211. Saxony in the Grip of Crypto-Calvinists.

It was a severe blow to the Lutheran Church when Bremen and the

Palatinate fell a prey to Calvinism. And the fears were not unfounded

that before long the Electorate of Saxony would follow in their wake,

and Wittenberg, the citadel of the Lutheran Reformation, be captured by

Calvin. That this misfortune, which, no doubt, would have dealt a final

and fatal blow to Lutheranism, was warded off, must be regarded as a

special providence of God. For the men (Melanchthon, Major, etc.) whom

Luther had accused of culpable silence regarding the true doctrine of

the Lord's Supper, were, naturally enough, succeeded by theologians who,

while claiming to be true Lutherans adhering to the Augsburg Confession

and, in a shameful manner deceiving and misleading Elector August

zealously championed and developed the Melanchthonian aberrations, in

particular with respect to the doctrines concerning the Lord's Supper

and the person of Christ, and sedulously propagated the views of Calvin,

at first secretly and guardedly, but finally with boldness and abandon.

Gieseler says of these Philippists in Wittenberg: "Inwardly they were

out-and-out Calvinists, although they endeavored to appear as genuine

Lutherans before their master," Elector August. (3, 2, 250.)

The most prominent and influential of these so-called Philippists or

Crypto-Calvinists were Dr. Caspar Cruciger, Jr., Dr. Christopher Pezel,

Dr. Frederick Widebram, and Dr. Henry Moeller. The schemes of these men

were aided and abetted by a number of non-theological professors:

Wolfgang Crell, professor of ethics, Esrom Ruedinger, professor of

philosophy; George Cracow, professor of jurisprudence and, later, privy

councilor of Elector August; Melanchthon's son-in-law, Caspar Peucer,

professor of medicine and physician in ordinary of the Elector, who

naturally had a great influence on August and the ecclesiastical

affairs of the Electorate. He held that Luther's doctrine of the real

presence had no more foundation in the Bible than did the Roman

transubstantiation. To these must be added John Stoessel, confessor to

the Elector and superintendent at Pirna; Christian Schuetze,

court-preacher at Dresden, Andrew Freyhub and Wolfgang Harder

professors in Leipzig, and others. The real leaders of these Philippists

were Peucer and Cracow. Their scheme was to prepossess the Elector

against the loyal adherents of Luther, especially Flacius, gradually to

win him over to their liberal views, and, at the proper moment, to

surrender and deliver Electoral Saxony to the Calvinists. In prosecuting

this sinister plan, they were unscrupulous also in the choice of their

means. Thus Wittenberg, during Luther's days the fountainhead of the

pure Gospel and the stronghold of uncompromising fidelity to the truth,

had become a veritable nest of fanatical Crypto-Calvinistic schemers

and dishonest anti-Lutheran plotters who also controlled the situation

in the entire Electorate.

The first public step to accomplish their purpose was the publication of

the _Corpus Doctrinae Christianae_, or _Corpus Doctrinae Misnicum_, or

_Philippicum_, as it was also called. This collection of symbolical

books was published 1560 at Leipzig by Caspar Peucer, Melanchthon's

son-in-law, with a preface to both the German and Latin editions written

by Melanchthon and dated September 29, 1559, and February 16, 1560,

respectively,--an act by which, perhaps without sufficiently realizing

it, Melanchthon immodestly assumed for himself and his views the place

within the Lutheran Church which belonged not to him, but to Luther. The

title which reveals the insincerity and the purpose of this publication,

runs as follows: _"Corpus Doctrinae, i.e._, the entire sum of the true

and Christian doctrine ... as a testimony of the steadfast and unanimous

confession of the pure and true religion in which the schools and

churches of these Electoral Saxon and Meissen territories have remained

and persevered in all points according to the _Augsburg Confession_ for

now almost thirty years against the unfounded false charges and

accusations of all lying spirits, 1560." As a matter of fact, however,

this _Corpus_ contained, besides the Ecumenical Symbols, only writings

of Melanchthon, notably the altered _Augsburg Confession_ and the

altered _Apology_ of 1542, the Saxon Confession of 1551, the changed

_Loci_, the _Examen Ordinandorum_ of 1554, and the _Responsiones ad

Impios Articulos Inquisitionis Bavaricae_.

