76. Symbolical Authority of Smalcald Articles.

The importance attached to the Smalcald Articles over against the

Reformed and Crypto-Calvinists appears from a statement made by the

Elector of Saxony, October 17, 1552 (shortly after his deliverance from

captivity), in which he maintained that the Lutheran Church could have

been spared her internal dissensions if every one had faithfully abided

by the articles of Luther. He told the Wittenberg theologians that

during his captivity he had heard of the dissensions and continued

controversies, "which caused us no little grief. And we have therefore

often desired with all our heart that in the churches of our former

lands and those of others no change, prompted by human wisdom, had been

undertaken nor permitted in the matters [doctrines] as they were held

during the life of the blessed Doctor Martin Luther and during our rule,

and confirmed at Smalcald, in the year 1537, by all pastors and

preachers of the estates of the Augsburg Confession then assembled at

that place. For if this had been done, no doubt, the divisions and

errors prevailing among the teachers of said Confession, together with

the grievous and harmful offenses which resulted therefrom, would, with

the help of God, have been avoided." (_C. R._ 7, 1109.)

In the Prolegomena to his edition of the Lutheran Confessions, Hase

remarks concerning the symbolical authority of Luther's articles: "The

formula of faith, drawn up by such a man, and adorned with such names,

immediately enjoyed the greatest authority. _Fidei formula a tali viro

profecta talibusque nominibus ornata maxima statim auctoritate

floruit._" To rank among the symbolical books, Luther's articles

required a special resolution on the part of the princes and estates as

little as did his two catechisms; contents and the Reformer's name were

quite sufficient. Voluntarily the articles were subscribed at Smalcald.

On their own merits they won their place of honor in our Church. In the

situation then obtaining, they voiced the Lutheran position in a manner

so correct and consistent that every loyal Lutheran spontaneously gave

and declared his assent. In keeping with the changed historical context

of the times, they offered a correct explanation of the Augsburg

Confession, adding thereto a declaration concerning the Papacy, the

absence of which had become increasingly painful. They struck the

timely, logical, Lutheran note also over against the Zwinglian and

Bucerian [Reformed and Unionistic] tendencies. Luther's articles offered

quarters neither for disguised Papists nor for masked Calvinists. In

brief they gave such a clear expression to genuine Lutheranism that

false spirits could not remain in their company. It was the recognition

of these facts which immediately elicited the joyful acclaim of all true

Lutherans. To them it was a recommendation of Luther's articles when

Bucer, Blaurer, and others, though having subscribed the Augsburg

Confession, refused to sign them. Loyal Lutherans everywhere felt that

the Smalcald Articles presented an up-to-date touchstone of the pure

Lutheran truth, and that, in taking their stand on them, their feet were

planted, over against the aberrations of the Romanists as well as the

Zwinglians, on ground immovable.

In the course of time, the esteem in which Luther's articles were held,

rose higher and higher. Especially during and after the controversies on

the Interim, as well as in the subsequent controversies with the

Crypto-Calvinists, the Lutherans became more and more convinced that the

Smalcald Articles and not the Variata, contained the correct exposition

of the Augsburg Confession. At the Diet of Regensburg, in 1541, the

Elector, by his delegates, sent word to Melanchthon "to stand by the

Confession and the Smalcald Agreement [Smalcald Articles] in word and in

sense." The delegates answered that Philip would not yield anything

"which was opposed to the Confession and the Smalcald Agreement," as he

had declared that "he would die rather than yield anything against his

conscience." (_C. R._ 4, 292.) In an opinion of 1544 also the

theologians of Hesse, who at Smalcald had helped to sidetrack Luther's

articles put them on a par with the Augustana. At Naumburg in 1561,

where Elector Frederick of the Palatinate and the Crypto-Calvinists

endeavored to undermine the authority of Luther, Duke John Frederick of

Saxony declared that he would abide by the original Augustana and its

"true declaration and norm," the Smalcald Articles.

Faithful Lutherans everywhere received the Smalcald Articles into their

_corpora doctrinae._ In 1567 the Convention of Coswig declared them to

be "the norm by which controversies are to be decided, _norma decidendi

controversias_." Similarly, the Synod of Moelln, 1559. In 1560 the

ministerium of Luebeck and the Senate of Hamburg confessionally accepted

the Articles. Likewise, the Convention of Lueneburg in 1561, and the

theologians of Schleswig-Holstein in 1570. The Thorough Declaration

could truthfully say that the Smalcald Articles had been embodied in the

confessional writings of the Lutheran Church "for the reason that these

have always and everywhere been regarded as the common, unanimously

accepted meaning of our churches and, moreover, have been subscribed at

that time by the chief and most enlightened theologians, and have held

sway in all evangelical churches and schools." (855, 11.)

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 83 / 313 题