141. Theological Attitude of Flacius Sanctioned.

The theological position which Flacius and his fellow-combatants

occupied over against the Adiaphorists was embodied in the Tenth Article

of the _Formula of Concord,_ and thus endorsed by the Lutheran Church as

a whole. Frank says concerning this most excellent article which our

Church owes to the faithfulness of the Anti-Melanchthonians, notably

Flacius: "The theses which received churchly recognition in the _Formula

of Concord_ were those of Flacius." The entire matter, too, concerning

the adiaphora had been discussed so thoroughly and correctly that the

subsequent formulation and recognition of the Tenth Article caused but

little difficulties. (Frank 4, 3f.)

Even Melanchthon, though refusing to confess that he was guilty of any

doctrinal deviations, finally yielded to the arguments of his opponents

and admitted that they were right in teaching as they did regarding the

adiaphora. In his famous letter to Flacius (who, however, was not

satisfied with the manner of Melanchthon's retraction), dated September

5, 1556, he wrote with respect to the Adiaphoristic Controversy: "I knew

that even the least changes [in ceremonies] would be unwelcome to the

people. However, since the doctrine [?] was retained, I would rather

have our people submit to this servitude than forsake the ministry of

the Gospel. _Cum doctrina retineretur integra, malui nostros hanc

servitutem subire quam deserere ministerium evangelii._ And I confess

that I have given the same advice to the Francans (_Francis_). This I

have done; the doctrine of the Confession I have never changed....

Afterwards you began to contradict. I yielded; I did not fight. In

Homer, Ajax fighting with Hector is satisfied when Hector yields and

admits that the former is victor. You never come to an end with your

accusations. Where is the enemy that does such a thing as striking those

who yield and cast their arms away? Win! I yield. I do not contend

concerning those rites, and I most earnestly wish that the churches

would enjoy sweet concord. I also admit that I have sinned in this

matter, and ask forgiveness of God, that I did not flee far from those

insidious deliberations [in which the Interim was framed]. _Fateor hoc

in re a me peccatum esse, et a Deo veniam peto, quod non procul fugi

insidiosas illas deliberationes_." (_C. R._ 8, 839.)

On January 17, 1557, Melanchthon wrote to the Saxon pastors: "I was

drawn into the insidious deliberations of the courts. Therefore, if in

any way I have either fallen or been too weak, I ask forgiveness of God

and of the Church, and I shall submit to the judgments of the Church."

(9, 61.) In the _Formula Consensus,_ written by Melanchthon at Worms, in

1557, the Interim is expressly condemned. For here we read: "With the

help of God we retain, and shall retain, the entire doctrine of

justification, agreeing with the Augsburg Confession and with the

confessions which were published in the church of Hamburg against the

book called Interim. Nor do we want any corruptions or ambiguities to be

mixed with it; and we desire most earnestly that the true doctrine in

all its articles be set forth, as far as possible, in identical and

proper forms of speech, and that ambitious innovations be avoided." (9,

369.) The _Frankfurt Recess_ of 1558, also written by Melanchthon and

signed by the princes, maintains: "Where the true Christian doctrine of

the holy Gospel is polluted or persecuted, there the adiaphora as well

as other ceremonies are detrimental and injurious." (9, 501.)

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 152 / 313 题