200. Melanchthon's Private Views.

While Melanchthon in a public and formal way, continued, in the manner

indicated, to maintain orthodox appearances till his death, he had

inwardly and in reality since 1530 come to be more and more of a

stranger to Luther's firmness of conviction, also with respect to the

doctrine of the Lord's Supper. Influenced by an undue respect for the

authority of the ancient fathers and misled by his reason or, as Luther

put it, by his philosophy, he gradually lost his firm hold on the clear

words of the institution of the Holy Supper. As a result he became a

wavering reed, driven to and fro with the wind, now verging toward

Luther, now toward Calvin. Always oscillating between truth and error,

he was unable to rise to the certainty of firm doctrinal conviction, and

the immovable stand which characterized Luther. In a letter dated May

24, 1538, in which he revealed the torments of his distracted and

doubting soul, he wrote to Veit Dietrich: "Know that for ten years

neither a night nor a day has passed in which I did not reflect on this

matter," the Lord's Supper. (_C. R._ 3, 537.) And his doubts led to a

departure from his own former position,--a fact for which also

sufficient evidences are not wholly lacking. "Already in 1531," says

Seeberg, "Melanchthon secretly expressed his opinion plainly enough to

the effect that it was sufficient to acknowledge a presence of the

divinity of Christ in the Lord's Supper, but not a union of the body and

the bread. _Ep._, p.85." (_Dogg._ 4, 2, 447.)

That Melanchthon's later public statements and protestations concerning

his faithful adherence to the doctrine of the _Augsburg Confession_ must

be more or less discounted, appears, apart from other considerations,

from his own admission that he was wont to dissimulate in these and

other matters; from his private letters, in which he favorably refers to

the symbolical interpretation of the words of institution; from his

communication to Philip of Hesse with regard to Luther's article on the

Lord's Supper at Smalcald, referred to in a previous chapter; from the

changes which he made 1540 in Article X of the _Augsburg Confession_;

from his later indefinite statements concerning the real presence in the

Holy Supper; from his intimate relations and his cordial correspondence

with Calvin; from his public indifference and neutrality during the

eucharistic controversy with the Calvinists; and from his unfriendly

attitude toward the champions of Luther in this conflict.

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 217 / 313 题