article of the _Formula of Concord_ came from the skeptical

circles of Humanists in Italy. Concerning these rationalists and

Epicureans the _Apology_ remarks: "Many [in Italy and elsewhere] even

publicly ridicule all religions, or, if they approve anything, they

approve such things only as are in harmony with human reason, and

regard the rest as fabulous and like the tragedies of the poets." (CONC.

TRIGL., 235, 28; _C. R._ 9, 763.) Pope Leo X was generally regarded as

being one of those who spoke of the profitable "fables concerning

Christ."

According to a letter of warning to the Christians in Antwerp, 1525, a

fanatic (_Rumpelgeist_) there taught: "Every man has the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit is our reason and understanding (_ingenium et ratio

naturalis_). Every man believes. There is neither hell nor damnation.

Every one will obtain eternal life. Nature teaches that I should do unto

my neighbor as I would have him do unto me--to desire which is faith.

The Law is not violated by evil lust as long as I do not consent to

lust. Who has not the Holy Ghost has no sin for he has no reason." (E.

53, 344; St. L. 21a 730; Enders 5, 147.)

In his report on the Marburg Colloquy, October 5, 1529, Melanchthon

remarks: "We have heard that some of them [the Strassburgers] speak of

the Deity as the Jews do, as though Christ were not God by nature. (_C.

R._ 1, 1099.) At Marburg, Zwingli remarked that some had spoken

incorrectly concerning the Trinity, and that Haetzer had written a book

against the divinity of Christ, which he, Zwingli, had not permitted to

be published." (1103.)

In a letter of Luther to Bugenhagen, 1532 we read: "Your undertaking [of

publishing a writing of Athanasius concerning the Trinity] is Christian

and wholesome in this our most corrupt time, in which all articles of

faith in general are attacked by the servants of Satan, and the one

concerning the Trinity is in particular beginning to be derided

confidently by some skeptics and Epicureans. These are ably assisted not

only by those Italian grammarians [Humanists] and orators, which they

flatter themselves to be, but also by some Italico-German vipers and

others, or, as you are accustomed to call them, viper-aspides, who sow

their seed here and there in their discourses and writings, and, as Paul

says [2 Tim. 2, 17], eat as doth a canker (_gar sehr um sich fressen_)

and promote godlessness, about which they, when among themselves, laugh

so complacently and are so happy that one can hardly believe it." (St.

L. 14, 326; Enders 9, 252.)

Some Antitrinitarians who affiliated with the Anabaptists have already

been referred to. Denk, Haetzer, and others rejected the Apostles' Creed

because of their opposition to the doctrine of the Trinity. Haetzer, as

stated wrote a book against the deity of Christ in which he denied the

tripersonality of God and the preexistence of the Logos, and

blasphemously designated the belief in the deity of Christ as

"superstition" and the trust in His satisfaction as "drinking on the

score of Christ (_ein Zechen auf die Kreide Christi_)." According to

Denk, Christ is merely an example showing us how to redeem ourselves

which we are all able to do because there is still within us a seed of

the divine Word and light. (Tschackert, 143, 461.) It was of Denk that

Capito wrote, 1526: "At Nuernberg the schoolteacher at St. Sebald denied

that the Holy Ghost and the Son are equal to the Father, and for this

reason he was expelled." (Plitt, _Augustana_ 1, 153.)

At Strassburg the Anabaptists were publicly charged, in 1526, with

denying the Trinity; in 1529, with denying the deity of Christ. In 1527

Urban Regius spoke of the Anabaptists in Augsburg as maintaining that

Christ was merely a teacher of a Christian life. In the same year

Althamer of Nuernberg published his book _Against the New Jews and

Arians under the Christian Name Who Deny the Deity of Christ_. In 1529

Osiander wrote concerning Anabaptists in Nuernberg: "It is well known,

and may be proved by their own writings, that they deny and contradict

the sublime article of our faith concerning the Holy Trinity, from which

it follows immediately that they also deny the deity of Christ." "Christ

is not the natural, true Son of God," such was also the accusation made

by Justus Menius in his book concerning the _Doctrines and Secrets of

the Anabaptists_. In his _Sermons on the Life of Luther_, Mathesius said

"Now the Anabaptists speak most contemptuously of the deity of Jesus

Christ.... This was their chief article that they despised the written

Word, the Holy Bible, and believed nothing or very little of Jesus

Christ the eternal Son of God."

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 283 / 313 题