Evidently this _Corpus Philippicum_, which was introduced also in

churches outside of Electoral Saxony, particularly where the princes or

leading theologians were Melanchthonians, was intended to alienate the

Electorate from the old teaching of Luther, to sanction and further the

Melanchthonian tendency, and thus to pave the way for Calvinism. It was

foisted upon, and rigorously enforced in, all the churches of Electoral

Saxony. All professors, ministers, and teachers were pledged by an oath

to teach according to it. Such as refused to subscribe were deposed,

imprisoned, or banished. Among the persecuted pastors we find the

following names: Tettelbach, superintendent in Chemnitz; George Herbst,

deacon in Chemnitz and later superintendent in Eisleben; Graf,

superintendent in Sangerhausen; Schade, Heine, and Schuetz, pastors in

Freiberg. When ministers who refused their signatures appealed to

Luther's writings, they were told that Luther's books must be

understood and explained according to Melanchthon's _Corpus_. At

Wittenberg the opposition to Luther and his teaching bordered on

fanaticism. When, for example, in 1568 Conrad Schluesselburg and Albert

Schirmer, two Wittenberg students, entered a complaint against

Professors Pezel and Peucer because of their deviations from Luther in

the doctrine of the Lord's Supper and refused to admit that Peucer and

his colleagues represented the pure doctrine in this matter, they were

expelled from the university, anathematized, and driven from the city.

(Schluesselburg 13, 609. 730; Gieseler 3, 2, 250.)

Immediately after its appearance, the _Corpus Philippicum_ was

denounced by loyal Lutherans, notably those of Reuss, Schoenfeld, and

Jena. When the charges of false teaching against the Wittenberg

theologians increased in number and force, Elector August arranged a

colloquy between the theologians of Jena and Wittenberg. It was held at

Altenburg and lasted from October, 1568, to March, 1569 because the

Wittenbergers, evidently afraid of compromising themselves, insisted on

its being conducted in writing only. The result of this colloquy was a

public declaration on the part of Wigand, Coelestinus, Kirchner Rosinus,

and others to the effect that the Wittenberg and Leipzig theologians had

unmistakably revealed themselves as false teachers. At the colloquy the

Jena theologians objected in particular also to the _Corpus Misnicum_

because it contained the altered _Augustana_, concerning which they

declared: Melanchthon "has changed the said _Augsburg Confession_ so

often that finally he has opened a window through which the

Sacramentarians and Calvinists can sneak into it. One must watch

carefully, lest in course of time the Papists also find such a loophole

to twist themselves into it." (Gieseler 3, 2, 252.)

The Philippists of Leipzig and Wittenberg in turn, denounced the Jena

theologians as Flacian fighting cocks (_Flacianische Haderkatzen_). They

also succeeded in persuading Elector August to adopt more rigorous

measures against the malcontents in his territories. For in addition to

the adoption of the _Corpus Philippicum_ the ministers were now required

to subscribe to a declaration which was tantamount to an endorsement of

all of the false doctrines entertained by the Wittenbergers. The

declaration read: "I do not adhere to the dangerous Flacian Illyrian

errors, contentions, poisonous backbitings, and fanaticism (_zaenkischem

Geschmeiss, giftigem Gebeiss und Schwaermerei_) with which the schools

and churches of this country are burdened [by Flacius] concerning the

imagined adiaphorism, synergism, and Majorism and other false

accusations, nor have I any pleasure in it [the quarreling], and in the

future I intend, by the help of God, to abstain from it altogether, to

damn, flee, and avoid it, and as much as I am able, to prevent it."

(Gieseler 3, 2, 253; Walther, 49.)

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 228 / 313 题